
Northern Mariana Islands: Residents Weigh The Costs Of A US Military Build-Up On Tinian
From the air, Tinian looks like a green patch in the blue Pacific.
Just six miles wide and seven miles long, you can drive across it in under an hour.
Yet, it is big enough to hold a World War 2-era airbase, atomic bombs that ended the war, and the site of a current US military build-up that includes airfield expansion and training ranges.
Tinian resident and local hotel owner Deborah Fleming drove me up to North Field during my 72 hour-visit to the island.
It is the site of several runways north of the island built during World War 2 from which two American planes took off to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Now, it is being refurbished under the US military's Agile Combat Employment (ACE) doctrine, a way to quickly move forces across the Pacific to confuse and enemy and avoid concentrating forces in one place.
"It alerts me, something is imminent," Fleming said when she saw more jungle being cleared as we arrived at North Field.
"But it's better to be prepared."
Fleming was a child when her father and other Tinian residents were debating whether to lease land to the US military for the purpose of building a base.
"The promise was that they would build schools, hospitals. My elders' main interest was school," said Fleming.
This was part of the agreement made between the US and the founding fathers of Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands' (CNMI) back in 1975.
Don Farrell, a Tinian-based military historian, explained that when CNMI's Covenant - the archipelago's governing document - was written, it outlined CNMI's right to control its internal matters while granting the federal government sovereignty over its foreign affairs and defense.
As a result, the US government negotiated to lease two-thirds of land on Tinian for 50 years.
"The people of Tinian are seeing approximately $1 billion dollars in [Department of Defence] contracts for construction projects here," Farrell said.
"We have seen virtually nothing in the way of federal funding to support, help develop the island of Tinian for the people of Tinian. That is causing some friction. But not causing civil disobedience or anything like that."
Joint Region Marianas (JRM), which oversees installation management for all Department of Defence (DoD) projects in the region, told KPRG/RNZ Pacific that there are no plans for the DoD to "construct medical facilities or a hospital on Tinian at this time."
JRM added that the Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command (NAVFAC) Marianas real estate team is "preparing a lease amendment to accommodate the return of about 30 acres of land for a future landfill within the Atgidon military lease area on Tinian."
Instead, the Defense Department proposed to create what they called the CNMI Joint Military Training Facility (CJMT) in 2015. It would serve as a training ground for the thousands of troops relocating from Okinawa to Guam's Marine Corps Base Camp Blaz to train.
A blueprint of the plan included ripping out a reef to practice amphibious landings, high hazard impact training like shootings and bombings, ship-to-shore launches using howitzers, and live bombing a smaller island just north of Tinian called Pagan Island.
Their plans were so outrageous that there was a huge backlash.
"The Tinian's Women's Association, Guardians of Gani, Pagan Watch, The Center for Biodiversity, we pulled together and sued regarding the military build up here," Fleming said, who was a spokesperson for one of the four community groups.
The case went all the way up to the ninth circuit court. They lost.
"I don't believe we lost," Fleming said, adding that a result of this lawsuit led to the scaling down of CJMT.
"There's not going to be a multi-spectrum bombing range here. Now, it's going to be a firing range. More small scale."
But those airfield runways? Hundreds of acres of jungle are still being cleared. While vegetation removal efforts are underway across North Field, austere landings are already happening.
A Divert Airfield near Tinian's airport is expected to finish construction by 2027. It'll provide an alternative landing site for the US Air Force in case Guam's Andersen Air Force base in unavailable or down.
According to Tinian's mayor Edwin Aldan the military build-up has brought a "big change" for the island.
"The impact on this military build-up has brought the economic base for Tinian Island hundred folds in taxes and job opportunities," said Aldan, who was a former police officer for the island home to just about 2,000 people and has a minimum wage of $7.25. U.S. military contractors are offering more than twice that amount for starting wage ($17.25 to be exact).
Aldan said that's a lot of money for locals with little to no work experience.
"But I just want to make sure that when [the military] leave, we got something behind to sustain ourselves, which is tourism," Aldan said.
Most hotel accommodation on Tinian have been booked for two to three years on end due to military developments.
"We're having trouble and problems in trying to make the tourists stay for longer - three, four days - because all of these rooms are taken," he said.
The build-up and influx of contractors have also sent housing costs soaring. Prior to 2018, Aldan said a two-bedroom home would cost around $80,000. Now, a one-bedroom can go up to $180,000.
"The demand was huge. The supply was limited," Alan Perez said, financial advisor to the mayor. "Prices have gone up considerably."
Deborah Fleming is a witness to this. "It's hard on the locals, and even the contractors. There's just no housing," she said. "It's extremely expensive."
While some people might see it as a problem, Aldan said the build-up is necessary as it's creating job opportunities for people and helping the economy.
Historian Don Farrell agrees, noting that most residents have no say about what happens.
"The people of Tinian don't have direct access to decision makers, right? That's all in Saipan through the Commonwealth Bureau of Military Affairs. They talk, but they don't communicate with us either," he said.
"So we usually don't know what's happening, as far as the military is concerned, until something happens, and we get some kind of a public information release. So everybody here is essentially in the dark."
Farrell emphasised that the build-up is a federal issue. "We are outside of the loop and communications."
This does not deter Fleming.
"Honest to God, I'd rather be an American than under Chinese or even Russia," she said.
"Because there's due process. You have the freedom to speak. You're guaranteed the right to speak. That's important for self-preservation, for the preservation of our community, our culture, our thinking."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

1News
5 hours ago
- 1News
US intelligence director attacks Trump's foes over Russia probe
As the national intelligence director, Tulsi Gabbard is responsible for guarding America's secrets and discovering threats from overseas. But when she made a surprise appearance in the White House briefing room on Thursday, her targets were President Donald Trump's political enemies. Escalating her attempts to undermine the long-settled conclusion that Russia tried to help Trump beat Hillary Clinton for the presidency nearly a decade ago, she unspooled what she called unshakable proof that then-President Barack Obama and his advisers plotted nothing short of a coup. 'They conspired to subvert the will of the American people,' she said, claiming they fabricated evidence to taint Trump's victory. Little of what she said was new, and much of it was baseless. Gabbard said her investigation into the former Democratic administration was designed to stop the weaponisation of national security institutions, but it spurred more questions about her own independence atop a spying system intended to provide unvarnished intelligence. Gabbard, a former Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii who ran for president herself before joining Trump's idiosyncratic political ecosystem, seemed prepared to use her presentation to burnish her own standing. She was trailed by her cinematographer husband, who held a video camera to capture the moment. ADVERTISEMENT And Trump, who had previously expressed public doubts about Gabbard's analysis of Iran's nuclear programme, appeared satisfied. He posted a video of her remarks, pinning them at the top of his social media feed. It was a display that cemented Gabbard's role as one of Trump's chief agents of retribution, delivering official recognition of Trump's grievances about the Russia investigation that shadowed his first term. The focus on a years-old scandal also served Trump's attempts to shift attention from the Jeffrey Epstein case and questions about the president's own association with an abuser of underage girls. Gabbard touts her latest release During her White House remarks, Gabbard said she has referred the documents to the Justice Department to consider for a possible criminal investigation. Hours later, the department announced the creation of a "strike force" to investigate the findings. Obama's postpresidential office declined to comment on Thursday but issued a rare response a day earlier. "These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction," said Patrick Rodenbush, an Obama spokesman. The White House rejected questions about the timing of Gabbard's revelations and whether they were designed to curry favour with Trump or distract attention from the administration's handling of files relating to Epstein. Still, Trump was quick to reward Gabbard's loyalty this week, calling her "the hottest person in the room". ADVERTISEMENT On Thursday, she released a report by the Republican staff of the House Intelligence Committee produced during the first Trump administration. It did not dispute that Russia interfered in the 2016 election, but cites what it said were trade craft failings in the assessment reached by the intelligence community that Russian President Vladimir Putin influenced the election because he intended for Trump to win. Gabbard went beyond some conclusions of the report in describing its findings from the White House podium. She, along with the report, also seized on the fact that a dossier including uncorroborated tips and salacious gossip about Trump's ties to Russia was referenced in a classified version annex of an intelligence community assessment released in 2017 that detailed Russia's interference. The dossier was not the basis for the FBI's decision to open an investigation in July 2016 into potential coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia, but Trump supporters have seized on the unverified innuendo in the document to try to undercut the broader probe. Timing of Gabbard's intel reports prompts questions Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, speaks with reporters in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House (Source: Associated Press) Gabbard said she didn't know why the documents weren't released during Trump's first administration. Her office did not respond to questions about the timing of the release. Responding to a question from a reporter about Gabbard's motivations, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt accused journalists of looking for a story where there wasn't one. ADVERTISEMENT "The only people who are suggesting that she would release evidence to boost her standing are the people in this room," Leavitt said. Trump, however, has said he wants the media, and the public, to focus on Gabbard's report and not his ties to Epstein. "We caught Hillary Clinton. We caught Barack Hussein Obama ... you ought take a look at that and stop talking about nonsense," Trump said Wednesday. CIA Director John Ratcliffe served briefly as director of national intelligence during Trump's first term but did not release any of the information declassified by Gabbard. The CIA declined to comment on Gabbard's remarks. Trump and Gabbard's evolving relationship Gabbard told Congress in April that Iran wasn't actively seeking a nuclear weapon, and Trump dismissed her assessment just before US strikes on Iran. "I don't care what she said," Trump said in June on Air Force One when asked about Gabbard's testimony. ADVERTISEMENT Gabbard recently shared her findings about the Russia investigation in an Oval Office meeting with Trump, according to two administration officials who requested anonymity to discuss a private conversation. Afterwards, one of the officials said, Trump expressed satisfaction that Gabbard's findings aligned with his own beliefs. Other recent releases on the Russia investigation Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard walks to the podium to speak with reporters in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House (Source: Associated Press) On Saturday, Gabbard's office released a report that downplayed the extent of Russian interference in the 2016 election by highlighting Obama administration emails showing officials had concluded before and after the presidential race that Moscow had not hacked state election systems to manipulate votes in Trump's favour. But Obama's Democratic administration never suggested otherwise, even as it exposed other means by which Russia interfered in the election, including through a massive hack-and-leak operation of Democratic emails by intelligence operatives working with WikiLeaks, as well as a covert influence campaign aimed at swaying public opinion and sowing discord through fake social media posts. Earlier this month, Ratcliffe released a report criticising aspects of the intelligence community assessment and suggesting the process had been rushed. The report did not address multiple investigations since then, including a report from the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee in 2020 that reached the same conclusion about Russia's influence and motives. Democrats call for Gabbard's resignation ADVERTISEMENT Lawmakers from both parties have long stressed the need for an independent intelligence service. Democrats said Gabbard's reports show she has placed partisanship and loyalty to Trump over her duty, and some have called for her resignation. "It seems as though the Trump administration is willing to declassify anything and everything except the Epstein files," Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a statement Thursday. Warner predicted Gabbard's actions could prompt US allies to share less information for fear it would be politicised or recklessly declassified. But Gabbard enjoys strong support among Republicans. Representative Rick Crawford, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said she and Ratcliffe were working to put the intelligence community "on the path to regaining the trust of the American people". Representative Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence panel, said Gabbard hasn't offered any reason to ignore the many earlier investigations into Russia's efforts. "The Director is free to disagree with the Intelligence Community Assessment's conclusion that Putin favoured Donald Trump, but her view stands in stark contrast to the verdict rendered by multiple credible investigations," Himes said in a statement. "Including the bipartisan report released by the Senate Intelligence Committee."


Scoop
6 hours ago
- Scoop
U.S. Court Agrees Trump Administration's ICC Sanctions Likely Violate First Amendment Rights Of Fortify Rights CEO
(Bangkok, July 23, 2025)—A U.S. federal court last week granted a preliminary injunction in Smith v. Trump, a lawsuit brought by Fortify Rights CEO Matthew Smith and human rights advocate Akila Radhakrishnan challenging the Trump administration's executive order imposing sanctions on officials of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and banning advocates from communicating with the ICC under threat of criminal prosecution. The court issued the order on July 17 and concluded that the advocates were likely to succeed on their claim that the speech restrictions imposed on them by the executive order violate the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects the right to freedom of speech. The preliminary injunction prohibits the administration from punishing the two advocates for their work related to the ICC while the litigation is pending. 'I'm grateful the court recognized the serious threat this executive order against the ICC poses to fundamental freedoms and to our ability to pursue accountability for mass atrocity crimes,' said Matthew Smith. 'This case is not only about our rights — it's about safeguarding the space for all human rights defenders to advocate for justice, speak truth to power, and demand international accountability without fear of reprisal.' Both Smith and Radhakrishnan are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)—a leading American organization that defends and promotes individual rights and liberties guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. As the lawsuit explains, the sanctions violate the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution by prohibiting Smith, Radhakrishnan, and other Americans like them from speaking with the ICC's Office of the Prosecutor, including by providing legal advice, expert analysis, and evidence. 'Preventing our clients and others like them from doing critical human rights work with the ICC is unconstitutional, and we're heartened that the court saw that as well,' said Charlie Hogle, staff attorney with the ACLU's National Security Project. 'The First Amendment does not allow the government to impose sweeping limits on what Americans can say and who they can say it to.' Under the executive order, people in the U.S. who have devoted their lives to seeking justice for the victims of atrocities — like the genocide of Myanmar's Rohingya people, or gender-based violence committed against Afghan women under the Taliban — could face stiff penalties simply for exercising their constitutional right to engage and advocate with ICC investigators and prosecutors. The international community, including the United States, established the ICC in 1998 to help maintain international peace and security. The ICC investigates and prosecutes crimes of the severest magnitude — including genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes — when domestic courts are unwilling or unable to do so. Today, 125 countries have joined the ICC's founding treaty, known as the Rome Statute. As the lawsuit explains, although the United States has not ratified the Rome Statute, it has supported the ICC's critical work on a wide range of matters. 'Fighting this order isn't only a defense of the work I do, or the court itself,' wrote Matthew Smith in an op-ed published June 6 in the New York Times. 'It's also a statement about what kind of country we want to be.' On Friday last week, the New York Times referred to the court's decision to grant a preliminary injunction 'a striking, if tentative, blow to the president's efforts to penalize and isolate the world's highest criminal court.' For more information about the lawsuit, please see the ACLU's webpage devoted to Smith v. Trump.


Otago Daily Times
9 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
French president sues podcaster over wife claim
French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte filed a defamation lawsuit in the United States against right-wing influencer and podcaster Candace Owens, centred on her claim that France's first lady is male. The Macrons said in a complaint filed in Delaware Superior Court that Owens has waged a lie-filled "campaign of global humiliation" to promote her podcast and expand her "frenzied" fan base. These lies included that Brigitte Macron, 72, was born under the name Jean-Michel Trogneux, the actual name of her older brother, the Macrons said. "Owens has dissected their appearance, their marriage, their friends, their family, and their personal history - twisting it all into a grotesque narrative designed to inflame and degrade," the complaint said. "The result," the complaint added, "is relentless bullying on a worldwide scale." In her podcast on Wednesday, Owens said, "This lawsuit is littered with factual inaccuracies," and part of an "obvious and desperate public relations strategy" to smear her character. Owens also said she did not know a lawsuit was coming, though lawyers for both sides had been communicating since January this year. A spokesperson for Owens called the lawsuit itself an effort to bully her, after Brigitte Macron rejected Owens' repeated requests for an interview. "This is a foreign government attacking the First Amendment rights of an American independent journalist," the spokesperson said. In a joint statement released by their lawyers, the Macrons said they sued after Owens rejected three demands that she retract defamatory statements. "Ms Owens's campaign of defamation was plainly designed to harass and cause pain to us and our families and to garner attention and notoriety," the Macrons said. "We gave her every opportunity to back away from these claims, but she refused." HIGH LEGAL STANDARD Wednesday's lawsuit is a rare case of a world leader suing for defamation. US President Donald Trump has also turned to the courts, including in a $US10 billion ($NZ16.5 billion) lawsuit accusing The Wall Street Journal of defaming him by claiming he created a lewd birthday greeting for disgraced late financier Jeffrey Epstein in 2003. The Journal said it would defend against that case and had full confidence in its reporting. In December, meanwhile, Trump reached a $US15 million settlement with Walt Disney-owned ABC over an inaccurate claim that a jury found him liable for rape, rather than sexual assault, in a civil lawsuit. To prevail in US defamation cases, public figures must show defendants engaged in "actual malice," a tough legal standard requiring proof the defendants knew what they published was false or had reckless disregard for its truth. Owens has more than 6.9 million followers on X and more than 4.5 million YouTube subscribers. TUCKER CARLSON, JOE ROGAN The Macrons' lawsuit focuses on the eight-part podcast "Becoming Brigitte," which has more than 2.3 million views on YouTube, and X posts linked to it. According to the Macrons, the series spread "verifiably false and devastating lies," including that Brigitte Macron stole another person's identity and transitioned to female, and that the Macrons are blood relatives committing incest. The complaint discusses circumstances under which the Macrons met, when the now 47-year-old president was a high school student and Brigitte was a teacher. It said their relationship "remained within the bounds of the law." According to the complaint, baseless speculation about Brigitte Macron's gender began surfacing in 2021, and the topic has been discussed on popular podcasts hosted by Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan, who have many conservative followers. In September, Brigitte won a lawsuit in a French court against two women, including a self-described medium, who contributed to spreading rumours about her gender. An appeals court overturned that decision this month, and Brigitte Macron has appealed to France's highest court.