Israel Bans Palestinians in Gaza from Swimming and Fishing
The ban covers swimming, fishing, and diving, and warns that any violations will be met with force by Israeli forces.
During Israel's genocide of Palestinians in Gaza, more than 6,000 people, the majority of them fishermen, have effectively lost their jobs and sources of food. The fishing sector, once producing around 3,500 tonnes a year, has dropped to zero.
Nearly all boats and equipment have been destroyed, and over 210 people from this sector have been killed since October 2023, including at least 60 fishermen.
Gaza's fishing port has been destroyed, and all maritime activity has been stopped because of the genocide.
Gaza's Government Media Office, led by director general Ismail Al‑Thawabta, condemned the ban as a violation of international law.
He described it as a deliberate starvation tactic targeting Gaza's livelihood, undermining the right to work and live with dignity, and amounting to collective punishment under the Fourth Geneva Convention and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
As the enclave endures shortages of food, clean water, fuel, and electricity under a broader blockade, the maritime ban marks yet another devastating blow. With no safe space left on land or at sea, more than two million Palestinians in Gaza are stripped of one of the few existing freedoms and sources of survival.
This article was previously published on kuwaitmoments. To see the original article, click here
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Towards a peaceful and stable Middle East
Throughout the Middle East, pundits and public alike are wondering how the changes that the region is witnessing may affect the fragile existing balance of power and whether they can open the door, finally, for an era of peaceful co-existence and prosperity. It is well established that the strategic weight of our region is not confined to politics or security. It also lies in its increasingly pivotal role in the global economy. Key maritime routes, including the Strait of Hormuz and the Suez Canal, serve as vital arteries of global trade and energy supplies. At the same time, many Arab Gulf states are investing heavily in emerging industries such as renewable energy and advanced technologies. It is clear that bringing peace and stability to the Middle East is no longer a regional aspiration, but a global imperative intertwined with international prosperity. For the Arab League, a new strategic reality in the Middle East can only come about when a true vision for peace is implemented. The vision we have in mind is one based on the two-state solution: restoration of Palestinian rights for independence and dignity, followed by the implementation of the engagement of peace outlined in the Arab Peace Initiative, thus opening the door for an era of true peace and stability in the region. But regional security has been viewed differently by various parties in the region. For the Arabs, based on Arab Summit resolutions, the notion of regional security has always been based on five major pillars: a) An end to the Arab-Israeli conflict and the emergence of an independent contiguous Palestine, b) Respect of sovereignty and non-interference in the internal affairs of States, c) The establishment of a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the region, d) Relentless combatting of terrorism and the preservation of nation-states, and e) Security guarantees for all and shared interests as applicable. From an Arab perspective, while all these elements are essential for reaching a viable and sustainable formula for regional security, we view this equation as a win-win for all parties. Unfortunately, we cannot say the same about the perspective offered by other parties in our region, such as Israel. For years, and in particular after the '93 Oslo accords, the concept of regional security for Israel was based primarily on achieving military and security superiority while 'postponing indefinitely' any viable solution for the Palestinian question and without producing any real vision for achieving just and comprehensive peace. Since October 7, 2023, it appears that 'postponing indefinitely' a solution to the Palestinian question was replaced by 'eliminating' it altogether. Achieving a sustainable peace requires addressing broader geopolitical dynamics, particularly those involving Iran Driven by its extreme right-wing forces and its advancement in the past two decades, such a vision is a considerable impediment for peace and prosperity in the region. Enabling those forces to continue on such a path is nothing but a recipe for continued conflict and instability. Such a zero-sum equation with no room for a win-win formula is no salvation for our region and certainly meets no aspiration for peaceful co-existence in it. At the same time, achieving a sustainable peace requires addressing broader geopolitical dynamics, particularly those involving Iran. Over the past few years, several Arab countries have taken steps toward de-escalation and restoring dialogue with Tehran, aiming to establish a framework of mutual respect and non-interference. This approach must be preserved and reinforced, as it offers the potential to reduce tensions and prevent wider regional confrontation. For peace to take root, all regional actors must abandon policies of provocation and ideological dominance, and instead commit to principles of co-existence and balanced co-operation. I acknowledge that in my numerous encounters throughout the Arab World, and in particular after witnessing the horrors committed by Israel in Gaza through 21 months of genocidal war, I often reach the unhappy conclusion that many Arabs, in particular the youth, have ceased to believe that peace will be the order of the day in our region in the foreseeable future and that it is somehow condemned to perpetual instability and turmoil. The brief moments of peace of the 1990s seem like such distant memories. It's impossible to envisage any possibility of reliving them. All powerful players, in the region and outside it, should try and change such desperate views, if we are to seek a better and more prosperous future for the coming generations. To my understanding, a number of Arab countries who play a major role in the region have expressed readiness to engage in meaningful discussions on the matter. However, in the absence of an Israeli willingness to engage on a viable path for peace, it can be an exercise in futility. The hope remains that an active and motivated US president may intervene to tip the balance not only for the sake of morality and law, but also for shared interests and a win-for-all formula which addresses the concerns of all parties. It is still possible. Let us not waste the opportunity.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Syria's wildfires show the urgent need for a regional conversation on climate change
In the years leading up to Syria's revolution, in 2011, more than a million people in the Syrian countryside had fled to its cities as a result of climate-induced drought, creating dual crises in the agricultural sector and the cost of living. How much this contributed to the revolution and the ensuing 14-year civil war remains a subject of considerable debate. Syrians had many reasons to rise up against the Assad regime, which maintained power for decades through systematic oppression and mass torture. But there is little doubt that the drought had exacerbated an already-combustible situation. Syria's new government is proving to be entirely different from its predecessor. Its leader, Ahmed Al Sharaa, speaks of a tolerant and inclusive new chapter, and his popularity shows most Syrians believe him. But wholesale political change does not make the country's environmental problems – nor their consequences for stability – go away, as evidenced by a series of wildfires that ravaged Syria's coastal forests last week. Thanks to the dedication of the local civil defence workers and volunteers, the fires were contained in 10 days. But, as several of them told The National, the task was arduous – made harder by the sorry state of the country's post-war infrastructure and the presence of landmines in the area. Wildfires are becoming a perennial problem for Syrian authorities, worsened by the persistence of drought. The current drought, ongoing since 2021, is even worse than the one in the late 2000s. In the absence of sufficient rainfall, wheat production has declined, this year meeting less than 20 per cent of national demand. Bread prices, as a result, have soared. The lack of rainfall has also contributed to a water crisis in Damascus, the Syrian capital, where authorities have urged residents to reduce consumption. At the same time, the country's authorities are struggling to keep a tight lid on sectarian violence. Clashes last weekend between rival factions in the southern city of Sweida left 30 people dead. Since March, violence in the south as well as the north-west has killed more than 1,000 people. The overall level of danger remains a far cry from the civil war years, but one of the chief lessons of that period is that any emergent combination of deadly violence, environmental crisis and economic strain should not be ignored. Wholesale political change does not make the country's environmental problems go away Syria's regional neighbours have pledged to do much to help its fledgling government stabilise the country – in terms of infrastructure, investment and, where needed, diplomatic support. Co-operation should be expanded more vigorously to the realm of the environment. Some countries, like Iraq and Turkey, sent support to battle the recent wildfires but there is a need to act more firmly to confront desertification and all aspects of climate change. The governments of the Middle East, to be sure, have many other issues to contend with just now. But climate change and its consequences do not wait for wars to wind down or political disputes to be resolved. Co-ordination in this area could be an avenue for building trust and strengthening ties, rather than something to be explored when it is already too late. Syria's crisis is particularly acute, but it is not unique to that country. Across much of the Arab world, droughts, wildfires and other environmental threats are proliferating. With them comes a greater risk of volatility. Conversations about how to deal with these issues together should be included in efforts to resolve the region's other challenges, and the time to have them is now.
Middle East Eye
9 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Gaza: Families of Israeli captives contact Hamas over fate of ceasefire talks
The families of Israeli captives being held in Gaza reached out to Hamas through a representative to ask about the fate of stalled ceasefire talks, Middle East Eye can reveal. Sources told MEE that the third party reached out to Hamas after the captives' families feared Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin was trying to torpedo a possible deal. A senior figure within Hamas told the representative it was "serious" about reaching an agreement to end the war and release the captives, but that it was facing "intransigent Israeli positions", sources told MEE. "Hamas is serious about reaching an agreement to end the war and establish arrangements that ensure calm and stability. It has demonstrated significant flexibility and positive responsibility during the negotiation rounds," the sources quoted Hamas as saying. "Israel has insisted on continuing the war, destroying the Gaza Strip, displacing its population, and imposing a state of hunger, suffering, and ongoing massacres that have not ceased for a single day." New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Hamas and Israel reached a brief three-stage ceasefire in January, but the deal collapsed in March after Israel took back several of its captives and resumed bombing Gaza, walking away from the deal before talks with Hamas on a permanent end to the war could start. Since then, the Trump administration has given Israel full backing to wage war on Gaza. According to sources, the Hamas official told the representative that the Palestinian movement had complied with "everything stipulated" in the first phase of the previous ceasefire, which was supposed to transition to phase two talks on ending the war. Before withdrawing from the ceasefire, Hamas said that Israel committed "hundreds of violations", including deploying troops beyond 'buffer zones", killing 132 civilians, preventing the inflow of reconstruction material, and remaining in the Philadelphia Corridor that separates Gaza from Egypt. Hamas reportedly told the representative that despite Israel unilaterally resuming the war, it responded to proposals by mediators to revive the ceasefire, 'but Israel rejected them and insisted on releasing half of the Israeli prisoners without offering any guarantees that the war would cease. In fact, it openly insisted on its continuation'. As it stands, there are believed to be around 20 living captives in Gaza and just over 30 dead Israelis. Since the 7 October 2023 attacks on southern Israel, the country's military has only rescued eight captives in raids that have seen hundreds of Palestinians killed. Talks remain deadlocked On Sunday, US President Donald Trump said talks on a Gaza ceasefire were going along well, repeating remarks he made last week during a visit to Washington by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. In contrast, MEE reported on Saturday that Hamas negotiators were sceptical that a ceasefire agreement could be reached in the current round of talks in Doha, Qatar. Sources close to Palestinian negotiators said talks have remained deadlocked over at least two of four key issues. Exclusive: Gaza talks at risk after Israel refuses to withdraw from Rafah Read More » The first is the extent of the proposed Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip during a 60-day truce. The second is the method of aid distribution. The US has reportedly proposed postponing discussions on these two points, instead focusing on the names of Palestinian prisoners to be released by Israel in exchange for the remaining Israeli captives. According to the sources, Hamas told the representative for the captives' families that it asked to amend three points related to the distribution of aid, the deployment of Israeli soldiers in Gaza and guarantees on ending the war after an initial 60-day truce is over. 'However, Israel has taken a hardline stance, particularly in its redeployment maps, where it seeks to control approximately 36 percent of the Gaza Strip's area and keep approximately 600,000 residents displaced and unable to return to their homes," Hamas is reported to have said. "Israel has repeatedly rejected our offer to return all Israeli prisoners at once in exchange for ending the war. "They rejected it and preferred a partial solution. This is a clear indication of their intention to continue the war and their disregard for prisoners as a central issue for Israeli society," it added. For more than 21 months, Israel has relentlessly bombed the besieged Gaza Strip, displacing the entire 2.3 million population multiple times, and has killed more than 58,000 Palestinians, mostly civilians. The figure also includes at least 1,400 health sector professionals, 280 United Nations aid workers - the highest staff death toll in UN history - and at least 228 journalists, with the highest number of media workers killed in conflict since the Committee to Protect Journalists began recording data in 1992.
