Troubling ascent
While Ms. Yaccarino's public statement provided no specific reason for her exit, it highlighted a crucial, and often confusing, aspect of Elon Musk's corporate structure at X Corp.
Grok is a product of xAI, an AI company founded by Mr. Musk in March 2023. xAI and X Corp. (formerly Twitter Inc.) were once sister companies. However, in March, Mr. Musk announced that xAI had acquired X Corp. in an all-stock deal, merging the two into a single entity called X.AI Holdings. This merger formalised an already deeply intertwined relationship, effectively putting the position of the CEO of X Corp. at risk.
Grok is integrated into the X platform, where it is available to subscribers. It utilises X's real-time data to inform its responses.
The disturbing content generated by Grok in early July was a response to a user query about dealing with 'anti-white hate'. The chatbot suggested that Hitler would 'spot the pattern and handle it decisively, every damn time.' In another now-deleted post, Grok echoed anti-Semitic tropes, including the conspiracy theory that Jews control Hollywood, and made offensive remarks about individuals with Jewish-sounding surnames.
Just a day after Grok's pro-Hitler comments went viral, Ms. Yaccarino announced her decision to step down as CEO of X.
Tightrope walk
Ms. Yaccarino, a seasoned advertising executive, was appointed in May 2023 to restore advertiser confidence and bring stability to X. Her two-year tenure was marked by a constant struggle to balance the platform's commitment to 'free speech' with the practical challenges of content moderation and brand safety. Analysts suggested that the 'lack of fit' between her corporate style and Mr. Musk's disruptive approach may have reached a tipping point with the Grok controversy.
Grok's behaviour was not an isolated incident. In May, the chatbot became fixated on the racist conspiracy theory of 'white genocide' in South Africa, often responding to unrelated questions about topics such as baseball or HBO.
Mr. Musk launched Grok in November 2023, naming it after a term from Robert Heinlein's sci-fi novel Stranger in a Strange Land, which signifies a profound, intuitive understanding.
The chatbot was pitched as a 'maximum truth-seeking' alternative, characterised by a 'rebellious streak' that wouldn't shy away from sensitive topics.
xAI asserts that Grok 3 outperforms competitors such as OpenAI's GPT-4o in benchmarks related to mathematical and scientific reasoning. Additionally, the model introduces a 'Think' mode, enabling more comprehensive information processing before generating a response.
Grok's distinguishing feature lies in its real-time access to the extensive and chaotic information stream of X itself. However, this design choice presents both its unique selling point and its Achilles' heel. An AI learning from a platform where content moderation has been significantly relaxed is akin to unleashing a digital storm.
Following the deletion of Hitler-praising posts, Grok's own X account issued an apology, labelling the comments 'an unacceptable error from an earlier model iteration' and condemning Nazism. xAI further clarified that the company is solely training truth-seeking models and utilises feedback from millions of users to identify and enhance the model.
In her farewell post, Ms. Yaccarino expressed gratitude to Mr. Musk for the opportunity to work on transforming X Corp. Her departure leaves a significant void and raises new questions about the platform's direction. Grok's intended triumph as an unfiltered AI has instead become a stark illustration of the potential dangers of such an approach. It serves as a sobering reminder that AI's quality is contingent upon the data it learns. In the unregulated expanse of the Internet, a rebellious streak can rapidly escalate into something far more sinister.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Six Naxalites killed in encounter with security personnel in Chhattisgarh's Narayanpur
NARAYANPUR: Six Naxalites were killed in an encounter with security personnel in Narayanpur district of Chhattisgarh on Friday, police said. A gunfight broke out in the afternoon in the forest of Abujhmad region when joint teams of security forces were out on an anti-Naxal operation following inputs about the presence of ultras, Inspector General of Police (Bastar Range) Sundarraj P told PTI. "Multiple exchanges of fire between the security forces and Maoists occurred since the afternoon. So far, the bodies of six Maoists have been recovered from the encounter site along with AK-47/SLR rifles, other weapons, explosive material and daily use items," he said. The operation is still underway, the IG added. Hailing security forces, Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai said, under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the guidance of Union Home Minister Amit Shah, his government has been marching ahead firmly towards fulfilling the resolve of making the country completely Naxal-free by March 31, 2026. "In a major operation by security forces, six Naxalites have been neutralised so far in Abujhmad of Narayanpur district. I congratulate all the brave jawans of the security forces involved in the operation and salute their indomitable courage," he said in a statement.
News18
38 minutes ago
- News18
Wanted Worldwide, VVIP In Pakistan: How Islamabad Protects These 7 Terrorists
Last Updated: Despite global terror listings and India's repeated warnings, Pakistan continues to shield 7 most-wanted terrorists, from Hafiz Saeed to Dawood Ibrahim. Despite repeated diplomatic calls from India and mounting evidence shared with global bodies like the United Nations and FATF (Financial Action Task Force), Pakistan continues to provide safe haven to some of the world's most wanted terrorists. From masterminds of the 26/11 Mumbai attacks to underworld kingpins and terrorists operating across borders, these seven individuals remain free- brazenly protected, directly or indirectly, by Pakistan. Hafiz Saeed Founder of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), Hafiz Saeed orchestrated the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks that killed 166 people and the 2006 Mumbai train bombings that killed over 200. He is also responsible for attacks on the Red Fort in 2000 and countless strikes across Kashmir. Despite being designated a global terrorist by the UN and US and facing a $10 million bounty, Hafiz Saeed lives comfortably in Lahore, often seen attending Friday prayers under armed police protection. In June 2025, Pakistani politician Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that Hafiz Saeed was under 'house arrest"- a claim India dismissed as eyewash. Pakistan's Lashkar HQ in Muridke was destroyed by India in Operation Sindoor. Masood Azhar Dawood Ibrahim India's most wanted underworld don Dawood Ibrahim was the mastermind of the 1993 Mumbai serial bombings that killed over 250 people. He heads the D-Company, a transnational crime syndicate involved in narco-terrorism, extortion and money laundering. Labelled a global terrorist by the US and UN, Dawood Ibrahim has a $25 million bounty. His Karachi address- House No. D-13, Clifton, Karachi- has appeared in multiple dossiers shared with Pakistan and the UN. Yet he continues to live with impunity under the protection of Pakistan's ISI and reportedly enjoys direct contact with elements of the military. Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi A top Lashkar commander, Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi was one of the primary handlers of the 10 Pakistani gunmen who carried out the Mumbai 26/11 attacks. Captured gunman Ajmal Kasab named him as a key figure. Though briefly jailed under global pressure, Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi was granted bail in Pakistan and has since vanished from public record. He continues to enjoy military protection in Pakistan's Punjab province and his assets remain largely untouched. When Pakistan was on the FATF 'grey list', Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi faced limited sanctions but once that scrutiny faded, he reemerged with impunity. China has repeatedly blocked UN efforts to list him under global sanctions. Syed Salahuddin Chief of Hizbul Mujahideen Syed Salahuddin operates out of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, where he frequently leads anti-India rallies, calling for jihad and threatening to turn Kashmir into a 'graveyard for Indian soldiers." The US State Department designated him a global terrorist in 2017. Riyaz and Iqbal Bhatkal The Bhatkal brothers- Riyaz and Iqbal- founded the Indian Mujahideen (IM) and have been behind a spate of bombings in Indian cities, including Delhi, Hyderabad, Bangalore and Pune. While Iqbal is the operational head and bombmaker, Riyaz handles funding and logistics, with help from Gulf-based handlers and Pakistan's ISI. Both are currently believed to be living in Karachi, where they are said to operate sleeper cells in India through encrypted apps and hawala channels. view comments First Published: July 18, 2025, 21:18 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Centre tells Karnataka HC 'chilling effect' not an all-in-all solution
The central government on Friday told the Karnataka High Court that claiming a 'chilling effect' on free speech cannot be an all-in-all solution against reasonable restrictions. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued before the court that reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2) of the Constitution on Freedom of Speech and Expression are an 'elastic' concept that must evolve with the ever-expanding scope of Article 19(1)(a) in today's technologically advanced era. The Karnataka High Court is hearing X (formerly Twitter) Corp's plea against the Centre, challenging the unlawful content regulation and arbitrary censorship through the Ministry of Home Affairs' Sahyog Portal. The Centre is now making its submissions before Justice M Nagaprassana after X argued its case. X Corp has argued that Section 79(3)(b) of the Information Technology Act does not confer the government with the authority to issue information blocking orders, and that such orders can only be issued after following the procedure under Section 69A of the Act, read with IT Rules. The social media platform has also argued that content take-down orders under Section 79(3)(b) of the Information Technology (IT) Act have a chilling effect on its users. While Section 69A empowers the government to block access to information, subject to specific procedures and safeguards, Section 79 serves as an exemption provision, providing a 'safe harbour' for intermediaries. Responding to this, SG Mehta said that the chilling effect is not a defence for disseminating content that is 'not in the interest of society' and that X cannot claim a chilling effect on behalf of its users. He quoted a 2020 case of the Supreme Court where a 3-judge bench had observed that the widening of the 'chilling effect doctrine' has always been viewed with judicial scepticism. Talking about the misuse of technology, Mehta submitted that if, hypothetically, an AI video of the judge saying something against the nation were created, it would not fall within the vires of Section 69A but would unquestionably be unlawful, and this is where Section 79 comes in. "Section 69A is not only about taking down, but also a penal provision. Courts have developed that my fundamental rights of doing something may come into conflict with other persons' fundamental rights, so there is always a competition of fundamental rights—Article 14, 19, 21. Therefore, jurisprudence is developed for balancing competing fundamental rights to achieve constitutional goals." Mehta also argued that to curb the menace, such as fake accounts and posts, 'safe harbour' protection to intermediaries cannot be absolute. Take-down directives issued under Section 79(3)(b) are an exception to the exception of safe harbour, he said. "Similar safe harbour provisions and exceptions to exceptions exist in all jurisdictions of the world. This is the only social media intermediary (X Corp) that has a problem and is before the court. X Corp in some other jurisdictions has been fined, censured, etc. I have shown that certain intermediaries are not complying, and every country is grappling. Any deviation from the exception to safe harbour, taking care, due diligence, etc., is viewed seriously now by all you are informed and you do not follow guidelines, then 'safe harbour' will be lost," Mehta said.
