Texas Democrats slam GOP redistricting plan as "grossly unfair" and "deeply undemocratic"
Republican state lawmakers unveiled a draft congressional map on Wednesday that would turn five U.S. House districts currently held by Democrats into GOP-leaning seats — an idea blessed by President Trump as Republicans angle to hold onto their narrow congressional majority in next year's midterms.
One Democratic member of Congress whose district could be impacted called the proposed map "grossly unfair," arguing Black and Latino communities are being "scrambled" and intentionally fractured for political gain.
"They've already gerrymandered the map — and now they're trying to make it 30 to 8 in favor of Republicans," the lawmaker told CBS News, referencing the state's congressional delegation. "This is grossly unfair and starts a dangerous domino effect. If Texas lights the fire, it will spread to other states like California and New York. It's going to be a mess across the country."
The Democratic representative also argued that Texas Republicans are banking on maintaining the historic margins they saw among Hispanic voters in November's election, but warned that recent polling shows a softening in GOP support among Latino voters — particularly in the wake of backlash over the Trump administration's deportation policies.
Those voters "may not be there," the lawmaker said, cautioning the strategy could backfire and jeopardize Republican gains.
Another top Democrat who has previously run statewide in Texas echoed the concern, calling the proposal "deeply undemocratic."
"We're seeing losses of representation for people of color in Texas," the Democrat said. "Five of the affected districts are Latino-majority seats. They're not just stacking the deck — they're doing it without any expectation of being held accountable. But they will be held accountable."
New congressional map could expand GOP's House edge
Mr. Trump has publicly encouraged Texas Republicans to reshape the state's congressional districts, predicting to reporters earlier this month a "simple redrawing" could net five extra seats for his party. The GOP currently controls 25 of Texas' 38 House districts, which were last redrawn after the 2020 Census.
House Republicans are defending a razor-thin seven-seat majority in next year's congressional elections — a challenging task since the party that controls the White House almost always loses upwards of a dozen seats in the midterms.
Texas' Republican Gov. Greg Abbott called the state legislature into a special session, and on Wednesday, lawmakers released an early draft map — though changes could be made. It will need to pass the GOP-controlled state House and Senate.
The map would improve the GOP's edge by tilting two Democratic seats in the Rio Grande Valley to the right, making a pair of districts in the Dallas and Houston area redder and merging two Democratic seats near Austin into one.
For example, Democratic Rep. Henry Cuellar — who already represents a district won by Mr. Trump in 2024 — would lose parts of the San Antonio suburbs under the new map. And the Dallas-area district held by Democratic Rep. Julie Johnson would be redrawn to stretch more than 100 miles from Dallas County to deep-red parts of rural North Texas.
Texas Republicans have pledged to ensure the redistricting plans are constitutional. Abbott has argued the maps need to be redrawn due to "constitutional concerns" raised by the Justice Department. CBS News has reached out to the Texas GOP for comment.
But Democrats have blasted the map, which Democratic National Committee chair Ken Martin called a "blatant gerrymander" and a "likely violation of the Voting Rights Act." Rep. Greg Casar — whose Austin-area district would be merged with that of fellow Democratic Rep. Lloyd Doggett — called the move "illegal voter suppression of Black and Latino Central Texans."
The governors of some Democratic states, including California and New York, have floated launching their own mid-decade redistricting processes, with an eye to creating more blue seats. But those plans could require constitutional amendments since, unlike Texas, those two states have put independent commissions in charge of redistricting.
Johnson — whose Texas district is set to be redrawn — says other states should redraw their maps in response.
"This is an all-out war," she told CBS News senior White House correspondent Ed O'Keefe. "I am for fair and independent redistricting across the country, so long as we all do it. But if we're going to do partisan gerrymandering, then game on, we all should."
Meanwhile, some experts have suggested Texas' plan to create five extra GOP-leaning districts could make some of those newfound red seats more competitive, by distributing Republican voters across more districts.
The state has also undergone significant demographic changes in recent elections. The fast-growing Dallas and Houston suburbs have shifted toward Democrats, but the once reliably blue Rio Grande Valley has become redder with more Hispanic voters supporting Republican candidates. Those shifts could complicate efforts to rearrange the congressional map.
Watch: Hawaii Gov. Josh Green gives update on tsunami warning
Forensics expert analysis of Jeffrey Epstein jail video contradicts government's claims
Russia reacts to Trump's new deadline on Ukraine ceasefire
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Who Would Benefit the Most From Trump's $1K Baby Savings Accounts?
Now that President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' has been signed into law, many families with newborns can expect to receive $1,000 to invest in their child's future. Referred to as 'Trump Accounts,' they're designed to encourage families to begin investing in a child's future from birth and enjoy the benefits of compound interest. Read Next: Explore More: But is everyone really going to benefit from this plan? Let's explore the details of these Trump Accounts and who they could be most useful for. Who Is Eligible for the $1K? With these accounts, every child born a U.S. citizen with a Social Security number between Jan. 1, 2025, and Dec. 31, 2028, will receive a $1,000 deposit from the U.S. government into the account. Find Out: How Will Trump Accounts Work? Setting up your newborn for a Trump Account can be done in a couple of different ways. Parents or guardians can open the account in their child's name. If not, the Treasury Department could open it, per Kiplinger. Once the account is open, $1,000 will be deposited for those who qualify. There are some restrictions on these accounts that parents should be aware of. There will be a $5,000 yearly contribution limit for each year before the child turns 18. No distributions are allowed until the first day of the year when the child turns 18. After the child turns 18, the account will follow traditional IRA rules. All contributions made to the account before the child's 18th year will be made with after-tax dollars. This means parents will not be able to deduct their contributions from their taxes. Accounts can be used for college expenses, to start a business or to purchase a home. Who Would Benefit From Trump Accounts? Who would benefit from these Trump Accounts will be something that's heavily debated. 'The $1,000 baby savings account is a simple but powerful idea,' said Tim Rosenberger, fellow at the Manhattan Institute. 'It gives every American child, not just those born into privilege, a small but meaningful stake in the nation's future. That's the kind of ownership society that puts America first.' According to Rosenberg, this could benefit working families. 'A universal savings account at birth offers a new kind of opportunity infrastructure. It won't solve every problem, but it's a strong first signal that the country is serious about helping working families build intergenerational stability,' he said. While these accounts may be a good first step, however, they may not always provide the best option for saving for a child's future. 'Everyone eligible for the $1,000 should make sure they get it, but that alone is not enough to set aside for your kids' education or set them up for generational wealth,' said Dave Fortin, co-founder and investment advisor with FutureMoney. '529 plans are a better option than Trump accounts if you're saving for education. When you make a qualified withdrawal from a 529 plan, it's tax-free and penalty-free. Trump accounts are tax-deferred, meaning when the withdrawal eventually happens, the money counts as ordinary income, so income taxes are owed.' Ultimately, while all eligible families should take advantage of the free money being offered, it's important to consider the long-term implications. Before making additional contributions, make sure the account aligns with your child's savings goals. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 25 Places To Buy a Home If You Want It To Gain Value 6 Big Shakeups Coming to Social Security in 2025 This article originally appeared on Who Would Benefit the Most From Trump's $1K Baby Savings Accounts? Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kamala Harris Only Uses Wired Headphones For This One Reason That Has Me Genuinely Terrified
Cbs Photo Archive / Getty Images Kamala Harris is back in the statement on the California governor's race and the fight ahead. She also announced a new book about her 107 days running for president called... "107 Days." @nbcnewsFormer VP Kamala Harris on appeared on 'The Late Show' with Stephen Colbert.♬ original sound - nbcnews - nbcnews">And on Thursday, she appeared on "Colbert" and explained exactly why she wasn't running for public office right now. Former VP Kamala Harris on appeared on 'The Late Show' with Stephen Colbert. Cbs Photo Archive / Getty Images "I don't want to go back in the system. I think it's broken," she doesn't care how much you clown her but Auntie 'VP and Senator Who Was on The Intelligence Committee' Kamala is telling you to use wired ear pods 😂 CBS "I know I've been teased about this, but I like these kinds of earpods that have the thing [she points to the wire] because I served on the Senate Intelligence Committee," she said. "I have been in classified briefings, and I'm telling you, don't be on the train using your earpods thinking somebody can't listen to your conversation." CBS "I'm just telling you that it's a little more secure." ABC Uhhhhhhh, okay, then. Wired it is! Though to be fair, I'm sure my hackers would LOVE how much I listen to the Sister "Act" soundtrack.


Business Wire
29 minutes ago
- Business Wire
BAC Applauds Landmark Passage of Trigger Lead Ban
WASHINGTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Broker Action Coalition (BAC) welcomes the passage of the Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act, bipartisan legislation that limits the sale of trigger leads. With the Senate passing the House version on August 2, the bill has officially cleared Congress and now heads to the President's desk. The BAC urges President Trump to sign the bill into law without delay. 'This victory shows what's possible when brokers get involved, stay organized, and invest in advocacy.' Brendan McKay, Chief Advocacy Officer and Co-Founder of the BAC Share The passage of this bill through Congress marks the culmination of a multi-year advocacy effort—driven by the BAC, its advocates, and coalition partners. Led by the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), this united effort aimed to ban abusive trigger lead practices and curb the sale of consumer data without consent. This legislative victory would not have been possible without the leadership of Representatives John Rose (R-TN) and Ritchie Torres (D-NY) and Senators Jack Reed (D-RI) and Bill Hagerty (R-TN). Why Brokers Fought to End Trigger Leads When a consumer applies for a mortgage and their credit is pulled, credit bureaus sell that data as 'trigger leads'—including personal details like full name, contact information, and credit score range. Solicitors buy these leads and unleash a barrage of calls, texts, and emails, overwhelming homebuyers at a critical point in the process. All of this is done without the consumer's permission or proper disclosure. Some solicitors blur compliance boundaries, using deceptive language to imply connections with brokers or lenders. In addition to violating basic data privacy expectations, these tactics erode consumer trust and have been especially harmful to first-time homebuyers, non-native English speakers, and other vulnerable borrowers. The Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act ends these abusive practices while preserving narrow exceptions for pre-existing relationships and giving consumers the power to opt in. Thank You to the Partners Who Powered the Push Advocacy at this level doesn't happen alone. It takes investment, commitment, and shared belief in what's possible. The BAC is proud to recognize the partners that helped make this win possible: Equity Prime Mortgage (EPM), Pennymac TPO, The Loan Store, Inc., Rocket Pro, Paramount Residential Mortgage Group, Inc. (PRMG), Freedom Mortgage Wholesale Division, Newfi Wholesale, Gold Star Wholesale, and West Capital Lending. These partners stood alongside brokers and homebuyers to champion stronger consumer protections and real industry change. Continued Commitment to Homebuyer & Broker Interests 'The BAC was built to channel broker priorities into real policy wins. When we launched, we asked our earliest supporters to help set the agenda. The response was overwhelmingly clear: ending abusive trigger leads was our top priority. Today's congressional action delivered on that,' said Brendan McKay, BAC Chief Advocacy Officer and Co-Founder. 'This victory shows what's possible when brokers get involved, stay organized, and invest in advocacy.' 'This is a major win—but it's just the beginning,' added Rachel Clark, BAC Executive Director. 'If you want more of this kind of progress, brokers need to keep showing up—and start funding the fight.' About the Broker Action Coalition The Broker Action Coalition (BAC) is the grassroots advocacy channel uniting mortgage brokers and their supporters to fight for broker and homebuyer rights nationwide. The BAC aims to level the playing field between independent mortgage brokers and retail banks, to support inclusive homebuying policy change, and to fight for the needs of Veterans, minorities, and underserved communities to make the American dream of homeownership possible for more people than ever before. For more information or to support our advocacy efforts, visit