Adeel Akhtar (Angad)
In the opening scenes, first time playwright Shaan Sahota (she also works as a doctor!) does a decent job of spinning an In The Thick of It -style yarn about Angad (Adeel Akhtar), a very junior British Sikh shadow minister who suddenly finds himself in play for the leadership of what is implicitly the Tory Party. The opening scenes thrum with an energy not dissimilar to a previous National Theatre triumph, James Graham's This House, as it plunges us into an amusingly compromised world of sweary spads, cocky whips and malleable MPs. Helena Wilson is scene stealingly entertaining as the apparently humble Angad's shark-like head of comms Petra. It's fun.
But then Sahota introduces what is essentially an entire second main storyline, this time revolving around Angad's late father's will and his family's lasting trauma at their patriarch's unfeeling treatment of them. We see Angad playing the role of the understanding if somewhat distant brother to his GP eldest sister Gyan (Thusitha Jayasundera) and hilariously highly strung middle sister Malika (Shelley Conn, superb). And then we see him calmly accept the will's shock contents, much to the horror and fury of his siblings.
These two threads – cynical political comedy and more sensitive look at the traumatising legacy of a patriarchal upbringing – are by no means impossible to square. Akhtar's Angad displays broadly the same characteristics in each: a genuinely nice, humble guy whose head is instantly turned the second opportunity presents itself. But it's not enough to make The Estate align with itself. In Daniel Raggett's production the comedy bits are so broad as to undercut the more sensitive bits. It feels like two different shows crashing into one another, bound only by a corrosive cynicism about politicians.
But on that last note it feels weirdly detached from the real world: there's no mention of Rishi Sunak, Reform or who the actual ruling party of the day is. I'm not even sure any real life politicians or political events are namechecked at all. I realise the intention is to avoid getting bogged down in political detail, but there is something peculiar about its blend of detachment from and immense cynicism toward contemporary British politics. In the Thick of It was very recognisably a version of the late New Labour era, but the 2025 Tory Party is an astoundingly hot mess and The Estate suffers from only wanting to engage with it in very general terms.
Don't get me wrong: there are two pretty good plays here. The 'comedy' plot may lack in specifics but it has some very smart stuff about the way Parliament is composed of people from such an unhealthily compressed social sphere that they have all known each other since they were kids, and were literally groomed for power.
The 'serious' plot paints the entire family as so traumatised by their overbearing late dad that they're each damaged to the point of dysfunction. It reckons more sensitively with the family's status as second generation immigrants and the lasting shadow of 'traditional' values.
Either would have made a really satisfying full length play, or even a double bill of shorter plays. But the two just don't mesh properly: The Estate seesaws between amusingly cynical and just plain bleak; Aktar's Angad – even by this country's Trussian standards – just too much of a public liability to possibly be made LOTO, at least by the end. You're allowed a bit of latitude in a comedy of course but Raggett's production is only half that. It's decent, but too disjointed to serve as a classic debut.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
14 minutes ago
- Spectator
Soul suckers of private equity, Douglas Murray on Epstein and MAGA & are literary sequels ‘lazy'?
First up: how private equity is ruining Britain Gus Carter writes in the magazine this week about how foreign private equity (PE) is hollowing out Britain – PE now owns everything from a Pret a Manger to a Dorset village, and even the number of children's homes owned by PE has doubled in the last five years. This 'gives capitalism a bad name', he writes. Perhaps the most symbolic example is in the water industry, with water firms now squeezed for money and saddled with debt. British water firms now have a debt-to-equity ratio of 70%, compared to just 4% in 1991. Britain's desperation for foreign money has, quite literally, left Britain 'in the shit'. Gus joined the podcast to discuss further, alongside the journalist Megan Greenwell, author of Bad Company: Private Equity and the Death of the American Dream. (00:46) Next: why is MAGA so incensed over Jeffrey Epstein? Six years after he died, the Jeffrey Epstein scandal is still haunting Donald Trump. Trump had vowed to release all files on various cases that attract conspiracy theorists – from JFK to Martin Luther King Jr. What makes the Epstein case different, as Douglas Murray writes in the magazine this week, is that the case was so recent and Epstein's ties with the elites, many of whom are still in power. Trump appeared to backtrack on releasing files relating to Epstein, prompting ire from the MAGA world, and there is now mounting cross-party pressure to uncover who knew what. Mike Johnson, the House speaker, sent representatives home early for summer, and there is even talk of Ghislaine Maxwell testifying. Why is the Epstein scandal such a lightning rod for MAGA rage? Douglas Murray joined the Spectator to discuss. The full interview can be found on Spectator TV. (15:49) And finally: are literary sequels 'lazy'? It's 'sod's law', says the Spectator's literary editor Sam Leith, that when a friend's book is due to be reviewed in the pages of the books section that you edit, the review will be bad. Mike Cormack reviews Men In Love by Irvine Welsh this week, calling the decision by Welsh to pen another sequel to Trainspotting 'lazy'. At the Spectator this made us ponder whether this is true of all literary sequels, and what motivates authors to stick with characters and stories that they know. Sam joined us to discuss further alongside Lucy Thynne, the Telegraph's deputy literary editor. (33:59) Hosted by William Moore and Lara Prendergast. Produced by Patrick Gibbons and Megan McElroy.
Daily Mirror
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'I'm a French expat in Britain and I was left amazed by one element of UK culture'
Stéphane Jouin, who moved to the UK nine years ago, shared the revelation in a video for his YouTube channel, 'A French guy in England', which showcases the two nations' "cultural quirks" A French expat living in the UK has named a particular aspect of British culture that's left him "amazed". Stéphane Jouin, who swapped France for the UK nine years ago, divulged his findings on his YouTube channel ' A French guy in England ', which delves into the "cultural quirks" of both countries. In his video, '6 Things I Really Appreciate as a French Guy in England', Stéphane shared his observations from nearly a decade in Britain, touching on aspects such as our politeness and tendency to be "merciful". Among these UK insights, he highlighted his admiration for the British propensity for kindness, a trait he finds "amazing" and notes is even promoted by companies and organisations here. Stéphane expressed: "Number two is that people tend to be kind." He elaborated: "I'm actually amazed that people are generally ready to help. For example, if you're stranded with your car on the road, and your bonnet is open - they call it 'hood' in the USA - they will come to ask you if you are okay, if you need any help. I find this amazing." Stéphane added that acts of kindness are "part of everyday life here." He also pointed out that the UK is home to many charities that support people suffering from health issues. He pointed out that British firms and groups are known for rallying people to join events they organise to raise money for charitable causes. On the flip side, in May, a Brit living in France took to TikTok to share five reasons why life across the Channel is "better." The expat, known as Alex or "It's moi" on the platform, presented her "household edition" of insights. First up was the revelation that people in France tend not to have their washing machines in the kitchen, instead opting for the bathroom or elsewhere, meaning you "don't have the eyesore or the noise" in the kitchen. But there's more; Alex also highlighted the convenience of having plug sockets in the bathroom, "square-shaped" pillows for extra headroom, and shutters on every window. Alex said: "You don't have to worry about blackout blinds or blackout curtains if you want to make the room dark. You just close the shutters, which is absolutely fantastic when you have children." Finally, Alex claimed that a "lot of the houses around here" tended to be detached rather than semi-detached. She said they didn't have to worry about any "potential noise problems" from neighbours. However, not everyone saw things the same way, with one commenting: "I'd hate to have a washing machine in my bathroom." Some did agree with the TikToker, with one claiming that once you try using a square pillow, there's "no going back".
The National
32 minutes ago
- The National
If I was John Swinney, here's what I would say to Donald Trump
You might expect me to want the First Minister to boycott a meeting with the current US president. I personally would not have actively sought out a meeting, but heads of state meet heads of state and talking to people you don't like is part of geopolitics. That does not mean prostrating yourself, or complying – but it also doesn't mean grandstanding. This is not a serious meeting and there is nothing at stake. Talk about the weather for a bit and smile for the camera. It won't change US policy. READ MORE: Donald Trump protest planned near mother's birthplace during Scotland visit Of course most of us want to see someone put Donald Trump in his place, but posing is meaningless – it is what you do that counts. So Scotland's First Minister should courteously welcome Donald Trump back to Scotland and otherwise do his best to say as little as possible – while the rest of us make boaking gestures in the background. That does not mean Scotland should treat this current incarnation of the USA passively. The US has not only become an unreliable partner, it is much less important to us than it was. In reality the British establishment is clinging to the US almost wholly because we have degraded our defence capabilities to the extent that we are entirely reliant on the US for defence. There are also sectors of the Scottish economy that heavily export to the US (notably whisky and textiles) and in turn the US supplies us with a number of software systems on which we rely. In terms of access to markets, however, it is China that is manufacturing cost-effective batteries, solar panels, wind turbines and electric vehicles. We need those more than we need Oreos. And yes the US still controls the global reserve currency, but Scotland is less exposed to 'dollar bullying' since we don't have our own distinct currency. This gives us some leeway to insulate ourselves from the erratic behaviour of the US. First, we should be tasking our economic development agencies to work with producers to diversify their markets. If China, India, Brazil, Mexico and others aren't buying enough whisky then we need to help them because they're clearly missing out. In the turbulent world in which we currently live, any exporter overly reliant on a single nation state is vulnerable. Second, we need to start to develop direct trading relationships with what used to be known as the Brics counties – because they are dominant among the emerging economic players and all of them have large-scale production capacity that links to our needs. We assume that US corporations will always act as go-betweens and we need to stop assuming that. Third, we should look at areas of vulnerability which could be exposed if the US's behaviour gets more erratic still (we're only one eighth of the way through Trump's term and it isn't clear what is coming next). If a nation state has indicated a willingness to use economic blackmail as a policy tool then you should look at where you might have exposure. One example of this is in software. Think of the public sector's ability to operate and now ask what would happen if a technology boycott was ever enacted – it has already been used against China. How would we cope?Other nations are quietly already addressing this weakness. Denmark has dropped public sector use of all Microsoft Office products and is exploring dropping Microsoft more generally. It has shifted to using open source applications such as OpenOffice (which is what we use in Common Weal). France has also shifted much of its public sector IT to OpenOffice (or rather a version known as LibreOffice) and Germany has just announced it is doing the same. Extending this to a logical conclusion it is simply mad that Scotland is relying solely on US corporate AI. Other nations are training bespoke, public-good AI systems which they then own. Scotland should do the same. Fourth, we should start to move our soft power diplomacy. There is almost a reflex reaction that 'overseas' means 'US'. How much more might we get tapping in to diaspora in Canada, Australia and New Zealand? Might a Tartan Week in Bejing achieve more than one in New York? Does the average Indian policy-maker know we exist? We are moving rapidly into a multipolar world and Scotland must adapt. Insulting the US President is frankly a stupid way to do business – but pretending he isn't a threat to our national interests is unrealistic and being inactive in the face of that risk is really dangerous. Scotland shouldn't stand on the steps and waggle its bare bum at Trump even if it makes us feel better. We should suck up the reality of global diplomacy, do what is needed to get Trump out the country without having developed one of his crazy grudge matches – and then we should roll up our sleeves and take concrete action to make sure no nation can ever bully us like this again.
