The Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Is Both a Square and a Circle. A Squircle!
In addition to brighter screens, there's also the by-now standard dual-frequency location tracking, which helps with fitness tracking, and the new Running Coach feature, which copies what Google introduced last year on the Pixel Watch 3. Google Assistant has also been replaced with Gemini, but I mostly used it as I would Siri, for simple verbal commands like turning on the flashlight or starting a timer.
It's also worth noting here that Samsung recently switched to a new Dynamic Lug system. Instead of using a tiny pin to swap bands, you just slide and click to swap proprietary bands in and out. I first failed to notice this because this is how you swap the bands on last year's Samsung Watch Ultra, as well as the Apple Watches.
Personally, I like this system a lot because I find using the tiny pins to be horrible and annoying, and they break my nails. But I'm sorry for everyone who was expecting to be able to use your old round watch bands on the new squircle watch. Samsung offers four new bands with Dynamic Lugs, but that's not many if you've been building your collection for a while now. Eat Your Veggies
Courtesy of Adrienne So
I compared basics like my step count, sleep tracking, and heart rate to my Oura ring and was shocked by how closely the two matched. On one day, the Watch8 tracked me as having walked 14,100 steps; the Oura, 14,099 (thanks, dual-frequency GPS!). Sleep counts and heart rates were tallied mostly, too. Automatic activity tracking worked well, as it usually does with Samsung watches. Dog walks got picked up within a minute or two, as did runs and pool swims.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
8 minutes ago
- Forbes
Google Issues ‘Critical Security' Warning For All Pixel Users
Google surprised Pixel users in July, with a monthly security update lacking any actual security updates. But we're back on train for August. Google has confirmed a 'critical security vulnerability' that opens phones to remote attacks. Ironically, despite all its other security benefits, this threat only affects Android 16. So there's some good news for Samsung users who would otherwise continue to harbor frustration at the company's latest Android upgrade delays—maybe. Google warns CVE-2025-48530 'could lead to remote code execution in combination with other bugs, with no additional execution privileges needed.' It emphasizes that 'user interaction is not needed for exploitation' of this System level flaw. This isn't the only fix, with a number of high-severity vulnerabilities addressed as well. But the critical bug will generate the most attention, especially as it affects just the latest version of the Android OS. As ever, Pixels have been first to this new software. The update will now be released for Pixels and you can expect it to roll out to phones within days. Again a stark difference between Google's phones and Samsung's, with Android's leading OEM still subject to a patchwork quilt of updates by region, model and carrier, and lacking 'seamless' updates across almost all devices. As ever you can check your Pixel device has the latest security updates installed. Owners of other smartphones, Samsung included, should check their own monthly bulletins to confirm the fixes, the timing and the model eligibility. Samsung's own August monthly security release has also just been issued.
Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
I biked 12 miles with the Apple Watch 10 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 8, and there's a clear winner
The Apple Watch Series 10 is the best smartwatch for iPhone users in 2025, and also one of my favorite smartwatches ever. The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 is similarly one of the best smartwatches for Android, especially if you're after useful Gemini AI features. But which one is the best for biking? To find out, I biked 12 miles wearing the Apple Watch Series 10 on my left wrist and the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic on my right wrist to determine which of these two popular smartwatches is the more competent fitness tracker. As a control, I ran Strava on my handlebar-mounted iPhone 12 Mini. I also set a course for a familiar route, one I've recorded with Strava multiple times prior. Each smartwatch is packed to the gills with fitness tracking and wellness monitoring tech, including built-in GPS, altimeters, heart rate sensors, body temp sensors, and more. You also get a wide variety of fitness tracking modes. In fact, either can autodetect basic workouts like walks, runs, swims, and bike rides without user input. However, for this test, I manually started the tracking app on both to ensure the best results possible. So, which smartwatch, the Apple Watch Series 10 or Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic, proved to be more accurate when it comes to tracking a roughly 12-mile bike ride through a mix of forested and urban areas? Read on. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The Galaxy Watch 8 is the world's only wearable device with the brilliant Gemini AI voice assistant app built right in. In fact, you can customize a button to open it with ease. The Classic model also features a nifty rotating bezel for navigation. You additionally get best-in-class sleep tracking insight and loads of fitness and wellness tools. Apple's newest device is the brand's thinnest and lightest, while boasting the largest display to date. Sleek and comfortable on the wrist, the Series 10 is a supremely well-rounded smartwatch with more wellness monitoring, fitness tracking, smart, and safety features than you'll know what to do with. The Apple Watch Series 10 and Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 are fairly evenly matched spec-wise across the board. They each represent the non-tough-built, i.e., non-Ultra, flagship models in either brand's respective lineups. While the Apple Watch Series 10 comes in two sizes (42mm and 46mm), the Galaxy Watch 8 comes in three: 41mm, 44mm, and the 46mm "Classic" edition with rotating bezel. For this test, I used the larger Apple Watch and the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic. Comfort-wise, the Series 10 felt a lot better on my wrist throughout my ride than the larger/heavier Samsung. The Galaxy Watch 8's larger case size does allow for a multi-band GPS antenna, compared to a single-band antenna in the Series 10. With my bike route winding through a mix of heavily wooded and densely urban portions of Seattle, Washington, I fully expected the Samsung watch to slightly outperform the Apple Watch regarding distance and elevation tracking data. However, the previous time I pitted the Apple Watch 10 vs the Galaxy Watch 8 in a 5,000-step walk test, the Apple Watch came out on top despite its single-band GPS. Did Apple have a repeat upset win here? Check the results for yourself below. Apple Watch Series 10 Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Strava Distance 11.66 miles 11.73 miles 11.79 miles Elevation gain 735 feet 639 feet 665 feet Average speed (moving) 11.3 mph 12.3 mph 12.2 mph Max speed 20.5 mph 23.8 mph 25.4 mph Average heart rate 165 bpm 166 bpm n/a Max heart rate 178 bpm 180 bpm n/a Calories burned 652 calories 621 calories n/a Battery drain 16% 10% n/a According to Strava, during my one-hour bike ride, I covered nearly twelve miles in distance and gained 660+ feet in elevation. My average moving speed was around 12.2 mph, and my fastest speed was a little over 25 mph. Across the board, the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic churned out nearly the same stats as Strava. Sure, the device likely undercounted my total elevation gain by as much as 26 feet, but that's better than overcounting by as much as 70 feet, as the Apple Watch appears to have done. While Apple's total distance data is close enough, both the average speed and max speed appear quite low. As noted above, having recorded this route numerous times prior, I've come to expect a max speed of right around 25 mph and an average speed somewhere between 12 and 15 mph. (Note: Neither smartwatch was piggybacking off a smartphone's location data for this test; I didn't even bring a Samsung phone with me and disabled the ability in the Watch app on my iPhone.) Moving on, heart rate and calories data match up nicely between the Apple Watch and Samsung, something that's oh-so heart-warming to see. However, the Apple Watch Series 10 used a bit more battery to track my excursion compared to the Galaxy Watch 8. Interestingly, in my previous test between these two, it was the Samsung that exhausted more battery. Cupertino may've taken the crown in the first showdown between these two fitness-tracking wearables, but in this bout, it's Mountain View coming out on top with the more accurate workout tracking data. That said, having extensively tested both of these devices, either is a great choice to help you keep tabs on your workout journey. We may be splitting hairs with the results here, but I'd trust either to accurately track my progress over time. In fact, the Galaxy Watch 8's new Running Coach feature and Apple's new Workout Buddy tool both promise personalized, real-time AI coaching. Stay tuned for more in-depth reporting on both, along with a deep dive comparison of these two watches. Which smartwatches or fitness trackers should I test next in a head-to-head competition? And what workout should I do? Let me know in the comments below.
Android Authority
an hour ago
- Android Authority
Samsung's new foldable display tech could make the Galaxy Z Fold 8 its sleekest yet
C. Scott Brown / Android Authority TL;DR Samsung Display has introduced a new foldable display brand called MONTFLEX. The branding promises thinner, more durable, and flatter foldable displays MONTFLEX panels could power next year's Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Flip 8 Samsung's display arm has a new foldable display brand called 'MONTFLEX,' which is essentially the company's way of highlighting its most innovative foldable displays ever. The name 'MONTFLEX' comes from the French word mont, meaning 'mountain,' Which Samsung says symbolizes the peak of innovation in foldable display technology. The company will officially debut the MONTFLEX brand at the Korea Display Industry Exhibition (K-Display 2025) on August 7. While not yet confirmed for any specific device, it's highly likely that MONTFLEX displays could feature in next year's Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Flip 8, offering further upgrades in design and durability. Samsung Display Samsung says each letter of 'MONT' reflects a key strength of its next-gen foldable OLED: M: Mechanically durable, with improved folding reliability Mechanically durable, with improved folding reliability O: Opto-mechanically flat, delivering a vivid screen with minimal crease Opto-mechanically flat, delivering a vivid screen with minimal crease N: Narrow bezels, for a more immersive display Narrow bezels, for a more immersive display T: Thin and lightweight, enhancing portability For users, this could mean smoother folding, a slimmer profile, and a screen that looks and feels more like traditional glass. In the MONTFLEX announcement, Samsung also referenced the Galaxy Z Fold 7's foldable panel, which can endure up to 500,000 folds. Although the company hasn't officially confirmed whether the Galaxy Z Fold 7 or Flip 7 use the MONTFLEX branding, the introduction of this new name strongly hints that future devices, likely the Fold 8 and Flip 8, will use it. Foldables have come a long way since the original Galaxy Fold. Samsung's early models were fragile, with visible creasing and durability concerns. But today, Samsung is claiming half a million folds without failure, and someone out there is even manually testing it fold by fold. Follow
