
Fuel to AI Flight 171 engines cut off seconds before crash: Report
'At about 08:08:42 UTC (1:38pm, 42 seconds) and immediately thereafter, the engine 1 and engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another with a time gap of 01 sec,' stated the report, before stating: 'In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cutoff. The other pilot responded that he did not do so'.
The 15-page report, published exactly one month after the disaster that killed 260 people, provides the first official account of India's worst aviation accident in decades. Citing data from the black boxes, the report stated that moments after the aircraft left the tarmac, both fuel switches moved to the 'cutoff' position.
On the flight deck were captain Sumeet Sabharwal, 56, and first officer Clive Kunder, 32.
The crew restored fuel flow within 10 and 14 seconds respectively, triggering automatic engine restart sequences, but the Boeing 787 had already begun its irreversible descent toward a medical college hostel in Ahmedabad.
The report did not identify which remarks came from the captain versus the first officer, nor which pilot transmitted 'Mayday, Mayday, Mayday' before the crash.
The findings have fractured the global aviation community over their implications for the flight crew, with Indian aviators questioning its neutrality, while their western counterparts saw little explanation apart from deliberate human action for fuel switches that moved one second apart and required considerable force to operate.
What caused both fuel switches to transition from normal operation to cutoff position remains the investigation's central mystery. The preliminary report establishes facts without determining causation, leaving open possibilities ranging from mechanical failure to human error to electronic malfunction.
Civil aviation minister Ram Mohan Naidu urged caution. 'We care for the welfare and the well-being of pilots so let's not jump to any conclusions at this stage, let us wait for the final report,' he told reporters in Vishakhapatnam.
Minister of state for Civil Aviation Murlidhar Mohol emphasised the preliminary nature of the findings. 'The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau is an autonomous body that is doing good work. What they have submitted is a preliminary report. The investigation into the plane crash is still on,' he said.
Air India acknowledged the report while expressing solidarity with families. 'We continue to mourn the loss and are fully committed to providing support during this difficult time. We acknowledge receipt of the preliminary report released by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau today. Air India is working closely with stakeholders, including regulators,' the airline said.
Boeing deferred to investigators. 'Our thoughts remain with the loved ones of the passengers and crew on board Air India Flight 171, as well as everyone affected on the ground in Ahmedabad. We continue to support the investigation and our customers. We will defer to the AAIB to provide information about AI171,' a Boeing spokesperson said.
The report also painted in grim detail the extent of devastation at the crash site.
Wreckage analysis revealed the aircraft's violent disintegration across a debris field measuring approximately 1,000 by 400 feet. The vertical stabilizer separated early in the sequence, coming to rest 200 feet from the initial impact point – the rooftop of the hostel mess of BJ Medical College. Major components scattered across vast distances, with the flight deck structure found 650 feet from first contact with buildings.
The aircraft initially struck trees and an incineration chimney before impacting the medical college hostel's northeast wall at an eight-degree nose-up attitude with wings level. The right engine separated and came to rest on the roof, having struck a concrete tank, while the left engine was catapulted farther ahead, striking one of the hostel buildings at ground level.
Closed-circuit television captured the deployment of a ram air turbine—an emergency windmill that provides backup power—confirming complete engine shutdown. The device appeared in airport footage almost immediately after lift-off, indicating both engines had lost power generating capability.
Flight recorders documented Engine 1 showing signs of recovery during restart attempts while Engine 2 managed to relight but could not arrest its core speed deceleration. The Full Authority Digital Engine Control systems automatically managed restart sequences once fuel flow resumed, but insufficient altitude and time prevented successful recovery.
Other key findings ruled out alternative explanations: flap handle found in correct 5-degree takeoff position, landing gear lever in 'DOWN' position, thrust levers found near idle but flight data shows they remained forward until impact, good weather conditions with light winds, aircraft weight within normal limits and no evidence of bird strike.
The report noted fuel samples from airport bowsers tested satisfactory, though very limited fuel samples recovered from the aircraft are still being analysed.
The report states there are 'no recommended actions to B787-8 and/or GE GEnx-1B engine operators and manufacturers' at this stage, suggesting investigators found no systemic issues affecting the global fleet of over 1,100 Dreamliners.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Jane Street Sets Aside $564 Million as India Probe Continues
(Bloomberg) -- Jane Street Group LLC has deposited 48.4 billion rupees ($564 million) in an escrow account to comply with an order from India's securities regulator, part of an ongoing probe into allegations of market manipulation by the US trading giant. While Indian authorities had previously indicated the deposit would allow Jane Street to return to local markets after a ban imposed on July 3, the regulator's statement on Monday didn't clarify whether the firm has a green light to resume trading. The Securities and Exchange Board of India has accused Jane Street of manipulative transactions involving local options and shares — allegations that the firm has denied. Jane Street doesn't intend to immediately return to India's options market, a person familiar with the matter said, asking not to be named as the information is private. The firm didn't reply to emails seeking comment. India's bombshell allegations against Jane Street have gripped the financial industry, pitting one of the world's biggest and most secretive trading firms against regulators in the largest equity derivatives market by volume. What happens next will hinge on the findings of SEBI's further probes into Jane Street's trading activity as well as the firm's decision on whether to officially file an appeal. In its initial order, the regulator said its investigation into the firm's trades in the options, cash and futures market will continue. The probes will include activity involving the flagship indexes of National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. and BSE Ltd., Bloomberg News reported earlier this month. On Monday, SEBI said the US firm has requested for 'certain conditional restrictions' imposed in SEBI's interim order to be lifted, the regulator said in a statement Monday. The regulator added that it is reviewing the request. Jane Street made about 365 billion rupees ($4.3 billion) in overall gains from trading in Indian derivatives and the cash market during the period between January 2023 and March 2025, according to SEBI. Jane Street told staff on July 6 that it strongly rejected the premise and substance of SEBI's interim order, and that it was preparing a formal response to the regulator and assessing legal options. The firm said that what the regulator called 'intraday index manipulation' was an example of basic index arbitrage trading, a practice common in financial markets. The New York-based quantitative trader's next move remains unclear. It can appeal SEBI's order before the Securities Appellate Tribunal, while also reserving the right to respond to the allegations within the 21 days of the order. If the regulator finds the response satisfactory, it may reverse its interim order. Otherwise, SEBI is expected to issue a confirmatory order outlining a timeline for its probe, before serving a so-called show-cause notice. SEBI said that Jane Street used its 'immense trading, financial and technological prowess' to illegally manipulate markets. It alleged that the company, on weekly index options expiry days, influenced prices in the futures and cash market, and earned huge profits on its options wagers mostly at the expense of individual traders. Jane Street also traded in India's cash and equity futures before the ban through a local arm and units registered outside the country, according to SEBI's order. The regulator in its order had directed stock exchanges to closely monitor any future dealings and positions of Jane Street and its units, to ensure that they do not directly or indirectly indulge in what it called 'manipulative activity.' Jane Street's absence has impacted India's derivatives market, with the value of options traded plunging to a four-month low at the expiration of Nifty 50 Index options on Thursday at NSE. On Monday, shares of BSE jumped as much as 4.5% in Mumbai, while those of Jane Street's local trading partner Nuvama Wealth Management Ltd. climbed 2.6%. Moneycontrol earlier reported that Jane Street had deposited the sum, citing people it didn't identify. (Updates with more context starting in second paragraph.) More stories like this are available on


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
US Embassy warns: Visas can be revoked anytime for rule violations — What travellers should know
The US Embassy in India issued a stern reminder to visa holders, stating that violating US laws or immigration rules could lead to immediate visa revocation and deportation. The announcement, shared through an official post on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), emphasised that US visa monitoring does not end after a visa is granted. 'U.S. visa screening does not stop after a visa is issued. We continuously check visa holders to ensure they follow all U.S. laws and immigration rules – and we will revoke their visas and deport them if they don't,' the US Embassy wrote. The warning comes in the wake of new measures rolled out under the Trump administration's ongoing crackdown on illegal immigration, with visa vetting protocols becoming increasingly stringent. Social media under scrutiny A key part of the new tightening involves the monitoring of social media activity of non-immigrant visa applicants. The US Government has directed applicants under F (student), M (vocational student), and J (exchange visitor) visa categories to turn their social media profiles 'public' to allow for background checks. On Friday (July 11), a day before the deportation warning, the Embassy had posted another advisory, cautioning applicants not to falsify or omit social media information during the visa process. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Most Successful Way of Intraday Trading is "Market Profile" TradeWise Learn More Undo Read more: No more shoe checks: TSA updates airport screening rules; what flyers need to know Applicants are now required to disclose all social media handles used in the past five years on their DS-160 visa application form. 'Applicants certify that the information in their visa application is true and correct before they sign and submit,' the embassy noted. Zero tolerance on visa fraud This is not the first time in recent weeks that the US Embassy has raised red flags about visa fraud. On June 28, it had issued a clear warning that those attempting to misrepresent or forge information during the visa process would be held accountable. The statement read: 'If you break US law, you will be punished with significant criminal penalties.' The cumulative message from the US administration is unmistakable: transparency, accuracy, and lawful conduct are non-negotiable when it comes to entering and remaining in the United States on a visa. What it means for Indian applicants India remains one of the top countries for student and work visa applications to the US. These latest announcements serve as a reminder for Indian applicants and visa holders to stay compliant with US immigration laws, avoid misrepresentation, and ensure that their social media activity does not raise concerns during background checks. Read more: 6 unmissable stops that make Chandigarh to Shimla hill tour worthwhile The embassy's travel advisory also highlights that the US reserves the right to reassess and revoke visas at any point if a violation is found. This means that receiving a visa is not a final clearance, and any future behaviour, online or offline, can affect one's legal status in the country. As the US intensifies its immigration scrutiny under current policies, applicants are urged to be truthful, diligent, and informed at every stage of the visa process.


The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Nimisha Priya case: The last-minute efforts to save Malayali nurse from execution in Yemen
The story so far: Malayali nurse Nimisha Priya, who is on death row at the Central prison in Yemen's capital Sanaa for the alleged murder of a Yemeni national, is scheduled to be executed on July 16, according to unconfirmed reports. The Supreme Court on July 14, 2025 (Monday) heard a plea filed by Save Nimisha Priya International Action Council, an organisation fighting to save her life from the gallows. The Centre told the apex court that 'the Government of India is doing whatever is utmost possible' in the matter. Attorney General R. Venkataramani told a Supreme Court Bench that 'having regard to the sensitivity and status of Yemen as a place, there is nothing much the Government of India can do.' The news about her reported execution emerged in the public domain after Samuel Jerome Baskaran, a member of the Save Nimisha Priya International Action Council who has been based in Yemen since 1999, told the media last week that he had received a message from the chairman of the central prison in Sanaa that Nimisha's execution has been scheduled on July 16. The counsel representing the council in the apex court had stated that the option to pay 'blood money (diyah)' to the murdered man's family and be pardoned for the crime was still open. How did she end up behind the bars? Nimisha, a native of Kollengode in Palakkad district, had left for Yemen in 2008 with dreams of securing a better future for her parents, who worked as domestic helps. She joined as a nurse at a government-run hospital in Sanaa initially. She worked there until 2011, before returning to Kerala to marry Tomy Thomas, a native of Thodupuzha in Idukki district. The civil war that resulted in the Houthi rebels with links to Iran gaining control over Sanaa in September 2014 shattered her dreams. The Government of India issued an advisory in April 2015 asking Indian nationals not to travel to Yemen owing to the adverse political and security situation triggered by the rift between the Houthis and the Saudi-led coalition forces in Yemen. Though she left for Yemen a month earlier before the internal strife escalated, her husband and daughter had to stay back in Kerala in view of the visa restrictions. In 2015, Nimisha quit her low-paying hospital job to start her own clinic. However, Yemeni law required its nationals to own and operate businesses, forcing her to partner with Yemeni national Talal Abdo Mahdi to set up the venture. A petition filed by Nimisha's mother, Premakumari, in December 2023 before the Delhi High Court, seeking the Centre's permission to visit her daughter, stated that her relationship with Mahdi deteriorated over time after he allegedly began torturing her and siphoned off all the clinic's revenue. In July 2017, desperate for a way out, Nimisha sought advice from a jail warden near her clinic where Mahdi had previously been imprisoned for various offences. The warden suggested sedating Mahdi to recover her passport. However, an apparent overdose resulted in his death. Nearly a month later, Nimisha was arrested near Yemen's border with Saudi Arabia after Mahdi's dismembered body was discovered in a water tank. She was sentenced to death by a trial court in Sanaa in 2020 and the Houthi Supreme Council had dismissed her appeal in November 2023 while keeping the option of paying blood money open. What were the measures initiated to secure her release from prison? The efforts to release her from prison gained momentum after the formation of Save Nimisha Priya International Action Council. The collective, comprising elected representatives, lawyers and human rights activists, was formed to ensure Nimisha's access to justice and raise funds for blood money — the compensation paid to the victim's family in accordance with Shariah law — should the victim's family agree to pardon her. Their intervention also helped Premakumari to travel to Yemen to meet her daughter in prison and seek pardon for her with the family of Mahdi. The Delhi High Court, on a plea filed by her and the council, asked the Centre in December 2023 to relax its 2017 notification, which barred Indian passport holders from travelling to Yemen. She has been staying with Samuel Jerome since April 23, 2024. The Ministry of External Affairs had announced on December 31, 2024, that the Government of India was extending all possible assistance to Nimisha. Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan has appealed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi to intervene with Yemeni authorities and save her. Why did the attempts to halt her death sentence fail to yield expected results? The case had posed significant challenges due to India's lack of official ties with the Iran-aligned Houthi rebels. The hurdles in reaching out to the family of the victim also delayed the efforts. Samuel had claimed in December last that the negotiations came to a halt following the release in the delay of the second instalment of the fee asked by the lawyer engaged on behalf of Nimisha to carry out the talks with the family members and tribal leaders. However, the council had clarified that the lawyer had demanded a total of about 40,000 dollars as pre-negotiation fee. About 20,000 dollars were transferred to him through the Indian Embassy in Yemen in July 2024. Subhash Chandran K. R., member of the council and Supreme Court lawyer, had then said that the release of the second instalment was put on hold as the council had asked the lawyer to update on the progress of the negotiations and the details about how the initial funding was utilised. It was later transferred in December, 2024, he said. What are the options left before Nimisha? The options before her are limited as the execution can be halted only if the family of the victim agreed to pardon her. There has been no official word still on any such response from them. Samuel had said last week that the prison authorities would not have scheduled the execution date without informing the family of the victim, indicating that they have given their consent. There was also no word yet on whether the family had demanded any blood money.