Markets rise on Canada trade deal hopes
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
2 hours ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Claude vs Grok 4 App Build Test : Which AI Builds Your App Faster & More Efficiently
What if the future of app development wasn't just about coding skills but choosing the right AI collaborator? In a rapidly evolving tech landscape, the battle between AI models like Claude 4 and Grok 4 is reshaping how developers approach their craft. Imagine building a complex to-do app in record time, with one AI seamlessly handling tasks while another stumbles over integration issues. This isn't just a hypothetical scenario—it's the reality revealed in a recent head-to-head evaluation of these two advanced models. While both promise to transform development workflows, their performance and reliability tell two very different stories. In this comparison, Rob Shocks uncovers how Claude 4 and Grok 4 stack up in critical areas like autonomous task execution, error handling, and integration stability. Whether you're a seasoned developer or exploring AI-powered tools for the first time, this perspective will illuminate the strengths and limitations of each model. From Grok 4's ambitious but inconsistent performance to Claude 4's polished and dependable efficiency, the findings offer valuable insights for anyone seeking to streamline app development. As you read on, consider this: is it better to bet on potential or proven reliability? Claude 4 vs Grok 4 Grok 4: A Promising Newcomer with Challenges Grok 4, developed by Elon Musk's xAI, represents a new entrant in the competitive AI landscape. It features a 128,000-token context window, allowing it to process extensive inputs, and is offered via subscription at $300 annually or $30 monthly. Integrated into Cursor, Grok 4 aims to simplify development tasks by using its advanced processing capabilities. Despite its potential, Grok 4 encountered several challenges during testing. Its integration stability proved inconsistent, often requiring manual intervention to complete tasks. This lack of reliability in managing complex workflows limits its effectiveness in demanding development scenarios. While Grok 4 shows promise, its current iteration struggles to meet the expectations of developers seeking seamless and autonomous solutions. Claude 4: A Mature and Reliable AI Model Claude 4, in contrast, demonstrated consistent and robust performance throughout the evaluation. Renowned for its ability to autonomously execute tasks, it required minimal prompting and excelled in error resolution. Its seamless integration with modern tech stacks and its efficiency in handling complex workflows make it a standout choice for app developers. Claude 4's maturity as an AI model was evident in its ability to deliver results with minimal disruptions, reinforcing its reputation as a reliable tool for development tasks. Claude 4 vs Grok 4 : Comprehensive AI App Development Comparison Watch this video on YouTube. Below are more guides on AI-powered app development from our extensive range of articles. Testing the Models: Building a To-Do App The evaluation involved a practical test: creating an AI-powered to-do app capable of generating task plans. The tech stack used for this project included React, Prisma, and Neon DB, all of which are widely used in modern app development. Both Claude 4 and Grok 4 relied on Cursor, a tool designed to assist in generating and executing development tasks. The results highlighted key differences in their performance: Claude 4: Completed the app with fewer prompts, showcasing superior error-handling capabilities. It required minimal manual adjustments, streamlining the development process. Completed the app with fewer prompts, showcasing superior error-handling capabilities. It required minimal manual adjustments, streamlining the development process. Grok 4: Required additional troubleshooting and manual intervention, which slowed progress and exposed its limitations in managing tasks autonomously. This test underscored Claude 4's ability to handle complex workflows efficiently, while Grok 4's performance revealed areas that need improvement. Cursor Integration: A Crucial Component Cursor played a pivotal role in the evaluation by structuring task execution and guiding workflows. Both AI models depended on Cursor to generate to-do lists and manage development processes. However, their ability to integrate with Cursor varied significantly: Claude 4: Used Cursor effectively, maintaining stability and efficiency throughout the development process. Used Cursor effectively, maintaining stability and efficiency throughout the development process. Grok 4: Struggled with integration stability, leading to interruptions and inefficiencies that hindered its overall performance. The disparity in their performance with Cursor further highlighted Claude 4's reliability and Grok 4's need for refinement. Key Performance Insights The comparison between Claude 4 and Grok 4 revealed several critical insights into their capabilities: Autonomous Task Execution: Claude 4 excelled at completing tasks with minimal input, reducing the need for manual intervention and improving efficiency. Claude 4 excelled at completing tasks with minimal input, reducing the need for manual intervention and improving efficiency. Error Handling: Claude 4 demonstrated superior error resolution, making sure a smoother and more reliable development process. Claude 4 demonstrated superior error resolution, making sure a smoother and more reliable development process. Integration Stability: Grok 4 faced challenges with tool integration, which negatively impacted its performance and usability. Grok 4 faced challenges with tool integration, which negatively impacted its performance and usability. Potential for Growth: While Grok 4 shows promise, it requires updates and refinements to match Claude 4's efficiency and reliability. These insights emphasize the importance of selecting an AI model that aligns with the specific needs of app development projects. Looking Ahead: The Future of AI Models in Development As AI technology continues to advance, both Claude 4 and Grok 4 have the potential to evolve further. Grok 4's upcoming code-optimized version may address its current shortcomings, particularly in integration stability and autonomous task execution. Such improvements could make it a more competitive option in the future. Additionally, tools like Cursor, which are designed to be AI-agnostic, provide developers with the flexibility to integrate multiple models into their workflows. This adaptability allows developers to use the strengths of different AI models while mitigating their weaknesses. As the field of AI-powered app development progresses, developers can expect even more sophisticated tools and models that enhance productivity and innovation. Media Credit: Rob Shocks Filed Under: AI, Guides Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Katie Miller makes cryptic comment about 'best job in the world' after being unfollowed by boss Elon Musk
Former White House aide Katie Miller posted a cryptic statement along with a sun-drenched bikini pic - one day after being 'unfollowed' by her boss Elon Musk. Katie Miller - who is married to Trump aide Stephen Miller - declared that she had the 'best job in the world' as she posed in a blue bikini with her family on the beach. 'Three kids later and I'm in the best shape of my life,' Miller wrote on X. 'If you needed a reason to have kids here it is: they make you better, stronger and life richer. 'Being a mom is the best job in the world. Cheers to a weekend in the summer sun.' A fully-clothed Stephen Miller could be seen in the ocean holding one of their kids as she frolicked in the surf with their two other children. Her husband retweeted the post. Her message came just days after Musk abruptly severed social media ties with her, raising immediate questions about whether she's still on his payroll. Katie, 30, had served as a spokesperson for Musk's federally-backed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) before leaving government altogether in late May to work for Musk full-time. Her departure shocked insiders and was interpreted by many as a betrayal of Trump in favor of the world's richest man. Her move to Musk's private team, insiders say, was about flexibility - and money. Katie Miller has been unfollowed by billionaire tech mogul Elon Musk and responded with a cryptic, sun-drenched bikini X post declaring motherhood to be the 'best job in the world' The timing of Katie's post, and the apparent emphasis on loyalty to family over politics or power, has ignited a fresh round of speculation. Musk has been in an escalating war with Donald Trump - most recently over the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Also, Musk has unfollowed Katie Miller on X without any obvious explanation. The mystery deepened when users noticed Musk had also unfollowed other Trump-world figures, including Senator Mike Lee, Rep. Nancy Mace, and Speaker Mike Johnson - all in one day. The rift between Trump and Musk, once a bromance of mutual flattery, has disintegrated into an open feud. Musk slammed Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' accused him of appearing in Epstein's files, and even endorsed impeachment. Miller was 'deeply displeased' with Musk's attacks on the president's flagship legislation. He publicly defended the bill and blasted Musk's criticism, accusing the Congressional Budget Office of using 'accounting gimmicks' to inflate cost projections. In retaliation, Trump threatened to strip Musk of billions in federal contracts, while Steve Bannon called for his deportation. Stephen Miller, long thought to be a key Musk ally, now appears to be joining the opposition. Soon after, Musk unfollowed him, too. As the drama plays out, DOGE - the agency at the center of the chaos - is reportedly collapsing. According to Politico's West Wing Playbook, the department is hemorrhaging staff. Eight of its original members have left and armed security is gone. 'Authorized Access Only' signs have also been removed. Once Musk's pet project to slash government waste, DOGE now looks more like a discarded experiment. In June, Musk appeared at the White House alongside Trump with a conspicuous black eye - one he claimed was from roughhousing with his son. But that didn't stop internet sleuths from floating a darker theory and that Stephen Miller, incensed over his wife's defection to Musk, had delivered the blow himself. The Millers' marriage has long been a MAGA spectacle. Their 2020 wedding at the Trump D.C. hotel was attended by the president himself as an Elvis impersonator crooned through their first dance. They now have three young children, who accompanied them to this year's White House Easter Egg Roll. After Trump's 2020 loss, Katie pivoted to consulting. When Trump returned to power, she joined DOGE as a 'Special Government Employee,' a designation that allowed her to work part-time for the government while maintaining private contracts.
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
New tax break for auto loans could save some buyers thousands of dollars. But will it boost sales?
Millions of people receive a federal tax deduction for the interest they pay on home loans. Under President Donald Trump's new tax-cut law, many people for the first time also could claim a tax deduction for interest on their vehicle loans. The new tax break will be available even to people who don't itemize deductions. But there are some caveats that could limit its reach. The vehicles must be new, not used. They must be assembled in the U.S. And the loans must be issued no sooner than this year, to list just a few qualifications. Here are some things to know about the new auto loan interest tax deduction: Candidate Trump promised an auto loan interest tax break Trump pledged while campaigning last year to make interest on car loans tax-deductible. He said it would make car ownership more affordable and 'stimulate massive domestic auto production.' The idea made it into the big tax-cut bill passed by Congress, which Trump signed into law July 4. The law allows taxpayers to deduct up to $10,000 of interest payments annually on loans for new American-made vehicles from 2025 through 2028. It applies to cars, motorcycles, sport utility vehicles, minivans, vans and pickup trucks weighing less than 14,000 pounds, a threshold referred to as light vehicles. But it only applies to vehicles purchased for personal use, not for fleets or commercial purposes. The tax break can be claimed starting on 2025 income tax returns. But the deduction phases out for individuals with incomes between $100,000 and $150,000 or joint taxpayers with incomes between $200,000 and $250,000. Those earning more cannot claim the tax break. Millions of buyers could benefit, but millions of others will not U.S. automobile dealers sold 15.9 million new light vehicles last year, a little over half of which were assembled in the U.S, according to Cox Automotive. It says around 60% of retail sales are financed with loans. After excluding fleet and commercial vehicles and customers above the income cutoff, an estimated 3.5 million new vehicle loans could be eligible for the tax break this year, if purchasing patterns stay the same, said Jonathan Smoke, chief economist at Cox Automotive. It's the assembly plant, not the automaker's headquarters that matters The tax break applies to vehicles assembled in the U.S., no matter where the company making them is headquartered. All Tesla vehicles sold in the U.S. are assembled in this country. But so are all Acura brands, the luxury model of Japanese automaker Honda. Last year, 78% of Ford vehicles sold in the U.S. were assembled in this country, according to Cox Automotive. But customers wanting the tax break will need to pay attention to specific models. While the Ford Mustang is assembled in Michigan, the Mustang Mach-E is built in Mexico. General Motors assembles all of its Cadillacs in the U.S. But just 44% of its Chevrolets sold last year were assembled in the U.S., and just 14% of Buicks, according to Cox Automotive. That's a lower U.S-assembled rate than Honda (60%), Toyota (52%) and Nissan (48%), which all are headquartered in Japan. Taxpayers could save hundreds of dollars a year The average new vehicle loan is about $44,000 financed over six years. Interest rates vary by customer, so the savings will, too. In general, the tax deduction will decline after the initial year, because interest payments on loans are frontloaded while principal payments grow on the back end. At a 9.3% interest rate, an average new vehicle buyer could save about $2,200 on taxes over four years, Smoke said. The tax savings would be less on a loan at 6.5%, which is the rate figured into calculations by the American Financial Services Association, a consumer credit industry trade group. Some people also could see a reduction in state income taxes Whereas the tax deduction for home loan interest can be claimed only by people itemizing on their tax returns, Congress wrote the deduction for auto loan interest so that it can apply to all taxpayers, including those claiming the standard deduction. On a tax form, the auto loan deduction will come before the calculation of a taxpayer's adjusted gross income. That's an important distinction, because many states use a taxpayer's federal adjusted gross income as the starting point for figuring their state income taxes. If that income figure is lower, it could reduce the state taxes owed. The verdict is out on whether the tax break will boost sales At Bowen Scarff Ford in Kent, Washington, customers started asking about the auto loan tax deduction before Congress had even taken a final vote on the tax-cut bill, said General Manager Paul Ray. So he decided to promote it on the dealer's website. A website ribbon exclaims: 'CAR LOAN TAX DEDUCTION NOW AVAILABLE" while also promoting an electric vehicle tax credit that is ending soon as a result of Trump's tax-cut law. 'I think it's going to help incentivize vehicle purchases through this year," Ray said. Celia Winslow, president and CEO of the American Financial Services Association, concurred: 'For some people deciding — should I buy it, should I not — this could be something that tips the scale.' Others remain skeptical. According to Smoke's math, the average annual tax savings is smaller than a single month's loan payment for a new vehicle. 'I don't think it moves the needle on somebody on the fence of buying a new vehicle or not," Smoke said. "But I think it could influence their decision to finance that vehicle instead of paying cash or instead of leasing a vehicle.'
