Children And Families In Poverty Let Down By Today's Budget
Looking at Budget 2025, I dont see the investment thats needed to significantly reduce, and ultimately pave the way to ending child poverty,' says Chief Childrens Commissioner Dr Claire Achmad.
Budget 2025 doesn't address the urgent needs of many of our country's children and young people facing the greatest disadvantage, says Chief Children's Commissioner Dr Claire Achmad.
'Budget decisions have a direct and significant impact on our country's 1.2 million mokopuna – nearly quarter of our population – and on their families and whānau. The decisions made in the Budget are an opportunity to ensure children and young people facing disadvantage are invested in, so they can flourish.
'Looking at Budget 2025, I don't see the investment that's needed to significantly reduce, and ultimately pave the way to ending child poverty. For example, how will this Budget significantly help the 156,000 children in our communities who are living in material hardship?
'Today, I repeat my call that is becoming increasingly urgent: the Government must make ending child poverty a project of national significance, working across the Parliament, so real, meaningful change in children's lives is supported and sustained, now and into the future. Today's Budget is a missed opportunity for the Government to show that bold leadership, so that children today don't grow up in poverty, meaning better lives both today and tomorrow.
'The reality is that right now, we are continuing to let children down on the most basic things: having enough healthy food, safe and healthy housing, and their physical and mental health. For mokopuna Māori, as well as mokopuna whaikaha and Pacific mokopuna, the impacts of things like food insecurity are even more extreme. From a children's rights perspective, Budget 2025 does not play the part it needed to, so that all children in our country are growing up thriving with an adequate standard of living. This is basic stuff that we can't afford to keep letting children and families down on.'
The Chief Children's Commissioner notes that the Government's social investment fund does provide opportunities to invest in children, young people and families especially those in the most complex circumstances.
'I welcome the focus on mokopuna and families in the social investment three pilots that have been announced. I'm keen to understand how these pilots will be evaluated, so their impact will be well understood. Alongside this, I emphasise the urgency of the need for real, practical action and investment now across the three priority areas outlined in the Government's own Child and Youth Strategy: support for children and families in the first 2000 days of children's lives, reducing material hardship affecting children, and preventing harm.
'I acknowledge the crucial role that education plays in children and young people's lives, so I am pleased to see that the Budget places a significant focus on education. My team and I will be taking some time to dig into the detail of the Budget's education initiatives, especially relating to learning support. I also want to understand more detail about the changes to the Jobseeker Benefit, in particular about how this might impact on children and young people who have been in or who are in State care and/or custody.
'As their independent advocate, I hear directly from children and young people about what matters most in their world,' says Dr Achmad.
'They want to have their basic needs met – to have a warm, safe, dry home to grow up in, and enough food for their family. Young people want to be involved in decision-making about their own future.
As one mokopuna told me recently: 'We, too, are concerned about what goes on in our world, especially our country. What happens now WILL affect our future.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Spinoff
41 minutes ago
- The Spinoff
Government under fire over sweeping changes to voting rules
The government's electoral overhaul introduces new restrictions critics say will disproportionately affect young, Māori and lower-income voters, writes Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. Enrolment deadline brought forward The government has unveiled wide-ranging changes to New Zealand's voting laws, including scrapping same-day enrolment and tightening rules on campaigning and donations. Under the proposals, from the next election, voters must be enrolled by midnight on the Sunday before advance voting begins – 13 days out from election day. Justice minister Paul Goldsmith said the current system, brought in by Labour in 2020 with NZ First's backing, places 'too much strain' on the Electoral Commission and delays final results. 'We used to be able to get an outcome of the election in two weeks,' Goldsmith said. 'It went out to three weeks … If we do nothing, it'll be longer than that.' Goldsmith insisted the changes are 'significant, but necessary'. But critics have called foul, reports Thomas Manch in The Post (paywalled). Green Party electoral reform spokesperson Celia Wade-Brown described it as a 'dark day for our democracy', and Labour's justice spokesperson Duncan Webb said the move was 'despicable'. Critics have raised concerns that the changes will disproportionately affect Māori and Pasifika, young people, and those in unstable housing, with Webb noting that people with 'busy lives' are exactly the kind the system should be helping to vote. Seymour's 'dropkicks' jab draws backlash Government messaging on the changes took a sharp turn when deputy prime minister David Seymour dismissed affected voters as 'dropkicks'. 'Frankly, I'm a bit sick of dropkicks that can't get themselves organised to follow the law … then going along and voting to tax away hard-working people's money,' Seymour told reporters. Webb responded in Parliament, calling the remarks 'outrageous' and showing 'disrespect' to over 100,000 New Zealanders who enrolled on election day in 2023, reports Glenn McConnell in Stuff. While Seymour focused on people failing to enrol in time, the law would also partly disenfranchise voters who had recently moved – such as students or renters – by disallowing changes of address during the advance voting period, notes Laura Walters in Newsroom. In 2023, 134,000 voters updated their enrolment details during this window, and under the new rules, their party vote might count, but their electorate vote would not. Does comparing ourselves with Australia make sense? Goldsmith defended the proposed 13-day cut-off by pointing to Australia, where voters must enrol 26 days before election day. 'I have every confidence New Zealand can manage within the 13-day deadline,' he said. Speaking to Checkpoint's Melissa Chan-Green, constitutional law expert Andrew Geddis called the comparison flawed, noting that voting is compulsory in Australia. 'They put a lot of sticks in the system,' he said. 'If you're not enrolled and don't vote, they chase you and fine you.' Geddis said it was misleading to suggest New Zealand could replicate the same compliance without a similar level of enforcement. He also questioned whether speeding up final election results was worth disenfranchising tens of thousands of voters, pointing out that special votes – which would be dramatically reduced under the new law – historically favour left-leaning parties. After the 2023 election, special votes shifted two seats away from National and toward Te Pāti Māori and the Greens. Geddis conceded that counting special votes was taking longer than in the past, but noted the Electoral Commission had issued a set of recommendations on how it could be sped up. 'That recommendation did not include what the government's doing,' he said. 'The government is doing something off its own bat, where the people who run the elections did not think it was necessary.' 'Manurewa Marae rule' prompts ban on kai near polling places Another headline reform is a new $10,000 offence targeting 'treating' near polling places – defined as offering free food, drink or entertainment within 100 metres while voting is taking place. The move appears inspired by the controversy at Manurewa Marae, which served as a polling place for the 2023 election and offered hāngī and other refreshments during the voting period. The Electoral Commission investigated a number of complaints of treating at the marae but concluded there was no breach, citing a lack of 'corrupt intent' and describing the provision of kai as manaakitanga. Geddis said the law change amounts to legislative overreach: 'A hammer has been taken out to smash the walnut.' While the government says the rule will bring clarity, it also risks deterring community engagement and complicating efforts to boost turnout in marginalised areas. As with many of the bill's provisions, the new rule's perceived alignment with government interests will likely come under intense scrutiny in coming weeks.
1News
2 hours ago
- 1News
Same-day election enrolments scrapped in electoral law overhaul
Same-day enrolment for elections is set to be scrapped, with the Government announcing legislation to overhaul electoral laws it says have become unsustainable. Previously, voters have been able to turn up to the booth at any time during the advance voting period and enrol at the same time, as well as on election day, with their vote being counted as a special vote. Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said late enrolments, while well intentioned, were resource intensive and had placed too much strain on the system. Ballot boxes (file image). (Source: "The final vote count used to take two weeks. Last election, it took three," he said. ADVERTISEMENT "If we leave things as they are, it could well take even longer in future elections. The 20-day timeframe for a final result will likely already be challenging to achieve at the next election without changes." The Government has agreed to close enrolment before advance voting begins, with people needing to enrol or update their details by midnight on the Sunday before advance voting started on the Monday morning (in other words, 13 days before election day). The legislation set a requirement of 12 days advance voting at each election, and the changes would mean special vote processing could get underway sooner. Justice minister Paul Goldsmith says late enrolments, while well intentioned, are resource intensive and has placed too much strain on the system. (Source: The Electoral Amendment Bill contained some other changes, including the introduction of automatic enrolment updates so the Electoral Commission could update a person's address directly following a data match. The process would not be used for new enrolments, to allow for Māori to choose whether to enrol on the general roll or Māori roll when they first enrolled. Postal requirements for enrolment would be removed, to acknowledge the decline of postal services. ADVERTISEMENT Free food, drink or entertainment within 100m of a voting place would be made an offence, punishable with a fine of $10,000. "There has been some confusion in the past around what is and isn't treating. This will make the rules crystal clear," Goldsmith said. The ban on prisoner voting, which the Government had already announced, would also be included in the bill. In addition, the donation threshold for reporting the names of donors would be adjusted from $5000 to $6000 to account for inflation.
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Enrolment changes could have 'significant' impact on democratic participation
Photo: NZ ELECTORAL COMMISSION Justice officials say closing enrolments ahead of advance voting could result in lower turnout and reduce confidence in the electoral system. And electoral law experts are also questioning why the changes need to stretch for the whole advanced voting period. As part of a suite of Electoral Act changes, same-day election enrolments are set to be scrapped . It reverses a change brought in for the 2020 election, which allowed for enrolments and updating details up to and including on election day. It then goes even further, ensuring voters have to enrol or update their details before advance voting begins. The government is also legislating to require 12 days of advance voting. The changes are primarily being made to improve the timeliness of the official vote count, and so give voters certainty of a result. The growth in the number of special votes has been putting a strain on processing a result, with the timeframe for a final vote count stretching into three weeks at the last election. The justice minister said the uncertainty could be avoided if more people enrolled in a timely manner. "We never know what the circumstances are going to be after an election," Paul Goldsmith said. "We don't know what pressure the country will be under. An extra week, extra two weeks, if we do nothing could be longer, then that just creates extra uncertainty that we can easily avoid by people enrolling in a timely fashion." In its Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS), the Ministry of Justice did not recommend the option of closing enrolment earlier. "Its impact on reducing special votes is uncertain, while its impact on democratic participation could be significant," officials said. Special votes take much longer to process than a standard vote, as they need to go through a lot more scrutiny. Officials noted a positive aspect of closing enrolments earlier was it would mean enrolment processing was done by the close of polling, allowing special vote counting to begin promptly. The ministry acknowledged there was value in a timely and smooth transfer of power following an election, but it was uncertain whether any package of changes could reduce the count timeframes. Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii The RIS acknowledged the growth of special votes in both volume and as a proportion of the total number of votes, with the largest proportion being those who were not enrolled or needed to update their details. About 300,000 to 350,000 people cast a special vote because they were not enrolled, or not enrolled at the correct address by writ day, or on the dormant roll. Māori, Asian, and Pasifika communities, as well as younger people, are more likely to cast special votes. "This option will create a barrier to participation and may be seen as a step backwards for accessibility, in light of changes to enable greater participation over recent elections. Closing enrolment earlier could harm confidence and trust if people are not able to vote because they missed the deadline or if more votes are disallowed," officials said. At the 2020 election, the rules were changed to allow people to enrol to vote on election day, as they have been able during the advanced voting period since the 1990s. It was a response to what the then-government said was 19,000 voters feeling "disenfranchised" by being turned away in 2017. Goldsmith did not believe the new bill would mark a return to that disenfranchisement. "We've got to balance the fact that we want to have an outcome of an election in a timely manner. It does actually matter if we have an uncertain outcome. People don't start coalition negotiations until they know the final outcome, and if that's drifting into four weeks than that creates more uncertainty." Electoral law expert Graeme Edgeler doubted the changes would prevent people from knowing the outcome of an election, as the Election Night result usually gave a good indication of the makeup of the next government. "Two weeks or three weeks, does it really matter? There's nothing stopping the politicians who look like they've been elected from negotiation before the final special votes are out," he said. "The results, we know they tended to change one or two seats or something like that. The time delay just doesn't seem like a particularly good reason for this." Electoral law expert Graeme Edgeler. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Edgeler did not think removing the ability to enrol on election day would not make too much of a difference, as it had only been in place for two elections. But he was concerned at closing the enrolment period before advanced voting started. "Requiring people to have a think about the election two weeks before the actual vote happens is probably more of a big change than the same-day enrolments." On Election Day 2023, 110,000 people enrolled or updated their details. Labour's justice spokesperson Duncan Webb questioned whether the trade-off to get votes counted faster was worth it. "Counting the vote took an extra week, last election. I think 110,000 votes are worth it. I think every single New Zealander is entitled to have a voice in who represents them in this place. If it takes another week, that's OK by me because democracy is worth waiting for," he said. Celia Wade-Brown, the Green Party's spokesperson for democracy and electoral reform, said it would lead to fewer people participating in democracy. "This government is reducing the number of people, particularly those who are mobile, who move around, who change addresses, and preventing them from voting. This should be a government for all New Zealanders." Labour Party justice spokesperson Duncan Webb. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Opposition parties were not consulted on the Electoral Act changes. University of Otago law professor Andrew Geddis said some parts of electoral law, such as changing the voting age or the term of Parliament, were protected by entrenchment provisions, requiring a 75 percent majority of MPs or a referendum. Everything else was left to a simple majority of votes in Parliament like any other piece of legislation. "Because the government has a majority in Parliament, if it wants to do this, it can. It's just a question of whether it's the right thing to do," he told Checkpoint . "Democracy is more than just what a current government wants it to be. It has to be, what is the best rules for our polity, us as a group, to choose our leaders." Geddis said the growth in special votes had been causing strain, but questioned why the government had taken this option. "The government's response has essentially been to bring down a guillotine and say, 'well tough.' All of those people who haven't enrolled or changed their details before voting starts, 'tough. Your votes just won't count. We're just not going to listen to you.'" While officials did not recommend closing the enrolment period, they were in favour of introducing automatic enrolment updates. This option has formed part of Goldsmith's package of reforms, and would allow the Electoral Commission to update people's enrolment details using data from other government agencies. The option would make it easier for electors to keep enrolments up to date, and reduce the number of special votes over time. It was something Edgeler was in favour of. "Allowing the government to do the work for you in that area, you've told one government department you've moved and got a new address, allowing that to be used for election purposes as well will hopefully mean that fewer people need to update their enrollment details during the election period itself." He said there would need to be a significant publicity campaign from the Electoral Commission reminding people of the deadlines. While that would be up to the Electoral Commission in how that was communicated, Goldsmith said they had received more funding at the Budget. "Their core role up to now is to encourage people to enrol. But they've also been saying 'but by the way, you don't really need to, you can just rock up and enrol on election day.' "And so we've now got a clear message: get yourself organised, get enrolled, make sure you're enrolled before election day starts."
