Activists seeking review as AirBnB complaint dropped
The High Court challenge is part of a wider strategic action launched today, where five separate international legal challenges were launched against AirBnB over its alleged rental lettings in occupied Palestinian territory.
The action is led by Sadaka, the Ireland Palestine Alliance, and the Global Legal Action Network, who say AirBnB has over 300 rental properties in the occupied West Bank.
In Ireland, they are seeking a judicial review of the GNECB's decision not to launch an investigation into AirBnB Ireland in August 2023.
It alleged that AirBnB Ireland is in breach of Irish money laundering laws by profiting from lettings in illegal Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territories.
The groups said the GNECB declined to open an investigation, stating that the complaint did not disclose an offence within the jurisdiction of Ireland.
AirBnb denies money-laundering accusations, stating that it operates in compliance "with applicable Irish and US laws".
A spokesperson for the company added that since 2019, it has "donated all profits generated from host activity in the West Bank to an international nonprofit".
Speaking about the case, Independent Senator Frances Black said similar cases could be taken against other companies, unless the Government includes a ban on services with occupied territories in the Occupied Territories Bill.
She said: "My concern is that services will not be included in the Government's Bill so today is hugely significant because it really talks about why this is important.
"The cases are hugely important not only because they seek to put to an end a wrong in the immediate sense, but they also highlight exactly what we mean when we say that services must be included in the Occupied Territories Bill when Government finally bring their version to the Dáil."
She added: "This case is hugely important, but AirBnB is just one company and there are many others.
"We need Government to step up and take responsibility, pass full, proper and complete legislation that bans all trade with the illegal settlements in both goods and services for every company so cases like this are not necessary."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
21 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Ireland's new defamation law ‘falls short of EU SLAPP directive'
Ireland's new defamation laws risk incurring EU legal action, the Government has been warned. The Dáil last week passed the long-awaited Defamation Bill, with the Seanad passing it at second stage last Wednesday. However, a group of organisations, including the National Union of Journalists, the Irish Council for Civil Liberties, and RTÉ have argued that while the Defamation Bill contains provisions to stop so-called SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) cases, it 'fails to include the robust safeguards required to meaningfully protect public interest speech'. Such SLAPP cases usually involve affluent plaintiffs attempting to silence or censor criticism by suing critics, forcing them to spend huge sums on legal fees defending their position. The Ireland Anti-SLAPPs Network group says that, nearly a decade after the review of the Defamation Act 2009 began, 'this is a frustrating outcome and a missed opportunity to protect the freedom of expression that is the lifeblood of our democracy'. Law falls short of transposing full directive The group says that while the bill brings in provisions that give effect to aspects of the EU Anti-SLAPP Directive, it falls short of transposing the directive's full set of minimum standards and protections, which Ireland is legally required to implement in full by May 2026. The anti-SLAPP provisions in the bill apply only to defamation proceedings and do not extend to privacy, copyright, or data protection cases. The group stated: The Government has provided no clear explanation of how it intends to extend protections beyond defamation in line with its EU obligations. They said that the legislation also 'omits key components of the directive that could have been readily included'. These include provision for third-party interventions in support of SLAPP defendants (Article 9), security for damages (Article 10) and a reversal of the burden of proof (Article 12). The legislation also fails to incorporate the protections against SLAPPs initiated in non-EU countries (Articles 16 and 17). 'By failing to incorporate these core safeguards, the Irish Government exposes itself to potential infringement proceedings from the European Commission," the group stated. Recommendation on countering SLAPPs It said the Government could and should have drawn on established international best practices, including the Council of Europe's recommendation on countering the use of SLAPPs. 'This recommendation includes vital safeguards, such as an automatic stay of proceedings while an early dismissal motion is being heard, which are designed to protect against abusive litigation. "It provides clear, practical guidance for safeguarding free expression and democratic accountability. Yet the Government appears to have almost entirely disregarded it.' Speaking in the Seanad on the bill last week, justice minister Jim O'Callaghan said full transposition 'will be done'. 'Let us remember that this is a defamation bill. It is appropriate that we just transpose into the Defamation Bill those aspects of the SLAPP directive that relate to defamation.' Jessica Ní Mhainín of Index on Censorship said: 'It is ironic that this piece of legislation was passed in the Dáil on European Day of Action against SLAPPs because it completely fails to offer meaningful protection to SLAPP defendants. "Its complex and flawed provisions risk becoming tools only accessible to those with significant legal resources — not the individuals most often targeted with SLAPPs.'
Irish Examiner
21 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Simon Harris warns of Irish job losses in 30% US-EU tariff war
A 30% tariff trade war with the US would have 'significant' impacts on the Irish economy, including an increasing rate of job losses, ministers will be warned on Tuesday. Simon Harris, the Tánaiste and foreign affairs and trade minister, will issue the warning at a Cabinet meeting, as the EU tries to avoid an all-out trade war with the US, after Donald Trump upended negotiations by demanding a deal by August 1 or face a 30% tariff on goods coming to the US from the EU. That scenario, according to EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic, would effectively end trade between the EU and the US. Arriving for talks with European ministers in Brussels, Mr Sefcovic said a tariff of 30% or more would have a huge impact, making it 'almost impossible to continue' current transatlantic trade, which is worth €4.4bn a day. Irish ministers to focus on talks At Tuesday's Cabinet meeting, Mr Harris is expected to tell ministers that Ireland's focus over the next two-and-a-half weeks is on negotiations to reach a deal to avoid the imposition of higher tariffs that could precipitate a full-blown trade war between the EU and US. He will tell colleagues that this scenario would see a significant impact on the economy, including devastating job losses. Mr Harris will warn that the possibility of the EU imposing a revised list of counter tariffs, amounting to €72bn, against the US if talks fail would 'cause pain on both sides'. The coming weeks must, therefore, be used for a negotiated settlement to avoid such a scenario, Mr Harris will say. The Tánaiste will also update ministers on plans to engage with the pharmaceutical industry this week. 30% tariffs 'unthinkable' Modelling carried out by the Department of Finance in May said that an ongoing 10% tariff war would see GDP hit by 1.5 percentage points and around 25,000 fewer jobs created, but modelling of a 30% tariff scenario has not been carried out. A Government source said the 30% figure was 'unthinkable' until recently. It is understood this modelling is being prepared in advance of the budget. On Monday, Mr Harris met with the new US ambassador to Ireland, Ed Walsh, and said that he had relayed to the US administration a 'consistent' and 'very straightforward' message — 'we in Ireland, we in Europe, want a deal'. Mr Harris added: I believe there was a landing zone very nearly there last week, and it's regrettable that that wasn't arrived at. Paschal Donohoe, the finance minister, said it is impossible to gauge the impact of a 30% tariff on the Irish economy. 'What the exact effect could be would depend on what exactly the level of tariffs would be, and at this moment in time, with all the unpredictability, it is very difficult to forecast.' In response to Mr Trump's latest deadline, the EU decided to postpone until August 1 retaliatory counter-tariffs on €21bn of US goods that had been due to kick in at midnight last night. In Brussels on Monday, EU foreign ministers discussed plans for a further round of counter-measures, targeting €72bn of US imports to the EU. Michael McGrath emphasises EU unity European commissioner Michael McGrath said that the EU does not want to use those counter-measures, but would if necessary: 'I want to underline the importance of unity," he said. "What we have been doing in relation to counter-measures is preparing for different scenarios. 'There are two different sets of packages of countermeasures that amount to the imposition of tariffs of exports from the US into the EU of over €90bn,' Mr McGrath said. 'We do not wish for that to come to pass, but in the event that it does, then we will need to respond if the US proceeds unilaterally with the imposition of tariffs of the order that president Trump has flagged in his letter over the weekend,' he told RTÉ radio.
Irish Examiner
35 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Charity calls for targeted measures to help financially insecure families with soaring cost of living
Irish families have been left exposed to growing financial insecurity linked to the spiralling cost of living, and targeted measures must support them in this autumn's budget, a leading charity has said. In its pre-budget submission, the Society of St Vincent de Paul (SVP) said with one-off-measures for all households now a thing of the past, it was vital to get the approach right to help families who need it most, as it expects to receive 250,000 calls for help this year. 'Poverty in a wealthy country like Ireland is a policy failure, but our next budget offers a vital opportunity to put financial certainty and dignity at the heart of Government decision-making,' SVP's head of social policy Louise Bayliss said. Rising poverty and homelessness rates should not be happening in a wealthy country with a growing economy. The charity said the core adult social protection rate must be increased by €16 a week, while increases should also be made to the Living Alone Allowance and the introduction of a weekly cost of disability payment to cover the additional costs facing people with a disability. Child income supports should also be increased, according to SVP, as current rates fall 'significantly short of what is needed". Other measures it called for included the benchmarking of third-level student grants with the cost of living, increasing the fuel allowance by €9.50 a week, and the piloting of a community energy advice service. The charity's national president Rose McGowan said the latest figures on poverty, which show around 45,000 more children are now living in consistent poverty in Ireland, demonstrate the clear need for action. 'These are not abstract statistics — they represent children growing up in cold bedrooms, going to school hungry, and missing out on the social and educational experiences that are fundamental to a healthy childhood,' she said. 'We know from our experience on the frontline that the right policy choices do make a difference — we saw it with the introduction of free schoolbooks and hot school meals. Budget 2026 must continue that momentum.' Read More MABS sees 10% surge in families in debt due to soaring cost of living
