logo
UK's Reeves announces National Wealth Fund investment in carbon capture

UK's Reeves announces National Wealth Fund investment in carbon capture

Reuters8 hours ago
LONDON, July 7 (Reuters) - British finance minister Rachel Reeves will announce on Monday a 28.6 million pound ($39 million) investment by the National Wealth Fund in a carbon capture project that could create jobs in central and northern England.
Last year, Britain said it would provide funding of up to 21.7 billion pounds over 25 years to develop carbon capture and storage projects to curb emissions from industry and create new jobs.
Britain has a climate target to reach net zero emissions by 2050 and has said CCS will be needed to curb emissions from energy-intensive industrial sectors.
On Monday, Reeves will hail the funding as the first step towards the development of a carbon capture pipeline between cement and lime companies in Britain's Peak District, which will store emissions below the Irish Sea, according to a statement from her ministry.
"The National Wealth Fund is a force for growth, investing 3 billion pounds into the British economy and securing 12,500 jobs," Reeves said in a statement.
"We're modernising the cement and lime industry, delivering vital carbon capture infrastructure and creating jobs across Derbyshire, Staffordshire and the North West to put more money into working people's pockets."
Reeves and the rest of Prime Minister Keir Starmer's cabinet are keen to show what the Labour government is doing to change Britain by announcing new projects after being forced into a series of embarrassing U-turns and a major rebellion from within the party over welfare reforms. Those have raised questions about the government' ability to cut spending and about party control.
($1 = 0.7325 pounds)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Post Office victims ‘to wait three more years for payouts'
Post Office victims ‘to wait three more years for payouts'

Telegraph

time28 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Post Office victims ‘to wait three more years for payouts'

Victims of the Post Office Horizon scandal could wait another three years for compensation, lawyers have warned. Many victims of the scandal are still awaiting full redress, as one of the final reports from the long-running inquiry – looking at the impact on those who had their lives destroyed and compensation – is set to be published on Tuesday. More than 900 sub-postmasters were wrongfully prosecuted by the Post Office between 1999 and 2015 after faulty Horizon software made it look as though money was missing from the business accounts. The previous Conservative government said those who had their convictions quashed were eligible for £600,000 payouts – with victims such as Amanda and Norman Barber accepting the fixed offer. Despite losing their business and home, the couple, from Warrington, said they found it 'almost impossible' to provide the details required to have their case individually assessed so did not want to risk 'getting less'. Unexplained shortfalls in their accounts at Thelwall Post Office eventually led to them being prosecuted over a deficit of £5,600 – despite using around £200,000 of their own money to attempt to balance the books. Both received a community order of 12 months and 100 hours' community service. Missing evidence Speaking about the redress process, Mrs Barber, 55, said: 'We were being asked to produce evidence we simply couldn't get our hands on with regards to our losses as we are talking going back 15 years. 'We found it almost impossible to provide the details needed to go down the route of having our case individually assessed. 'It just didn't seem worth it. I think sub-postmasters are still being left in an impossible situation when it comes to seeking true and full redress. 'Given the time it would take we simply couldn't risk a full assessment and getting less, particularly because the lack of documents we had. 'It got to the stage where, when the £600,000 was offered, it seemed the best way to bring years of torture to an end.' Redress has been a key issue for sub-postmasters since the scandal came to light, with many finding the various compensation schemes difficult to navigate. Lead campaigner Sir Alan Bates previously described the various processes as 'quasi-kangaroo courts', telling The Sunday Times that the Department for Business and Trade 'sits in judgment of the claims and alters the goal posts as and when it chooses'. The chairman of the Horizon IT inquiry, Sir Wyn Williams, is due to publish his findings on redress on Tuesday. Mrs Barber, who will join other sub-postmasters in attending the report's publication event, said: 'We feel we just need to be there to hear what is said. 'Lives were ruined and compensation has been made too hard to get, and too little by far.' One law firm involved in securing redress for victims, Hudgell Solicitors, said it still had more than 700 compensation cases to resolve. Solicitor Neil Hudgell said the firm had agreed damages for more than 300 people, totalling £170 million, but said the redress process had 'far too much red tape to get through'. He said: 'We have seen inconsistencies between the various compensation schemes, which remain over-engineered and over-legalistic, with far too much red tape to get through. 'There has also been a repeated failure to give the benefit of the doubt to sub-postmasters in appropriate circumstances. 'It's made it far too long a process for so many people who have been through so much, and are now in the latter stages of their lives. 'It has been re-traumatising for many, and increasing numbers are sadly passing away without seeing redress.' Addressing how long it could take for all claims to be settled, the solicitor added: 'At the current speed, we are looking at another two to three years.' Mr Hudgell said one client who was initially offered £50,000 has seen their offer rise to £500,000. He added: 'It is not a one-off glitch, but a stark illustration of a very common issue. 'It has been a painful process for all, and ended with a new appeals process being confirmed earlier this year, in recognition that many people had been under-compensated.' In a statement, the Department for Business and Trade said: 'We are grateful for the Inquiry's work, which has revealed the immeasurable suffering that victims of the scandal have endured. 'This Government has quadrupled the total amount paid to affected postmasters to provide them with full and fair redress, with more than £1 billion having now been paid to over 7,300 claimants.'

Property flipping hits lowest level in a decade after tax raid
Property flipping hits lowest level in a decade after tax raid

Times

time33 minutes ago

  • Times

Property flipping hits lowest level in a decade after tax raid

The number of homes flipped by property investors is at its lowest level in 12 years as it becomes harder to make any kind of profit. Homes bought and sold within a year accounted for 2.3 per cent of all sales in the first three months of the year, the lowest proportion since 2013, according to the estate agency Hamptons. It found that that 7,301 properties were flipped between January and March in England and Wales, well below the ten-year average of 10,000 homes per quarter. The average gross profit made on these properties was £22,000, an increase of £6,000 on the same period last year but down from £38,000 in 2022. It comes after Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, raised the stamp duty surcharge on additional properties from to 3 per cent to 5 per cent in her budget in October. The property value threshold at which you start paying stamp duty was also lowered in April, meaning bigger bills for all homebuyers, when temporary reliefs introduced by Liz Truss in 2022 ended. Aneisha Beveridge from Hamptons, said: 'The 5 per cent surcharge for investors, coupled with the value at which buyers start paying stamp duty being reduced, means it's harder than ever to make the sums stack up.' 'The extra 5 per cent stamp duty surcharge for those buying additional properties comes on top of the rates that apply for main homes — these are 2 per cent on the value of a property between £125,001 and £250,000 and 5 per cent for the amount between £250,001 and £925,000. From £925,001 to £1.5 million the charge is 10 per cent, and above that it is 12 per cent. The 5 per cent surcharge does not apply on properties worth less than £40,000. The stamp duty surcharge on additional properties was introduced in April 2016 under the Conservative government. Before this, an investment property could be bought at the same stamp duty rate as one bought by an owner occupier, with an average of £1,900 paid per property in the first three months of 2015. The average was £6,375 in the first three months of this year. Hamptons calculated that on properties flipped in the first three months of the year, stamp duty had lost owners 21 per cent of the average gross profit. In April the property value threshold at which buyers start paying stamp duty fell from £250,000 to £125,000 — for first-time buyers it fell from £425,000 to £300,000. This has heaped further costs on property investors, with the average stamp duty bill for someone buying an additional property now £11,920. • UK house prices fall as stamp duty hits demand Beveridge said: 'If you take into account the new thresholds, stamp duty bills for property investors account for nearly a third of gross profits. And in some cases, these bills are now higher than the cost of renovating the property. 'This, together with rising material and labour costs and, in some places, falling house prices, makes flipping homes an increasingly tricky business.' According to Hamptons, 80 per cent of homes flipped between January and March were sold for more than they were bought for, but only 66 per cent made a profit once stamp duty was accounted for. This didn't include any spending on renovations. • Should landlords get more tax breaks? The northeast is the area with the highest proportion of homes being flipped, with about 4.7 per cent of all homes sold being those bought less than a year before. This was nearly double the average for England and Wales of 2.3 per cent, and three times the 1.5 per cent of flipped homes in London. The three local authorities with the highest proportion of flipped properties were all in the northeast. Redcar and Cleveland was highest with 7.6 per cent, then Co Durham with 6.6 per cent and Hartlepool with 6.5 per cent. Only one of the top 20 local authorities for flipped homes was in the south of England — Torridge in the Devon. Beveridge said: 'These rising upfront costs have pushed investors further north, where properties can still be bought without paying any stamp duty. It's also where more house price growth has been concentrated over the past few years.'

Neil Kinnock: Labour should bring in ‘wealth tax' to balance books
Neil Kinnock: Labour should bring in ‘wealth tax' to balance books

Times

time33 minutes ago

  • Times

Neil Kinnock: Labour should bring in ‘wealth tax' to balance books

Sir Keir Starmer should introduce a wealth tax to fill the £5 billion hole in the finances left by the government's welfare climbdown, Labour's former leader Lord Kinnock has said. In a provocative intervention that will appeal to sections of the party's backbenchers, Kinnock said taxing the highest earners in the country would be popular with the 'great majority of the general public' and help Rachel Reeves fill her budget shortfall. He suggested that the tax could be levied on assets of more than £10 million and raise as much as £11 billion for the Treasury. He warned that the chancellor had become boxed in by her own words that ruled out further borrowing to cover day-to-day spending or raising income tax, national insurance or VAT. • Is reform of the welfare system still possible? 'Unless you are looking for other original sources of revenue in order to invest in public services and long term investment, then you are really jammed into a bit of a corner,' he told Sky News. However, Kinnock said that there were other 'pathways' to raise money that some within Labour were 'willing to explore' and that would 'commend themselves to the great majority of the general public'. He said: 'They include asset taxes in a period in which for the last 20 odd years in the United Kingdom, like quite a lot of other western economies, earned incomes have stagnated in real terms while asset values have zoomed. 'Even by going for, an imposition of two per cent (tax) on asset values above £10 million, say, which is very big fortune. The government would be in a position to collect £10 or £11 billion a year.' There are calls from the left of the party for Reeves to consider increasing taxes on wealth to pay for higher spending. Louise Haigh, the former transport secretary who quit the cabinet last year, has said that the tax system 'punishes earned income but barely touches the sides of the real driver of inequality — wealth'. Rachael Maskell, who was one of the leaders of the backbench Labour rebellion which forced the government to drop its welfare reform suggested that as much as £24 billion a year could be raised by equalising capital gains tax — and through income tax. Before the election, Reeves said that the government had 'no plans for a wealth tax'. • Keir Starmer's Labour as chaotic as Tories, voters say Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, warned on Sunday that the climbdown on welfare reform would impact other areas of government tax and spending. Downing Street sources told The Sunday Times plans to shelve the two-child benefit cap were 'dead in the water' while the likelihood of tax rises has increased. When asked if there was now less chance of the cap being scrapped given the costs that come with Tuesday's decision, Ms Phillipson told the BBC that ministers were 'looking at every lever and we'll continue to look at every lever to lift children out of poverty'. But she added: 'The decisions that have been taken in the last week do make future decisions harder.' Reeves is looking at a number of potential tax-raising measures ahead of the budget, including a further freeze to income tax thresholds that would increase the number of people paying the higher rate of tax. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said that Reeves may need as much as £30 billion to cover the cost of reversals on welfare reform and winter fuel payments coupled with downgrades to economic growth forecasts. But the Treasury is likely to be reluctant to look at wealth taxes as it is feared this could increase the flight of the super-rich from the UK, damaging investment and growth. Reeves is already considering softening changes to inheritance tax that affect wealthy non-doms. Sir Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, said a new wealth tax would be the 'worst thing to do'. He said: 'We've also seen around 10,000 to 15,000 high net worth individuals leave our country as a result of this government's policies. Now, some people, the socialists, might say, 'Well, who cares about that?' Well, the problem is that the amount of tax that those people have been paying requires about a third of a million people on average earnings, to cover that lost tax that's just gone straight out of the door. 'So the last thing we want to be doing now is piling further taxes on the wealth creators. We need to be, if anything, getting those taxes down, and empowering them to go out and do what they do best, which is creating jobs, and, you know, creating wealth and prosperity for our country.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store