logo
Control, fear, and division—Congress hasn't changed even 50 years after Emergency

Control, fear, and division—Congress hasn't changed even 50 years after Emergency

The Print5 days ago

Journalist Coomi Kapoor, in her detailed account titled The Emergency: A Personal History , wrote that more people were jailed during those 21 months than during the entire Quit India Movement in 1942. This single line tells you how deep the betrayal ran.
That night, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi imposed a nationwide Emergency. With one signature, the Constitution was rendered powerless, civil liberties vanished, and the world's largest democracy slipped into darkness. Over the next 21 months, India became unrecognisable. Parliament was silenced, the courts stood helpless, the press lost its voice, and the people lost their rights.
It was on the night of 25 June 1975 that India's democracy was quietly smothered under the weight of fear and tyranny. Not by an invading army. Not by a colonial power. But by our own elected government. A government led by the Congress party, the same party that claims it gave India its freedom.
The party that once chanted slogans of freedom jailed its own citizens for demanding it.
Courtroom verdict that shook a PM
The seeds of the Emergency were sown in a courtroom. In the 1971 Lok Sabha elections, Indira Gandhi secured a massive win from Rae Bareli. But her victory was contested by Raj Narain, a socialist leader, who accused her of electoral fraud.
On 12 June 1975, the Allahabad High Court found her guilty and declared her election void. The verdict disqualified her from holding office for six years. Her political legitimacy stood shattered. And rather than stepping down, she chose to strike at the very roots of democracy.
Gandhi advised then-President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed to declare an Emergency. The order was signed in haste on the night of 25 June. The people of India went to sleep in a free country and woke up in a dictatorship.
Also read: JP wasn't a saviour of Constitution. He called Mao his guru
India in chains
What followed was one of the darkest periods in our republic's history. Opposition leaders were thrown into jail. Atal Bihari Vajpayee, LK Advani, Morarji Desai, Jayaprakash Narayan – all were imprisoned under harsh laws like the Maintenance of Internal Security Act (MISA).
The press was brought to its knees through censorship. Some newspapers, like The Indian Express, left editorial pages blank in protest. Students were hunted, citizens were watched, and those who spoke were put behind bars. The infamous forced sterilisation drive robbed countless people of dignity and choice.
Even those within Congress who raised their voices paid the price. Leaders like S Jaipal Reddy in Andhra Pradesh and then-Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M Karunanidhi were targeted for daring to oppose the Emergency.
Government figures reported over one lakh detainees under the MISA and Defence of India Rules (DIR). It was not just politics that suffered. India's soul was under arrest.
The people answer back
Despite the repression, the people did not forget. And when given the chance, they responded with courage. On 21 March 1977, the Emergency was lifted. In the elections that followed, the Congress faced the full force of public anger.
The Janata Party coalition swept to power. Indira Gandhi lost her seat in Rae Bareli to Raj Narain, the very man whose challenge had triggered the crisis. Congress was wiped out in states like Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. For the first time, Indians realised that change was possible. That a Congress-free India was not a dream, but a choice.
Has the Congress changed?
The short answer is no. The same mindset that led to the Emergency still lingers in the Congress party today. It still believes in power without accountability. It still believes that only one family has the right to lead.
Time and again, it has sidelined deserving leaders in favour of dynastic loyalty.
Time and again, it has sidelined capable leaders in favour of dynastic loyalty. A telling example is that of Jyotiraditya Scindia. After the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, despite being a promising young leader from Madhya Pradesh and a loyal member of the party, he was kept away from key decision-making and denied major responsibilities. Eventually, disillusioned, he left the Congress to join the BJP in 2020, and now serves as a Union minister. This episode clearly reflects the Congress' persistent preference for family over merit.
The Congress that once dominated Indian politics now barely holds on. It governs in only a few states. In many parts of the country, it has no presence at all. In the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, it contested 328 seats, but could win only 99. In several constituencies, it finished third or lower.
This is not just a story of electoral defeat, it is a story of losing touch with the people.
Also read: Alienating Hindus broke Congress. It must win them back to survive
Emergency is a warning, not a memory
Today, 50 years later, the Emergency still haunts our collective memory. It is a reminder that freedom cannot be taken for granted. That institutions must be protected. That democracy needs not just elections, but accountability, courage, and truth.
Had Congress respected democracy after Independence, India could have marched forward much faster. Instead, decades were lost to a politics of control, fear, and division.
The India we see today – confident, growing, respected across the world – is not the result of Emergency-style governance. It is the result of restoring people's trust, empowering citizens, and putting the nation first.
The Emergency was not just a political blunder. It was a betrayal. The Congress party tried to erase the very idea of democracy in India. That cannot be forgotten. It should never be forgiven.
Those who hijacked MK Gandhi's name have no right to speak about freedom. It is time they apologise to the nation. It is time they step aside.
Only then will India's democracy truly be complete.
S Vishnu Vardhan Reddy is Vice President, BJP Andhra Pradesh. He tweets @SVishnuReddy. Views are personal.
(Edited by Aamaan Alam Khan)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No talks with Maoists as long as they carry arms: Union Minister Amit Shah
No talks with Maoists as long as they carry arms: Union Minister Amit Shah

New Indian Express

time30 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

No talks with Maoists as long as they carry arms: Union Minister Amit Shah

HYDERABAD: Reiterating that the Union government was committed to ending Naxalism by March 31, 2026, Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Sunday urged Maoists to surrender and join the mainstream. He categorically stated that the Centre would not hold talks with those who continue to bear arms. 'Our policy is no talks with those who have arms in their hands. Give up arms and surrender. If you do not surrender, we have decided to end Naxalism by March 31, 2026. Should we not end the Naxalites who have killed adivasis and police personnel?' Shah said. Addressing the gathering after inaugurating the National Turmeric Board headquarters in Nizamabad, the Union home minister said that while he 'feared that the Congress might provide shelter to Maoists, there was no cause for concern as Narendra Modi was in power at the Centre'. 'The Congress is asking for talks with Maoists. Our government's policy is clear — no talks with those who hold weapons. Surrender and join the mainstream,' he said. Shah noted that in the Northeast, 10,000 individuals had surrendered and joined the mainstream, with some contesting elections at district and Assembly levels. 'In the last one-and-a-half years, around 2,000 Maoists surrendered,' he added. 'From Telangana's soil, I want to ask those who speak of protecting Naxals: What answer will you give to the families of police personnel and adivasis who lost their lives in Naxal violence? Naxals have obstructed development in adivasi areas for decades. What is your answer?' he asked. Shah accused the BRS of indulging in massive corruption during its 10-year rule. He alleged irregularities in Dharani, Kaleshwaram, Singareni and other projects, and questioned whether Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy initiated even one case against those involved. Shah claimed that the family of former chief minister K Chandrasekhar Rao used Telangana as an 'ATM' and alleged that the state has now become an 'ATM for the Delhi Congress'.

'Backdoor NRC' Push? Why 2.93 Crore Bihar Voters Must Prove Citizenship To Cast Their Ballot
'Backdoor NRC' Push? Why 2.93 Crore Bihar Voters Must Prove Citizenship To Cast Their Ballot

News18

time30 minutes ago

  • News18

'Backdoor NRC' Push? Why 2.93 Crore Bihar Voters Must Prove Citizenship To Cast Their Ballot

The EC kicked off a special, intensive revision of the voter list in Bihar this week. According to an announcement on Saturday, of the total 7.89 crore voters in the state, around 4.96 crore—those who were already registered as of January 1, 2003—only need to fill out and submit the new enumeration form. However, the remaining 2.93 crore voters, which is about 37 per cent of the total, will also need to provide documents proving their Indian citizenship along with the form. Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar told news agency PTI on Sunday that the purpose is to ensure that no eligible citizen is left out of the electoral rolls while no ineligible person is part of it. The 37 per cent population will have to provide one of the 11 listed documents to establish their place or date of birth. EC, however, clarified that it does not mean they need to furnish the place/date of birth of their parents if their parents are named in the 2003 voters' list. WHY THE NEED NOW? There is a difference between a usual revision of the electoral roll where one can add delete or edit names and EC's special intensive revision. Intensive revisions were carried out in 1952-56, 1957, 1961, 1965, 1966, 1983-84, 1987-89, 1992, 1993, 1995, 2002, 2003 and 2004, the poll body has revealed—a fact that may put the Congress in a spot. The last intensive revision for Bihar was conducted by the commission in the year 2003. This time, the EC has its reasons for repeating the practice. 'Various reasons such as rapid urbanisation, frequent migration, young citizens becoming eligible to vote, non-reporting of deaths and inclusion of the names of foreign illegal immigrants have necessitated the conduct of an intensive revision so as to ensure integrity and preparation of error-free electoral rolls," the poll body reasoned on June 24 when it announced its plans for Bihar. WHAT WILL PROVE YOUR CITIZENSHIP? In addition to the enumeration form, electors added to the role after 2003 will have to prove their citizenship in Bihar in this assembly election. Those born in India before July 1, 1987, will have to submit any document from the specified list. But those born in India between July 1, 1987, and December 2, 2004, will have to submit an additional document establishing one parent's date and place of birth. Those born in India after December 2, 2004, will have to submit documents establishing the date and place of birth of both parents. Passports, birth certificates, and SC/ST certificates are some of the valid documents that will do the job among many others. POLITICS & GHOST OF NRC The EC has made it clear that the move will not be limited to Bihar and will be rolled out across the country. With six assembly elections lined up, many chief ministers are visibly uncomfortable with the move. Advertisement

Puri stampede: Naveen blames Odisha govt for lapses, Rahul seeks review
Puri stampede: Naveen blames Odisha govt for lapses, Rahul seeks review

New Indian Express

time30 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Puri stampede: Naveen blames Odisha govt for lapses, Rahul seeks review

The BJD president urged the government to implement urgent corrective measures to ensure the smooth conduct of Adapa Bije, Bahuda, Suna Besha, and other key Rath Yatra rituals. He extended his heartfelt condolences to the families of the three devotees who lost their lives in the tragic incident and prayed for the swift recovery of those injured. Senior Congress leader Rahul Gandhi also expressed grief over the stampede. Stating that the incident was 'extremely tragic', he urged the Odisha government to expedite relief efforts. 'This tragedy is a serious reminder that security and crowd management preparations for such large events must be thoroughly reviewed. Protecting lives is paramount, and any lapse in this responsibility is unacceptable,' he said in a post on X. Rahul conveyed deep condolences to the bereaved families and wished a speedy recovery to those injured in the incident.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store