Senate panel begins negotiations with the House over how to scrap the STAAR test
The Senate changes kick off formal negotiations with the lower chamber as the clock is running out on the legislative session. The Senate Education Committee's rewrite reflects a gap in what the two chambers want to see out of the new state assessment — and the A-F accountability ratings that are largely calculated based on assessment results.
House Bill 4 would swap the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness test for a shorter test that aims to better support student learning. Students would be tested at the beginning, middle and end of the year to monitor their progress.
'By the time we get to a shorter end-of-year test, we are not concentrating this into a high-stakes anxiety game that basically has teachers and students walking a tightrope,' said Sen. Paul Bettencourt, the Houston Republican sponsoring the bill. 'I know there'll be more of this coming out of my House counterparts as we move this bill on.'
The Senate amendments to the legislation absorbs much of the language from Senate Bill 1962, the Senate's own bill on testing and accountability. The House had started the session with much of that language but moved away from it after public testimony and closed-door meetings with school leaders.
The House wants to grade Texas students by comparing their performance to their peers around the country in what is called a 'norm-referenced test.' Proponents of this kind of test say it allows students and their families to get results back faster. The Senate panel does not specify what grading would look like, which would allow the state to continue a rigid scale to track students' academic performance.
The House also eliminated a mandatory standardized test on social studies, while the Senate chose to retain it.
Students' STAAR performance is a key metric in the state's ratings of school districts and school campuses, which are graded on an A-F scale each year. School performance ratings were held up in court because of two consecutive years with lawsuits.
The House's bill also left an avenue for districts to sue to challenge the Texas Education Agency in the future, but set up a fast-track court process so those lawsuits do not halt the release of the ratings. The Senate's bill, meanwhile, doubled down on discouraging schools from taking legal action again. It gives the TEA commissioner, for example, the option to appoint a conservator to districts that initiate a lawsuit.
Bettencourt has repeatedly slammed districts who joined the lawsuits over the A-F ratings in the past, calling the action 'lawfare.'
The Texas Tribune partners with Open Campus on higher education coverage.
First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
13 minutes ago
- Newsweek
China Responds to Lindsey Graham Russia Threat
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. China hit back at "illegal unilateral sanctions" after U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham said Beijing would be among those to feel the pain of his proposed legislation, which would slap up to a 500 percent secondary tariff on those trading with Russia. Graham, a Republican from South Carolina, said the legislation has bipartisan support in Congress, and it comes as U.S. President Donald Trump threatens new secondary tariffs against Russia to force Moscow to make peace in Ukraine. Trump touted a 100 percent secondary tariff, but Graham's bill would give him the power to do five times that. Large-scale Chinese oil purchases have been a vital crutch for the sanctions-hit Russian economy during the ongoing invasion of Ukraine. Lin Jian, spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry, said at a press briefing on Tuesday, July 15, Beijing's position on ending the Ukraine war has been consistent and clear, and that it can only be achieved through dialogue and negotiation. "China firmly opposes any illegal unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction," Lin said, the state-run Global Times reported. "There are no winners in a tariff war, and coercion and pressure cannot solve problems. "It's hoped all parties will further foster an environment and accumulate conditions to advance the political settlement of the Ukraine crisis, and take more actions that are conducive to peace talks." This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Boston Globe
22 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump is doing the right thing in pushing back on Putin to support Ukraine
Trump made his announcement during an Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up US arms shipments to the beleaguered Ukrainian troops came to a virtual halt following Trump's Advertisement It was a time when Trump thought his well-publicized bromance with Putin would help bring the Russian leader to the bargaining table — even if Trump's pledge to end the conflict on 'I felt we had a deal about four times,' Advertisement And as Trump told reporters Sunday in Washington, Putin 'talks nice and then he bombs everybody in the evening.' And that certainly has been For years, Trump has managed to look beyond Putin's blatant flouting of international law — his targeting of Ukraine's civilians and its critical infrastructure and even his encouraging the The question remains: Will this change in attitude be too little, too late? The weapons deal, of course, has a certain transactional appeal to Trump, who has harped on NATO nations paying more to assure European security going back to his first administration. And as the threat from Russia, beyond its unprovoked attack on Ukraine, becomes ever more real to the rest of its neighbors, so did the need for a response. That is now a done deal. 'We'll send them a lot of weapons of all kinds,' Advertisement Trump's threat of tariffs of as much as 100 percent on those nations that do business with Russia remains just that, a threat, unless the Senate, which has been working on a bill since April, moves to make it real. It would target countries like China, India, and Brazil, which continue to buy oil, gas, and other products from Russia despite existing sanctions that were imposed after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. 'That's the money Putin uses to prosecute the war,' Graham said Sunday on 'Face the Nation.' The Senate sanctions bill would give the president the power to impose tariffs of up to 500 percent on any nation doing business with Russia. That kind of economic pressure might encourage more Russians to oppose Putin's war, given how dearly the country has already paid in rubles and lives. Russia has lost as many as Graham and Representative French Hill, an Arkansas Republican, also promoted the possibility of using seized Russian assets to help the Ukrainian war effort. 'I think it's time for the president to convert those seized assets to a trust account for the benefit of Ukraine,' Hill said on 'Face the Nation.' Advertisement It would be encouraging for Congress, a coequal branch of government let's not forget, to show some backbone here by passing the Senate bill — which is tougher than Trump's proposal — rather than play 'May I,' awaiting orders from the president. And wouldn't that be an encouraging sign, one that even Putin could read. Absent that two-pronged show of commitment, it's entirely likely Trump's 50-day deadline will come and go without bringing Putin to the table even as those Russian drones keep up their nightly killing spree. Trump can be justly proud of the arms deal with NATO and its potential impact. He should also know by now that the only thing Putin understands is force, whether military or economic, and how essential that sanctions 'sledgehammer' from the Senate can be. Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russia does not care about Trump's 'theatrical ultimatum', senior official says
MOSCOW (Reuters) -Russia does not care about U.S. President Donald Trump's "theatrical ultimatum" about slapping sanctions on buyers of Russian exports unless Moscow agrees to a peace deal in Ukraine, a senior security official said on Tuesday. Trump, sitting beside NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office, on Monday, announced new weapons for Ukraine and threatened secondary tariffs of 100% on the buyers of Russian exports, of which crude makes up a major chunk. The U.S. president also expressed frustration with Vladimir Putin, saying he did not want to call the Russian leader "an assassin, but he's a tough guy". "Trump issued a theatrical ultimatum to the Kremlin," former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said in a post in English on X. "The world shuddered, expecting the consequences. Belligerent Europe was disappointed. Russia didn't care." The Kremlin has so far not commented on Trump's remarks but said on Monday it was clear that the United States had continued to supply weapons and ammunition to Ukraine. In Washington, a White House official said Trump's intention is to impose "100% tariffs on Russia" and secondary sanctions on other countries that buy oil from Russia if a peace deal is not struck in 50 days. Eighty-five of the 100 U.S. senators are co-sponsoring a bill that would give Trump the authority to impose 500% tariffs on any country that helps Russia, but the chamber's Republican leaders have been waiting for Trump to give them the go-ahead for a vote. China and India are the biggest buyers of Russian crude. Trump told the BBC that he was "not done" with Putin and that he thought a Ukraine peace deal was on the cards.
