Elon Musk company signs preliminary agreement on Dubai Loop project
The United Arab Emirates' Artificial Intelligence Minister, Omar Al Olama, announced the project on a video interview with Elon Musk during the World Governments Summit on Thursday without providing further detail.
The Boring Company (TBC) said the memorandum of understanding covers an initial pilot phase of 11 stations, transporting passengers in electric vehicles through tunnels at speeds up to 160km per hour.
It will be similar to the Vegas Loop, which began transporting passengers in EVs through tunnels in 2021. It has five stations around a convention center in the U.S. city and is aiming for a total of more than 100.
Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Cedar News
7 days ago
- Cedar News
Elon Musk Revives ‘Vine' as an AI-Powered App
Elon Musk has announced the return of 'Vine'… 'We're bringing back Vine, but in AI form'
Nahar Net
22-07-2025
- Nahar Net
Two cases threatening Tesla: Can Musk be trusted?
by Naharnet Newsdesk 22 July 2025, 14:09 Elon Musk fought court cases on opposite coasts Monday, raising a question about the billionaire that could either speed his plan to put self-driving Teslas on U.S. roads or throw up a major roadblock: Can this wildly successful man who tends to exaggerate really be trusted? In Miami, a Tesla driver who has admitted he was wrong to reach for a dropped cell phone moments before a deadly accident, spoke of the danger of putting too much faith in Musk's technology — in this case his Autopilot program. "I trusted the technology too much," said George McGee, who ran off the road and killed a woman out stargazing with her boyfriend. "I believed that if the car saw something in front of it, it would provide a warning and apply the brakes." In unusual coincidence, regulators arguing an Oakland, California, case tried to pin exaggerated talk about the same Tesla technology at the center of a request to suspend the carmaker from being able to sell vehicles in the state. Musk's tendency to talk big — whether it's his cars, his rockets or his government costing-cutting efforts — have landed him in trouble with investors, regulators and courts before, but rarely at such a delicate moment. After his social media spat with President Donald Trump, Musk can no longer count on a light regulatory touch from Washington. Meanwhile, sales of his electric cars have plunged and so a hit to his safety reputation could threaten his next big project: rolling out driverless robotaxis — hundreds of thousands of them — in several U.S. cities by the end of next year. The Miami case holds other dangers, too. Lawyers for the family of the dead woman, Naibel Benavides Leon, recently convinced the judge overseeing the jury trial to allow them to argue for punitive damages. A car crash lawyer not involved in the case, but closely following it, said that could cost Tesla tens of millions of dollars, or possibly more. "I've seen punitive damages go to the hundreds of millions, so that is the floor," said Miguel Custodio of Los Angeles-based Custodio & Dubey. "It is also a signal to other plaintiffs that they can also ask for punitive damages, and then the payments could start compounding." That Tesla has allowed the Miami case to proceed to trial is surprising. It has settled at least four deadly accidents involving Autopilot, including payments just last week to a Florida family of a Tesla driver. That said, Tesla was victorious in two other jury cases, both in California, that also sought to lay blame on its technology for crashes. Lawyers for the plaintiffs in the Miami case argue that Tesla's driver-assistance feature, called Autopilot, should have warned the driver and braked when his Model S sedan blew through flashing lights, a stop sign and a T-intersection at 62 miles-an-hour in an April 2019 crash. Tesla said that drivers are warned not to rely on Autopilot, or its more advanced Full Self-Driving system. It says the fault entirely lies with the "distracted driver" just like so many other "accidents since cellphones were invented." Driver McGee settled a separate suit brought by the family of Benavides and her severely injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. McGee was clearly shaken when shown a dashcam video Monday of his car jumping a Key West, Florida, road and hitting a parked Chevrolet Tahoe which then slammed into Benavides and sent her 75 feet through the air to her death. Asked if he had seen those images before, McGee pinched his lips, shook his head, then squeaked out a response, "No." Tesla's attorney sought to show that McGee was fully to blame, asking if he had ever contacted Tesla for additional instructions about how Autopilot or any other safety features worked. McGee said he had not, though he was heavy user of the features. He said he had driven the same road home from work 30 or 40 times. Under questioning, he also acknowledged he alone was responsible for watching the road and hitting the brakes. Summarizing the testimony, Tesla said in a statement after the court adjourned that McGee had "stated the simple truth that we all know: If he had just paid attention to the road instead of searching for his dropped cell phone and pressing the accelerator —which he was doing for over a minute before the crash — this tragic accident would never have happened." But lawyers for the Benavides family had a chance in the courtroom at parrying that line of argument, asking McGee if he would have taken his eyes off the road and reached for his phone had he been driving any car other than a Tesla on Autopilot. McGee responded, "I don't believe so." The case is expected to continue for two more weeks. In the California case, the state's Department of Motor Vehicles is arguing before an administrative judge that Tesla has misled drivers by exaggerating the capabilities of its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features. A court filing claims even those feature names are misleading because they offer just partial self-driving Musk has been warned by federal regulators to stop making public comments suggesting Full Self-Driving allows his cars to drive themselves because it could lead to overreliance on the system, resulting in possible crashes and deaths. He also has run into trouble with regulators for Autopilot. In 2023, the company had to recall 2.3 million vehicles for problems with the technology and is now under investigation for saying it fixed the issue though it's unclear it has, according to regulatory documents. The California case is expected to last another four days.
L'Orient-Le Jour
21-07-2025
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Houthi arms dealers use X, WhatsApp to sell US weapons
On July 15 it was revealed that many Houthi weapon deals were taking place across both X and Whatsapp despite site regulations, according to a report by Washington-based Tech Transparency Project (TTP), cited by The Guardian. The investigation found over 130 Yemen-based X accounts, as well as at least 67 WhatsApp business accounts, all of which sell a myriad of rifles, grenade launchers and other military equipment, some being American-manufactured. The buyers, identified as likely militants, can pay up to $10,000 per rifle, which they can buy directly off the social media sites. On X, many Houthi sellers were found to have bought premium, allowing them to publish extended videos with which they advertised their weaponry in depth, as well as have access to the tip feature, which buyers can use to directly send money. Additionally, on WhatsApp, dealers made business accounts in which they were able to publish 'catalogues' of the rifles on sale, allowing viewers to directly pick out weapons without ever leaving the website. Both X and Meta, the parent company of WhatsApp, have policies that supposedly do not allow for the sale of weapons, with WhatsApp claiming that if they 'identify or are made aware of U.S.-designated terrorist organizations attempting to use our service, we will take appropriate action.' However, these accounts seemingly bypassed all checks both WhatsApp and X claim to have in place, despite their profiles and posts clearly boasting Houthi affiliation. Both companies allowed for the sale of these weapons to go on for months, and, in some cases, years. As director of TTP Katie Paul stated, 'They are allowing arms traders linked to a U.S.-designated terrorist group to traffic weapons on their platforms.' Not only that, but X seemingly added advertisements at the bottom of these arms dealers' posts, suggesting the company made a profit off of the Houthi deals, in direct violation of their policy. This spike in sales comes after both X and Meta heavily rolled back content moderation. After purchasing X in 2022, Elon Musk laid off around 80 percent of the trust and safety team. WhatsApp followed suit, as in January of 2025 they stated they would limit content moderation. Both actions seemingly took place in response to Trump's accusations of censorship on social media platforms. Most of these accounts were created and began selling after the major layoffs at both companies. Paul holds them both accountable, stating, 'Both Meta and X have the capital, the tools and the human resources to address this problem, but they're not doing so.' TTP argued that both platforms were greatly contributing to the U.S.' national security risks by facilitating Houthi armament. This crisis arose in the wake of much talk surrounding Houthi weaponry. Firstly, an interception of military equipment headed to Houthi hands was just announced on July 16, alarming many. The shipment, containing up to 750 tons of equipment and bearing Iran's hallmark, is only part of the arms Iran sends to the militias it deems part of its 'Axis of Resistance.' Additionally, Israeli Defense Minister Katz just met with his U.S. counterpart, Pete Hegseth, on July 18 to discuss the financial difficulties the Israeli managers of Eilat Port were facing due to Houthi attacks. This then begs the question of how these Houthi arm dealers were acquiring such equipment, especially as much of it is listed as 'property of U.S. Govt' and 'NATO,' indicating that they were used by the U.S. military. Taimur Khan, head of Gulf regional operations at Conflict Armament Research, stated that it is difficult to track how said weapons arrive in Yemen, as the weapons being advertised 'reflect all the different vectors of supply in Yemen.' Whether they come from previous stocks of American forces, trafficking channels through the Gulf, or smuggling by Iran, Khan said there is no way to be sure.
