US stocks close at an all-time high just months after plunging on tariff fears
NEW YORK — U.S. stocks closed at an all-time high Friday, another milestone in the market's remarkable recovery from a springtime plunge caused by fears that the Trump administration's trade policies could harm the economy.
The Standard & Poor's 500 rose 0.5%, finishing above its previous record set in February. The key measure of Wall Street's health fell nearly 20% from February 19 through April 8.
The market's complete turnaround from its deep swoon happened in about half the time that it normally takes, said Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at CFRA.
'Investors will breathe a sigh of relief,' he said.
The Nasdaq composite gained 0.5% and set its own all-time high. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 1%.
President Donald Trump's decision Friday to halt trade talks with Canada threatened to derail Wall Street's run to a record, but the market steadied.
The gains on Friday were broad, with nearly every sector within the S&P 500 rising. Nike soared 15.2% for the biggest gain on the market, despite warning of a steep hit from tariffs.
The broader market has seemingly shaken off fears about the Israel-Iran war disrupting the global supply of crude oil and sending prices higher. A ceasefire between the two nations is still in place.
The price of crude oil in the U.S. is mostly unchanged on Friday. Prices have fallen back to pre-conflict levels.
Investors are also monitoring potential progress on trade conflicts between the U.S. and the world, specifically with China. The U.S. and China have signed a trade deal that will make it easier for American firms to obtain magnets and rare earth minerals from China that are critical to manufacturing and microchip production, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Friday.
China's Commerce Ministry also said that the two sides had 'further confirmed the details of the framework' for their trade talks. But its statement did not explicitly mention an agreement to ensure U.S. access to rare earths, and instead said it will review and approve 'eligible export applications for controlled items.'
An update on inflation Friday showed prices ticked higher in May, though the rate mostly matched economists' projections.
Inflation remains a big concern for businesses and consumers. Trump's on-again-off-again tariff policy has made it difficult for companies to make forecasts. It has also put more pressure on consumers worried about already stubborn inflation. A long list of businesses from carmakers to retailers have warned that higher import taxes will likely hurt their revenues and profits.
The U.S. has 10% baseline tariffs on all imported goods, along with higher rates for Chinese goods and other import taxes on steel and autos. The economy and consumers have remained somewhat resilient under those tariffs, though analysts and economists expect to see the impact grow as import taxes continue to work their way through businesses to consumers.
'While we also would have expected to already to be seeing a bit more pass through into the inflation statistics, we still expect these impacts to show up in a more meaningful way in the next few months,' said Greg Wilensky, head of U.S. fixed income and portfolio manager at Janus Henderson.
The threat of more severe tariffs continues to hang over the economy. The current pause on a round of retaliatory tariffs against a long list of nations is set to expire in July. Failure to negotiate deals or further postpone the tariffs could once again rattle investors and consumers.
The Federal Reserve is monitoring the tariff situation with a big focus on inflation. The rate of inflation has been stubbornly sitting just above the central bank's target of 2%. In a report Friday, its preferred gauge, the personal consumption expenditures index, rose to 2.3% in May. That's up from 2.1% the previous month.
The Fed cut interest rates twice in late 2024 following a historic series of rate hikes to cool inflation. The PCE was as high as 7.2% in 2022 while the more commonly used consumer price index hit 9.1%.
The Fed hasn't cut rate cuts so far in 2025 over worries that tariffs could reignite inflation and hamper the economy. Economists still expect at least two rate cuts before the end of the year.
Bond yields held relatively steady. The yield on the 10-year Treasury rose to 4.27% from 4.24% late Thursday. The two-year Treasury yield, which more closely tracks expectations for what the Federal Reserve will do, edged up to 3.74% from late Thursday.
All told, the S&P 500 rose 32.05 points to 6,173.07. The Dow gained 432.43 points to 43,819.27, and the Nasdaq added 105.55 points to 20,273.46.
Stocks in Europe were mostly higher, while stocks in Asia finished mixed.
Troise and Veiga write for the Associated Press.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Associated Press
3 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Rocket Lab Completes Record Launch Turnaround From Launch Complex 1, Successfully Deploys 68th Electron Mission
MAHIA, New Zealand--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jun 28, 2025-- Rocket Lab Corporation (Nasdaq: RKLB) ('Rocket Lab' or 'the Company'), a global leader in launch services and space systems, today successfully launched its 68th Electron rocket to deploy a single satellite to space for a confidential commercial customer. The mission was the second of two launches from the same launch site in less than 48 hours, a new launch record for the Company as it continues to deliver dedicated, repeatable and reliable access to space for satellite operators. The 'Symphony In The Stars' mission lifted-off from Rocket Lab Launch Complex 1 in Mahia, New Zealand on June 28 th (7:08 p.m./07:08 UTC) to deploy a single spacecraft to a 650km circular Earth orbit. The mission was the first of two dedicated launches for the new customer on Electron booked less than four months ago, with a second mission scheduled before the end of 2025. Rocket Lab has now completed four launches in June for commercial satellite constellation operators, underscoring Electron's consistent performance and rapid deployment capabilities as the world's leading small launcher: the 'Full Stream Ahead' mission on June 3 rd; 'The Mountain God Guards' mission on June 11 th; 'Get The Hawk Outta Here' launched on June 26 th UTC, and today's 'Symphony In The Stars' mission. Rocket Lab Founder and CEO, Sir Peter Beck, says: 'Electron has demonstrated once again that it is the gold standard for responsive and reliable space access for small satellites. The future of space is built on proven performance, and Electron continues to deliver against a stacked launch manifest this year. Congratulations to the team on achieving its fastest launch turnaround yet between two missions from Launch Complex 1. This launch was also a quick-turn mission to meet our customer's mission requirements, and we're looking forward to doing it again later this year.' 'Symphony In The Stars' was Rocket Lab's tenth Electron mission of 2025 and its 68th launch overall. With 100% mission success so far this year, Electron continues to deliver reliable deployment amid an increasing launch cadence and rapid contract-to-launch timelines. Launch images: Launch webcast: View source version on CONTACT: Rocket Lab Media Contact Murielle Baker [email protected] KEYWORD: AUSTRALIA/OCEANIA NEW ZEALAND INDUSTRY KEYWORD: TECHNOLOGY AEROSPACE MANUFACTURING SATELLITE SOURCE: Rocket Lab Corporation Copyright Business Wire 2025. PUB: 06/28/2025 04:45 AM/DISC: 06/28/2025 04:45 AM

Associated Press
3 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Lead Plaintiff Deadline is July 14, 2025 for Investors of Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. (IOVA)
NEW YORK, NY - June 28, 2025 ( NEWMEDIAWIRE ) - Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. ('Iovance' or the 'Company') (NASDAQ: IOVA) on behalf of investors that purchased or otherwise acquired Iovance securities between May 9, 2024 and May 8, 2025 (the 'Class Period'). CLICK HERE TO JOIN THE CASE If you are an investor in Iovance and have suffered losses, you may CLICK HERE to contact us. You may also contact Kaplan Fox by emailing [email protected] or by calling (212) 329-8571. DEADLINE REMINDER: If you are a member of the proposed Class, you may move the court no later than July 14, 2025 to serve as a lead plaintiff for the purported class. If you have losses we encourage you to contact us to learn more about the lead plaintiff process. You need not seek to become a lead plaintiff in order to share in any possible recovery. On May 8, 2025, after the markets closed, Iovance announced its first quarter 2025 financial results. The Company revealed that total product revenue for the quarter was $49.3 million, a decline from the prior quarter's reported revenue of $73.7 million. The Company also disclosed that full fiscal year 2025 revenue guidance was being revised to $250 million to $300 million from previous guidance of $450 million to $475 million. Iovance stated that it was 'revising full-year 2025 revenue guidance to reflect recent launch dynamics' of the Company's T cell immunotherapy, Amtagvi (lifileucel). Amtagvi was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in February 2024 and was commercially launched in the first half of 2024. Following this news, the price of Iovance stock fell $1.42 per share, nearly 45%, to close at $1.75 per share on May 9, 2025. The complaint alleges, among other things, that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that Defendants, (i) new Authorized Treatment Centers were experiencing longer timelines to begin treating patients with Amtagvi; (ii) the Company's sales team and new ATCs were ineffective in patient identification and patient selection for Amtagvi, leading to higher patient drop-offs; and (iii) the foregoing dynamics led to higher costs and lower revenue because ATCs could not keep pace with manufactured product. WHY CONTACT KAPLAN FOX - Kaplan Fox is a leading national law firm focusing on complex litigation with offices in New York, Oakland, Los Angeles, Chicago and New Jersey. With over 50 years of experience in securities litigation, Kaplan Fox offers the professional experience and track record that clients demand. Through prosecuting cases on the federal and state levels, Kaplan Fox has successfully shaped the law through winning many important decisions on behalf of our clients. For more information about Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, you may visit our website at This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. If you have any questions about this Notice, your rights, or your interests, please contact: CONTACT: Jeffrey P. Campisi KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP 800 Third Avenue, 38th Floor New York, New York 10022 (212) 329-8571 [email protected] Laurence D. King KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1560 Oakland, California 94612 (415) 772-4704 [email protected] Contacting or submitting information to Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP does not create an attorney-client relationship, nor an obligation on the part of Kaplan Fox to retain you as a client.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I'm a stay-at-home. Do I take a part-time job to spend more time with my kids — or get a job for six figures?
I've been thinking about the kind of life I want, why I want it, and the finances needed to get there. We live in a high-cost-of-living area and have to stay since my husband's work is here. Our children are in elementary school and finally settling in, but I wouldn't mind moving somewhere else for better schooling and programs for kids with ADHD and speech issues. Growing up, my parents drilled it into me to work hard, which I really appreciate. But it came with a heaping side of shame that if I didn't 'achieve my full potential' and make millions of dollars and be on the cover of Forbes magazine, I would be a disappointment to them. At the same time, they were not supportive when I went into the workforce. When I got my first promotion, they scoffed at the paltry increase. I've been working since I was 14; sometimes in the family business, sometimes with side gigs. If I had saved even a quarter of what I've earned and put it into a Roth IRA, I'd have a decent nest egg when I reach my 50s. I find it very odd that for parents who want me to be my best, they didn't educate me about personal finance, but just kept pushing me to get more schooling and work more hours at the family business. I guess it was easier to keep me under control that way. My brother stole $100K from my mom to buy bitcoin. Do I convince her to sue him? Most American weddings are a lot more extravagant than the nuptials of Amazon's Jeff Bezos 'He doesn't seem to care': My secretive father, 81, added my name to a bank account. What about my mom? S&P 500 scores record high for first time in 4 months. What could push stocks higher from here? JPMorgan has a new way of forecasting the stock market — and there's a surprising finding Now, I've been a stay-at-home mom for the last decade. It's one of the hardest jobs because the work is constant, there are no holidays or sick days, there are no colleagues or intellectual stimulation, and my parents are still scoffing at my life choices when they were the ones to push me to get married and have kids. I did find a man I love and who loves me and I'm so grateful for our two beautiful, healthy kids, but I still hear the criticisms, expectations and disappointments inside my head. Again, I find it odd that my parents would push me to get married and have kids without a plan for getting back to work. Don't miss: My wife and I have $7,000 in pensions, $140,000 in cash, plus Social Security. Can we afford to retire? What now? Do I take a low-paying part-time job that allows me the freedom and flexibility to be there for my kids? Or do I put them in after-school programs that are a bit of a madhouse so that I can work a full-time job? Do I take courses and earn certificates and go for a six-figure position in the tech field? Or do I work at my kids' school or in a municipal office? My husband makes a good living, which allows me to stay home and take care of the kids. We make a good team. But I'm aware that if something happens to either of us, our family/kids would be in trouble. So that is a good reason for me to at least try to make six figures. Is it possible to have a decent life making $40,000 a year in my 50s and 60s? Part of me wants to get a master's degree in library science online and apply to work at local libraries. I'm not crazy about paying for a master's at this time, only to end up with a job that pays at most $35 an hour. So I may only go that route if there are scholarships or such. So much of my head has been filled with thoughts of needing to be the best, the brightest, the wealthiest, and I've just come to the realization that that's not where true happiness lies. But I'm also aware that I've been sheltered and did not have to live on $40,000 a year. What is the minimum needed to have a decent retirement? A fully paid off house, $1 million dollars spread out across 401(k), taxable brokerage, (Roth) IRAs and perhaps a part-time job with health benefits? I feel awful that we have nothing set aside for our kids' college funds, but I am thinking that I could work at a college that provides tuition benefits to direct family members. Is this a possibility? Just to make this scenario extra fun, my parents have tried offering me monetary gifts with conditions that would make me feel like I would be again under their control. I wonder if I'm being naive and stupid not to accept some of these gifts. Stay-at-home Mom Related: My job is offering me a payout. Should I take a $61,000 lump sum or $355 a month for life? The last thing I want to do is give you homework, but I'm going to give you homework. The first thing you can do is get a giant piece of paper and write all the things your parents did to disappoint you, annoy you, thwart you, undermine you, frustrate you and generally make you feel less than. Then buy a giant red marker and write in big letters over all of those complaints: 'THEY DID THE BEST THEY COULD AT THE TIME.' And then burn it. They want to help you now. Maybe it's a form of amends, or perhaps they believe they were good parents. They did what they did. They said what they said. They are who they are. They wanted to help you, but they didn't have all the skills. There was no workbook, as you know, and what's done is done. The second thing you can do is know that everyone has regrets, particularly financial ones, and it's easy to have the decision-making skills of Mary Barra or Warren Buffett when you're looking back with hindsight. When you're done forgiving your parents for raising you, forgive yourself for all the twists and turns you wish you'd done differently. If it helps, get out a separate sheet of paper and write all the good decisions you've made in one column, with your regrets in another column, and do the same thing again. Take out that red pen and write: 'I DID THE BEST I COULD AT THE TIME.' And burn it. Life is pretty good. You've gotten this far. If you're unsure about whether to go back to work full-time or part-time, ease back into it. If it suits you, good. If you get the urge to go back and join the rat race full-time with an eye on a six-figure salary in a job that gives you a renewed sense of purpose, fantastic. If it also helps you save more for retirement and put money aside for your children's college education in tax-advantaged 529 plans, great. Perhaps it would allow you and your husband to pay off your mortgage earlier than planned. But there's no right/wrong answer. Nobody will write, 'I wish I spent more time at the office' on their gravestone. Don't miss: 'I'm 68 and my 401(k) has dwindled to $82,000': My husband committed financial infidelity and has $50,000 in credit-card debt. What now? Here's the headline: It's OK to take the foot off the pedal when your children get a little older and you have more time to yourself. You've been working a 24/7 job raising your kids. Research shows that women take more time off from their careers than men and their lifetime income suffers as a result, as does their ability to rejoin the workforce at a similar level of seniority. Life, society and the workplace, as they're currently structured, are not fair or equal. But you have a husband who works full time and earns a good living, so see a financial therapist or a psychologist and talk through your plans. You don't have to put even more pressure on yourself. If your gut tells you that a master's in library science does not have the kind of reward that makes it worthwhile, don't do it. But yes, it's possible to have a comfortable life and retirement if you earn $40,000 a year. Millions of Americans do it, despite letters to this column from couples with millions of dollars who worry about retirement. Studies repeatedly warn Americans that they need $1 million or more, but the truth is you need enough to ensure that your expenses don't exceed your income, have at least two years of a cash cushion for unexpected events, including medical complications — and long-term-care insurance doesn't hurt. What's missing from my answer is women's voices, so here are a few thoughts on your letter about returning to work from the Moneyist Facebook Group. 'You'll be providing a good role model for the kids, too. Since family life is a job in itself, don't let the new job be too demanding, just pleasantly challenging,' one woman writes. 'Start by taking a few classes at a local community college to get some idea of what you might like to pursue,' another adds. A former teacher says: 'Although teaching wasn't at the top of the pay scale, by 63 I was retired and debt-free with enough to live well and do a little traveling.' The past is another country. The future is a travel agent's window. Give yourself a break today. Related: We're living in 'end times' when you can't retire on $1 million Most American weddings are a lot more extravagant than the nuptials of Amazon's Jeff Bezos My husband will inherit $180K. I think we should invest the money. He wants to pay off his $168K mortgage. Who's right? I'm 51, earn $129K and have $165K in my 401(k). Can I afford to retire when my husband, 59, draws Social Security at 62? What drove stock market's record-breaking week? Don't overlook growing rate-cut expectations. My job is offering me a payout. Should I take a $61,000 lump sum or $355 a month for life? There's an important market indicator that suggests investors remain wary. It's good news for stocks. Coinbase's stock is up over 40% this month as Wall Street projects amazing profit growth 20 banks expected to increase their dividends the most following the Fed's stress tests