China lifts a nearly 2-year ban on seafood from Japan over Fukushima wastewater
A notice from the customs agency said the ban had been lifted Sunday and that imports from most of Japan would be resumed.
The ban, imposed in August 2023, was a major blow to Japan's fisheries industry. China was the biggest overseas market for Japanese seafood, accounting for more than one-fifth of its exports.
The nuclear plant at Fukushima was heavily damaged by a deadly tsunami that followed a huge offshore earthquake in 2011. Water still must be pumped in to cool the radioactive fuel. The water is then stored in what was an ever-growing complex of tanks on the property.
After years of debate, the utility won government permission to discharge the water gradually into the sea after treating it to remove most of the radioactive elements. Japanese officials said the wastewater would be safer than international standards and have negligible environmental impact.
China disagreed and imposed a ban, saying the discharge would endanger the fishing industry and coastal communities on its east coast.
The ban will remain in place for seafood from 10 of Japan's 47 prefectures, including Fukushima and nearby ones.
Japanese seafood exporters will have to reapply for registration in China and all imports will have to include a health certificate, a certificate of compliance for radioactive substance testing and a certificate of origin, the Chinese customs agency said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
25 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Foxconn's Chinese engineers called back, disrupting Apple's India expansion
Over 300 Chinese engineers and technicians have been sent back from Foxconn's iPhone factories in India, raising concerns about a potential slowdown in Apple's local manufacturing push. According to a Bloomberg report citing sources, the recall began nearly two months ago, with the majority of Chinese staff at Foxconn's southern India facilities asked to return home. Most of those who remain are Taiwanese support personnel. While Foxconn has not issued any statement on the move, it aligns with recent informal efforts by Chinese authorities to discourage the transfer of skilled labour, technology, and equipment to countries like India and Vietnam. Apple's dependence on Chinese expertise Apple CEO Tim Cook has often praised the proficiency of China's assembly workforce, attributing the company's reliance on the country to their expertise rather than just cost advantages. While the withdrawal of these staff from India is not expected to affect product quality, it could impact assembly line efficiency, a source told Bloomberg. The development comes at a crucial moment for Apple, which is working with manufacturing partners in India to scale up production of the upcoming iPhone 17. So far, Apple has not issued any comment on the development. China tightens grip on tech exports Foxconn's decision appears to align with recent efforts by Beijing to limit the movement of technology, skilled professionals, and specialised equipment out of China. These measures are seen as a response to growing interest from countries like India and Vietnam, which are working to attract global tech manufacturers amid ongoing tensions between the United States and China. Recently, China even halted the export of key rare earth metals. This shift in supply chains began during Donald Trump's first term as US president, when Apple started shifting some of its device production to India and Vietnam. The trend has continued, especially as Trump pushes forward with new tariff plans. In response, China has tightened its grip on exports of rare earth materials, technology, and labour. Foxconn's presence in India Although Foxconn still produces most iPhones in China, it has steadily expanded its operations in India, as earlier reported by Business Standard. To support this growth, the company had deployed many experienced Chinese engineers to help speed up production and train Indian workers. Chinese supervisors have played a key role in guiding Foxconn's Indian workforce. Large-scale iPhone production in India began just four years ago and now contributes around 20 per cent of global output. Apple aims to manufacture most iPhones destined for the US market in India by the end of 2026. However, Trump has criticised this move, saying Apple should make phones for American users within the US. High labour costs in the US make this idea difficult to implement. And if China restricts the movement of its skilled engineers, setting up advanced manufacturing in the US would become even less viable. India-China relations Meanwhile, India and China continue to share a strained relationship. While tensions have eased slightly over the past year, and high-level meetings have resumed, direct flights between the two countries remain suspended. India still enforces strict visa rules for Chinese nationals and maintains bans on Chinese apps like TikTok. On the other hand, China continues to block exports of fertilisers to India, even though such restrictions have been lifted for other nations.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Quad remains resilient. But everyone wants to be friends with China again
Quad took a significant step in its long journey to shed ambiguity and reveal its true purpose on Tuesday in Washington DC. The US, India, Japan, and Australia signed on to a joint statement that was more pointed and critical of Chinese actions in the maritime domain than in the past. Quad also categorically called out China's economic coercion, price manipulation, supply-chain disruptions, and use of non-market principles to concentrate production in critical minerals. In classic diplo-speak, the statement did all of this using the passive voice without attributing actions to the agent. Trump, to lend retrospective coherence to a badly thought out tariff policy, made it all about China in April. (REUTERS) To be sure, each edition of Quad has witnessed the introduction of a more critical nuance against Beijing and an additional layer of tech, economic, or security cooperation with the subtext of countering China. But this week's Quad meeting was much sharper in its focus. It also narrowed down cooperation to maritime security, economic security, critical and emerging technologies, and humanitarian assistance. The advantage of this sharp approach is that the fluff is out, and all sides are discussing real actionable items. The disadvantage is there is drastic dilution of the agenda and many valuable items of cooperation may get lost. But the Quad statement is significant because a strong diplomatic rebuke of China has become rare. Indeed, the big geopolitical picture of the moment is that China is on the geopolitical comeback trail after five years. The onset of Covid-19 in early 2020 woke the world to the dangers of opaque systems that can suppress information with globally devastating consequences. China's weaponisation of its overwhelming advantage in manufacturing awoke the world to the need for diversified supply chains. China's inroads into eastern Ladakh alerted New Delhi to the dangers of a belligerent neighbour that was willing to violate Indian sovereignty. China's continuous aggression in the East China Sea, South China Sea, and around Taiwan made the region aware of Beijing's territorial and maritime ambitions. China's predatory economics made Global South nations conscious of the downsides of Chinese development and investment flows. China's stunning technological, military, and economic strides awoke the US to its 'peer-level competitor'. Under the first Donald Trump administration, the Joe Biden administration, and under a set of Indo-Pacific leaders worried about Beijing, there was a concerted approach to take on this Chinese machine. American export controls on chips were meant to slow down China's progress. The US began building stronger countervailing coalitions in the Indo-Pacific. It encouraged plurilaterals, trilaterals, and strengthened bilaterals to shape the environment around China. The US married strategic and defence imperatives with business opportunities and innovated with new tech partnerships. It expanded its developmental, climate, and security footprint in neglected regions such as the Pacific Islands. This period saw China's internal vulnerabilities get more pronounced. Beijing's Covid-19 crackdown boomeranged. Its real estate and infrastructure-fuelled boom created a crisis. Its domestic consumption paled in comparison to its production excess. Its demographic policies generated social fissures and policy pressures. It seemed relatively friendless in the region. And theories about how China had peaked gathered traction. That 2020-2024 era of rising global estrangement with China is over. 2025 may well be the year when everyone wants to become friends with China again. The effort to construct a bridge between Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific theatres has faltered. Even as Russia and China work more closely together, the US is now doing little to bridge the gap between Nato and Indo-Pacific allies and is instead pressuring both simultaneously to step up on defence. The Australian, South Korean, and Japanese heads of government decided to stay away from the Nato summit in The Hague. European countries, both collectively and separately, are seeking to cut deals with China. To many in Europe, a closer working relationship with China seems safer than putting their eggs in the unpredictable American basket. America itself is sending signals of wanting a deal with China. Trump, to lend retrospective coherence to a badly thought out tariff policy, made it all about China in April. As soon as markets responded negatively and inflationary concerns became real, he did a deal by mid-May. When the deal showed cracks and China imposed restrictions on exports of rare earths, the US showed a willingness to lift restrictions on exports and visas. Nikkei now reports that Trump is exploring a visit to China with a major business delegation. China's dependencies are real, Beijing is far more keen to do a deal than it publicly lets on, and no one is discounting either the structural rivalry or US advantages. But, in this entire episode, China has shown it has cards too and held its own to a large extent, while American vulnerabilities have become visible. And then you have China's neighbours. Despite Japan's fundamental security contradiction with China, Trump has made life so difficult for Tokyo that it cancelled a 2+2 ministerial dialogue with the US and is engaged in a public acrimonious fight on auto tariffs — any such rift plays to China's advantage. South Korea's new government is all about a more balanced approach to foreign policy compared to its pro-US conservative predecessor. Australia is struck by the Pentagon's review of the AUKUS pact and Trump hasn't even met Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. And India is sending public signals of rapprochement with China — despite China being the force behind Pakistan's military response during Operation Sindoor, India's own border tensions, the trade asymmetry that emanates from Chinese manufacturing dominance, and Beijing's efforts to construct a hostile architecture in South Asia. New Delhi's political troubles with the US due to Trump's false claims on peacemaking, mediation, and trade could only have made China happy. And in smaller countries in the region, American instruments of influence in the form of foreign aid, foreign trade, and liberal visa policy have all but gone, leaving the ground open for more Chinese presence. Neither was China about to collapse or get isolated in the past four years, nor is it about to take over the world now. But there is a shift that suits Beijing. As the next Quad chair, India's challenge is framing a credible and strong agenda that takes into account this adverse diplomatic environment. Prashant Jha is a political analyst. The views expressed are personal.
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
Russian IT sector sees Asia influx Kommersant
The number of foreign companies registering their businesses in the first half of 2025 was reportedly nearly double the total for 2024 The number of foreign IT companies applying to register their businesses in Russia surged sharply in the first half of 2025, with Asian firms leading the charge, Kommersant reported on Tuesday, citing research compiled by Kokoc Group. According to the data, around 3,000 foreign registration applications were filed in the first six months of the current year, compared to some 1,650 in all of 2024. India reportedly topped the list with more than 1,000 applications, followed by China with over 800, and Türkiye with around 150. IT firms from Africa and Persian Gulf nations are also increasingly seeking entry into the Russian market. Industry experts interviewed by the business daily attributed the surge to relatively low competition in Russia's large consumer market, rising demand for local IT solutions, and a shortage of Western software amid ongoing geopolitical shifts. Analysts also highlighted the crucial role of the growing digitalization of government services and business sectors. Foreign firms mainly target niches such as cybersecurity, cloud platforms, fintech, artificial intelligence, industrial enterprise resource planning (ERP) and customer relationship management (CRM) systems, Kommersant noted. Each country reportedly tends to focus on its traditional strengths, with China applying to register firms operating in telecommunications and fintech, and India targeting outsourcing and software development. Natalya Vozyanova, head of Asian client relations at the consulting firm TeDo, confirmed to the news outlet that there had been a notable rise in Chinese applications, adding that around 9,000 Chinese companies, primarily focused on the IT, technology, and engineering sectors, are currently registered in Russia. Interest from friendly foreign nations in the Russian IT market was evident, according to Kristina Kovalenko, CEO of Fork-Tech, who highlighted that Chinese developers find the Russian market largely untapped with respect to related hardware manufacturing. At the same time, Russian companies could face increased competition, possible price dumping, and talent migration, especially in high-margin areas, Mikhail Pryshlyak, Commercial Director of MD Audit, told Kommersant. He noted, however, that the new players could also stimulate partnerships, local integration, and demand for advanced IT services including security, DevOps, and support. Oleg Sazhin, advisor to the CEO of Content AI, noted that foreign companies are expected to face "their own difficulties" when entering the Russian market. These include lingering distrust among local customers towards new overseas suppliers following the exit of Western vendors, as well as strict government requirements to only use software from the country's official registry. (
