Dear Tim Davie, here are 10 easy ways to get Reform voters to watch the BBC
The corporation's lofty condescension to those uppity plebs was summed up by a BBC Politics tweet which described the newly-elected Reform UK Mayor of Greater Lincolnshire, Dame Andrea Jenkyns, as 'the former Greggs worker and Miss UK finalist'. Never mind that she'd also been a Conservative MP and minister. Mind you, give me a Greggs worker and beauty queen over the coldly supercilious Naga Munchetty any day.
BBC staff are quick to complain about 'misogyny' unless the target is someone they consider to be 'far-Right' and almost certainly Brexity (Eeuw!) in which case all feminist sensitivities are off. That snobbish, snide remark about the force that is Dame Andrea provoked a huge backlash, quite rightly, and the BBC hastily removed the tweet saying, 'We acknowledge the tone of the post was wrong, and it has been taken down'. Still, they had revealed their true colours – Rayner Red and Lib Dem Yellow – and they weren't pretty.
Now – oh, joy! – we are told the BBC is holding talks about how to win over Reform-voting viewers amid fears their views are 'under-represented by the broadcaster'. You don't say! I reckon many Reform supporters have already cancelled their licence fees in disgust. Still, to appeal to any that remain, senior executives including director-general Tim Davie and chair Samir Shah are said to have discussed plans to overhaul the BBC's news and drama output to tackle 'low-trust issues' among Reform voters.
Deborah Turness, BBC News boss, apparently briefed the broadcaster's board on how to ensure the views of Reformers were being given enough airtime. The BBC is understood to be keen to ensure it represents all audiences and their concerns, suggesting the broadcaster may seek to boost its coverage of issues such as immigration.
Well, that's a first. I can count on the fingers of one hand the occasions when the BBC has suggested that immigration is anything other than an unmitigated joy or treated anyone arguing to cut numbers as anything other than some racist pariah. I still remember the pained wince of Laura Kuenssberg when Kemi Badenoch confirmed that she did indeed believe that not all cultures are equally valid – 'cultures that believe in child marriage?' quipped the Tory leader devastatingly.
A number of key BBC presenters may need to be sedated before being required to challenge their own faith in open borders and slavish loyalty to the EU.
Why, you might ask, has it taken the prospect (um, threat) of a Reform government to make our supposedly national broadcaster feel it has to make sure that all viewers' experiences and backgrounds are portrayed on screen? Well, while Reform has not said it would scrap the BBC licence fee, it believes it is 'not sustainable' in its current form. Playing nice with a future prime minister Farage may stick in the craw, but the Beeb don't have much choice but to swallow hard.
If the BBC is serious, here are my top 10 tips for Reform-friendly programming:
In anything. Literally anything and everything. Call The Midwife, Springwatch, sewing contests, anchoring News at Ten, chairing Question Time. Clarkson's Farm on Amazon Prime is rightly adored for its host's no-nonsense style and contempt for fashionable pieties. Peak Reform! Best of all for attracting Nigel fans, restore Top Gear with the original, irrepressible cast of petrolheads. Clarkson once said the most British saying of all was, 'Oh, for God's sake.' He speaks directly to Reform voters.
No need to sack Gary Lineker (a Reform imperative if Mr Gaza hadn't already stepped down!), but the BBC could help restore national pride and joy by buying the rights to broadcast all England Test matches. Many Reform voters are older and may struggle to afford a Sky subscription just to watch the game they love. The national broadcaster should be broadcasting our nation's sports.
After the woke ratings disaster of Ncuti Gatwa's Doctor Who, this cult show is on death row. Former doctor's companion Billie Piper is rumoured to be lined up to be the second female Doctor. A better idea would be to cast Piper's former husband Laurence Fox. As well as possessing the ideal hectic energy, dancing wit and sonorous delivery for the role, Fox was cancelled and lost his acting career after appearing on Question Time, where he said that Britain was not racist. It was, he insisted, the warmest, most welcoming and tolerant country on Earth. A belief which is pretty much universally shared by Reform voters. Uncancelling Fox would be proof of the BBC's new openness to views it finds uncomfortable as well as giving that endangered acting species – the posh white male – a role he would undoubtedly make his own.
While you're at it, drop the relentless diversity casting of BBC drama. It's patronising and silly. This may come as a shock, but there are actually some police officers in the UK who are not married to a spouse from an ethnic minority – not that you'd know it from watching every single thriller or police procedural. Viewers – both Reform voters and others – would occasionally like to see the country they live in accurately represented, not as it is viewed by a producer who lives in on-trend east London.
BBC News bulletins to feature subjects discussed down the pub not by non-binary Marxist postgraduates called Umberto in Broadcasting House, e.g. our energy bills are horrendous and net zero is clearly madness. Maybe occasionally suggest that it's 'green taxes' not the 'war in Ukraine' which is giving Britain the highest energy bills in the developed world. It's what Reform voters believe after all.
Every time a journalist uses the term 'far-Right' they must also use 'far-Left' (which, mysteriously, we never hear on the BBC). ie the 'far-Left' Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner.
To be stated every time the war with Israel is mentioned, and no equivocation.
An ambitious new factual history series which travels back into our nation's past and discovers, astonishingly, that Britons weren't always the biggest bastards imaginable.
Headliners, the just-cancelled GB News late-night comic news review show, to go out at 11pm on BBC Two. An unfamiliar, Right-wingish slant on current events. Reform voters will love.
Do please tell me your suggestions for a Reform-friendly BBC in the comments below.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
5 minutes ago
- Fox News
Farage torches UK minister over 'disgusting' predator jab in free speech clash
Leader of right-wing Reform UK Nigel Farage demanded an apology on Tuesday after the head of U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's tech branch accused the conservative Member of Parliament (MP) of "siding" with sexual predators amid clashes over a new online safety law. In remarks from Reform UK's headquarters, Farage said accusations levied at him earlier in the day by Technology Secretary Peter Kyle were "disgusting" and "below the belt," and he called on the labor secretary to retract his comments. Farage's demands came after Kyle said the right-wing party's insistence that they will repeal the law if they gain a majority and sweep No 10 in the next general election, was akin to "turning the clock back to the time when strange adults…[could] get in touch via messaging apps with children." "We have people out there who are extreme pornographers, peddling hate, peddling violence. Nigel Farage is on their side," Kyle claimed in a Sky News interview earlier on Tuesday. "Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'll be perpetrating his crimes online," Kyle added, in reference to a British media personality who was found to have preyed on "hundreds" of victims and sexually abused children. "And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side." Farage questioned "Just how low can the Labor government sink" amid their flagging poll numbers. Kyle took to social media to refuse to back off his statements and said, "If you want to overturn the Online Safety Act you are on the side of predators. It is as simple as that." The clash over the internet-based laws, which Farage has described as "borderline dystopian," is just the latest spat unfolding in the U.K. over freedom of speech concerns — a fight that has been ongoing for decades after a 2003 law made it illegal to intentionally "cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another" with online posts, reported The Times. The report found that nearly 3,400 people were arrested for violating the law in 2016, and criminalizing online posts remains a point of concern for many in the U.K. One such example is the case of Lee Joseph Dunn, who posted three images and comments on his Facebook page in July 2024 which were deemed to be "grossly offensive" and which "risked worsening community tensions." The images reportedly depicted Asian men with knives, and Dunn's comments apparently suggested they could illegally immigrate to the U.K. and move into British communities. Dunn, who took down the posts and apologized, was sentenced to eight weeks for the posts. In response to the sentence, Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor for CPS North West Janet Potter said, "This conviction should be a stark reminder to so-called keyboard warriors: online actions have consequences." Concerns over non-internet-based freedom of speech restrictions have also arisen in recent years, as in the 2022 case involving Adam Smith-Connor, who was arrested for quietly praying for his aborted son within a buffer zone of an abortion clinic and forced to pay roughly $12,000 in fines. Divisions over the Online Safety Act have escalated in recent months after the law, which was first introduced in 2023, put the legal onus on social media companies and online platforms to protect users, particularly children, from criminal and harmful material through algorithm-based policies and age restrictions in March. However, some have argued the law oversteps and now risks violating freedom of speech by forcing social media companies to "censor" anti-government content. When President Donald Trump was asked on Monday while sitting next to Starmer whether he was concerned about his own social media platform, Truth Social, Trump jokingly responded, "I only say good things about him and his country." Starmer replied to the question and said, "We're not censoring anyone." Failure to comply with the new legal rules could mean any platform or social media company is hit with a fine of up to 10% of a firm's global turnover or nearly $24 million, whichever is greater. The U.K.-based fight was renewed this month after new restrictions under the law came into effect that require online platforms to take action to prevent children from accessing content relating to self-harm, dangerous pranks or challenges, suicide, eating disorders, pornography, and violent or bullying-related content.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Britain's self-inflicted Afghanistan data leak disaster
When a news story bursts into the headlines in the U.K. and consumes all the oxygen for several days, it can be difficult to know whether it is a domestic uproar or something that is reaching an international audience. For all the fevered debate here, it seems that what we are calling 'the Afghan data leak scandal' has not attracted much notice in America. Perhaps we should be grateful. To sum up, in February 2022, a Royal Marine at U.K. Special Forces headquarters emailed a spreadsheet that he thought contained the names of around 150 Afghan nationals who had applied to come to Britain, having assisted U.K. forces in Afghanistan. In fact, it had the details of 18,714 Afghans, as well as some Special Forces personnel, senior defense officials, members of Parliament and intelligence officers. In the wrong hands, it could have been a pre-prepared Taliban kill list. This was a catastrophic breach of data security. The Ministry of Defence was unaware of this loss of data for 18 months, until some of the information appeared in a Facebook group in August 2023. Defence Secretary Ben Wallace applied to the High Court for a temporary injunction on reporting the leak so that the security implications could be assessed and appropriate measures put in place to protect those at risk. Wallace was, however, standing down. His successor, Grant Shapps, who took on responsibility for the issue. Astonishingly, the High Court judge who considered the Ministry of Defence's application, Justice Robin Knowles, went even further: He granted what is referred to as a 'super-injunction,' which not only prevents reporting of the issue covered by the injunction, but disclosure of the existence of the injunction itself. The use of this kind of measure by the government is unprecedented, and it meant that there was no public or parliamentary scrutiny of the data loss, because very few people even knew it had occurred. Those who knew the full extent of the situation were extremely few: Shapps as defence secretary and the armed forces minister, James Heappey; Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and his deputy, Oliver Dowden; Labour's defense spokesman, John Healey, who is now defence secretary; the speaker of the House of Commons, Lindsay Hoyle; the media organizations whom it silenced; precious few others. The current prime minister, Keir Starmer, was not informed at that point. Under the cloak of secrecy — the super-injunction's duration was extended twice in 2024 — a new resettlement scheme was hastily introduced which extended to 900 individuals affected, along with 3,600 family members. When Starmer's Labour government took office in July 2024, only Healey, the incoming defence secretary, knew the full situation. Although he told the House of Commons when the super-injunction was lifted that 'it has been deeply uncomfortable to be constrained from reporting to this House,' it was in place for slightly longer under Labour than it had been under the previous Conservative government. A review was conducted by Paul Rimmer, a former deputy chief of defence intelligence, which concluded that 'there is little evidence of intent by the Taliban to conduct a campaign of retribution against' those who assisted U.K. and coalition forces. The various resettlement schemes for Afghan nationals have now been closed down. Inevitably, the current government is seeking to blame its predecessor. But that will not wash. Not only did Starmer and Healey have a year to rescind the injunction, but the prime minister's office will not rule out seeking such an instrument in the future. The government did not inform the Intelligence and Security Committee, the independent oversight body of these kinds of issues, and it has not been frank with the National Audit Office, the U.K.'s public spending watchdog. The Ministry of Defence is a secretive organization by instinct. It parts with even the most harmless information under duress. Many will find it hard to avoid the conclusion that when a judge offered such a wide-ranging court order to prevent scrutiny or comment, it was as if Christmas had come early. Not only could challenging questions be avoided, they would never even be asked, because most legislators were unaware there was anything to ask questions about. The eventual cost of the debacle is not clear, but it will be billions of pounds. That it touches on the ultra-sensitive subject of immigration compounds the damage done. Some have called it the worst data breach in British history; sadly it is part of a pattern at the Ministry of Defence, which reported 569 incidents of data loss in 2023 to 2024. The most damaging aspect, however, is the corrosive effect on public trust, already at a historic low. Those inclined to believe overblown tales of 'the deep state' have been provided with fresh ammunition — the government using the courts to prevent parliamentary scrutiny and media reporting of an issue for two years. It should not have happened. It cannot happen again. But the government will struggle to make voters believe that. Eliot Wilson is a freelance writer on politics and international affairs and the co-founder of Pivot Point Group. He was senior official in the U.K. House of Commons from 2005 to 2016, including serving as a clerk of the Defence Committee and secretary of the U.K. delegation to the NATO Parliamentary Assembly.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘No Other Land' Collaborator Shot Dead By Israeli Settler In West Bank
Palestinian journalist and community leader Odeh Hathalin (aka Awdah Hathaleen), who worked with directors Basel Adra and Yuval Abraham on their Oscar-winning documentary No Other Land, has been shot dead by an Israeli settler in the Occupied West Bank. In a post on X, Israeli journalist and documentarian Abraham reported that Hathalin was shot in the chest on Monday by an Israeli settler. More from Deadline BBC, Reuters & Other World News Orgs Urge Israeli Authorities To Let Journalists Facing "Threat Of Starvation" In And Out Of Gaza Syrian TV Presenter Flees Studio Following Airstrike; Israeli Defense Minister Posts Video With Caption: "The Heavy Blows Have Started" Jerusalem Film Festival Issues Statement Ahead Of Upcoming Edition: "We Stand At A Moment Of Deep Pain & Uncertainty" The director said the man had been identified by local residents as Yinon Levi, who is among a group of Israeli settlers West Bank, who have been sanctioned by the UK and the EU, while Donald Trump rescinded restrictions at the beginning of his presidency this year. The post also featured footage of Levi brandishing a gun and firing wildly, although it was not clear whether the images were related to the incident in which Hathalin was killed. No Other Land, which won the Best Documentary Academy award this year, documents the cycle of destruction and harassment on a collection of hamlets and their Bedouin communities which lie on the Palestinian West Bank side of the 1949 Green Line. Their future has been at stake since Israel declared much of the land they are situated on a live-fire training zone in the 1980s, with their inhabitants coming under further pressure from the construction of illegal Israeli settlements on their doorstep such as Carmel and Ma'on. Hathalin's killing is reported to have taken place in a village close to Hebron and comes amid growing violence settler across the entire West Bank in recent months. There has been widespread condemnation of the killing. France's Ministry For Europe and Foreign Affairs put out a statement on Tuesday voicing the country's 'immense sadness' on learning of 'the murder' of Odeh Hathalin. 'France condemns this murder in the strongest possible terms, as well as all the deliberate violence perpetrated by extremist settlers against the Palestinian population, which has been increasing across the West Bank, particularly in Kafr Malik and the Christian village of Taybeh in recent weeks,' read the statement. 'This violence constitutes an act of terrorism. Settlers have killed more than 30 people since the beginning of 2022. Israeli authorities must take responsibility and immediately punish the perpetrators of this violence, which continues with impunity, and protect Palestinian civilians,' it added. Israeli police said they arrested an Israeli citizen for questioning on the incident. Best of Deadline 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery Everything We Know About Season 3 Of 'Euphoria' So Far
