
Mexico sues Google over ‘Gulf of America' name change
Advertisement
Sheinbaum did not provide details of the lawsuit during her daily press briefing, but said that Google had been sued.
Mexico's foreign relations ministry had previously sent letters to Google asking it to not label Mexican territorial waters as the Gulf of America.
Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The body of water has shared borders between the United States and Mexico. Trump's order only carries authority within the US. Mexico, as well as other countries and international bodies, do not have to recognise the name change.
Advertisement
Mexico argues that Gulf of America should apply only to the part of the gulf over the United States continental shelf.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTHK
2 hours ago
- RTHK
Ukraine calls for clarify after US weapons pause
Ukraine calls for clarify after US weapons pause Ukraine said Washington's move would weaken its ability to defend against intensifying airstrikes and battlefield advances. File photo: AFP Ukraine appealed to the United States for clarity on Wednesday after it was caught off guard by a White House announcement that Washington was halting some arms shipments to the war-battered country. The Ukrainian defence ministry, which is deeply dependent on US arms, said it had not been notified about the reduction in aid announced one day earlier. Moscow revelled in the decision, saying it could bring the end of the war closer. Any slowdown in US support could harm Kyiv's ability to fend off escalating Russian aerial bombardments or frontline gains. Kyiv has long feared halts to US aid after Donald Trump returned to the White House in January, having criticised the tens of billions of dollars in support and weapons sent by his predecessor, Joe Biden. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in an evening address that Kyiv and Washington were clarifying details on supplies. "Continued American support for Ukraine, for our defence, for our people is in our common interest," he said. John Ginkel, the deputy chief of mission at the US embassy in Kyiv, was summoned by the foreign ministry – a rare diplomatic move usually reserved for foes and rivals, not vital allies – given uncertainty about what the cuts would mean for Kyiv. "Now is not the time for weak decisions," Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga wrote on X. "We need more interceptors and systems. We are also ready to purchase or rent them," he added. US officials downplayed the move. "The Department of Defense continues to provide the president with robust options regarding military aid to Ukraine, consistent with his goal of bringing this tragic war to an end," Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell told journalists. "The department is rigorously examining and adapting its approach towards achieving this objective while also preserving US military readiness and defense priorities," he said. In Moscow, the Kremlin said that reducing weapons deliveries to Kyiv would help end the conflict. "The fewer the number of weapons that are delivered to Ukraine, the closer the end of the special military operation," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters in response to a question by AFP, using Russia's term for its more than three-year-long offensive. (AFP)


South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump wants US$30 billion for China shipbuilding race. Here's why victory won't come easy
America's view of China as a 'pacing threat' has shaped its defence priorities as the military seeks to maintain an edge over a rapidly modernising PLA. In the last of a three-part series on how US budget tensions will affect efforts to deter China, we look at Trump's massive funding request aimed at turbocharging naval construction. Read the rest of the series here US President Donald Trump aims to invest tens of billions of dollars to revitalise American shipbuilding, as China's rapidly expanding naval fleet and commercial shipbuilding industry challenge US maritime dominance, especially in the Indo-Pacific. As part of the strategy, the Trump administration is considering setting aside a major portion of its US$150 billion defence reconciliation bill – under a special legislative process that allows Congress to fast-track funding – for naval shipbuilding. The US has also been seeking to increase shipbuilding cooperation with Indo-Pacific treaty allies South Korea and Japan, in an attempt to match Beijing's naval fleet in case war breaks out around Taiwan. However, despite Washington's resolve, the US might find it very difficult to match China's shipbuilding capacity within Trump's term, analysts warned. Potential solutions such as involving regional allies would also face challenges, they said, citing factors including Washington's political priority to keep jobs within the country. Will money talk for Trump?


South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Questions loom at Brics Rio summit about group's effectiveness
Brics country leaders are meeting for the bloc's annual summit in Rio de Janeiro this week, as questions loom about the group's effectiveness as a voice of the Global South and counterweight to the Washington-led coalition of developed economies. Against the backdrop of relentless tension that US President Donald Trump has injected into America's trade policy, this year's gathering on July 6 and 7 will test whether the bloc can present a unified front capable of countering Trump's efforts to revamp global economic engagement on his terms without antagonising the US leader. The prospects for a convincing show of unity are unclear at best. In April, Brics foreign ministers failed to issue a joint communique after disagreements over language advocating that bloc members Brazil India and South Africa gain permanent UN Security Council seats. Yet weeks later, the same countries aligned to sign a statement condemning American and Israeli military strikes on Iran , a newer Brics member, calling the attacks violations of international law.