What the Justice Department's push to bring denaturalization cases means
Efforts to identity and go after those suspected of cheating to get their citizenship are not new to this administration.
But the public push is raising concerns from advocates, who have accused the administration of trying to use immigration enforcement for political purposes. It's receiving increased scrutiny after a Republican member of Congress suggested that Zohran Mamdani, the New York City Democratic mayoral candidate, should be subject to denaturalization proceedings.
Here's a look at the denaturalization process and what the Justice Department's memo means:
___
Denaturalization cases are rare
The U.S. government can strip a naturalized immigrant of their citizenship if they are criminally convicted of naturalization fraud or if the government proves through civil proceedings that they illegally obtained their citizenship through fraud or misrepresented or concealed facts on their application.
For years, the government's denaturalization efforts focused largely on suspected war criminals who lied on their immigration paperwork, most notably former Nazis. The Justice Department filed just more than 300 total cases between 1990 and 2017.
An initiative that began under the Obama administration called Operation Janus expanded those efforts by seeking to identify people who had used different identities to get green cards and citizenship after they were previously issued deportation orders.
In 2016, an internal watchdog reported that 315,000 old fingerprint records for immigrants who had been deported or had criminal convictions had not been uploaded to a Department of Homeland Security database that is used to check immigrants' identities. The same report found more than 800 immigrants had been ordered deported under one identity but became U.S. citizens under another.
The first Trump administration made such investigations a bigger priority, creating a Justice Department section focused on denaturalization cases.
But even then, the number of denaturalization cases remained small, as the administration didn't have the resources to bring many amid an onslaught of legal challenges to immigration policies it had to defend against, said Matthew Hoppock, an attorney in Kansas who represents people in denaturalization cases.
Justice Department says it will prioritize certain cases
The push was announced in a memo from the recently confirmed head of the Justice Department's Civil Division, Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate. Shumate said the cases the department will prioritize include people who 'pose a potential danger to national security,' people who commit violent crimes, members of gangs and drug cartels and people who commit Medicaid fraud and other types of fraud.
The benefits of the denaturalization process, Shumate wrote, 'include the government's ability to revoke the citizenship of individuals who engaged in the commission of war crimes, extrajudicial killings, or other serious human rights abuses; to remove naturalized criminals, gang members, or, indeed, any individuals convicted of crimes who pose an ongoing threat to the United States; and to prevent convicted terrorists from returning to U.S. soil or traveling internationally on a U.S. passport.'
Hoppock said the memo sort of 'blows the doors open' for the administration to file as many as many denaturalization cases as it has the resources to file.
Lawyers raise alarm about the potential impact
The broad language in the memo raises the prospect 'that any offense, at any time, may be used to justify denaturalization,' said Christopher Wellborn, president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
'It is not difficult to imagine a scenario where the government invokes unsubstantiated claims of gang affiliation or uses an individual's criminal record to claim that citizenship was illegally procured,' Wellborn said in a statement.
Others worry the administration's public push will stoke fear among naturalized immigrants.
'The more you talk about it, the more you frame it as 'we're coming after your naturalization, we're coming after you,' the more of a chilling effect we see on people applying for naturalization,' said Elizabeth Taufa, senior policy attorney and strategist at the Immigrant Legal Resource Center. 'Even those folks that really are eligible for naturalization."
Critics have accused the Trump administration using immigration enforcement to go after people because of their speech — most notably in the case of Columbia University activist Mahmoud Khalil, whom it has sought to deport over his role in pro-Palestinian protests.
'One of our ongoing concerns is will they target these politically, will they start combing through people's immigration files if they don't like you or if they think you don't agree with the government,' Hoppock said.
'I think most Americans would support the idea of stripping someone of citizenship if they got it through fraud and they are also a dangerous person,' he said, but the concern is if they start going through 'regular folks' immigration files to find a T that is not crossed or an I that is not dotted so they can use it as a weapon."
Justice Department recently secured denaturalization in one case
The department last month announced that it had successfully secured the denaturalization of a man who was convicted of possessing child sexual abuse material.
The British man had become a U.S. citizen after enlisting in the U.S. Army under a provision that provides a pathway to citizenship for U.S. service members, officials said. He only listed a speeding ticket when asked on his naturalization application if he had 'ever committed a crime or offense for which you were not arrested," and he became a U.S. citizen in 2013.
Months later, he was arrested in Louisiana on child sexual abuse material charges and convicted, according to the department.
'The laws intended to facilitate citizenship for brave men and women who join our nation's armed forces will not shield individuals who have fraudulently obtained U.S. citizenship by concealing their crimes,' Shumate said in a statement at the time. 'If you commit serious crimes before you become a U.S. citizen and then lie about them during your naturalization process, the Justice Department will discover the truth and come after you.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
12 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Why Tesla needs to fire Elon Musk: It's business, not politics
President Donald Trump and the Republican part have ignored climate change and demonized electric vehicles (EV). The president's so-called "Big Beautiful Bill" phases out the tax credit for buying an EV with it disappearing in September. He has also repeatedly called out EVS as being unreliable and "not going very far." Before he became buddies with Tesla CEO Elon Musk, he ridiculed him and his businesses. Related: Costco has a massive labor problem nobody is talking about When Elon Musk came to the White House asking me for help on all of his many subsidized projects, whether it's electric cars that don't drive long enough, driverless cars that crash, or rocketships to nowhere, without which subsidies he'd be worthless, and telling me how he was a big Trump fan and Republican, I could have said, 'drop to your knees and beg,' and he would have done it," Trump wrote on social media. Musk, however, became a Trump advisor when he donated nearly $300 million to his election campaign. That got him appointed to lead the childishly-named Department of Government Efficiency where he gleefully harassed long-time federal workers and eliminated programs that wasted money doing things like feeding hungry people. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter It was a hard-right turn for Musk, which was and odd choice given who the buyers fro EVs. are Democrats: "On every dimension, Democrats view EVs more favorably than Republicans do," shared Pew Research. Image source: Bocsi/Bloomberg via Getty Images While many CEOs lean right, or openly embrace right-wing ideology, but it's common to step down from any leadership positions before joining the government. Woody Johnson, the owner of the New York Jets, for example, served in the first Trump administration and stepped down from his position running the team. New York is overly liberal, but Johnson separated his two live. Musk did not do that and that's a problem because the Pew data suggests that Republicans are not a real market for EVs. Environmental benefits: Democrats and those who lean to the Democratic Party are much more likely than Republicans and GOP leaners to say EVs are better for the environment than gas vehicles (69% vs. 24%).Cost to buy: A majority of both Democrats and Republicans say EVs cost more to buy than gas vehicles. But fewer Democrats than Republicans say this (65% vs. 81%).Cost to charge/fuel: Half of Democrats say EVs cost less to charge than gas vehicles do to fuel. That compares with a quarter of Very few Democrats or Republicans think EVs are more reliable than gas vehicles, but Democrats are more likely than Republicans to say this (14% vs. 5%). Half of Democrats say EVs and gas vehicles are about the same on reliability, while 34% say EVs are less reliable. Republicans are even more negative, with 69% saying EVs are less reliable. Musk's hard-right turn and eventual return to the middle, has had major consequences on Tesla. When a CEO does something that overshadows the brand, they get fired. Both Best Buy and McDonald's removed successful CEOs over inappropriate, but not illegal, relationships. Musk has done something far worse, He has made it so Tesla's (TSLA) core audience, liberals, sees the Tesla name as a sort of swear word. That has led to many existing owners adding a "I bought this before Elon went crazy" bumper sticker and new liberal customers staying away. Tesla sales dropped 13.5% in the second quarter, after also dropping in the first quarter. The company faces the Musk backlash, and concerns over its aging vehicle lineup. Musk has not hurt Tesla irreparably, but his presence makes it harder to fix the problem. About half of U.S. adults have an unfavorable opinion of Tesla, including 30% of Republicans, according to a June AP-NORC poll. Related: As shoppers ditch Shein and Temu, these stores are winning "Musk has acknowledged that his work as head of the Department of Government Efficiency and his embrace of European far-right candidates have hurt the company. But he said earlier this year that much of the sales plunge is due to customers holding off while they waited for an ugrade to Tesla's best selling Model Y. That new version has been out for months now," reported. Take Musk off the top off the masthead, and liberals can go back to saluting the brand for its social responsibility, but leave him there, and your target audience simply won't buy. That's not a political decision. It's just business. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The British Embassy's Shady Fourth of July Tweet Speaks Volumes Without Saying Much
The British Embassy in Washington, D.C., didn't need fireworks to make its point this Independence Day. On Friday, centuries of unresolved transatlantic tension culminated in a simple tweet made by the U.K. diplomats — a reminder that dry wit remains one of Britain's most enduring exports. 'Enjoy your big day,' the post read, accompanied by an American flag. The well-timed dig was taken up a notch when the account attached a meme with scenes pulled from 2023 Netflix documentary 'Beckham,' in which Victoria and David Beckham engage in some domestic banter. The overlaid text offered quiet commentary on the national mood disguised as light internet mischief. 🇺🇸 Enjoy your big day!Honestly... — British Embassy Washington (@UKinUSA) July 4, 2025 The phrase 'big day' wasn't just about the Fourth. It was also a not-so-veiled nod to President Donald Trump signing of his so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a measure expected to slash healthcare coverage for millions while delivering tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans. This isn't the first time the embassy has extended its signature 'warm regards' to the American people. Back in 2022, it marked the holiday with a Spotify meme looping the 1977 hit 'Baby Come Back.' The tweet also featured an image of Jonathan Groff portraying King George III, the British monarch famously unwilling to part ways with the colonies, in the hit musical 'Hamilton.' Trump Pushes A July 4th Deadline For Big Tax Bill As Senators Dig In 'Hateful' Trump Trashed Over 'F**king Disgusting' Line About Half The Country For 4th Of July Trump Says He Will Delay EU Tariffs Until July 9


Forbes
13 minutes ago
- Forbes
Fox News Channel's Panel Show ‘The Five' Just Made Cable News History
Logo at the main entrance to the FOX News Headquarters at NewsCorp Building in Manhattan. (Photo by ... More Erik McGregor/LightRocket via Getty Images) Katie Pavlich couldn't resist raving at one point during Thursday's episode of The Five that the House of Representatives' passage that same day of President Trump's domestic policy bill represented a 'big, beautiful win for America.' Appropriating the same rhetorical flourish that Trump himself popularized in reference to the nearly 900-page budget reconciliation package, Pavlich then went on to poke fun at Democrats for 'throwing a hissy fit' over their legislative loss. In response to a tweet from President Biden that was put on the screen for viewers of The Five, Pavlich continued: 'Joe Biden campaigned on being a moderate and governed like a far-left lunatic, essentially, and a lot of this bill takes back a number of things that he implemented during his term.' That kind of sharp commentary, mixed with rapid-fire hot takes about the day's news from a rotating panel of hosts, is the simple formula that Fox News Channel's 5 p.m. talk show has parlayed into cable news dominance. And enough viewers keep tuning in to the show to hear panelists break down the news that it's not only become a ratings juggernaut for Fox — The Five also just made television history in the second quarter of this year: It's now the first non-primetime program ever to finish as the most-watched cable news offering for 15 consecutive quarters. The Five, Fox News' ratings giant Look even closer at the second quarter ratings data, and the trend gets even more interesting: At a time when CNN just saw its worst quarter in history in terms of viewership in the key demo, the parent network of The Five just finished its second highest-rated second quarter in history among weekday total day viewers, behind only 2020's coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Fox News now owns 62% of the total day cable news audience and 63% in primetime. Both CNN and MSNBC, meanwhile, not only saw double-digit declines in their audiences during the quarter, according to Nielsen data — those two networks are also set to be spun off by their respective parent companies, while The Five alone grew its viewership in the 25-54 demo 52% year-over-year. It's hard to overstate just how crucial the show has become to Fox's daily program schedule. In the second quarter, The Five also surpassed a slew of major broadcast programs, with Nielsen estimates revealing that The Five outperformed everything from the CBS Evening News to NBC's Law & Order, and CBS' NCIS: Origins — programs that boast a much larger reach in terms of broadcast households. Yet despite being available in far fewer homes as those broadcast giants reach, The Five consistently outranked them, delivering an average of 3.9 million total viewers and 410,000 viewers in the key 25-54 demo. Those numbers reveal two important facts: The Fox talk show is capturing not only traditional cable news audiences but also viewers in the younger, more sought-after demographic. And it's still doing so almost 15 years after its debut. The fact that the show has seen a steady number of guest hosts cycle on and off the panel over the years is also further evidence that the formula itself is strong enough to keep viewers coming back. Considering the fact that when The Five originally premiered in July 2011 it was as a replacement for Glenn Beck's show and only meant to run during the summer, the show's success is all the more remarkable. It quickly outperformed expectations, winning its time slot and scoring a permanent renewal just a few months after its debut. Since then, the ratings trend line for The Five has only really flowed in one direction — up and to the right.