logo
White House tries to assuage industry worries over migrant workers amid aggressive deportation campaign

White House tries to assuage industry worries over migrant workers amid aggressive deportation campaign

CNN8 hours ago
As the Trump administration has doubled down on its hardline immigration agenda, behind the scenes senior Trump officials and the president himself have grappled with the consequences of that crackdown against a key portion of the workforce: migrant workers.
President Donald Trump has wavered repeatedly on the topic: At times he has suggested farms and other industries employing migrants should be protected, even as he and some top aides have pushed Immigration and Customs Enforcement to intensify its immigration sweeps.
'We're working on it right now,' Trump said Tuesday. 'We have a lot of cases where ICE would go into a farm and these are guys that have been there 10 or 15 years, and the farmers know them – it's called farmer responsibility. Or owner responsibility. But they're going to be largely responsible for these people. And they know these people. They've worked at the farms for 15 years.'
Senior administration officials have had discussions with stakeholders as they quietly try to find a durable compromise on the fate of migrant workers, floating various new ways of granting them legal status, multiple sources told CNN. But it's unclear what, if any, solution they can reach without Congress, according to experts.
'President Trump is a tireless advocate for American farmers – they keep our families fed and our country prosperous. He trusts farmers and is committed to ensuring they have the workforce needed to remain successful,' said White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson in a statement, maintaining that deporting 'dangerous criminals and targeting the sanctuary cities that provide them safe harbor is a top priority for the President.'
The focus on migrant workers reveals the delicate balance the Trump administration is wrestling with as it tries to carry out a historic number of deportations and avoid agitating key industries or unsettling a fragile economy. Similarly, the president faces headwinds from immigration hardliners who view additional protections for migrant workers as an unnecessary form of relief. The ambiguity in Trump's approach has kept both sides of the debate off balance.
CNN reached out to the White House for comment.
'They are working at a breakneck speed to better understand employers' issues with current guest worker visa programs and cut down on paperwork processing delays. Effective reform is a complex undertaking, and initial attempts may not get it entirely right from the start,' said Kip Eideberg, senior vice president of government and industry relations at the Association of Equipment Manufacturers, describing the message he's received from the administration.
'The Administration recognizes this and have been clear that they will make adjustments based on feedback from industry to strike the right balance between border security and immigration reform,' he added.
Undocumented immigrants account for 4% to 5% of the total US workforce and between 15% to 20% in industries like crop production, food processing, and construction, according to Goldman Sachs, which warned in a recent report that losing a 'significant share' of those workers could result in temporary bottlenecks, shortages, and price increase.
Multiple industry representatives have raised alarm over indiscriminate immigration sweeps where undocumented immigrants without criminal records have been picked up for deportation, including in sectors that are critical to the president's broader agenda.
'It will make it damn near impossible to lean into the administration's effort to strengthen manufacturing,' Eideberg said, despite overwhelming support within the industry for that effort.
'We're stuck between a rock and a hard place,' he said, noting that mass deportations will shrink the labor force. One of the primary concerns for customers is that they won't have enough workers to harvest crops, which will likely have a trickle-down effect on equipment manufacturers and reduce demand, according to Eideberg.
But tilting toward helping manufacturers and other employers could cause political problems for the president.
'The more he panders to employers of illegal workers, the more he's going to anger his base of voters who expected – and voted for – tough immigration enforcement across the board without exemptions for politically connected people,' said Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies for the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for limited immigration.
Representatives from various industries have taken their worries directly to the administration, including the departments of Labor and Agriculture.
In an April Cabinet meeting, Trump appeared to nod to those concerns, telling Homeland Security Kristi Noem after her presentation: 'We're also going to work with farmers that if they have strong recommendations for their farms for certain people, we're going to let them stay in for a while and work with the farmers and then come back and go through a process of – legal process.'
He later tasked Noem, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer, and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins to work on the issue, according to a source familiar with the move.
Last month, Chavez-DeRemer established the Office of Immigration Policy to try to streamline industry needs and thread the needle of delivering on Trump's mass deportation promise while helping employers navigate existing programs.
'Under President Trump's leadership, I'm working closely with Secretary Rollins, Secretary Noem, and our federal partners on fulfilling this Administration's mission to cut red tape, support agricultural employers, and ensure they have the legal workforce needed to keep our food supply secure,' Chavez-DeRemer said in a statement.
According to an agriculture industry source, a similar idea had been discussed in a meeting with Rollins earlier this year that would include setting up a program for farmers to ensure they had enough laborers. It's unclear how that program would be different from existing temporary farm visas known as H-2A.
The source said Trump has also raised the idea to Rollins of creating a mechanism that would allow farmers to sign a document or affidavit for undocumented workers, who would self-deport and then be allowed to return legally. But that kind of proposal would draw objections from hardliners.
'It ends up being who's going to win this tug of war,' said Chris Chmielenski, president of the Immigration Accountability Project, which advocates for limited immigration, describing a form of relief for undocumented migrant workers akin to 'amnesty.'
'I have no idea which way it's going to go,' he said.
There are 2.4 million farmworkers in the United States, according to the Economic Policy Institute, 40% of whom the Agriculture Department estimates lack legal status. United Farm Workers President Teresa Romero previously told CNN that she's been getting calls from concerned farmworkers across California about ICE crackdowns in the state.
Separate from the existing undocumented population, the administration has also made a series of moves to strip temporary protections from migrants who had been given permission to legally work and live in the country – suddenly depriving some employers of workers.
'We might keep losing legal workers from the system,' said Jennie Murray, president and chief executive officer of the National Immigration Forum. 'All of them (industries) are extremely worried. They're worried they don't have future flows of workers coming into the country. They're extremely worried to lose these temporary workers they've become dependent on.'
An immigration raid at an Omaha meat production plant on June 10 that resulted in dozens of workers being taken away sparked fresh concerns about the administration's priorities – culminating in a phone call between Rollins and Trump the following day over the issue.
Two days later, Trump posted on his Truth Social: 'Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace… This is not good. We must protect our Farmers, but get the CRIMINALS OUT OF THE USA. Changes are coming!'
Immigration and Customs Enforcement quickly issued guidance to agents limiting immigration raids at farms, hotels, and restaurants.
Just a few days later, Trump posted on his Truth Social account telling ICE officials 'to do all in their power to achieve the very important goal of delivering the single largest Mass Deportation Program in History.' ICE soon announced worksite enforcement would continue.
ICE has conducted sweeps at construction sites, popular vacation destinations like Nantucket and Martha's Vineyard, as well as local Home Depots, which are a common spot for contractors and homeowners to approach and hire laborers.
Rosanna Maietta, president and CEO of the American Hotel & Lodging Association, told CNN in a statement that the organization has also held meetings with administration officials 'to convey our acute workforce shortage challenges and underscore the importance of a strong hospitality and tourism sector.'
Trump seemed to shift course again in the last week, saying the administration is working on a temporary pass for migrant workers, particularly those working on farms and in the hospitality industry, arguing he's on 'both sides.'
'I'm the strongest immigration guy that there's ever been, but I'm also the strongest farmer guy that there's ever been,' Trump said in an interview on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures.'
The whiplash has been indicative of the two factions within the administration – one focused on the impact on labor, and another intent on arresting and deporting as many people as possible. The latter has been led by White House deputy chief of staff and architect of Trump's hardline immigration policies Stephen Miller.
Miller has argued on CNN that the administration's immigration crackdown wouldn't disrupt the agriculture industry and result in higher prices, saying that migrants who recently arrived to the US 'aren't doing farmwork.'
Rollins sees the issue differently.
'The labor question is a significant one. It is one that is perhaps not the very top of the list, but for some they would say the very top of the list,' the agriculture secretary told lawmakers at a congressional hearing in mid-June.
In a CNBC interview Wednesday, Rollins said Trump's 'goal, that he has tasked me with effectuating, is making sure that we have a 100% legal workforce. That anyone that is here illegally must pay the consequences, return to the country, and then eventually, as he's talked about in different ways, come back. So, we are working on all of that right now.'
She cited reforms to temporary worker visas, arguing: 'There will be zero amnesty. We will ensure all laws are followed.'
Sources familiar with the dynamic between Rollins and Miller told CNN the relationship between the two is professional and despite the different viewpoints on immigration policy, it hasn't devolved.
'There's a respect between the two, and also a very clear understanding that Trump likes and is deeply reliant on both,' one administration official said.
'This is an area where their equities overlap and are quite different. They both understand that – or at least have up to this point. But POTUS cares deeply about farmers and ranchers and beyond his personal affinity for the Secretary, really values hearing directly from her about what the industry is saying,' the official said. 'And they're freaking out right now – and have been for months.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Watch Live: House nears final vote on "big, beautiful bill" after Jeffries sets record for longest speech
Watch Live: House nears final vote on "big, beautiful bill" after Jeffries sets record for longest speech

CBS News

time13 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Watch Live: House nears final vote on "big, beautiful bill" after Jeffries sets record for longest speech

Washington — The House is nearing a final vote Thursday on President Trump's "big, beautiful bill" after Republican leaders overcame resistance from GOP holdouts in a dramatic overnight session, prompting Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries to delay a final vote by delivering the longest House speech on record. "We'll have the votes," House Speaker Mike Johnson said Thursday morning. "We'll land this plane before July 4th." Republicans are trying to approve the final version of the legislation ahead of the self-imposed Friday deadline to get the bill to the president's desk. After hours of delay, the House voted 219-213 to advance the bill, scoring a key victory for Johnson. Lawmakers began voting at about 9:30 p.m. ET Wednesday, but didn't wrap up until about 3:20 a.m. Thursday, as GOP leaders and the White House spoke with holdouts for hours to overcome their objections. "What are the Republicans waiting for??? What are you trying to prove??? MAGA IS NOT HAPPY, AND IT'S COSTING YOU VOTES!!!" Mr. Trump wrote on Truth Social shortly after midnight. Following the procedural vote, the House began debating the bill. Just before 5 a.m., Jeffries began addressing the chamber for a "magic minute," a House custom that allows the leader unlimited speaking time. The New York Democrat pledged to "take his time" as he highlighted the Americans who he said would suffer because of the bill. He ended up speaking for 8 hours and 44 minutes straight, surpassing the record for the longest floor speech in House history, which was previously held by Kevin McCarthy, who spoke for 8 hours and 32 minutes in 2021. "I rise today in strong opposition to Donald Trump's one, big ugly bill," Jeffries said as he began speaking. "This disgusting, abomination, the GOP tax scam, that guts Medicaid, rips food from the mouths of children, seniors and veterans, and rewards billionaires with massive tax breaks. Every single Democrat stands in strong opposition to this bill because we're standing up for the American people." Johnson was expected to speak after Jeffries concludes, followed by the final vote. House hardliners push back against Senate changes After the Senate approved the bill Tuesday, House GOP leaders had aimed to move ahead quickly on the signature legislation of Mr. Trump's second-term agenda, which includes ramped-up spending for border security, defense and energy production and extends trillions of dollars in tax cuts, partially offset by substantial cuts to health care and nutrition programs. But some House Republicans, who voted to pass an earlier version of the bill in May, were unhappy with the Senate's changes. Holdouts, including moderates and members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, met with Mr. Trump on Wednesday as the White House pressured House Republicans to vote for the bill. While some lawmakers described the meetings as productive, a number of conservatives said ahead of a rule vote Wednesday afternoon that they thought the procedural vote would fail. Johnson spent weeks pleading with his Senate counterparts not to make any major changes to the version of the bill that passed the lower chamber by a single vote in May. He said the Senate bill's changes "went a little further than many of us would've preferred." The Senate-passed bill includes steeper Medicaid cuts, a higher increase in the debt limit and changes to the House bill's green energy policies and the state and local tax deduction. Other controversial provisions that faced pushback in both chambers, including the sale of public lands in nearly a dozen states, a 10-year moratorium on states regulating artificial intelligence and an excise tax on the renewable energy industry, were stripped from the Senate bill before heading back to the House. Before the critical procedural vote ended, Johnson told reporters that Mr. Trump was "directly engaged" in conversations with skeptical members. "Members wanted to hear certain assurances from him about what's ahead, what the future will entail, and what we're going to do next, and all of that," Johnson said. "And he was very, very helpful in that process." In the wee hours on Thursday, five House Republicans had voted no on the rule vote, which was enough to tank the vote with a razor-thin GOP majority in the lower chamber, and eight possible holdouts had not voted. But the vote remained open as GOP leaders worked to shore up support, allowing lawmakers to change their votes from no to yes. Mr. Trump had taken to Truth Social as a handful of Republican holdouts didn't appear to be budging, declaring "FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE. RIDICULOUS!!!" Republican leaders ultimately won the support of about a dozen GOP opponents to the rule. And when the vote finally came to an end, Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania was the sole Republican opposed. , and contributed to this report.

From New York to Arizona, migrant facilities shuttering in wake of Trump's border crackdown
From New York to Arizona, migrant facilities shuttering in wake of Trump's border crackdown

Fox News

time13 minutes ago

  • Fox News

From New York to Arizona, migrant facilities shuttering in wake of Trump's border crackdown

Migrant shelters in the United States are closing their doors in large numbers as the border crisis has waned significantly. In January, two shelters shuttered in Pima County, Arizona, according to the Arizona Daily Star. In San Diego, the Jewish Family Service closed its shelter in February, specifically citing policy changes like the CBP One app going away as part of the reason for its closure. In Texas, the San Antonio-based Migrant Resource Center that opened in 2022 closed in February due to the plunge in people crossing into the United States, according to Texas Public Radio. On the East Coast, New York City closed 63 migrant shelters this year, according to PIX11, and Massachusetts is down to four shelters from over 120 in 2024, according to NBC 10 Boston. The outlet reported that 24 of the Massachusetts shelters closed their doors this week. "President Trump ended Joe Biden's illegal alien invasion and ushered in the most secure border ever. Migrant shelters are shuttering because illegal aliens are no longer being released into our great country – that's the Trump Effect," White House Assistant Press Secretary Liz Huston said in a statement to Fox News Digital. The White House is also touting that processing facilities along the border have closed, as the United States Customs and Border Protection told Fox News Digital in May that all of its "soft-sided" facilities in Texas, California and Arizona have shut down. "Due to the unprecedented drop in apprehensions of illegal aliens as a result of the President's recent executive actions, CBP is not operating any temporary, soft-sided processing facilities where illegal aliens have been held in specific locations along the southwest border. CBP no longer has a need for them as illegal aliens are being quickly removed," a CBP spokesperson confirmed to Fox News Digital at the time. "The U.S. Border Patrol has full capability to manage the detention of apprehended aliens in USBP's permanent facilities. Manpower and other resources dedicated to temporary processing facilities will be redirected toward other priorities and will speed CBP's progress in gaining operational control over the southwest border," the spokesperson added. In Mexico, there has also been a reported drop in people seeking to come to the U.S. illegally. The latest border numbers revealed that numbers remain significantly lower than they were compared with the Biden administration, as there were only 6,070 southern border apprehensions in June by Border Patrol, and there were zero releases in May or June. On June 28, there were only 137 encounters at the southern border, according to CBP data. The comments from the White House come as the House is in its closing hours of deciding on the Trump-backed reconciliation bill, which includes major funding for the president's border and immigration agenda totaling out to roughly $170 billion, according to Reuters. Billions will go toward Immigration and Customs Enforcement as the agency ramps up its deportation efforts, including a goal of hiring at least 10,000 more agents, according to the White House. In addition, the bill seeks to more than double the detention capacity for those in deportation proceedings and fund further border wall construction, according to Reuters. "Once the One, Big, Beautiful Bill is passed, this historic border security progress will be made permanent and the largest mass deportation campaign in American history will be carried out," Huston added. Unsurprisingly, not everybody is on board with the immigration measures outlined. "A deportation machine will be unleashed on steroids," House Minority Leader Hakeem Jefferies said during his lengthy House floor speech on Thursday.

Reverting records, a written apology and policy changes: How UPenn reached a deal with the White House over trans athletes and $175 million in federal funding
Reverting records, a written apology and policy changes: How UPenn reached a deal with the White House over trans athletes and $175 million in federal funding

CNN

time17 minutes ago

  • CNN

Reverting records, a written apology and policy changes: How UPenn reached a deal with the White House over trans athletes and $175 million in federal funding

Donald Trump LGBTQ issues People in sports Education policyFacebookTweetLink Follow President Donald Trump's alma mater recognized early on it could be under threat. A week after the University of Pennsylvania alumnus' inauguration, the university president composed a message to the school community: 'Like you, I am closely monitoring recent developments from Washington that directly affect higher education.' 'Together we will protect and preserve what defines us as Penn,' then-interim President J. Larry Jameson wrote. A week later, the university was under investigation by the federal government. What followed was a high-stakes, months-long back-and-forth between one of the country's most prestigious universities and the Department of Education. But the battle over $175 million in frozen federal funding that centered around women's sports at UPenn, and one transgender swimmer in particular, would unfold much differently — for now — from the ongoing funding fight its sister Ivy League institution, Harvard University, has been waging with the Trump administration. The deal reached this week between UPenn and the DOE, which restored the federal funding to the university, drew substantial praise from the Trump administration and conservatives. It also drew accusations of surrender and capitulation from some faculty, local politicians, and more. In the end, UPenn's president maintained the university remained committed to 'fostering a community that is welcoming, inclusive and open to all students, faculty and staff.' But Jameson acknowledged the deal with the administration was made because 'if unresolved, (the investigation) could have had significant and lasting implications for the University of Pennsylvania.' The conflict began in earnest in early February, when President Trump signed an executive action titled 'Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports.' 'You've been waiting a long time for this,' said Trump, flanked by dozens of young girls and female athletes at a ceremonial signing at the White House. 'So have I.' The following day, the Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights announced an investigation into three entities, including the University of Pennsylvania, for violating Title IX by 'denying women an equal opportunity to participate in sports.' Title IX prohibits sex-based discrimination at any academic institution that receives federal funding. The DOE specifically cited Lia Thomas, a transgender woman and UPenn swimmer, as the basis for the investigation into the university. In 2022, Thomas won the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) championship for Penn competing in the women's 500-yard freestyle. Since then, Thomas has become a symbol for those — including Trump — hoping to prevent transgender women from competing in women's sports. After the president's executive action, the NCAA announced a new policy limiting 'competition in women's sports to student-athletes assigned female at birth only.' UPenn said it complied with the new rules of the NCAA—and maintained it hadn't violated Title IX when Thomas competed three years ago, saying it was just following NCAA guidance at the time. But the university said it was blindsided when it learned 'through various news outlets' that the Trump administration had frozen $175 million of federal funding to the school anyway. Jameson said the funding cut impacted research, 'preventing hospital-acquired infections, drug screening against deadly viruses, quantum computing, protections against chemical warfare, and student loan programs.' 'We expect to continue to engage with (the DOE Office of Civil Rights), vigorously defending our position,' he wrote to the Penn community on March 25. By the end of April, the DOE's investigation concluded Penn had violated Title IX. But also that month, according to The Daily Pennsylvanian, Penn came to the negotiating table. The demands by the DOE's Office of Civil Rights to become Title IX compliant were relatively straightforward. UPenn had to issue a statement that it would comply with Title IX in its athletic programs, restore records and titles to the women who competed against Thomas and any other transgender women, and write apologies to those women who competed against Thomas. As UPenn's leadership released public statements on a new front with the Trump administration — visas for foreign students being threatened — internally, the university was working with the administration to comply with the Title IX investigation. 'UPenn came back to the table and asked us what they can do to make it right,' said Education Secretary Linda McMahon in remarks published Tuesday evening. 'We said, 'You have to completely rewrite your institutional policy.' They signed on the dotted line,' said McMahon. 'We said, 'You have to take these steps with records and reporting so this never happens again.' They signed on the dotted line.' 'We said, 'You owe (former UPenn swimmer Paula Scanlan), (former collegiate swimmer Riley Gaines), and the other female athletes you've wronged a formal written apology. On Penn letterhead. In 10 business days.' 'Even that provision made it into the agreement,' said McMahon. In a statement to the community, UPenn confirmed it agreed to these terms, reiterating that it believes it has always followed Title IX regulations under NCAA guidelines. On its athletics website, Thomas' swimming records set for UPenn are now a footnote in Penn Women's Swimming. CNN has reached out to Thomas for comment. On Wednesday morning, a White House official confirmed to CNN it had restored the $175 million in frozen funding. By Wednesday afternoon, the agreement had been trumpeted as a major victory for President Trump. 'About dang time,' wrote former UPenn swimmer Paula Scanlan on X, adding in another post, 'I got what I voted for!' 'A long overdue step in the right direction,' wrote Republican Pennsylvania Sen. Dave McCormick. 'Fantastic news,' posted Republican Texas Sen. Ted Cruz. But criticism spilled out as well. 'By following a path of political expediency at the expense of trans athletes, Penn makes all trans students, faculty, staff, and community members less safe, exposing them to renewed and emboldened harassment and discriminatory treatment,' wrote the UPenn chapter of the American Association of University Professors. 'This move is not about equity,' wrote Pennsylvania State Representative Rick Krajewski and Philadelphia City Councilmembers Jamie Gauthier and Rue Landau in a joint statement calling the deal a 'surrender.' 'It is about appeasing the Trump administration.' McMahon applauded UPenn's decision to comply, adding Tuesday, 'We advise every institution that is currently violating women's rights under Title IX to follow suit — not just in college sports, but in K-12 and every other institution covered by Title IX.' CNN's Betsy Klein and Amanda Musa contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store