Explainer-What is the UN's development conference in Seville, and what can it achieve?
FILE PHOTO: World Bank President Ajay Banga attends the Milken Institute Global Conference 2025 in Beverly Hills, California, U.S., May 5, 2025. REUTERS/Mike Blake/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: Nigeria's Amina Mohammed, Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations, looks on during the official opening of the World Economic Forum on Africa in Cape Town, South Africa September 5, 2019. REUTERS/Sumaya Hisham/File Photo
Explainer-What is the UN's development conference in Seville, and what can it achieve?
LONDON - Global leaders will kick off the once-a-decade Conference on Financing for Development (FFD4) in Seville, Spain, on Monday, which aims to improve the world's aid and financial architecture.
Ambitious reforms to everything from global tax to climate-focused funding are on the agenda.
What is the event, who will attend, and what can it achieve?
WHAT IS IT?
The fourth such conference brings together political, financial and trade leaders to formulate a coherent approach to issues bedevilling global development - from aid to trade to debt.
Leaders will formally adopt a 38-page document - dubbed the "Seville Commitment" - which was painstakingly negotiated and agreed prior to the event. It will be a blueprint for development financing for the coming decade, but it is a political commitment, rather than a legally binding agreement.
The first FFD's "Monterrey Consensus" in 2002 produced targets for rich countries to spend 0.7% of gross national product on official development assistance and supported the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative, which eventually yielded billions in debt relief.
The last FFD, in Addis Ababa in 2015, produced the 17 sustainable development goals that have guided multilateral funding for the past decade, and focused attention on strengthening taxation and stemming illicit financial flows.
This year's backdrop is particularly challenging, with widespread aid cuts across the rich world - and climate change scepticism from U.S. President Donald Trump.
WHAT ARE THIS YEAR'S OBJECTIVES?
The Seville Commitment focuses on reforms to help poor nations adapt to climate crises, such as debt swaps, natural disasters debt pause clauses and an exploration of "global solidarity levies", which could tax highly polluting activities - or the super-rich - to finance sustainable development.
It also targets progress towards better debt restructuring frameworks and innovations to boost funding, such as multilateral development banks' efforts to leverage special drawing rights.
Leaders will also launch the Seville Platform for Action, which would form alliances to expedite concrete progress on the goals.
WHO WILL BE THERE?
UN Deputy Secretary-General Amina Mohammed said on Wednesday that more than 70 heads of state and government would attend. They include French President Emmanuel Macron, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa - this year's G20 chair - and sustainable finance rock stars such as Barbados Prime Minister Mia Mottley.
World Bank President Ajay Banga is expected, along with development bank chiefs, the Gates Foundation and other campaign groups.
Notably absent, however, is the United States, which withdrew during negotiations after it tried, unsuccessfully, to strip climate, sustainability and gender equality from the Seville Commitment.
WHAT IMPACT COULD IT HAVE?
The U.S. absence, and continued discord over the approach to certain other issues, such as debt, could hobble the event's impact.
Trump's opposition to goals such as global tax rule changes could make success on that subject tougher.
Meanwhile, disagreements between African leaders and key lending nations, such as China, over a debt convention also bedevil substantive progress.
But sources said the event could be more successful without U.S. attendees trying to water down objectives, and there is a strong consensus that the world must take urgent action on issues such as climate adaptation funding.
WHAT IS THE BACKDROP?
The U.N. pegs the global financing gap for sustainable development at a whopping $4 trillion.
Multilateral lenders are working to boost funding - but the cash they have been able to mobilise thus far is in the hundreds of billions, not trillions.
At the same time, the average interest costs for developing countries as a share of tax revenues nearly doubled since 2014. China's lending to Africa has turned net negative as loan repayments come due, and an estimated 3.3 billion people - and more than half of Africans - live in countries that spend more on debt than health. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Serbian protesters deliver early election ‘ultimatum'
University students attend a protest against government pressure on the universities in front of a government building in Belgrade on June 9. PHOTO: REUTERS BELGRADE - Serbian protesters are expected to gather in their tens of thousands in the capital Belgrade on June 28, issuing an 'ultimatum' for the government to call early elections after months of student-led strikes. Anti-graft protests have rocked the Balkan nation since November when a train station roof collapse in the northern city of Novi Sad killed 16 people – a tragedy widely blamed on entrenched corruption. For more than half a year, students have blockaded universities and organised large demonstrations around the country, demanding a transparent investigation into the deaths. With little action from the authorities, their focus shifted last month to calls for early parliamentary elections. Ahead of June 28's protest, students issued the 'ultimatum' to President Aleksandar Vucic, with a deadline of 9pm (3am on June 29 in Singapore), three hours after the protest is set to begin in one of Belgrade's main squares. Mr Vucic responded on June 27, again rejecting the student's demands for immediate elections, having previously stated that a national poll would not be held before the end of 2026. 'The ultimatum was not accepted, you don't have to wait until 9pm tomorrow,' he told state television station RTS. 'Foreign powers' The outcry over the Novi Sad tragedy has already toppled the country's prime minister, but the ruling party remains in power – with a reshuffled government and the president at its heart. Mr Vucic has repeatedly accused the protests, which have remained peaceful throughout, of being part of a foreign plot to destroy his government. 'The foreign powers sent an ultimatum through local henchmen,' Mr Vucic said after attending a mass in the central Serbian city of Krusevac on June 27. 'People should not be afraid, only those who plan violence should be afraid.' More than a dozen people have been arrested in recent weeks, a crackdown that has now become a routine government reaction ahead of large demonstrations. In the latest arrests on June 27, five people were charged and held for allegedly plotting to overthrow the government, according to a statement from Serbia's Higher Court in Belgrade. 'Radicalisation' Students have also called for the removal of pro-government encampments outside parliament, which have been blocking a park and a major intersection in the city centre for months. Protesters warned of 'radicalisation' of the movement if their demands were not met. The police urged protesters to remain peaceful. 'Any attempt to attack the police, to storm any state institution, media outlet, or private property will not be tolerated by the Serbian police,' police director Dragan Vasiljevic said in a statement. Initial plans by Mr Vucic's ruling party to host a counter-rally were scrapped, though party officials said they might visit their supporters' camps. June 28's rally is expected to be the largest since March when 300,000 people gathered in Belgrade, according to an independent counting organisation. Earlier in June, local polls in two municipalities marked the first electoral clash between an opposition coalition and the Serbian Progressive Party, led by Mr Vucic. The ruling party secured a narrow victory amid accusations of voter bribery and electoral interference – similar to those following its win in the December 2023 parliamentary elections. As before, Mr Vucic dismissed allegations of fraud. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Suicide bombing kills 13 Pakistani soldiers near Afghan border, say sources
DERA ISMAIL KHAN, Pakistan - An explosive-laden car rammed into a Pakistani military convoy on June 28 in a town near the Afghan border, killing at least 13 soldiers, sources said. Four Pakistani intelligence officials and a senior local administrator told Reuters that the convoy was attacked in Mir Ali area of North Waziristan district. Around 10 other soldiers were wounded, some critically, and they were being airlifted to a military hospital, the sources said. A statement from the office of the chief minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province said it was a suicide bombing, adding it killed eight security officials. 'It was huge, a big bang,' the local administrator told Reuters, adding that residents of the town could see a large amount of smoke billowing from the scene from a great distance. One resident said that the explosion rattled the windowpanes of nearby houses, and caused some roofs to collapse. No one has so far claimed responsibility. The Pakistani military did not respond to a Reuters request for a comment. The lawless district which sits next to Afghanistan has long served as a safe haven for different Islamist militant groups, who operate on both sides of the border. Islamabad says the militants run training camps in Afghanistan to launch attacks inside Pakistan, a charge Kabul denies, saying the militancy is Pakistan's domestic issue. Pakistani Taliban also known as Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), an umbrella group of several Islamist militant groups, has long been waging a war against Pakistan in a bid to overthrow the government and replace it with its own Islamic system of governance. The Pakistani military, which has launched several offensives against the militants, has mostly been their prime target. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
US immigrants scramble for clarity after Supreme Court birthright ruling
That outcome has raised more questions than answers about a right long understood to be guaranteed under the US Constitution. PHOTO: REUTERS WASHINGTON - The US Supreme Court's ruling tied to birthright citizenship prompted confusion and phone calls to lawyers as people who could be affected tried to process a convoluted legal decision with major humanitarian implications. The court's conservative majority on June 27 granted President Donald Trump his request to curb federal judges' power but did not decide the legality of his bid to restrict birthright citizenship. That outcome has raised more questions than answers about a right long understood to be guaranteed under the US Constitution: that anyone born in the United States is considered a citizen at birth, regardless of their parents' citizenship or legal status. Ms Lorena, a 24-year-old Colombian asylum seeker who lives in Houston and is due to give birth in September, pored over media reports on June 27 morning. She was looking for details about how her baby might be affected, but said she was left confused and worried. 'There are not many specifics,' said Ms Lorena, who like others interviewed by Reuters asked to be identified by her first name out of fear for her safety. 'I don't understand it well.' She is concerned that her baby could end up with no nationality. 'I don't know if I can give her mine,' she said. 'I also don't know how it would work, if I can add her to my asylum case. I don't want her to be adrift with no nationality.' Mr Trump, a Republican, issued an order after taking office in January that directed US agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of children born in the US who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident. The order was blocked by three separate US district court judges, sending the case on a path to the Supreme Court. The resulting decision said Mr Trump's policy could go into effect in 30 days but appeared to leave open the possibility of further proceedings in the lower courts that could keep the policy blocked. On June 27 afternoon, plaintiffs filed an amended lawsuit in federal court in Maryland seeking to establish a nationwide class of people whose children could be denied citizenship. If they are not blocked nationwide, the restrictions could be applied in the 28 states that did not contest them in court, creating 'an extremely confusing patchwork' across the country, according to Ms Kathleen Bush-Joseph, a policy analyst for the non-partisan Migration Policy Institute. 'Would individual doctors, individual hospitals be having to try to figure out how to determine the citizenship of babies and their parents?' she said. The drive to restrict birthright citizenship is part of Mr Trump's broader immigration crackdown, and he has framed automatic citizenship as a magnet for people to come to give birth. 'Hundreds of thousands of people are pouring into our country under birthright citizenship, and it wasn't meant for that reason,' he said during a White House press briefing on June 27. Immigration advocates and lawyers in some Republican-led states said they received calls from a wide range of pregnant immigrants and their partners following the ruling. They were grappling with how to explain it to clients who could be dramatically affected, given all the unknowns of how future litigation would play out or how the executive order would be implemented state by state. Ms Lynn Tramonte, director of the Ohio Immigrant Alliance said she got a call on June 27 from an East Asian temporary visa holder with a pregnant wife. He was anxious because Ohio is not one of the plaintiff states and wanted to know how he could protect his child's rights. 'He kept stressing that he was very interested in the rights included in the Constitution,' she said. Advocates underscored the gravity of Mr Trump's restrictions, which would block an estimated 150,000 children born in the US annually from receiving automatic citizenship. 'It really creates different classes of people in the country with different types of rights,' said Ms Juliana Macedo do Nascimento, a spokesperson for the immigrant rights organisation United We Dream. 'That is really chaotic.' Adding uncertainty, the Supreme Court ruled that members of two plaintiff groups in the litigation - CASA, an immigrant advocacy service in Maryland, and the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project - would still be covered by lower court blocks on the policy. Whether someone in a state where Mr Trump's policy could go into effect could join one of the organizations to avoid the restrictions or how state or federal officials would check for membership remained unclear. Ms Betsy, a US citizen who recently graduated from high school in Virginia and a CASA member, said both of her parents came to the US from El Salvador two decades ago and lacked legal status when she was born. 'I feel like it targets these innocent kids who haven't even been born,' she said, declining to give her last name for concerns over her family's safety. Ms Nivida, a Honduran asylum seeker in Louisiana, is a member of the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project and recently gave birth. She heard on June 27 from a friend without legal status who is pregnant and wonders about the situation under Louisiana's Republican governor, since the state is not one of those fighting Trump's order. 'She called me very worried and asked what's going to happen,' she said. 'If her child is born in Louisiana … is the baby going to be a citizen?' REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
