
The Trump administration is gutting EPA's research arm. Can California bridge the gap?
The EPA this month announced that it was eliminating nearly 4,000 employees as part of a cost-saving 'reduction in force,' the majority of which are staffers from its Office of Research and Development — whose research into environmental risks and hazards underpins nearly all EPA rules and regulations. The reduction will save the agency $748.8 million, officials said.
'Under President Trump's leadership, EPA has taken a close look at our operations to ensure the agency is better equipped than ever to deliver on our core mission of protecting human health and the environment while Powering the Great American Comeback,' read a statement from EPA administrator Lee Zeldin. 'This reduction in force will ensure we can better fulfill that mission while being responsible stewards of your hard-earned tax dollars.'
The ORD had been in operation since the EPA was established by President Richard Nixon in 1970 and was focused on conducting scientific research to help advance the EPA's goals of protecting human health and the environment.
Experts said the decision to break up the research office sends a chilling signal for science and will leave more communities exposed to environmental hazards such as industrial chemicals, wildfire smoke and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances — or PFAs — in drinking water, all of which are subject to the department's analysis.
'The people of this country are not well served by these actions,' read a statement from Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta, former EPA Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator for Science. 'They are left more vulnerable.'
It also shifts the onus onto California and other states to fill the void left by the federal government. ORD's research supported work around Superfund site cleanups and environmental disasters such as the Los Angeles wildfires or the East Palestine, Ohio, train derailment.
'There will be another East Palestine, another Exxon Valdez [oil spill] — some disaster will happen ... and those communities will be hurt when they don't have to be,' said Tracey Woodruff, a professor at UC San Francisco and a former senior scientist and policy advisor with EPA's Office of Policy.
The Golden State appears better positioned than many others carry on the work — particularly through the small but mighty department Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, or OEHHA, located within the California Environmental Protection Agency.
'California has for some time developed a pretty robust infrastructure of assessing the health harms of toxic chemicals and pollutants,' Woodruff said. 'So in that way, we're better off than almost any other state because we have such a stellar group of scientists.'
Indeed, California is known for some of its more rigorous health-based standards and regulations, such as the Proposition 65 warnings posted by businesses across the state to advise people of the presence of cancer-causing chemicals, which are overseen by OEHAA.
By dismantling ORD, the EPA is further politicizing the independent science and research that underpins so many of the nation's regulations, said Yana Garcia, California's Secretary for Environmental Protection. While California remains dedicated to such science, she said other states may not be so lucky.
'We will continue to keep the work of OEHHA strong and remain committed to it, but we're still getting a handle on what this loss really means,' Garcia said. 'It is a huge loss to California. It is an even bigger loss to so many other states that don't have an Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessments like we do.'
Kris Thayer, OEHHA's director, came to agency from ORD, where she directed its IRIS program for identifying and characterizing the human health hazards of chemicals. She said the state is 'absolutely going to be looking at every way that we can fill the void given our resources, but we are going to feel the pinch of this.'
'It's not only that the quantity of assessments will be reduced, but the credibility of the assessments will be reduced, because they will be developed by programs where there's a lot more opportunity for political interference in terms of the science that gets shaped,' she said.
Chemical industry and other anti-regulatory groups have lobbied for the EPA to limit ORD's influence. A January letter addressed to Zeldin spearheaded by the American Chemistry Council and 80 other organizations said risk assessments developed by ORD were 'being used to develop overly burdensome regulations on critical chemistries essential for products we use every day.'
In particular, they cited the government's evaluation of chemicals including formaldehyde, inorganic arsenic and hexavalent chromium, which can be used or created by industrial processes. The groups charged the agency with a lack of impartiality and transparency, a slow process and limited peer review.
Thayer noted that a lot of assessment work conducted by ORD is used in California. On the other hand, a number of states and EPA programs also look to California's assessments.
'We're going to be monitoring how this unfolds, but we're certainly going to be looking to do everything we can to meet capacity — we're not going to be able to fully meet it — and recognizing that our work will not only impact California, but can be used by other states,' she said.
Garcia said California has hired a number of people from the federal government over the past year and is open to absorbing more EPA employees who were recently laid off. OEHHA has a number of open positions.
'California remains open for [a] rigorous, science-based approach to health and environmental protections,' Garcia said.
Woodruff, of UCSF, said she hopes to see California and other states invest more in OEHAA and other scientific agencies by offering better salaries and bolstering staff numbers. But ultimately, she said the Golden State can use this moment to become an example for others to follow.
'California could be a real leader for all the other states who also want to keep doing right by their by their constituents and continuing to address toxic chemical exposure,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Politico
28 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump admin escalates its war with the courts — this time targeting Judge Boasberg
Boasberg's remarks at the conference came after weeks of Trump allies inside and outside the administration suggesting judges who rule against the president should be impeached and disfavored court orders should be ignored. Judges at every level — including justices of the Supreme Court — have raised the specter of defiance by the administration and urged officials to respect court orders regardless of which court or judge issues them. Jeffrey Sutton, the chief judge of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals who briefed journalists after the conference that day, said several lawmakers were in attendance, including Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), as well as Reps. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.), Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) and Hank Johnson (D-Ga.). It is unclear whether the lawmakers heard Boasberg's remarks. A spokesperson for Boasberg did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Mizelle's complaint falls to Sri Srinivasan, the chief judge of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, who oversees judicial disciplinary matters for judges in that circuit. Federal judges are ordinarily barred from making out-of-court public comments about pending or impending matters. It's unclear whether Boasberg's remarks at the judges' meeting qualify and whether he was speaking about any case he knew to be pending or imminent. The complaint also makes more general claims that his statements undermined 'public confidence in the integrity of the judiciary.' Mizelle also filed a complaint earlier this year against Washington-based U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes for her sharp-elbowed comments about the Justice Department's arguments in a lawsuit seeking to block Trump's transgender military ban. In March, the Justice Department asked the D.C. Circuit to remove Boasberg from the deportation case and reassign it to another judge, an extraordinary step. The appeals court never acted on that request but has paused his orders related to potential contempt proceedings. After Boasberg's March ruling, Trump called for the judge's impeachment, labeling him a 'troublemaker and agitator.' The new complaint again asks for Boasberg's removal from the deportation case and for him to be reprimanded publicly. It also raises the prospect of his fellow judges calling for his impeachment over the remarks. The administration has recently escalated its fight with the judiciary in two other arenas. The Justice Department sued the entire federal bench in Maryland over a policy granting an automatic 48-hour hold on deportation cases. And the administration publicly attacked judges in New Jersey for appointing a veteran federal prosecutor as the state's U.S. attorney — an effort to push aside Trump's pick for the post, his former personal attorney Alina Habba.

28 minutes ago
Jordan requesting US help with Gaza aid airdrops but Trump administration has no plans to assist, officials say
As international pressure to deliver more food aid to Gaza builds, the Kingdom of Jordan is "continuing to request assistance in the form of pledges to contribute aircraft, supplies, humanitarian aid, and logistical support" for its airdrop operation -- but the Trump administration has no active plans to join European allies in helping with the mission at present, according to an internal State Department communication reviewed by ABC News on Monday and two U.S. officials familiar with the matter. Per the communication, Jordan has informed the State Department of its intention to launch a three-week airdrop operation beginning in early August -- in addition to the drops conducted with the United Arab Emirates that took place Sunday -- and the department is tracking various pledges to assist with the operation from Spain, Belgium, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. "Emphasizing the irreplicable role of land routes and minimizing the risk of casualties due to airdrops are continued concerns among potential contributors," the department communication noted. Some aid organizations have also publicly expressed concerns about the efficacy and safety of airdrops. "Airdrops are the most expensive & inefficient way to deliver aid. It is a distraction to the inaction," Commissioner-General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency Philippe Lazzarini wrote in a post on X on Friday. Earlier Monday, President Donald Trump promised the U.S. would be "even more involved" when it comes to delivering aid to Gaza, saying this administration would work with European allies to set up "food centers" with fewer restrictions on access. He also suggested that additional assistance could come in the form of the U.S. helping with air drops if his administration chose to do so. "We did some airlifts before, some airdrops," he said following a meeting with U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer. "It's not very hard to do, actually." Jordan has also informed the State Department that it encountered significant delays when moving aid into Gaza by ground on Sunday, stating that the Israeli government allowed only 25 out of 60 trucks traveling from Jordan to enter the enclave. According to the internal communication, the Jordanian Armed Forces reported that the screening of the aid convoy "went substantially slower" than it has for three previous convoys organized by the country. The 25 trucks that were permitted entry on Sunday were carrying World Food Programme contents, while the delayed trucks were carrying food supplies from other organizations, including World Central Kitchen and the Jordan Hashemite Charity Organization, it added. Jordan has informed the department of its intention to move two more convoys into Gaza this week, according to the communication. "President Trump wants to alleviate suffering for the people of Gaza because he has a humanitarian heart. He announced a new aid plan today to help Gazans obtain crucial access to food – details are forthcoming," White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said in a comment to ABC News. Trump said earlier that European countries would also help with his plan to set up food centers but shared few other details about his vision. "We have all of the European nations joining us, and others also have called. So, we're going to set up food centers and where the people can walk in and no boundaries. We're not going to have fences," he said. Regarding ABC News reporting on Jordan's request for assistance with its air drop operation and the reported delay moving ground aid into Gaza caused by Israel, a State Department spokesperson responded, "President Trump has called for creative solutions 'to help the Palestinians' in Gaza, and we welcome any effective effort that delivers food to Gazans and keeps it out of the hands of Hamas." "At this time, GHF remains the best mechanism for getting aid into the hands of people in desperate need in Gaza while also keeping aid out of the hands of Hamas," the spokesperson said, referring to the U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. "A track record of distributing over 94 million meals to date while preventing any Hamas looting is absolutely incredible and should be commended and supported. We call on other aid agencies and the UN to participate in this secure aid delivery system and take GHF up on its offer to use its system to deliver food to Gazans in need," the spokesperson said. The Trump administration has pledged at least $30 million to the GHF and thrown its full support behind the controversial charity despite concerns from critics regarding its aid distribution practices. Earlier this month, more than 160 charity groups and NGOs called for the GHF to be shut down, claiming that more than 500 Palestinians had been killed while seeking aid from the organization and that its distribution locations 'have become sites of repeated massacres in blatant disregard for international humanitarian law.' The United Nations has also rejected requests to cooperate with GHF. 'We welcome working with any other partners. All we ask is that those partners work based on the most basic humanitarian principles, one of them being that don't set up an operation that will increase the risk of people to be shot at or trampled while trying to get food,' U.N. spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric said in a press conference last week. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation pushed back on the criticism in a statement to ABC News. "While Oxfam, MSF and these other groups hold press conferences and send out threatening letters, GHF is on the ground feeding people," a GHF spokesperson said. "We've offered to help them deliver it safely. They've refused. The humanitarian community must return to its core mission -- feeding people -- not protecting outdated systems or avoiding the discomfort of change. In a letter sent to Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday, a group of 21 Democratic senators called for the Trump administration to immediately cease funding for the GHF and resume support for the existing U.N-led aid coordination mechanisms.

USA Today
38 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump says he's 'allowed' to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell and he never went to Epstein's island
President Donald Trump said that while he is 'allowed' pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, a key associate of Jeffrey Epstein who's serving a 20-year sentence on sexual abuse charges, no one has asked him about it, and it would be 'inappropriate' to discuss it. Trump made the remarks, which appear to be some of his most extensive to date on Maxwell, during questioning by reporters on July 28 at his Trump Turnberry golf club in Scotland while meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. A reporter asked Trump whether he would 'ever consider' a pardon for Maxwell, who met with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche for two days last week to answer questions about Epstein. Critics have said the meetings with Blanche, Trump's former personal defense lawyer, were part of a White House effort to quell the backlash over the administration's handling of thousands of Epstein-related files in its possession. 'Well, I'm allowed to give her a pardon, but nobody's approached me with it. Nobody's asked me about it,' Trump said. 'It's in the news about that, that aspect of it, but right now, it would be inappropriate to talk about it.' Trump on July 28 also hit back at a question about whether his attorney general, Pam Bondi, has told him his name is mentioned in the federal government's Epstein files, as the Wall Street Journal reported last week. 'I haven't been overly interested in it,' Trump said. 'It's a hoax that's been built up way beyond proportion.' Trump then suggested without evidence that former President Joe Biden, then-Vice President Kamala Harris, FBI Director James Comey and Attorney General Merrick Garland could have put fake and incriminating material about him into the files. 'I can say this. Those files were run by the worst scum on Earth. They were run by Comey, they were run by Garland, they were run by Biden and all of the people that actually ran the government, including the autopen' during the Biden administration, Trump said. 'Those files were run for four years by those people. If they had anything (on Trump), I assume they would have released it.' The president dismissed another Wall Street Journal report that said he drew a picture of a nude woman decades ago as part of a lewd birthday letter for Epstein when they were close friends. It was part of a book compiled by Maxwell that included contributions from other high-profile people including former President Bill Clinton, the Journal reported. 'In one of my very good moments, I turned it down' Trump in Scotland also categorically denied that he'd ever been to Epstein's Caribbean island where sex trafficking of young girls allegedly occurred. 'I never had the privilege of going to his island, and I did turn it down, but a lot of people in Palm Beach were invited to his island," Trump said. 'In one of my very good moments, I turned it down. I didn't want to go to his island.' Trump also offered an explanation for why he broke off his friendship with Epstein after the two were close friends for many years. 'I wouldn't talk to Jeffrey Epstein because he did something that was inappropriate. … He stole people that worked for me. I said, 'Don't ever do that again.' He did it again, and I threw him out of the place,' Trump said, in reference to his Mar-a-Lago club and residence. 'Persona non grata,' Trump added. 'We haven't spoken to the president,' Maxwell's lawyer says Trump's comments three days after Maxwell's lawyer said July 25 that he is hoping Trump pardons the former British socialite for sex trafficking crimes she was convicted of in connection with the disgraced financier, who died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on related charges. David Markus spoke to reporters after his client's second day of interviews with Blanche in Tallahassee, Florida, near where Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence for trafficking a minor to Epstein for sexual abuse. Asked about Trump's comments earlier in the day about a potential pardon, Markus told reporters, "We haven't spoken to the president or anybody about a pardon just yet.' But, Markus said, 'The president this morning said he had the power to do so. We hope he exercises that power in the right and just way." When Trump was asked last week if he had already considered pardoning Maxwell, he said no. "I'm allowed to do it, but it's something I have not thought about," Trump told reporters. "I certainly can't talk about pardons now." Maxwell's meetings with Blanche, the No. 2 official in the Justice Department, came amid calls from the public and a bipartisan group of lawmakers for DOJ to release more information it has in its possession about Epstein's clients. The public outcry was prompted by announcements by the Justice Department and FBI earlier this month that they won't be releasing their Epstein-related files, despite promising to do so. Pressure has mounted since then for the administration to reconsider, including from members of Trump's own base who were bitterly disappointed by the announcement. That was especially the case after the Wall Street Journal report that Bondi notified Trump in May that his name had appeared 'multiple times' in the files. The president sued the newspaper for defamation for reporting that he wrote the birthday message for Epstein.