Jeffrey Epstein-related books and TV shows have exploded amid Trump's case-closed claims
The data points to deep public curiosity in Epstein's underage sex trafficking operation, and a possible government coverup, at a time when President Trump is trying to shift attention away from the topic.
Old copies of investigative reporter Julie K. Brown's 2021 book 'Perversion of Justice,' about Epstein, have been snapped up by buyers in recent weeks, leaving the book out of stock all across the web, from Amazon and Barnes & Noble to smaller and independent shops.
Brown said she has been hearing from interested buyers who can't find any print copies.
'I'm told the publisher is printing more copies,' she wrote on X to people who have been asking.
HarperCollins, the publisher, confirmed to CNN that the book is now entering its third printing.
'I hope it reflects that people really want to understand the story from the beginning,' Brown added in an interview with CNN.
A 2016 book about Epstein from James Patterson's true crime series, 'Filthy Rich,' has also climbed up Amazon's sales chart in recent days.
A Netflix docuseries based on that book, 'Jeffrey Epstein: Filthy Rich,' came out in 2020, and gained new viewers earlier this month when the Trump administration said it would not release any further material from its years-old probe of Epstein.
The case-closed message from the FBI and Justice Department fueled an uproar — and a dramatic spike in people searching for more information about the matter.
Google Trends showed a sudden uptick in Epstein-related searches when the government statement was released on July 17, and even higher levels of interest after Trump attempted to quell the outrage.
Similarly, from the first full week of July to the second week, US viewership of the Netflix docuseries rose 268 percent, as measured by minutes watched, according to Luminate, a streaming data firm.
A search of Epstein's name on YouTube, filtered only to show videos uploaded in the past week, found more than 40 videos with more than one million views each. Most of the top clips featured late-night TV hosts roasting Trump and speculated that the president wants certain secrets kept under wraps.
Last Friday, Trump sued the Wall Street Journal for libel over the newspaper's account of a birthday letter to Epstein bearing Trump's name and an outline of a naked woman.
On CNN's 'NewsNight,' New York Post editor at large Kelly Jane Torrance said the new Journal lawsuit might be a 'bad idea' for Trump because 'it's the Streisand Effect all over again.'
'Donald Trump is bringing so much more attention to this story than if he had just ignored it,' she said.
Two recent polls indicate that the public's interest in Epstein and the Epstein-adjacent universe of conspiracy theories does not outrank public policy matters like immigration and inflation.
However, when polled on the topic, Americans say the government should disclose more. 'Americans overwhelmingly suspect that the files contain damaging information about powerful and wealthy people,' CBS News pollsters reported Sunday.
Brown told CNN that she has been even busier this month — with source calls, TV interviews and the like — than she was when Epstein was found dead in his jail cell in 2019.
The reporter remains intrigued by unresolved questions, particularly about the sources of Epstein's riches. 'As they say, 'Follow the money,'' she remarked on 'AC360' last week.
Brown also said she believes government officials 'want to put a lid on this,' and that has made some of Epstein's victims even more anxious.
'I spoke to a couple of them over the past few days and, you know, they're afraid,' Brown said.
Then Brown paraphrased what the sources had said to her: 'The more our government covers up for Epstein, the more fearful I become because I keep thinking, 'Who is this guy? Who are the people that are in these files?''
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gilbert: Tony Evers' exit makes for a rare, truly open governor's race
Democrat Tony Evers' decision not to seek a third term means Wisconsin voters will experience something unusual in this political era — a truly 'open' race for governor. Nine of the past 10 gubernatorial contests in this state have involved a sitting governor. Now we know that the 2026 election will not. That makes the next campaign for governor more open-ended than it would have been, and harder to handicap. It also means there's a possibility both parties will have costly and hotly contested primaries for the state's highest office. Evers' decision not only alters the nature of the general election contest, but it also means the governor's race could serve as a platform for Democrats to debate their future in the aftermath of the party's momentous national defeat last year to Donald Trump and the GOP. For Democrats, a defeat for governor in 2026 in the nation's closest state would be hugely demoralizing. It also would be a major political failure, given the political advantage typically enjoyed in a midterm election by the party that is out of power in Washington. On the other hand, from a historical perspective, a Democratic victory would be groundbreaking. Coming as it would after Evers' two terms in office, it would produce the Democratic Party's longest hold on the governor's office in Wisconsin's nearly 180-year existence. Incredible as it sounds, Democrats have never occupied the office of governor for more than eight years in a row in Wisconsin. That is a testimony to several things: the dominance of the GOP in the state's first 100 years; the fact that until the 1970s, elections for governor here occurred every two years, not four; and the state's penchant for political swings in the current era of partisan parity and polarization. Let's look a little more closely at the history of governors' races here to put 2026 into some very broad perspective. Democrats have only once won three gubernatorial elections in a row in Wisconsin. It happened in the late 1950s and early 1960s when governors served two-year terms: Gaylord Nelson won in 1958 and 1960 and John Reynolds won in 1962. By contrast, Republicans have a history of longevity in power. There have been eight three-term Republican governors in Wisconsin's history, though only Tommy Thompson has done it since the four-year term was instituted beginning with the 1970 election. Thompson is the state's longest-serving governor (just over 14 years, from 1987 to 2001) and the only one to win four elections in a row. Only one other politician has tried to win three four-year terms, Republican Scott Walker, but he lost his bid for a third term to Evers in 2018. That Walker defeat illustrates some of the challenges a party faces staying in power in the current era. There is voter fatigue, which caught up with Walker after a drama-filled eight years, including a polarizing recall fight in 2014 and the failed bid he launched for the presidency in 2015. There is the cyclical nature of modern politics. Wisconsin has a history in mid-terms of voting against the party of the president, which worked against Republicans in 2002, against Democrats in 2010, and against Republicans in 2018. (Evers broke this pattern in 2022). In other words, America's frequent presidential swings have also produced frequent mid-term swings at the state level here. And finally, there is the state's extreme competitiveness. It was easier for a single party to stay in power when Wisconsin was dominated by one party. Since Wisconsin became a state in 1848, the governor's office has been held by four different parties: Republican, Democratic, Whig, and Progressive. But Republicans have been dominant for most of that history, at one point (between 1857 and 1930) winning 34 out of 37 contests for governor. Republicans have never been shut out of the governor's office for more than eight years in a row (a streak now in jeopardy). And there have been five different periods when Republicans held the office of governor for longer than eight years: ∎ 1987-2001, the Tommy Thompson era. It only ended when Thompson left office halfway through his fourth term to be health secretary under President George W. Bush. His lieutenant governor, Scott McCallum, filled the remainder of that term before losing the 2002 election to Democrat Jim Doyle. ∎ 1943-1959, when four different GOP governors served and Republicans won seven elections in a row for governor (again, these were two-year terms). ∎ 1895-1933. This was the longest period of Republican governance. Ten different Republican governors served, including both Fighting Bob La Follette and his son Philip. The GOP won 19 consecutive elections for governor. ∎ 1876-1891. ∎ 1856-1874. That history of lopsided control is long gone in Wisconsin, replaced not only by frequent partisan swings but also by routinely close elections. The past two races for governor have been the two closest of the past 60 years. The fact that this is now an open-seat race, without a sitting governor on the ballot, adds to the suspense. The last time this happened was 2010, when Walker was first elected. But the last time before that was more than 40 years ago in 1982. Evers would have been a formidable candidate for re-election as the most popular politician in the state, according to polling by the Marquette Law School. At the same time, his age (73) and the challenges of winning a third term were potential election wild cards. Without Evers on the ballot, this race will still be hugely influenced by the national political climate next year and by public opinion toward Trump. Democrats will still go into this race with the historic advantage of running against the party of the president. But historical patterns don't dictate the outcomes of elections; they just put them in context. Candidate quality matters. And in 2026, that is now a big unknown for both sides. Craig Gilbert provides Wisconsin political analysis as a fellow with Marquette University Law School's Lubar Center for Public Policy Research and Civic Education. Prior to the fellowship, Gilbert reported on politics for 35 years at the Journal Sentinel, the last 25 in its Washington Bureau. His column continues that independent reporting tradition and goes through the established Journal Sentinel editing him on Twitter: @Wisvoter. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Gilbert: Tony Evers' exit makes for a rare, truly open governor's race
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fighter's shocking meltdown filmed on plane
Aaron 'Tex' Johnson threw a tantrum on the plane and at the airport Aaron 'Tex' Johnson isn't new to fighting. After all, the Brazilian Jiu Jitsu expert makes his living as a mixed martial arts fighter. However, he's presumably new to fighting on airplanes, and his meltdown was captured on video. In videos posted to platforms like X, TikTok, and Instagram, Johnson is seen arguing with a Southwest Airlines flight attendant, and it is not going well. It's unclear what sparked the disturbance, but the fighter is seen yelling at the flight attendant about his bag. This quickly leads to a shouting match with fellow passengers. The flight attendant holds her ground, and the rest of the passengers are clearly on her side, joining her to yell at Johnson. The plane appears to be connected to the jet bridge because the fighter makes his way to the door as his fellow passengers gleefully shout,'Bye!' Instead of leaving, however, Johnson turns around and screams. At this point, the flight attendant begins to push Johnson off the plane as fellow crew members rush to assist her. Several large male passengers are also seen standing nearby, clearly signalling they are willing to assist the hard working flight crew if necessary. In another video posted to X, Johnson is being wheeled on a stretcher at the airport with a police escort. The officers remain calm as Johnson screams, 'I'm being treated like a Black person right now.' According to the New York Post, Johnson has since followed up with a post on Instagram Stories: 'For anyone trying to drag me down, it doesn't matter to me, I have the best friends.' He later followed up with a cryptic post that said: 'I never wanted to carry a gun Never used a weapon Been attacked by bats, knives and guns pulled I'm still here Karen's and b****es' It's currently unknown if charges were filed against Johnson or if he'll be welcome on future Southwest flights. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Todd Chrisley Thought About 'Going Back' to Prison Upon Seeing Wife Julie's Natural Brunette Hair
The married couple were indicted in 2019 for fraud and conspiracy, but were released from prison in early May under a pardon from President Donald Trump Todd Chrisley is sharing new details about his reunion with wife Julie after their release from prison. In a July 23 episode of the Chrisley Confessions 2.0 podcast, the couple sat down together to talk about their return home following their early releases from prison in May, which were made possible under a pardon from President Donald Trump. The pair, who were indicted on 12 counts of bank and wire fraud, tax evasion and conspiracy in 2019 and went to prison in January 2023, opened up about Julie, 52, being photographed in Nashville with her brunette hair and graying roots after life behind bars. "Was there a horrible picture that came out of me? Yeah. The way I flip that is, look at me now. People think I look even better because that horrible picture was out there to begin with," said Julie. "Listen, I will say, you set the bar low. You had to go nowhere but up," responded Todd, whose comment did not please his wife of almost 30 years. "That wasn't very nice," remarked Julie, but Todd, 56, doubled down on his statement. "I'm just trying to be honest. I'm not gonna lie, I first saw you, when I got out of that car, I started thinking about going back [to prison]. But then I thought, let me embrace this." He defended his statement further. "I mean it was a rough moment. It was a rough moment because I'd never seen you dark in my life. Julie, 30 years, I've never seen you with dark hair." Julie explained that she "didn't have any choice" but to embrace her natural hair color because of her lack of access to a salon. Although, she managed to make things work for a little while. "When I went to prison, my hair was blonde but it had a lot of I self-surrendered," she explained. "Then, we actually had a girl that was there at the prison when I got worked in the salon and she was really good and she did highlights for me. When I tell you they looked so good, it looked like I'd been to a salon on the outside." But then when her friend was released, Julie was left to her own devices and managed to get by with box dye purchased from the commissary. "I did that for probably a year and a half or so," she continued. According to her, she didn't have much time left away from home anyway so she thought, "You know what? I'm not going color my hair anymore. I'm just going to let it grow." "So even these chicks in prison acknowledged you need to do something with that," joked Todd. Prior to her time in jail, Julie was known for her platinum blonde locks and a day after her release, her son Chase Chrisley told Entertainment Tonight that she had no plans on hitting the bleach again. However, despite her claims. Julie eventually did return to the hair she was known for. On June 8, she was seen with her blonde hair freshened up at a Target, where fans took photos with her. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Later that month, Chase spoke to PEOPLE about always knowing his mom would eventually go back to her signature look. "I knew she wasn't going to keep it the same," he said while discussing his new alcohol-free sparkling water Gold Drop, out July 1, then revealing the joke his dad made about Julie's natural hair. "He said, 'This would be the first time in my life I've ever been with a brunette.'" Read the original article on People
