HRCP reports 405 honour killings in Pakistan in 2024, most victims women
Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) recorded at least 405 honour killings across the country in 2024. Most victims are women, often killed by relatives claiming to defend family honour.
While hundreds of so-called honour killings are reported in Pakistan each year, often with little public or legal response, the video of a woman and man being taken to a remote area by a group of men to be killed has struck a nerve.
A viral video of the "honour killing" of a woman and man in Balochistan has ignited national outrage, prompting scrutiny of long-standing tribal codes and calls for justice in a country where such killings often pass in silence.
The authorities have made at least 16 arrests in the case thus far.
The video shows the woman, Bano Bibi, being handed a copy of the Holy Quran by a man identified by police as her brother. "Come walk seven steps with me, after that you can shoot me," she says, and she walks forward a few feet and stops with her back to the men.
The brother, Jalal Satakzai, then shoots her three times and she collapses. Seconds later he shoots and kills the man, Ehsanullah Samalani.
Once the video of the killings in Balochistan went viral, it brought swift government action and condemnation from politicians, rights groups and clerics.
Civil rights lawyer Jibran Nasir said, though, the government's response was more about performance than justice.
"The crime occurred months ago, not in secrecy but near a provincial capital, yet no one acted until 240 million witnessed the killing on camera," he said.
"This isn't a response to a crime. It's a response to a viral moment."
Read: Brutal 'honour killing' caught on video sparks nationwide outrage
Police have arrested 16 people in Balochistan's Nasirabad district, including a tribal chief and the woman's mother.
The mother, Gul Jan Bibi, said the killings were carried out by family and local elders based on "centuries-old Baloch traditions", and not on the orders of the tribal chief.
"We did not commit any sin," she said in a video statement that also went viral. "Bano and Ehsan were killed according to our customs."
She said her daughter, who had three sons and two daughters, had run away with Ehsan and returned after 25 days.
Bano and Ehsan were killed according to our customs
Victim's mother
Police said Bano's younger brother, who shot the couple, remains at large.
Balochistan Chief Minister Sarfraz Bugti said it was a "test" case and vowed to dismantle the illegal tribal courts operating outside the law.
Police had earlier said a jirga, an informal tribal council that issues extrajudicial rulings, had ordered the killings.
#JusticeForCouple
The video sparked online condemnation, with hashtags like #JusticeForCouple and #HonourKilling trending.
The Pakistan Ulema Council, a body of religious scholars, called the killings "un-Islamic" and urged terrorism charges against those involved.
Dozens of civil society members and rights activists staged a protest on Saturday in the provincial capital Quetta, demanding justice and an end to parallel justice systems.
"Virality is a double-edged sword," said Arsalan Khan, a cultural anthropologist and professor who studies gender and masculinity.
"It can pressure the state into action, but public spectacle can also serve as a strategy to restore ghairat, or perceived family honour, in the eyes of the community."
The government outlawed honour killings in 2016 after the murder of social media star Qandeel Baloch, closing a loophole that allowed perpetrators to go free if they were pardoned by family members. Rights groups say enforcement remains weak, especially in rural areas where tribal councils still hold sway.
"In a country where conviction rates often fall to single digits, visibility - and the uproar it brings - has its advantages," said constitutional lawyer Asad Rahim Khan.
Read more: Three killed in honor-related incident in Bajaur
"It jolts a complacent state that continues to tolerate jirgas in areas beyond its writ."
Khan said rather than enforcing the law, the government has spent the past year weakening the judiciary and even considering reviving jirgas in former tribal areas.
"It's executive inaction, most shamefully toward women in Balochistan," Khan said.
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif in recent months has asked senior ministers to evaluate proposals to revive jirgas in Pakistan's former tribal districts, including potential engagement with tribal elders and Afghan authorities.
The Prime Minister's Office and Pakistan's information minister did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Viral and then forgetten?
The Balochistan killings were raised in the Senate, where the human rights committee condemned the murders and called for action against those who convened the jirga. Lawmakers also warned that impunity for parallel justice systems risked encouraging similar violence.
Activists and analysts, however, say the outrage is unlikely to be sustained.
"There's noise now, but like every time, it will fade," said Jalila Haider, a human rights lawyer in Quetta.
"In many areas, there is no writ of law, no enforcement. Only silence."
Haider said the killings underscore the state's failure to protect citizens in under-governed regions like Balochistan, where tribal power structures fill the vacuum left by absent courts and police.
"It's not enough to just condemn jirgas," Haider said.
"The real question is: why does the state allow them to exist in the first place?"
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Exceptionalism versus state credibility
Listen to article The literally en mass convictions (related to the May 9, 2023 protests) on account of terrorism and the resultant disqualifications of several PTI stalwarts including Omar Ayub, Shibli Faraz, Senator Ejaz Chaudhry, MNA Muhammad Ahmad Chattha and Punjab Assembly opposition leader Ahmad Khan Bhachar by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) exemplify a new brand of exceptionalism. Exceptionalism is a term often associated with the policies of the United States and its European allies in defending their interests, regardless of logic or morality. However, Pakistan has also been experiencing exceptionalism of a different kind in recent years. The ongoing terrorism in Balochistan and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa provinces, the state's narrative against violence and the disqualification of PTI MPs suggest exceptional approaches. Are these routine occurrences or consequences of Pakistan's exceptionalism in recent years? Ayub, Faraz, Chaudhry, Chattha and Bhachar were sentenced to 10 years in prison each under anti-terrorism charges related to the May 9 protests and riots. Their convictions were not surprising. Similarly, an opposition MP in the Punjab Assembly, Rana Shahbaz Ahmad, recently questioned the institution of multiple cases against him under the Anti-Terrorism Act. While holding the Holy Quran, he asked other MPs if he looked like a terrorist. This context fits the term exceptionalism, which denotes selective application of laws, subversion of regulations for expedience and socio-political discrimination in favour of certain groups. This approach distorts governance, stunts the rule of law and raises questions about the conduct of state institutions, which often claim to uphold the rule of law and justice for all but engage in actions that contradict their exhortations to the public. Exceptionalism undermines the state's integrity and authority by discrediting narratives against non-state actors. While certain segments face state-sponsored wrath and attacks on rights, the official advocacy for justice, equality and expectation of loyalty to the state loses credibility. Rhetoric on the rule of law becomes meaningless when protectors of state lands ally with lawbreakers and land grabbers. Citizens doubt the rule of law when state institutions turn a blind eye to political, non-political or religious groups intruding on public spaces, occupying green areas and disregarding laws. When religio-political groups are seen as tools for power politics, the state loses credibility. Can the rule of law thrive without action against anti-state elements? If the status quo persists and short-sighted policies continue, threats from within will also persist. State institutions use parties and individuals as socio-political crutches, disregarding the fact that most hosts (mosque/madrassas) and their guests (often militants/insurgents of different shades) are actually ideological partners. Many mosques and madrassas run by factions of mainstream parties serve as conduits and shelters for proxy terrorists but state institutions can't dare check them out. Such duplicity and inaction — a kind of exceptionalism vis a vis certain groups — also drain investors' confidence and casts doubt on the intent against terrorist groups. Even China's strategic patience in economic engagement can wear thin if Pakistani leaders continued the path of ambiguity as far as order and justice is concerned. Certainty of punishment is the primary reason for lower crime rates in countries like China, Iran, Central Asian Republics and Middle Eastern countries. Quick institutional responses and certainty of punishment deter such crimes. Until state institutions showcase exemplary case settlement through efficient policing, quick prosecution and a justice-focused judiciary, law-breaking will increase without fear of punishment. Until the state demonstrates indiscriminate justice to all law-breakers, crime will thrive, damaging the integrity of the rule of law narratives. Narrative is abstract, but its outcomes - indiscriminate due process of justice — are not. When people see the state's top brass indulge in expedient actions that run contrary to the notion of rule of law, they stop trusting the state. Compassion, favouritism and expedience subvert law and weaken public belief in it. Common people will believe only when justice is served to victims, and violators are punished. A people-centric rights-based advocacy campaign should accompany strict punishment. Indiscriminate commitment to and execution of the rule of law facilitates state narratives on rights and justice. Exceptionalism undermines state narratives against subversive groups or non-state actors. The civil and military leadership may peddle the anti-terrorism notions or scream day and night about their commitment to the rule of law, yet not many would accord any credence as long as people at large view that rhetoric being at variance with actions on ground. The most current example of exceptionalism's bitter outcomes is the genocide of the Palestinians at the hands of Israelis who are willfully starving tens of thousands of besieged, helpless Gazans, including women and children. Few people across the globe trust the sympathetic statements that ring out of major capitals because people at large view them as Israel-abettors. Similarly, exceptionalism is accruing huge credibility costs to the Pakistani society too. The sooner this approach ends the better it may be for the integrity and credibility of the state institutions. The latest round of convictions will only further erode the state credibility and deepen the wedge between the people and the state.
Express Tribune
3 days ago
- Express Tribune
'Women's right to reject marriage proposals rooted in Islam'
Islam grants every woman the right to accept or reject a marriage proposal without fear or coercion. The Constitution of Pakistan reinforces this right under its guarantees of personal liberty and choice. Yet across the country, a woman's refusal is often perceived not as autonomy, but defiance — a perceived insult that some men respond to with cruelty, violence, or even murder. These views were expressed by religious scholars, activists, and experts while condemning violence against women as un-Islamic. On June 2, 2025, Sana Yousaf was shot twice in the chest by Umar Hayat, a man whose repeated proposals she had declined. In another recent case in Rawalpindi, 18-year-old Sidra Bibi was allegedly murdered on the orders of a local jirga after marrying a man of her choice. Speaking to APP, Maulana Hafiz Muhammad Yasir Attari, a respected Islamic scholar, stated, "According to Shariah, a woman has full right to accept or reject a marriage proposal." When asked how to seek her permission, the Prophet replied: "That she remains silent." This Hadith clearly establishes that a woman's consent is essential. No guardian (wali), family member, or tribal council has the authority to override her will. "Rejection is not a sin," Maulana Yasir added. "It is not ingratitude or rebellion. Islam honours personal preferences and emotional compatibility. Saying 'no' is her Islamic rightlawful, protected, and sacred." Condemning violence in the name of honour, he said, "Violence, honour killings, burning, and suffocation are un-Islamic, unjust, and condemned. Forgiveness by family does not legitimise murder under Shariah. The state must treat such acts as murder and terrorism and prosecute them accordingly." In its July 2025 statement, the Pakistan Ulema Council declared that "Islam strictly prohibits honour killings. A woman has the full right to marry the man of her choice, and no violence or coercion is allowed." Dr Sobia Khateeb, a clinical psychologist and psychosexual therapist, highlighted the emotional dynamics behind such violence. "Rejection-driven violence reflects emotional immaturity and fragile masculinity. Boys are not taught how to handle rejection; they equate manhood with control," she said. She stressed that legal reforms alone are insufficient. "We need to raise boys with emotional intelligence and trauma-informed care," she urged. Rabbiya A Turkman, journalist and Deputy Editor of Risala Today, pointed out media bias in covering gender-based violence. "When powerful people are involved, mainstream media goes silent. Gender-based violence is underreported. Thankfully, social media is stepping in to build public pressure and preserve historical records," she noted. Muhammad Sanaullah Khan, an educationist at NUML University Islamabad, emphasised the transformative role of classrooms. "Educators must create safe spaces to discuss these issues. Through gender equality, consent education, and empathy, we can challenge deeply rooted stereotypes," he said. Bushra Iqbal Hussain, CEO of Mahfooz Bachpan, criticised law enforcement agencies. "Police often assume the girl did something wrong. Threats, acid attacks, and character assassination follow. Girls live in fear — not just for themselves, but for their families," she said. Hina Mushtaq, a student at COMSATS Islamabad, reflected on the generational struggle. "Whether we speak up depends on our environment. Fear of judgment silences many of us. But campuses that promote equality help students raise their voices," she said. This is not just a legal crisisit is a cultural one. These tragedies expose a toxic mix of patriarchal entitlement, legal loopholes, and silence from those in power. Laws mean little without enforcement. Honour means nothing when it costs lives.
Express Tribune
4 days ago
- Express Tribune
Scourge of honour
Listen to article The recent honour killing in Balochistan has drawn fresh attention to the illegal, but culturally acceptable practice of murdering relatives at the whim of family or community elders. But as gruesome as the recent case was, it is hardly an anomaly. In fact, honour killing is so widespread that many cases may not even make it into the headlines on a busy news day — the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan estimated over 400 honour killings carried out in 2024, and this number is almost certainly erring on the low side. Tribal jirgas, despite being outlawed, are near-omnipotent in some parts of the country and continue ordering executions. The 2016 anti-honour killing law, celebrated as a milestone, has proven hollow. The law's requirement for life imprisonment, even if families pardon killers, was supposed to close a notorious loophole, but enforcement remains crippled by parallel justice systems. While the number of recorded honour killings is less than half of the 1,000-plus figures from the years preceding the passage of the law, the current figures are still unacceptable. Cultural and economic drivers fuel this crisis. Feudal power structures target women asserting marital or financial autonomy, particularly those inheriting property. Over the years, HRCP has linked conservatism to the surge in honour killings, while noting that religious groups have actively opposed provincial laws protecting women. Disturbingly, perpetrators are lauded as "guardians of honour", while victims are erased from public memory. One of the ways to do this is through the connivance of politicians and law enforcers. Police often register honour killings as ordinary murders or suicides, enabling "reconciliation" and acquittals. In a just society, any perceived 'honour' crimes should only be adjudicated in a court by judges whose loyalty is only to the Constitution, not any tribe, caste, or cultural practices. Those who take the law into their own hands should face the full force of the state. It should not take viral videos to force the state's hand.
