
EXCLUSIVE Boy, 8, turned away by NHS because he is a private school pupil, amid claims by MPs that Labour's raid on fee-paying schools has triggered 'class war' and 'discrimination' in our public services
Tory MPs described the move as 'morally indefensible' and a symptom of Labour's 'vile class war', while the parent attacked the unfair 'two-tier' decision as a blatant breach of the health service ethos of offering equal treatment for all.
Yet her case is just one example of private pupils being refused access to NHS services unearthed by The Mail on Sunday. The mother of the eight-year-old blamed Labour's war on private schools for emboldening NHS managers to deny her child help with his crippling joint condition. 'If you discriminate against children because of the school they went to, where does it end?,' she asked. Her son was referred to a paediatrician at Kingston Hospital in south-west London after she noticed he was 'struggling to hold the pen well enough to write properly', along with other mobility issues.
At the hospital appointment she was asked to fill in a form which asked: 'Where does your child go to school?' And days later, she received a text message saying the child had been 'declined' the crucial next appointment with occupational health therapists.
She then discovered that the specialist unit had written a letter to her GP saying: 'We are unable to see this child as we do not provide a service to school age children who attend an independent schools [sic]. We are only commissioned to provide a service to the mainstream schools.'
The boy's older brother – who has the same condition, hypermobility syndrome – had been treated without issue several years earlier.
Their mother, who wishes to remain anonymous while her son's case is 'in limbo', said: 'I have never been refused treatment for my children – until now. There is clearly a two-tier system at play.
'I have complained bitterly and asked who created these eligibility criteria and where it says in the NHS constitution that it's OK to discriminate against independent schoolchildren.'
The mother of an autistic girl in Somerset told this newspaper her daughter was denied access to NHS mental health services, and was told: 'If you can afford the school fees, you should pay privately. If you had kept your child at the local authority primary school, she would have been supported.'
It is understood that in Norfolk a child was refused a much-needed standing frame by the NHS because he went to private school.
And last month we revealed how young cancer patients from private schools had to pay £115 an hour for tutoring in an Edinburgh hospital's wards, while it is provided free to state school pupils by the city council.
Shadow schools minister Neil O'Brien said last night that the cases 'seem like incredibly unfair discrimination'.
Citing Chancellor Rachel Reeves' decision to slap VAT on school fees, he said: 'Labour are already piling extra taxes on independent school parents. For their children to then be denied vital NHS services, which parents already paid for through their taxes, seems completely unfair. How can it be right that children with disabilities are denied services by the NHS because they attend a certain school?'
Shadow equalities minister Saqib Bhatti said: 'This is shocking. No child should be penalised based on what school they go to.
'Ultimately, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson's vindictive attack on independent schools has legitimised this kind of pernicious discrimination and triggered a class war against our children.
'Now it falls to the Health Secretary to urgently review NHS policies to ensure nobody is denied access to healthcare, no matter what their background.
'We must not allow this quasi-Marxist class war to take root in our public institutions and certainly not in our NHS.'
Shadow paymaster general Richard Holden added: 'The effect of front-rank Labour politicians targeting their vile class war on children who attend independent schools is brought into sharp relief by actions like this – where kids who need help are denied local NHS services.
'This culture of hate that Labour stoke out of perverse class envy has profound consequences for those in both state and independent schools but it'll always be the most vulnerable who suffer the most.'
And Tory MP Greg Stafford, a member of the Commons' health and social care committee, said: 'Denying NHS treatment to a child because of the school they attend is morally indefensible and completely at odds with the founding principles of the health service. Care should be based on clinical need, not a postcode or a parent's school choice. This decision must be reversed – and fast!'
The Mail on Sunday understands that other NHS trusts have also refused occupational therapy treatment to children because they attend independent schools.
The eight-year-old, who attends a prep school in Kew, was denied an appointment with Richmond children's occupational therapy service that would have been the 'most important stage' of his assessment.
It would have pinpointed the severity of symptoms – which include painful and easily dislocated joints and even problems with internal organs – and determined his future care.
At its most debilitating, hypermobility syndrome can be classed as a disability, and experts say a specialist assessment is vital for children with the condition to prevent more serious issues.
Physiotherapist Deepa Subramaniyan, a specialist in hypermobility at Adelaide Children's Physio clinic in London said long-term effects 'can include such severe mobility issues that a child can end up in a wheelchair.
'It's precisely for this reason that they need specialist assessment to determine how they should be treated. The earlier therapy starts, the better it will be in the long run.'
When the mother received the notice that her son would not be seen by therapists at the unit – based at Ham Clinic and part of Kingston and Richmond NHS Foundation Trust – she said: 'I knew straight away something wasn't right because we have used this service before.
'At the hospital I was asked "Where does your child go to school?" I've never been asked that before. It was never relevant so why is it relevant now? The only thing that has changed is a new government. It is Orwellian.'
The woman, who runs a small business with her husband, says the denial of an appointment was part of an 'anti-private school zeitgeist'. Branding her son's treatment as 'shocking and blatant discrimination', she added: 'Labour's dislike of independent schools is filtering down into the NHS and that is very damaging.
'The NHS has always been such a beacon of treatment for all. If you discriminate against children because of the school they went to, where does it end?
'In cases like my son's, they are effectively discriminating against children who are disabled and against some of the most vulnerable members of society. This is going to affect a lot of children if it is a new NHS protocol. Many people will not want to send their children to independent schools if it means foregoing NHS treatment.'
Such an exodus would follow the record 11,000 pupils who have left the sector since Labour introduced VAT on fees in January.
The woman added: 'I genuinely despair at what is happening. It's the demolition of the British private school system It feels like an ideological battle is going on.'
The website of her local NHS Trust says children's occupational therapy services are offered to 'all school aged children who are residents in the Richmond or Kingston boroughs and attend a state-maintained Richmond school.' A spokesman declined to address specific claims that private pupils had been discriminated against but 'apologised if the wording in our correspondence caused upset. We are in the process of revising it to ensure greater clarity.'
He added: 'Occupational therapy services are available to all school-age children who have an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) either through the NHS or the local authority. For children without an EHCP, advice may be available through existing NHS services provided in state school.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
Worcestershire Hospitals Trust warned over scan report training
A hospital trust has been told to urgently improve training for temporary staff after the death of a patient sent home before her full scan results were inquest concluded Jordanne Rose Roberts, 23, from Kidderminster, died from an undiagnosed pulmonary embolism, with neglect contributing to her death.A locum doctor at Alexandra Hospital, Redditch discharged her last August without waiting to read the second half of a CT scan report, which identified the blood being warned by the county's senior coroner of the risk of further deaths, Worcestershire Acute Hospital NHS Trust apologised, and said it had made changes. Ms Roberts was assessed in the emergency department of the hospital on 10 August 2024, after falling down stairs at locum doctor on duty - the most senior doctor on duty in A&E that day - did not know her CT scan results would be reported in two parts. She was discharged on the basis of the first half of the report, which did not mention a blood patient collapsed at home on 12 August, and died a short time first CT report did made clear a second report was to follow, coroner David Reid's prevention of future deaths report death would probably have been prevented if the pulmonary embolism had been identified and treated in hospital, he added. 'Lives put at risk' According to the report, although the trust confirmed employed doctors were trained to read both parts of CT scan reports, it could not say whether steps had been taken to ensure all locum doctors received the equivalent staff were invited to education sessions covering the topic, but no record was kept about whether they and until the trust was able to ensure all locum doctors at its hospitals were trained about the need to read the reports in full, there remained a risk "life-threatening conditions may go undiagnosed" and "patients' lives may be put at risk", the coroner said. "I would like to repeat our sincere and unreserved apologies to Jordanne's family for the failures in the care she received from us," said the NHS trust's chief medical officer Dr Jules Walton.A thorough review of what went wrong had been carried out, with a series of actions taken as a result, she added."Those actions include measures to make sure that all medical staff, including temporary staff, are aware of our processes for reporting scan results," Dr Walton trust must respond to the coroner's report in detail within 56 days. Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.


The Sun
30 minutes ago
- The Sun
Side-effects of fat jabs are transforming the dating scene – and ‘reshaping' our sex lives
WEIGHT loss jabs are changing people's lives. For the 1.5 million Brits already on them, many are likely to be shedding the pounds, and fast. While new studies suggest they may make people healthier, by slashing the risk of heart disease and curing booze addiction. But that's not all - these so-called ' fat jabs ' could be changing the way we flirt, date and have sex too. According to a survey by the Kinsey Institute, at Indiana University in the US, nearly half of people using GLP-1 drugs said the meds had changed their sex lives - for better, or worse. Some users reported feeling a serious boost in desire, feeling sexier naked, and noticing better performance in the bedroom. But it wasn't all good news, others said their libido took a hit, or that they felt less comfortable with their bodies, even as the weight dropped off. "There's a very nuanced story to tell here," Dr Justin Lehmiller, one of the study's authors said. "How these drugs impact your sex life will depend on a variety of factors, including dosage, speed of weight loss and changes to fitness habits.' The research conducted with polled 2,000 single adults in the US, aged 18 to 91. Of those, 8 per cent, just 160 people, said they'd used weight-loss jabs like Ozempic or Wegovy. Among those users, nearly 60 per cent said the medication had affected their dating lives. Feeling Full Naturally: Top 5 Foods That Act Like Weight Loss Jabs They reported a range of benefits, from getting more matches on dating apps to feeling confident enough to ask people out. Nearly one in six users said they had bought new clothes to show off their bodies, while others noticed exes reaching out, sparked by their transformations. Around 13 per cent felt more confident posting photos online, and 12 per cent said they were going on more dates. Sexual desire increased for 18 per cent of users, but 16 per cent experienced the opposite effect. Similarly, 16 per cent felt more comfortable naked, while 14 per cent felt less so. Improvements in sexual function were reported by 16 per cent, but 12 per cent said their sexual performance had worsened. Men see the biggest difference Men in particular reported more pronounced shifts, both positive and negative. They were twice as likely as women to say their libido had increased, they were happier with their bodies, and that their sexual function improved. Yet they were also more likely to report decreased libido and sexual difficulties. Despite the boost in confidence many felt, 60 per cent of men admitted to worrying about being judged or shamed for taking these medications, compared to 35 per cent of women. Dr Amanda Gesselman, another study author, added: 'GLP-1 use is rising among single adults and it's starting to influence more than just how people look and feel about themselves. "These shifts have the potential to reshape how people build intimacy in today's dating landscape. "For example, as users report reduced appetites and lower interest in alcohol, the classic dinner-and-drinks date may give way to new ways of connecting.' Everything you need to know about fat jabs Weight loss jabs are all the rage as studies and patient stories reveal they help people shed flab at almost unbelievable rates, as well as appearing to reduce the risk of serious diseases. Wegovy – a modified version of type 2 diabetes drug Ozempic – and Mounjaro are the leading weight loss injections used in the UK. Wegovy, real name semaglutide, has been used on the NHS for years while Mounjaro (tirzepatide) is a newer and more powerful addition to the market. Mounjaro accounts for most private prescriptions for weight loss and is set to join Wegovy as an NHS staple this year. How do they work? The jabs work by suppressing your appetite, making you eat less so your body burns fat for energy instead and you lose weight. They do this my mimicking a hormone called GLP-1, which signals to the brain when the stomach is full, so the drugs are officially called GLP-1 receptor agonists. They slow down digestion and increase insulin production, lowering blood sugar, which is why they were first developed to treat type 2 diabetes in which patients' sugar levels are too high. Can I get them? NHS prescriptions of weight loss drugs, mainly Wegovy and an older version called Saxenda (chemical name liraglutide), are controlled through specialist weight loss clinics. Typically a patient will have to have a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or higher, classifying them as medically obese, and also have a weight-related health condition such as high blood pressure. GPs generally do not prescribe the drugs for weight loss. Private prescribers offer the jabs, most commonly Mounjaro, to anyone who is obese (BMI of 30+) or overweight (BMI 25-30) with a weight-related health risk. Private pharmacies have been rapped for handing them out too easily and video calls or face-to-face appointments are now mandatory to check a patient is being truthful about their size and health. Are there any risks? Yes – side effects are common but most are relatively mild. Around half of people taking the drug experience gut issues, including sickness, bloating, acid reflux, constipation and diarrhoea. Dr Sarah Jarvis, GP and clinical consultant at said: 'One of the more uncommon side effects is severe acute pancreatitis, which is extremely painful and happens to one in 500 people.' Other uncommon side effects include altered taste, kidney problems, allergic reactions, gallbladder problems and hypoglycemia. Evidence has so far been inconclusive about whether the injections are damaging to patients' mental health. Figures obtained by The Sun show that, up to January 2025, 85 patient deaths in the UK were suspected to be linked to the medicines


Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
I tried the new foundation everyone's calling a 'new staple' for 'flawless' skin – and honestly, I was shocked (here's my honest review)
Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more On the hunt for a foundation that instantly smooths texture, blurs pores and leaves the skin looking flawless? Benefit has just released a brand-new foundation that ticks all these boxes and more, and we predict that it's going to receive icon status fast. Designed to smooth and perfect the skin with all-day wear, the Benefit POREfessional Foundation is already being coined a 'new staple' for stunning skin – so I put it to the test. Benefit POREfessional Foundation 30ml Smoothing and blurring the skin, the Benefit POREfessional Foundation delivers medium-buildable, weightless coverage and a seamless natural-matte finish that stays fresh all day - all without clogging pores. Take your pick from 40 inclusive shades covering warm, neutral and cool tones. Plus, score a free gift when you buy the new Benefit POREfessional Foundation online at Boots. £31.60 (save £7.90) Shop Ever since Benefit released its now-iconic POREfessional Primer 15 years ago, it's safe to say that it's been leading the charge when it comes to a smooth, pore-less complexions. So, when I saw Benefit had released a new foundation, I had to give it a try. Smoothing and blurring the skin, the new Benefit POREfessional Foundation delivers medium-buildable, weightless coverage and a seamless, natural-matte finish that stays fresh all day - all without clogging pores. Plus, as it's one part makeup and one part skincare, it also works to visibly smooth texture, blur pores and improve the look of skin instantly and over time. This is all thanks to the skincare-boosted formula which features Rose Hip Extract to refine the look of pores and smooth skin, as well as Glycerin to retain skin moisture. But the star of the show is Niacinamide, which, as a form of Vitamin B3, helps to smooth the look of pores and skin texture while contributing to skin hydration every time you apply. Waterproof, smudge-proof, transfer-proof and fade-proof (with not an ounce of oxidisation), this new foundation hasn't just been grabbing rave reviews, but impressive consumer results, too, showing to deliver 24 hours of longwear and 24 hours of hydration. Better still, in a self-evaluation by 116 participants after one week, 96 per cent said it visibly smoothed texture instantly, and in a self-evaluation by 116 participants after four weeks, 97 per cent said bare skin is smoother over time. But what did I think? Coming in a glass bottle with a handy pump, the POREfessional Foundation certainly looks the part – and with 40 shades covering warm, neutral and cool tones, I was able to find my absolutely perfect colour match with ease - 2N Mighty. As someone who is used to tinted moisturisers and dewy, low coverage foundation, I was nervous by the foundation's medium-buildable, natural-matte finish. Needless to say, I was very pleasantly surprised by how this foundation performed. I went in sparingly over my usual primer, applying just a pump of the lightweight foundation to my face with the gorgeous Benefit Makeup Blender Sponge and pressing the product worry-free into even my pore-centric areas. I was shocked by the result. This foundation instantly smoothed out my skin, layering effortlessly over areas of texture, old acne scars and, most importantly, the visible pores of my nose and cheeks. My complexion was left looking flawless and blurred without any of the flatness I worry about with matte products. Dark spots covered, redness covered, dark circles covered… it's rare for a matte foundation to leave me looking quite so healthy - but this one did. In fact, my skin looked utterly hydrated and, after layering beautifully with my other makeup products, continued looking flawless all day long – through a rain storm, a full day in the air-conditioned office and a four-hour train ride to Cornwall. No creasing, caking or clogging in sight. This one is truly a new favourite in my collection – and I'm not the only one who thinks so. While new, the Benefit POREfessional Foundation, the brand's more note-worthy foray into foundation, has already received hundreds of rave reviews from impressed users. 'I am a concealer and skin tint type of girly so I was not expecting to like this so much,' raved one impressed reviewer. 'I don't like heavy foundations as they clog my pores but this matched my exact skin colour I was so shocked. 'And on top of that it's medium coverage, but it blends out sooo nicely it looks like skin. I took a close up picture of my face because I have a lot of pores and you cannot even see them in the photo.' Another added: 'I absolutely love the POREfessional Foundation by Benefit! It makes my skin look flawless and perfect. It evens out my complexion beautifully and stays put all day long. The medium coverage is just right—since a little goes a long way, a bottle will last quite a while.' 'I'm obsessed with this formula!!' a third user shared. 'It's so good and dewy but it covers what it needs to cover at the same time! I really liked the way it matched my shade and overall it hold throughout the day pretty good! Would buy again!'.