logo
Mayor Brandon Johnson faces city grocery tax pushback as state levy expires

Mayor Brandon Johnson faces city grocery tax pushback as state levy expires

Chicago Tribune18-06-2025

Mayor Brandon Johnson faced stiff criticism from a City Council opponent Wednesday as he introduced an ordinance to implement a grocery tax at the city level.
Johnson's administration has argued the 1% city grocery tax is necessary as a state grocery tax that sent revenue to municipalities ends. But Ald. Brendan Reilly accused Johnson of sneaking the ordinance's introduction during a meeting to avoid legislative pushback, in what he characterized as a violation of the Open Meetings Act.
'They intentionally are leaving the public in the dark,' Reilly told reporters later. 'It is obvious the mayor is not proud of this ordinance because he tried to sneak it in without anyone understanding what it would actually do.'
Moments after the measure was introduced — the first step in a typically months-long legislative process that includes committee discussion, full City Council votes and often opposition delay tactics — Reilly accused Johnson of hiding the measure with an inaccurate description. Reilly called the introduction 'a cute trick' by Johnson's Law Department.
The two debated back and forth, with Johnson at points appearing to not recognize Reilly and Ald. Scott Waguespack as they raised their hands to speak. The mayor dismissed Reilly's claims that his corporation counsel was behind the alleged scheme.
'It was read into the record correctly, if you have an issue with the content or context, that sounds deeply personal, but it was read correctly,' Johnson said.
Reilly responded that he would have sent the measure to the City Council's Rules Committee, a move that would delay the tax's passage by adding another layer of required approval.
'Well, what you would have done or could have done, you had an opportunity,' Johnson said.
Reilly later cited the Open Meetings Act to argue Johnson was trying to avoid public scrutiny on the tax. And he continued to speak when he was not recognized.
'You have to recognize that,' Reilly shouted, his microphone off. 'I can sue.'
The heated back-and-forth marks the official start of what is sure to be a complicated effort by Johnson to keep the tax going for Chicago consumers.
Gov. JB Pritzker led the charge last year to rid the state of its decades-old grocery tax, arguing the regressive tax hits poor families hardest. The state tax will expire at the start of 2026. But Pritzker also left the door open for local governments to decide to implement the tax on their own, an offer around 200 municipalities across Illinois have already taken.
Johnson's budget director, Annette Guzman, urged aldermen to implement the tax earlier this month. Failing to do so before the Oct. 1 deadline would blow an $80 million hole in the city's already unbalanced future budget, she said.
After council adjourned, Reilly told reporters he plans to file a complaint with the Illinois Attorney General, saying the ordinance is now 'ripe for a lawsuit' should it pass. He said City Clerk Anna Valencia traditionally reads aloud the subject matter of the new items, and the obfuscation on Wednesday prevented him from using a parliamentary move to delay the legislation.
A spokesperson for City Clerk Anna Valencia told the Tribune Wednesday that the clerk's protocol is to read aloud new items based on the language used in the mayor's transmittal letter to her office.
A copy of the letter from Johnson regarding the grocery tax instructed her to introduce the legislation as 'an ordinance amending revenue-related provisions of Title 3 of the Municipal Code,' which was what she did during the meeting.
Aldermen also passed a Wrigley Field security upgrade plan that involves $32.1 million from the Cubs, city and state. The team and city officials are hopeful the added safety will check off a final box for Major League Baseball and help land Chicago an MLB All-Star Game.
The City Council also decided to grant St. Adalbert Catholic Church landmark status. The decision marks a decisive turning point in a long preservation battle over the closed Polish Pilsen church.
Activists who want the church reopened were dismayed that the final landmark status only protects the church building and not other buildings on the property. The narrowed landmarking clears the way for the Archdiocese of Chicago to sell the plot to a nondenominational Christian ministry.
Aldermen delayed consideration on an ordinance that would grant them the power to ban Airbnb's and other short-term rentals on a precinct-by-precinct basis. The measure would allow short-term rental companies to overturn aldermen's decision by collecting signatures of support from 10% of an affected precinct's voters.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Park upkeep fees floated by Austin City Council
Park upkeep fees floated by Austin City Council

Axios

time2 hours ago

  • Axios

Park upkeep fees floated by Austin City Council

Austin City Council members are contemplating levying a new fee to pay for city parks. Why it matters: Facing a budget deficit, the City Council is searching for ways to raise money instead of slashing maintenance and key park programs. The parks department has an operating budget of $185 million this fiscal year. What they're saying: Parks, splash pads, playgrounds and recreation centers — as well as park programming such as summer camps — "are vital to our city's identity and quality of life," Council Member Paige Ellis posted on a city message board last week. "But maintaining them requires sustained, reliable funding, and it is clear that the status quo is not enough," How it works: Without offering details, Ellis proposed "a small, dedicated fee on utility bills, with all revenue going directly toward the maintenance and improvement of Austin's parks system." Residents enrolled in a city-sponsored financial assistance program could be exempt from paying the monthly fee, she suggested. Between the lines: ParkScore, a national comparison of park systems across the 100 most populated cities in the U.S., produced by the Trust for Public Land (TPL), rated Austin 54th in 2025, down from 44th in 2024. "Austin's slip mostly has to do with other cities rising faster and that the city's score has largely remained the same," Rebecca Bullis, a spokesperson for TPL, tells Axios. The intrigue: A 2023 state law restricted Austin's ability to require developers to build new parks alongside new construction. Zoom out: The ParkScore drop "shows we can't keep doing things the same way," Council Member Vanessa Fuentes wrote on the message board last week in support of a fee. "But let's make sure we get the equity piece right, both in how we structure the fee and where the money actually goes. Too many neighborhoods have been left behind when it comes to quality parks and amenities." Zoom in: Residents living in lower-income neighborhoods have access to 64% less nearby park space than those in higher-income neighborhoods, per the TPL ParkScore report. Nearly 70% of Austin residents live within a 10-minute walk of a park, TPL says. Nationally, the figure is 76%. Austin also scored below average in the amenities category, which assesses the availability of popular park features like basketball hoops, off-leash dog parks, playgrounds and senior centers. The other side: Last year, Austin parks officials noted underlying "historic injustices" with park acquisition and said the city "is balancing the cost of acquiring parkland in an expensive market with rapid population growth and limited departmental resources." The bottom line: Washington, D.C., remains the system to beat, after claiming the top spot in the TPL report for a fifth consecutive year.

Trump bets on ‘big, beautiful' Senate win
Trump bets on ‘big, beautiful' Senate win

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

Trump bets on ‘big, beautiful' Senate win

Morning Report is The Hill's a.m. newsletter. Sign up here or using the box below: Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here President Trump is hours away from what he hopes will be Senate passage of the biggest legislative victory of his term, even as hurdles loom. The final vote will be a nail-biter. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), targeted by Trump in his primary because of his dug-in opposition, criticized his party's bill and Senate partisanship on Sunday before announcing he will not seek reelection next year. The president, who backs competing Senate and House versions, has wooed and pressured GOP lawmakers for months to extend expiring 2017 tax cuts and increase defense and immigration spending this year as the playbook for 2026 midterm victories. But some of the policies in the 940-page bill and its price tag worry some House and Senate conservatives. Democrats are united against it. The marathon Senate process to consider amendments to the bill, known as vote-a-rama, begins at 9 a.m. and is expected to stretch well into the afternoon or evening. It's unclear when senators could hold a final vote. If it clears the upper chamber, the legislation would then need to pass several procedural steps in the House before coming up for a vote. GOP leaders say a House vote could begin as early as Wednesday morning. 'ONE GREAT BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL, is moving along nicely! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' Trump posted on Truth Social after 2 a.m. ET. All eyes will be on a handful of GOP senators who can make or break the bill. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) said Saturday he resolved his Medicaid worries and supports the Senate version of the legislation. Joined by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), the last three holdouts — Sens. Mike Lee (R-Utah), Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) and Rick Scott (R-Fla.) — secured a commitment from Republican leaders to back a proposal from Scott to reduce the rate at which the federal government reimburses states that have expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act for new enrollees, according to Johnson. 'We just have their commitment that they're going to do everything in their power to make sure this passes,' Johnson said, according to The Washington Post. But such a provision could threaten the support of GOP Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), who have their own concerns about Medicaid changes. Murkowski is under pressure from lawmakers in her state to reject the bill. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who asserts his party is on the wrong path with a package estimated to raise the debt by $4 trillion over a decade, has said he opposes the measure. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) has a three-vote margin and is eager to keep his GOP colleagues in line after Saturday's arm-twistingly narrow 51-49 vote to proceed. Trump wants to sign a measure into law by Friday, July 4. Republicans in both chambers have battled for months over their promises to constituents and misgivings about slashing Medicaid. Tillis warned his Senate colleagues that cutting Medicaid will hurt red states and come back to bite GOP candidates in next year's midterms, wielding detailed data and charts to make this case. The approximately $800 billion in federal spending cuts to Medicaid are intended to help offset the price of extending tax cuts, which are estimated to add trillions of dollars to the federal debt. ▪ North Carolina newsline: Here's who is and isn't running for Tillis's seat as of Sunday. MAGIC ASTERISKS: GOP senators have charged forward with a controversial accounting measure for the tax portion of the bill, as Democrats accuse them of fanciful budget math. The GOP favors an accounting move called 'current policy' to assert that the expensive 2017 tax cuts, now in effect, should not count as additional spending when extended, even though those tax breaks are set to expire at the end of the year. Republicans want Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) to determine the baseline, effectively circumventing the Senate parliamentarian, who determines what can proceed through the special budgetary rules Republicans are using to avoid a Democratic filibuster. ▪ The Hill: Senate Republicans declined Sunday to meet with the parliamentarian on whether the Trump tax cuts add to annual deficits. Senate Republicans maintain that Democrats have done the same in the past while in the majority, while Democrats argue Republicans are using the accounting move in a way never before used. 'The only way for Republicans to pass this horribly destructive bill, which is based on budget math as fake as Donald Trump's tan, was to go nuclear and hide it behind a bunch of procedural jargon,' Sen. Ron Wyden (Ore.), the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, said in a statement late Sunday. Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), vice chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee and a former Budget Committee chair, also blasted her GOP colleagues during a weekend floor speech, arguing 'current policy' math is a gambit to mask the costs of tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations, which add trillions of dollars to projected deficits. ▪ The Hill: CBO says tax piece of GOP megabill could violate Senate Byrd Rule ▪ The Associated Press: Republican Senate tax bill would add $3.3 trillion to the US debt load, CBO says From the sidelines, former Department of Government Efficiency chief Elon Musk, who broke with Trump in the spring, blasted Senate Republicans for slashing alternative energy incentives from the Senate measure as it heads to a final vote. The billionaire Tesla CEO said the Senate's approach 'will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!' He called it 'utterly insane and destructive. It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.' Meanwhile, GOP senators reached a Sunday agreement to change a provision in the Senate measure that originally would have barred for 10 years state legislation over artificial intelligence (AI). SMART TAKE with BLAKE BURMAN As Republican senators worked through the weekend on the One Big Beautiful Bill, President Trump sent a warning to fiscal conservatives. 'Don't go too crazy! We will make it all up, times 10, with GROWTH, more than ever before,' he wrote on Truth Social about spending cuts. Republicans promised growth in 2017 as well when they were selling the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). We can now look back at the numbers: GDP hit 3 percent in 2018 and 2.6 percent in 2019, before COVID-19 rocked the economy in 2020. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and this bill is a different piece of legislation at a different time. However, we know how the economy, in part, responded to the TCJA. Extending those tax cuts is a backbone to the current legislation. Instead of predicting what might happen if the legislation passes, we can look to data points from the first iteration, including when it comes to growth. TARIFF PAUSE: Trump does not plan to extend a 90-day pause on tariffs on most nations beyond July 9, when the negotiating period he set expires, he told Fox News's Maria Bartiromo in an interview that aired Sunday. The administration will notify countries that the U.S. will go ahead with steep import taxes on their goods unless they strike a deal with the U.S. 'We'll look at how a country treats us — are they good, are they not so good — some countries we don't care, we'll just send a high number out,' Trump said. After Trump said Friday that he terminated trade talks with Canada, citing a potential Canadian tax on tech companies, Ottawa on Sunday announced it will rescind the digital services tax. The Canadian government said in a statement the two countries will resume trade 'negotiations with a view towards agreeing on a deal by July 21, 2025.' ▪ CNN: Trump's trade deals are stalling out at the worst possible time. ▪ Reuters: Trump said he found a buyer for TikTok, which he described as a group of 'very wealthy people' whose identities he will reveal in two weeks. ▪ The Independent: Trump left Bartiromo briefly speechless mid-interview when he suggested the U.S. is hacking China. IRAN: The president also suggested on Fox News that reporters will be pressured to reveal their sources on stories about the U.S. strike on Iranian nuclear facilities. Trump repeatedly criticized media outlets for reporting what he called 'fake news' about the military strikes that suggested they did not effectively destroy the country's nuclear programs. Although Democrats criticize Trump for bombing Iran without congressional consent, every Democratic president in the modern era deployed U.S. military forces overseas, including in Bosnia, Syria, Libya and Yemen. The Hill's Mike Lillis reports that history complicates some Democrats' assertions that Trump violated the Constitution by acting on his own against targets in Iran — forcing the party to reckon with its own actions. 'Just because it was wrong then doesn't mean it's not wrong now,' said Rep. Ted Lieu (Calif.), a former Air Force attorney who's now the vice chair of the House Democratic Caucus. 'The Constitution is the Constitution. And it says only Congress has the power to declare war. And it's been a bipartisan problem, with Congress ceding way too much power to the executive branch.' ▪ The Washington Post: On an intercepted call, Iranian officials were heard saying Trump's strike on Iran proved less devastating than expected. The White House called the intelligence insignificant. INDEPENDENT VOTERS: Trump's net approval among unaffiliated voters reached its lowest level of his second term on Tuesday, according to an aggregate from Decision Desk HQ (DDHQ), with his disapproval rating surpassing 60 percent for the first time since he took office. This has accompanied a wider decline in the president's overall approval rating throughout June. The shifts among independents could be linked to disapproval of Trump's handling of the economy, observers say. 'Right now, the independents are the moving factor,' said Scott Tranter, director of data science for DDHQ. 'He's holding his base, and he's staying steady not liked by Democrats, and so that's kind of why you see it.' VACCINES: Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has opened a new chapter of federal vaccine policy that invites questions on issues long considered to be settled and pushes anti-vaccine priorities into mainstream government guidelines. Kennedy's handpicked panel of vaccine advisers said last week they would launch an investigation into the cumulative effect of the childhood and adolescent vaccine schedules and consider new recommendations for shots that have long been on the market. 'What we heard in this meeting was really a false narrative that the current vaccine policies are flawed and that they need fixing,' Sean O'Leary, chair of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Infectious Diseases, said in a press conference. 'That's completely false. These policies have saved millions of lives, trillions of dollars.' AAP said it will no longer take part in the proceedings because they are not 'credible.' RELOCATING: The Department of Housing and Urban Development is moving out of its headquarters at the massive Weaver office building in downtown Washington and relocating to an office building in Alexandria, Va., that has been home to the National Science Foundation. IMMIGRATION: Trump on Fox News said the White House is developing a temporary pass for immigrants who work in certain industries — the latest shift in the administration's approach to immigration enforcement for farmworkers. 'We're working on it right now. We're going to work it so that some kind of a temporary pass where people pay taxes, where the farmer can have a little control, as opposed to you walk in and take everybody away,' Trump said. The president referenced authorities, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), going to farms and taking 'away people that have been working there for 15 and 20 years, who are good, who possibly came in incorrectly.' The move comes as the White House has waffled in recent weeks on whether to exempt certain worksites from ICE raids amid Trump's deportation push. Business and industry leaders have pressured administration officials to ease up on raids in certain sectors, warning about adverse effects for their industries. While Trump again flirted with a carve-out for businesses to sidestep ICE raids and manage migrant employees they see as key, the president's reliance on the Alien Enemies Act to jettison immigrants from the U.S. will be considered by a New Orleans appeals court today. The case before one of the most conservative courts in the country is likely to be the first to reach the Supreme Court. ▪ BBC: 'We can't do without these people': Trump's migrant crackdown has businesses worried. ▪ The New York Times: As the Trump administration escalates its deportation campaign, Roman Catholic bishops are raising objections to the treatment of migrants. DEPORTATION: The Trump administration agreed to release from prison Jose Ramon Hernandez Reyes, a three-time felon who drunkenly fired shots in a Texas community. He will be spared from deportation in exchange for his cooperation in the federal prosecution of Kilmar Abrego García, the Maryland man who was illegally deported to El Salvador this year. Reyes cooperated with prosecutors to reduce his time in prison and avoid deportation for one year by providing the alleged evidence the Justice Department used to charge Abrego Garcia as a driver trafficking in migrants in 2016. MICHIGAN: The U.S.'s military intervention in Iran could roil next year's House and Senate races in Michigan, a key battleground state that saw Democratic tensions play out last cycle over the war in Gaza. But the conflict also raises questions for Republicans, who will need to win over Arab, Muslim and Jewish Americans statewide while navigating the Trump administration's position on the broader conflict. 'The races next year should be really interesting, because in some ways, they're going to be a referendum on some of the key questions of who the Democratic Party is and who it will become,' said Abbas Alawieh, a senior Democratic strategist who was one of the leaders of the Uncommitted National Movement last year, which sought to pressure then-President Biden over his stance on the war in Gaza. ▪ The Hill: James Walkinshaw, the former chief of staff to the late Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), clinched the Democratic nomination to fill Connolly's seat in a deep-blue Northern Virginia district. ▪ NBC News: Trump is expected to be at the formal opening tomorrow of a controversial immigration detention center in Florida that state leaders have dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz.' ISRAEL: Trump is pressuring Israel to halt Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's corruption trial, threatening to suspend military assistance if what he calls a 'witch hunt' continues. Netanyahu is standing trial for charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust in three separate cases. Trump claimed Netanyahu is 'in the process of negotiating a Deal with Hamas, which will include getting the Hostages back,' and questioned how Israel could force its leader 'to sit in a Courtroom all day long, over NOTHING.' Meanwhile, the Israeli military issued broad evacuation orders for neighborhoods of Gaza City on Sunday, amid growing calls for a ceasefire from Trump. The notifications for people to leave parts of the city, as well as other areas in northern Gaza, came as the military warned that it would intensify operations. At least 86 people were killed in Israeli attacks in the 24 hours before midday on Sunday, the Gaza Health Ministry said. UKRAINE: Moscow launched the largest aerial assault on Ukraine overnight since the beginning of the full-scale invasion in 2022 The Ukrainian Air Force said that one of its F-16 fighter jet pilots was killed in the attack. In a statement on social media, the air force said Russia used 537 drones and missiles in the attack; 249 were shot down and the rest disappeared from the radar, the air force said. The strikes targeted cities throughout Ukraine. Local authorities said businesses and civilian infrastructure were hit, and 12 people were injured. President Volodymyr Zelensky called for more support from Washington and Western allies to bolster Ukraine's air defenses after the attack. 'Moscow will not stop as long as it has the capability to launch massive strikes,' Zelensky said on the social platform X. And finally … 🥵 When it comes to summer heat, misery doesn't love company, but a lot of countries are sharing in the triple-digit sweat. The culprit: climate change. The phenomenon: heat domes, which trap hot, dry air like a lid to sizzle everything underneath. Portions of the United States are suffering again this week from extreme weather and temperatures, including Washington, D.C. And it's Western Europe's turn. A high-pressure system, which draws hot air from North Africa as it shifts eastward, is wilting residents and visitors in Spain, Portugal, France, Italy and Greece. In southern Spain on Saturday, it was 114.8 degrees Fahrenheit, possibly a new national record for June. Parts of Great Britain today may see 97 degrees Fahrenheit, coinciding with the start of Wimbledon tennis, where the famous cream may bake on the strawberries. Thanks for reading! Check out more newsletters from The Hill here. See you next time.

Insurer Blue Shield of California's new parent company alarms consumer advocates
Insurer Blue Shield of California's new parent company alarms consumer advocates

Los Angeles Times

time3 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Insurer Blue Shield of California's new parent company alarms consumer advocates

Last year, regulators approved a request by Blue Shield of California, the state's third-largest health insurer, to restructure and establish a new parent corporation in Delaware. The Oakland-based nonprofit got the go-ahead from the Department of Managed Health Care, or DMHC, to create an entity called Ascendiun Inc., which is now the out-of-state corporate parent of Blue Shield. The insurer said that the restructuring would allow it to better serve its members 'with less bureaucracy and faster results, while making health care more affordable.' But the transaction has raised alarm among a former high-level Blue Shield executive and consumer advocates, who complain that it was carried out with no public oversight and could allow the insurer to transfer money to a Delaware parent company with few strings attached. The activists claim that some of that money could be used to boost its spending on charitable endeavors. The company has accrued a surplus of more than $4 billion over the decades as it benefited from its former tax-exempt status, according to a regulatory filing. 'The move guts the ability of the DHMC to enforce Blue Shield's nonprofit obligations to the California public and gives Blue Shield's directors ... a virtually free hand to make use of Blue Shield's billions of dollars in charitable assets as they please,' wrote Michael Johnson, the insurer's former vice president of public policy, in a recent letter to Mary Watanabe, director of the department, which was reviewed by The Times. Johnson is calling for the department to rescind its approval and unwind the restructuring. The department maintains that the insurer is not subject to charitable trust rules as a nonprofit mutual benefit corporation. In a statement, the department said it 'maintains full regulatory authority and enforcement of all Blue Shield of California health plan operations,' and reviewed the transaction to ensure that it will not harm the plan's financial viability. Blue Shield's restructuring is reviving a longstanding debate about whether one of the state's largest insurers is reinvesting enough of its profit to lower its rates, better serve low-income residents and provide coverage for underserved areas of the state. Controversy over the company's role as a nonprofit previously aired in 2015 as it sought approval from the department for its $1.2-billion purchase of Care1st, a Medicaid health plan. Blue Shield has disputed Johnson's claims, noting that the state has determined it is not subject to the rules governing charitable nonprofits. In the Jan. 8 announcement of its restructuring, Blue Shield also disclosed that it was forming a for-profit subsidiary called Stellarus that would provide services to other health plans, such as delivering drugs to patients more inexpensively than pharmacy benefit managers. Ascendiun is structured as a nonprofit and Blue Shield and the company's Medi-Cal insurer, Blue Shield of California Promise Health Plan — the former Care1st — also would continue as nonprofits, the insurer said at the time. 'This structure is not uncommon among health plans, as many across the country — including other nonprofit Blue Cross and Blue Shield companies — have made similar corporate reorganizations to better serve their membership,' the insurer said in its statement to The Times. Blue Shield was established in 1939 by the California Medical Assn. as the nation's first prepaid health plan to cover physician bills. It followed the creation of the first Blue Cross plan, in Texas, to pay for hospital bills. The California insurer did not pay federal taxes until a change in the law in 1986. And it was exempt from state taxes until the Franchise Tax Board revoked that status in August 2014 after a scathing audit that The Times first reported. The audit found that Blue Shield was operating similarly to a for-profit company, with executives instructed to 'maximize profitability.' The tax board also found that the insurer had stockpiled 'extraordinarily high surpluses' even as it failed to offer enough public benefits, such as more affordable coverage. Blue Shield denied the accusations but ultimately relinquished its tax-exempt status, even as it has continued to pursue an appeal of an order requiring it to pay more than $100 million in back taxes. Johnson contends that the new corporate structure will allow Blue Shield to move its assets around in pursuit of its business goals with little oversight beyond maintaining required reserves — especially given its parent company's incorporation in Delaware, a business-friendly state where most Fortune 500 companies are registered. The DMHC strengthened reserve requirements in approving the deal and it now totals about $2.1 billion, according to a regulatory filing, which Johnson says would allow Blue Shield to transfer about $2.4 billion to Ascendiun. Charles Bell, a healthcare advocate who was involved in last decade's debate over Blue Shield's charitable obligations, is troubled by the decision to establish an out-of-state parent. 'I think that the changes in corporate structure that were made are highly concerning, and it should have received a much higher level of public scrutiny and a lot more skepticism by the Department of Managed Health Care,' said Bell, advocacy programs director for Consumers Union, the publisher of Consumer Reports. The department said in its response to The Times that it 'may hold public meetings if a transaction meets certain requirements to qualify as a major transaction. Upon due consideration, the Department determined that the specific facts of this restructuring did not meet the criteria set out in law to hold a public meeting.' Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans have a long history of restructuring, including Blue Cross of California. That insurer broke ground when in 1993 it spun off a recently established for-profit subsidiary, Wellpoint Health Networks. Blue Cross was later required to distribute $3.2 billion to a pair of new nonprofits, the California Endowment and the California Health Care Foundation, which are still operating. Less than a decade later, Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans in more than dozen other states had converted to for-profits, typically highly controversial proposals, given questions about what was to become of their billions of dollars of assets. More recently, the nonprofits have converted into mutual insurance holding companies. That allows them to maintain their nonprofit status while funding for-profit ventures, such as in technology, said Brendan Bridgeland, an attorney with the Center for Insurance Research in Cambridge, Mass. What is unusual about Blue Shield of California's restructuring, he said, is that the DMHC allowed it to establish an out-of-state parent company. 'Once you reach the point where the subsidiary starts transferring money up to the parent and it gets reallocated, then it's going to be out of their control,' Bridgeland said. Johnson's concerns are rooted in efforts last decade by healthcare advocates to have Blue Shield declared a charitable organization and to dig into its assets to improve patient care as a condition of its approval to acquire Care1st. Johnson worked at Blue Shield from 2003 until 2015, when he resigned to mount a public campaign to pressure the insurer over its nonprofit mission. Johnson has been involved in litigation with his former employer, which sued him in 2015 alleging he disclosed confidential information, including Blue Shield's communications with the Franchise Tax Board. In a settlement, he agreed to no longer retain or disseminate such documents. In seeking to retain its state tax-exemption during its audit by the board, which began in 2013, Blue Shield argued that should it dissolve, its assets could be distributed only to another nonprofit. Yet, the insurer told the DMHC, when the agency reviewed the proposed acquisition in 2015, that as a nonprofit mutual-benefit corporation it served only its enrollees and had no such obligations. Ultimately, the department decided that Blue Shield did not have the charitable obligations though it required the insurer, in approving the acquisition that year, to refrain from making 'misleading or inconsistent' statements regarding the distribution of its assets if it ever were dissolved. 'Through this process there have been inconsistencies in what Blue Shield has said. It was frustrating because we had to spend a lot of time and energy to make sure what was true,' the department's then director, Shelley Rouillard, said at the time. The insurer pledged as part of the Care1st acquisition to spend $200 million over the next decade on several initiatives aimed at providing better patient care. Nevertheless, patient advocates criticized the DMHC's finding that Blue Shield did not have charitable obligations, saying the state lost the opportunity to regulate how the insurer spent its billions in assets — and then failed to impose tougher conditions on the insurer, such as limiting its ability to impose rate increases deemed unreasonable. In his March letter, Johnson called on the DMHC to require Blue Shield to spend annually at least 5% of its total assets on community benefits, which might go, for example, to grants to community clinics in underserved areas of the state. Blue Shield defended its charitable spending, noting that it caps its annual profit at 2% and allocates additional revenue to such services as delivering COVID vaccines at no cost to the state, and funding nonprofits that advance mental health. 'Blue Shield … has consistently supported its members and California communities throughout the state,' the company said. Johnson also contends newly public documents show Blue Shield has continued to argue before state tax authorities that it is a charitable trust. In the opening brief of its back taxes case in 2020, the insurer cites a state Supreme Court case that it said confirms 'Blue Shield operates exclusively for the promotion of social welfare,' his letter notes. Blue Shield told The Times that it has provided 'consistent information to DMHC about its corporate restructuring' and that Johnson's letter provided 'no new evidence' regarding Blue Shield's status as a 'tax-paying not-for-profit mutual benefit corporation.' Johnson and the DMHC traded additional letters last week, with Johnson questioning why the department had not reviewed the new tax appeal documents or why they had not reviewed Ascendiun's articles of incorporation or bylaws prior to approving the restructuring. Janet Rickershauser, a nonprofits lawyer at Hurwit & Associates, said that the bylaws are important to understanding the parent company's operations, including the relationship of the subsidiaries to each other and the holding parent company. In a letter sent June 23 to Johnson, Jonathon Williams, an assistant chief counsel at the DMHC, said the department concluded it was 'not necessary or appropriate' to review the tax-appeal documents in its review of Blue Shield's application to restructure nor conduct a 'full evaluation of Delaware's corporation statutory scheme.' The department told The Times that it conducted a 'comprehensive review' of the articles of incorporation of Blue Shield and its Medicaid Promise Health Plan as required by state law. Although it did not review Ascendiun's bylaws or articles of incorporation, the department said it retained its regulatory authority over Blue Shield. Blue Shield said it would not release it bylaws because they are 'confidential company documents.' However, Rickershauser said that 'hiding the ball on the bylaws is preventing transparency into important aspects of how they're operating.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store