5 Key Steps For The One Big Beautiful Bill To Become A Tax Law
American Politics
Late in the hours on Saturday, the Senate voted to advance the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, as reported by Forbes. President Trump immediately took to social media to claim victory. While impactful, this bill still has many necessary steps before Trump can sign it into law. This article discusses the current status of this bill in the legislative process and outlines the five key steps that must be taken before it can become a tax law.
Just A Bill On Capitol Hill
Many can recall the School House of Rock's famous 'I'm Just a Bill' episode, which features an animated piece of paper named Bill who is hanging out on the steps of the U.S. Capitol in an attempt to become a law. Bill outlines the numerous steps it takes for him to go from the House to the Senate before being signed by the President.
In many ways, the path of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is very similar. However, tax legislation has a more specific path. For instance, tax legislation must be introduced into the House Ways and Means Committee. This bill was introduced by Representative Jodey C. Arrington (R-TX-19). Thus, even though it is labeled as the bill to address Trump's domestic agenda, it is Congress, not the President, who introduces and passes laws.
The version of the bill that was introduced to the House of Representatives already reflected many changes from what was introduced by Representative Arrington, and the version that was passed on May 22, was the result of amendments, alterations, and compromises that were made to ensure that it achieved even the narrowest of victories, as I previously discussed in a Forbes article.
Like the House of Representatives, the Senate also has an important subcommittee, the Senate Finance Committee, which is delegated the responsibility of creating tax laws. As discussed in a white paper by Pillsbury Law, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act has many provisions that are the same in both the House and Senate versions of the tax bill. However, their article also highlights numerous ways that they might differ.
One such example is that the Senate proposes that the SALT tax deduction, an itemized deduction for state and local income taxes paid, remain at $10,000. In contrast, the House version proposes an increase to $40,000. As I previously discussed in a Forbes article, these differences are natural in the legislative process. However, they can lead to intense debates that can make or break a bill's prospects of becoming a law.
On June 28, the Senate voted on whether the Senate Finance Committee's version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would be advanced to open discussion on the Senate Floor. This vote passed by a narrow margin (51-49).
5 Key Steps To The One Big Beautiful Tax Bill To Become The One Big Beautiful Tax Law
While Trump was quick to claim victory, and the bill appears poised to pass the Senate, according to the BBC, the procedural vote was by no means the final passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. I outline the five key steps after the bill advancing in the Senate floor to it ultimately being signed into law by Trump.
1) Reading Of The One Big Beautiful Bill And Open Debate
Following this vote, the Senate Democrats required the nearly 1,000-page bill to be read out loud in its entirety. Fox News reported that the reading began on the evening of June 28, 2, and it took 16 hours to complete, delaying nearly a full day's worth of progress. Immediately following the reading, USA Today reported that the Senate has been hard at work ironing out the final sticking points.
2) A Vote-Arama And Senate Passage Of The One Big Beautiful Bill
Once the debate has curtailed, the Senate will enter into a vote-arama. In this situation, senators can introduce an unlimited number of amendments to a reconciliation bill or budget resolution and vote upon them in quick succession. Many expect the numerous amendments decided on by the Senate to be voted on in a quick and orderly manner, leading to a rare occurrence of a vote-arama. After all the amendments have been approved or rejected, the Senate will cast its final votes on the passage of the bill.
Unique to this bill is that it is a budget reconciliation bill. As discussed by The New Republic, most Senate bills require 60 votes to be passed. However, a budget reconciliation bill only requires a majority. Furthermore, since the Vice President breaks ties in the Senate, only 50 votes, plus the tie-breaking vote of Vice President Vance, are necessary for passage in the Senate.
3) The House And Senate Joint Conference Committee
Since the House and Senate bills differ, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will enter a Joint Conference Committee, where representatives from both chambers will come together to decide on the differences between the two bills that they believe will be approved by their respective bodies. It is not uncommon for differences between the two chambers to be resolved here. For instance, in the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, the House proposed a 20% corporate income tax rate, with 25% for certain entities, whereas the Senate proposed a 20% rate for all entities. Following the Joint Conference Committee, the 21% corporate income tax rate was accepted and passed by the House and the Senate.
4) Final Passage Of The One Big Beautiful Bill By The House And The Senate
The House and the Senate must both agree on the new combined version of the bill. This agreement is easier said than done, as many important provisions may have been altered from the original versions passed. For instance, Fox Business reports that one representative has said that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is 'dead on arrival' if the SALT tax deduction is not increased. Given that the original bill only passed the House by a single vote (215 to 214), it will be interesting to see if the consolidated version meets significant resistance.
5) Trump Signs The One Big Beautiful Bill Act Into Law, Maybe On The 4th Of July
The goal of any tax bill is to be signed into law by the President. While the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is effectively the product of his domestic agenda and, should it be passed, would be a function of going through budget reconciliation and having control of both the House and the Senate, some bills are not so fortunate to have such a clear path. In the case where Trump disapproves of a bill, he can veto it, thereby preventing it from becoming law. Even though Congress can override a veto with a two-thirds majority vote, this notion would represent a significant hurdle to the bill becoming law.
However, nobody expects the One Big Beautiful Bill Act to be vetoed. Once the House and the Senate pass it, it is expected that Trump will sign it into law almost immediately. CNN reports that Trump's goal all along has been to sign the bill into law on the 4th of July holiday. However, Trump now appears to be open to a later passage as long as it is passed soon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
36 minutes ago
EPA employees put names to 'declaration of dissent' over agency moves under Trump
A group of Environmental Protection Agency employees on Monday published a declaration of dissent from the agency's policies under the Trump administration, saying they 'undermine the EPA mission of protecting human health and the environment.' More than 170 EPA employees put their names to the document, with about 100 more signing anonymously out of fear of retaliation, according to Jeremy Berg, a former editor-in-chief of Science magazine who is not an EPA employee but was among non-EPA scientists or academics to also sign. The latter figure includes over 70 Nobel laureates. The letter represents rare public criticism from agency employees who could face blowback for speaking out against a weakening of funding and federal support for climate, environmental and health science. Scientists at the National Institutes of Health made a similar move earlier in June. "Since the Agency's founding in 1970, EPA has accomplished (its) mission by leveraging science, funding, and expert staff in service to the American people. Today, we stand together in dissent against the current administration's focus on harmful deregulation, mischaracterization of previous EPA actions, and disregard for scientific expertise," the letter read. Agency spokespeople did not immediately respond Monday to messages seeking comment. 'I'm really sad. This agency, that was a superhero for me in my youth, we're not living up to our ideals under this administration. And I really want us to,' said Amelia Hertzberg, an environmental protection specialist at the EPA who has been on administrative leave since February from the Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights, while the administration works to close down her department. Hertzberg's work focused on the most vulnerable groups impacted by pollution: pregnant and nursing people, young children and babies, the elderly, people with preexisting and chronic health conditions and people living in communities exposed to higher levels of pollution. That wasn't supposed to be controversial, but it's become so in this political climate, she said. 'Americans should be able to drink their water and breathe their air without being poisoned. And if they aren't, then our government is failing,' she said. Berg, who also directed the National Institute of General Medical Sciences at NIH from 2003-2011, said the dissent isn't motivated by partisan criticism. He said the employees hope it will help the EPA get back to the mission for which it was established — which 'only matters if you breathe air and drink water." The letter outlines what the EPA employees see as five main concerns: undermining public trust; ignoring scientific consensus to benefit polluters; reversing EPA's progress in America's most vulnerable communities; dismantling the Office of Research and Development; and promoting a culture of fear, forcing staff to choose between their livelihood and well-being. Under Administrator Lee Zeldin, EPA has cut funding for environmental improvements in minority communities, vowed to roll back federal regulations that lower air pollution in national parks and tribal reservations, wants to undo a ban on a type of asbestos and proposed repealing rules that limit planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas. Zeldin began reorganizing the EPA's research and development office as part of his push to slash their budget and gut their study of climate change and environmental justice. And he's seeking to roll back pollution rules that an Associated Press examination found were estimated to save 30,000 lives and $275 billion every year. 'People are going to die,' said Carol Greider, a Nobel laureate and professor of molecular and cellular biology at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who also signed the letter. She described last week's East Coast heat wave as evidence of the ways people are feeling the effects of climate change. 'And if we don't have scientists at the EPA to understand how what we do that goes into the air affects our health, more people are going to die,' she added. Berg said the declarations of dissent from both the NIH and EPA employees are noteworthy because they represent scientists speaking out as their careers are on the line. Even non-agency employees have to consider whether the government will withdraw research funding. Greider, asked about fears of repercussions or retaliation, said she's 'living the repercussions of everything.' She regularly meets with graduate students who are worried about pursuing scientific careers as labs lose funding. It's a long-term problem if we aren't supporting the next generation of scientists, she said: "That's decades worth of loss.' ___
Washington Post
39 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Sen. Thom Tillis denounces Medicaid cuts in Trump tax bill
Politics Sen. Thom Tillis denounces Medicaid cuts in Trump tax bill June 30, 2025 | 12:13 PM GMT Sen. Thom Tillis (R-North Carolina) on June 29 delivered a fiery speech on the Senate floor, denouncing steep cuts to Medicaid in Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill, a sprawling tax and immigration package.
The Hill
40 minutes ago
- The Hill
Pence group launches website to push for extension of Trump tax cuts
An advocacy group founded by former Vice President Mike Pence is launching a website and reaching out to lawmakers on Capitol Hill as part of its push to pass an extension of President Trump's 2017 tax cuts in the massive reconciliation package working its way through Congress. The website from Advancing American Freedom, details of which were shared first with The Hill, features resources and facts about the benefits of the tax cuts based on memos and a lengthy report from the advocacy group. The site also highlights data on potential tax increases on families and businesses if the tax cuts expire, as well as information about how the tax cuts generated revenue for the federal government. The launch of the website is being accompanied by a letter sent by Advancing American Freedom to lawmakers and staff touting the site as a 'one-stop shop' for talking points and information about the importance of extending the tax cuts. The Pence-founded group will also renew its ad spending in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania for a spot announced earlier this month calling on lawmakers to extend the tax cuts. The Senate is plowing ahead with efforts to pass the massive tax and spending bill that contains key pieces of Trump's agenda, including an extension of the 2017 tax cuts and additional funding for border security. Some Republicans in both chambers have expressed reservations about the bill's impact on the national debt and over Medicaid provisions. Republicans have limited wiggle room in the Senate and House to pass the bill and send it to Trump's desk.
