Lavrov's Q&A with media at BRICS summit: As it happened
This year, the summit focuses on multilateral cooperation, as well as global development and governance issues. Speaking during the second session of the summit earlier on Monday, Lavrov said the group has been striving for 'a more stable global economic architecture that is built on the principles of universality, transparency, and non-discrimination.'
The top Russian diplomat also called for a fundamental reform of international institutions, arguing that many have long since degraded into neo-colonial tools of control. The emerging multipolar world is 'not a choice but rather an objective reality,' he stated, adding that the new model is set to succeed 'the outdated neo-liberal model that actually builds on neo-colonial practices' dominated by 'the so-called developed states of the West.'
BRICS was founded primarily as a trade and development group in 2006 by Brazil, Russia, India, and China, with South Africa joining in 2010. Over the past year, the group has extended full membership to Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, the United Arab Emirates, and Indonesia, as well as welcoming ten partner states.
This year's summit brings together around 4,000 participants from 37 nations, including senior dignitaries from member states, partner countries, and international institutions.
This live feed has ended.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine threatens new invasion of two Russian regions
Ukraine's commander-in-chief, Aleksandr Syrsky, has called for the re-establishment of Kiev's military positions in Russia's Kursk and Belgorod Regions. The proposal comes despite the failure of Ukraine's past incursion attempts and the resumption of peace negotiations between Moscow and Kiev. In late April, Russia announced that it had fully regained control of Kursk Region after months of fighting and expelled all Ukrainian units from occupied settlements. The following month, Russian President Vladimir Putin personally visited the region to oversee restoration efforts. Kiev's forces have since continued their attempts to break through the border, but have been unable to re-establish a foothold. On Tuesday, Syrsky reported that he had attended a meeting chaired by Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky, during which the commander had 'emphasized the restoration of positions and holding territories in the Kursk and Belgorod regions of the Russian Federation.' Syrsky did not elaborate on how such objectives could be achieved. Ukraine has continued to face mounting challenges on the battlefield, including a severe manpower shortage and diminishing weapons supplies. Last week, the US reportedly halted all weapon shipments to Kiev, citing an internal stockpile review. On Sunday, Bild reported that Kiev had requested a variety of weapons from Germany valued at billions of euros. The request allegedly includes WiSENT demining vehicles, which were previously utilized by Ukrainian forces during their last unsuccessful incursion. Kiev launched its thrust into the Russian border region in August 2024. While initially managing to capture a number of settlements, Ukraine's offensive was soon halted, and its forces were gradually pushed out. During a recent appearance at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, Putin described the Ukrainian campaign in Kursk as a 'catastrophe,' saying it resulted in over 76,000 Ukrainian casualties. He stated that Ukraine's combat units are now manned at just 47% of their required strength. Syrsky's call to re-enter Kursk and Belgorod also comes amid renewed diplomatic efforts between Russia and Ukraine. Direct negotiations resumed in Istanbul earlier this year, with both sides exchanging prisoners and drafting preliminary memorandums on a potential ceasefire. However, Russian officials have expressed skepticism about Kiev's commitment to peace. The Kremlin has repeatedly accused Ukrainian forces of carrying out drone strikes and sabotage attacks on civilian infrastructure in Russian cities, including the Kursk and Bryansk Regions. Putin has characterized such operations as acts of terrorism, suggesting that Ukraine's leadership remains more focused on confrontation than compromise.
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russia took Afghanistan without firing a shot
When Russia recognized the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan last week, it didn't just open a new embassy – it opened a new geopolitical front. For the first time since the Taliban's return to power in 2021, a major world player has gone beyond informal contacts and embraced Kabul's de facto rulers as legitimate partners. On July 1, Taliban envoy Gul Hassan presented copies of his credentials to Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Andrey Rudenko. Two days later, Moscow made it official: the Islamic Emirate was now recognized – diplomatically, politically, and symbolically. The move followed a crucial domestic decision in April, when Russia removed the Taliban from its national list of terrorist organizations – a status that had persisted for more than twenty years. The Foreign Ministry framed the recognition as a pragmatic step toward security cooperation, economic dialogue, and regional stabilization. In Kabul, the reaction was swift. The Taliban welcomed the Russian gesture as a possible catalyst for wider international engagement. They had reason to – despite harsh rhetoric, even the West has kept indirect channels open. But no one had dared take the leap. Until now. This isn't Russia's first chapter in Afghan affairs. Back in 2021, it kept its embassy running while Western diplomats fled. And long before that, in 1989, Soviet troops withdrew from a decade-long war against the mujahideen, many of whom would go on to form the core of the modern Taliban. In that light, Moscow's latest decision seems less like a departure and more like continuity by other means. For Moscow, recognition is not just about diplomacy – it's about security. With formal ties in place, Russia now has a channel for demanding real cooperation from the Taliban on issues that matter most: containing radical groups and protecting Central Asia's fragile stability. The urgency is not theoretical. In March 2024, a deadly terrorist attack on Crocus City Hall shook the Russian capital. According to official reports, the perpetrators were linked to Khurasan Wilayah – a branch of ISIS that considers the Taliban too moderate and Russia an enemy. This incident shifted the calculus in the Kremlin. If the Taliban control the ground, then working with them – however distasteful to some – becomes a strategic necessity. In 2024, Vladimir Putin publicly referred to the Taliban as a partner in the fight against terrorism – a signal that Moscow views them not as a problem, but as part of the solution. Recognition is a way to formalize that logic – to move from ad-hoc contacts to structured expectations. Russia is not simply offering legitimacy; it is also asking for responsibility. With recognition comes access – and Afghanistan has plenty to offer. Rich in lithium, rare earth elements, and untapped mineral wealth, the country has become a target for global economic interests. Now that formal ties are in place, Russian companies can enter the market with legal cover and diplomatic support. But this isn't just about minerals. It's also about momentum. Russian exports are already flowing into Afghan markets, while Afghan agricultural products – from dried fruits to herbs – are showing up on store shelves in Russian regions. According to the Financial Times, Moscow is quietly building a trade corridor while others hesitate. Geography does the rest. Afghanistan sits at a crossroads – a land bridge between Central and South Asia, offering future access to Pakistan, India, and the Indian Ocean. For Russia, this is about more than strategy. It's about logistics. In an era of sanctions and shifting trade routes, every new corridor matters. Recognition is Moscow's ticket in – and it wants to be first at the table. In Washington and Brussels, Afghanistan is still viewed through the lens of defeat – a retreat, a failure, and a lingering embarrassment. Officially, the Taliban remain pariahs. Unofficially, backchannels are open. Diplomats talk, intelligence agencies coordinate. But no Western country has dared take the next step. Russia just did. Could this provoke new sanctions from the US or EU? Perhaps. But with Russia already under one of the harshest sanction regimes in modern history, the cost of further penalties is marginal. The ceiling has already been reached. Instead, recognition gives Moscow first-mover advantage – both in Kabul and across the region. While others worry about headlines, Russia is shaping realities on the ground. It is doing so not just with gas and guns, but with memory: in Central Asia, Russia still carries weight as a former security guarantor and post-Soviet stabilizer. That credibility now returns to the table. Russia has done this before. In 1997, it helped end a brutal civil war in Tajikistan by brokering a deal between warring factions. Those efforts are still remembered in Dushanbe – and they echo today. Tensions between the Taliban and Tajik authorities remain high. But Russia, trusted by both sides and embedded in regional security structures, is uniquely positioned to mediate. The same applies to Afghanistan's rocky relations with Turkmenistan, where border disputes and political distrust linger. This is where recognition becomes more than a headline – it becomes leverage. Moscow can now convene, propose, and shape talks that others can't. While Western powers watch from afar, Russia is turning Afghanistan from a global problem into a regional process. The ultimate play? Energy. With its early commercial footprint in Kabul and longstanding vision of an Eurasian energy corridor, Moscow sees Afghanistan not just as a risk to manage – but as a bridge to build.
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Kremlin ‘shocked' by likely suicide of ex-minister
The Russian presidency has described the apparent suicide of recently fired Transport Minister Roman Starovoyt as 'shocking,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said. Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Peskov said that 'we have found this shocking too,' adding that the incident was immediately reported to Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'This cannot but shock normal people,' Peskov stated. 'Of course, information of this kind is always tragic and sad.' The spokesman dismissed speculation that the minister was fired due to breach of trust, stressing that no such wording was used in a presidential decree on the matter. Peskov also warned against drawing any conclusions, stating that a probe into the incident was ongoing. Starovoyt's body was found beside the Tesla he had been driving near Malevich Park in the Moscow suburb of Odintsovo on Monday, hours after he was dismissed from his ministerial post. The ex-official reportedly took his own life by shooting himself in the head with a Makarov pistol, which he had previously been given as an award from the Interior Ministry. Before becoming transport minister, Starovoyt served as governor of Kursk Region, which was invaded by Ukraine last August. The region is currently being rocked by a major graft probe involving top officials suspected of embezzlement of funds allocated for border defense construction. Over 20 people have been detained in the probe, including Starovoyt's former deputy, Aleksey Dedov, and his successor, Aleksey Smirnov. The latter official held the post from May to December last year, with most of it in an interim role, becoming one of the most short-lived governors in modern Russian history. An RT source said an investigation against the ex-governor was about to begin over alleged embezzlement. Starovoyt was expected to be detained for questioning on Monday evening, the source claimed.
