logo
Those Passions by TJ Clark review – a timely study of the connection between art and politics

Those Passions by TJ Clark review – a timely study of the connection between art and politics

The Guardian16-02-2025
Politics runs through the history of art like a protester in a museum with a tin of soup. From emperors' heads on coins to Picasso's anti-war masterpiece, Guernica, and Banksy's street art, power and visual culture have been closely and sometimes combustibly associated. This relationship is explored in essays by the distinguished art historian TJ Clark, professor emeritus at the University of California, Berkeley. Many of them first appeared in the London Review of Books, where the academic is given room to dilate in its rather airless pages. He brings a wide scholarship and unflagging scrutiny to his task. That said, his introduction includes the discouraging spoiler: 'art-and-politics [is] hell to do'. From time to time, the reader finds themselves recalling this damning admission.
Clark writes from a 'political position on the left'. He reflects on epoch-making events such as the Russian revolution, which spawned socialist realist art. He says the Dresden-born artist Gerhard Richter, 93, maker of abstract and photorealist works, is 'haunted by his past' in the former East Germany. But there are also dustier subjects, including the Situationist International, a group of avant-garde artists and theorists who were active from the 1950s to the 1970s.
Clark's take on art and power is timely, though. Donald Trump's friends the tech bros are a new class of fabulously rich patrons with political clout to match. They are sponsoring a revolution in image-making through AI and social media. Clark writes about widely shared and often manipulated photographs of rioting in England in 2011 (and calls the typical subject of these visuals 'the un-elated looter'). But his pieces, the oldest of which dates back 25 years, have been overtaken by leapfrogging developments in the digital sphere.
His definition of what constitutes political art is broad; or better, say, elastic. One chapter examines a crucifixion done in grisaille, or shades of grey, by a northern Renaissance master. Is this political art? According to Clark, the painting expresses 'a Christian nihilism… lacking the consoling vehemence of the isms to come'. In fact, the picture was made in the immediate aftermath of a pretty vehement ism: a monk called Savonarola was responsible for the fanaticism of tossing books and paintings on to the Bonfire of the Vanities in Florence. Clark examines faces painted by Rembrandt. These are 'political' in the sense that the artist became the society portraitist of a new class in Dutch society, the bourgeoisie; but then the entire golden age of art in the Netherlands was paid for by their wealth.
Confronted in a gallery by the alchemy that transforms pigment, canvas and mark-making into a canonical work, some of us are content to attribute this to genius or serendipity. We imagine a silken thread connecting the artist's eye, hand and the picture. But to an art historian such as Clark, it's more of a Gordian tangle, and untying it is correspondingly knotty. He worries away at the inscrutable expression on the face of Mars by Diego Velázquez, with the god of war seen in what looks like a French firefighter's helmet and very little else, like an exhausted strippergram. Clark finds a similar look on a rifleman in The Surrender of Breda, also by Velázquez, who was painter to Philip IV of Spain. 'Mars's expression still eludes us,' Clark concedes, though one reading he offers of this poker face is that it was the default look at Philip's court, and that went for his tame artist and his portraits, too: 'Keeping things superficial, and therefore not subject to malicious misinterpretation, may be a virtue, not to say a survival skill.'
Clark doesn't indulge himself or the reader with the felicities of a stylist such as the critic Robert Hughes (who beautifully draws our attention in The Surrender of Breda to Velázquez's 'palisade of lances' and makes Clark's point about the artist with effortless succinctness, calling him 'the greatest impersonal painter who ever lived').
There are moments when Clark's inquiries are beneath his considerable dignity. Art historians have something in common with mediums and spiritualists: they attempt to get in touch with the other side. While there's a certain amount of empirical data about an artwork – its age, the materials it was made from, its provenance and so on – some commentators like to round out their appreciation with a kind of seance involving the artist. What was he thinking as he made his masterpiece? (See the art historians pitch up at the National Gallery in their gaudy headscarves and Romany caravans!) Clark divines the intentions of Hieronymus Bosch (who died in 1516) from the tiniest lick of paint on the face of a small figure on one of four panels now in Venice: 'I'm very sure that Bosch had an idea from the start how the man's mouth might serve his purposes.'
This communing with long-dead artists to channel what was going through their heads made me think of a British film star who once played a badly wounded war hero. He nailed a heartbreaking scene in which he woke up in hospital to find his leg had been amputated, and his co-stars begged him to reveal how he did it. He said: 'I just thought: 'I hope they've still got some beef sandwiches in the trailer.'' Is it bathetic, or simply an acknowledgment of human nature, to imagine that Velázquez, Bosch and the rest sometimes thought of beef sandwiches, so to speak? After all, the old masters were hired hands, working to commission. They were fulfilling the wishes of a client – often a demanding one – rather than expressing themselves or chasing a muse.
The sign of a good painting, it used to be said, was that the eyes follow you around the room. For Clark, indefatigable scrutiniser of facial features, the hallmark is that he follows the eyes around the room instead.
Those Passions: On Art and Politics by TJ Clark is published by Thames & Hudson (£40). To support the Guardian and Observer order your copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The UK city that's one of the best in the world for nightlife
The UK city that's one of the best in the world for nightlife

Daily Mirror

time10 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

The UK city that's one of the best in the world for nightlife

Time Out has revealed the 20 best cities in the world for nightlife, with one UK city making the cut - and it's not the nation's capital The crème de la crème of global nightlife destinations has been disclosed, and Brighton has flown the flag for the UK by securing a spot in the top ten, ranking seventh. Topping the charts overall is none other than Las Vegas, renowned for its glittering array of bars, nightclubs, and casinos. ‌ TimeOut has unveiled the rankings, showcasing the top 20 cities worldwide for those seeking the ultimate nocturnal experiences. They surveyed thousands across hundreds of leading cities globally, asking participants to judge their local nightlife scene, including clubs, bars, and evening entertainment. ‌ After analysing the responses, the experts compiled the definitive list of the top 20 nightlife hotspots around the globe. ‌ Brighton stands as the UK's lone entry on the list, building on its reputation from Time Out's previous accolade as one of the world's top 50 cities. The coastal city is a magnet for diverse crowds, all in search of a memorable night on the town, reports the Express. ‌ With offerings ranging from seafront clubs and sophisticated wine and cocktail bars to cabaret performances in historic ballrooms, Brighton caters to every taste. Among the city's gems is The Tempest Inn, a seafront establishment with a unique cave-like interior that has garnered glowing reviews on TripAdvisor. A patron shared their experience: "Came here for Forro dance (upstairs) ... really lovely venue and enjoyed a few drinks. Great central location, really nice internally, really top quality venue." ‌ Meanwhile, one patron of the cocktail and wine bar Bar Medusa penned: "I recently visited this bar and was left with a gorgeous impression. Everything was wonderful, from the friendly and welcoming staff to the delicious cocktails. 'Picasso' was stunning and become my favorite cocktail. I will definitely come here again." Additionally, a review of Brighton's Haus of Cabaret states: "Went for our anniversary not sure what to expect but had a great time was very funny Ruby our waitress was great kept us topped up with food and drink will definitely be going again." The world's 20 best cities for nightlife Las Vegas, USA Madrid, Spain Paris, France Shanghai, China Berlin, Germany Melbourne, Australia Brighton, UK Mexico City, Mexico Dubai, UAE Mumbai, India Cape Town, South Africa Warsaw, Poland Bangkok, Thailand Lagos, Nigeria Cairo, Egypt Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Amsterdam, Netherlands Medellín, Colombia Marrakech, Morocco Athens, Greece

Victory for Christian foster mom agency tried to ban after she said she wouldn't give trans child hormones
Victory for Christian foster mom agency tried to ban after she said she wouldn't give trans child hormones

Daily Mail​

time17 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Victory for Christian foster mom agency tried to ban after she said she wouldn't give trans child hormones

A widowed Christian mom-of-five scored a major legal victory after a federal appeals court ruled that the state of Oregon violated her constitutional rights by barring her from adopting foster children because of her refusal to support gender transitions. Jessica Bates, who says her faith prevents her from using preferred pronouns or facilitating hormone treatments, was blocked by the state after she said she could not affirm an LGBTQ + child's identity. She sued - and now, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals has sided with her, calling the state's policy a violation of her free speech and religious freedom. 'This is a win not just for me, but for people of faith who want to help kids without compromising their beliefs,' Bates said after the ruling. In a 2-1 decision issued on Thursday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals struck down an Oregon Department of Human Services (ODHS) policy that effectively barred Bates from becoming a foster parent. Bates was refusing to comply with the state's requirement to 'respect, accept and support' a foster child's gender identity and sexual orientation. 'We hold that Oregon's policy violates the First Amendment as applied to Bates,' wrote Judge Daniel Bress in the court's majority opinion, joined by Judge Michael Daly Hawkins. The court ordered a preliminary injunction blocking the state from using its current policy to prevent Bates from moving forward with the adoption process. Bates, who lives in Malheur County, said she felt 'called by God' to care for additional children after losing her husband. The five children she already has are her biological kids. She had hoped to adopt two siblings under the age of nine but was disqualified after refusing to sign a commitment to fully affirm an LGBTQ+ child's identity, including using chosen names and pronouns or providing access to gender-related medical treatments. 'I believe God gives us our gender/sex and it's not something we get to choose,' Bates wrote in her application. 'I have no problem loving them and accepting them as they are, but I would not encourage them in this behavior.' The state of Oregon argued that its policy is essential to ensure the safety and well-being of vulnerable children in its custody. But the appeals court disagreed, finding the regulation was overly broad and imposed an unconstitutional burden on Bates' free speech and religious liberty. 'It is not narrowly tailored to impose on Bates an extreme and blanket rule that she may adopt no child at all based on her religious faith,' Bress wrote. The court emphasized that the state could simply avoid placing LGBTQ+ children with Bates while still allowing her to foster or adopt. The lone dissent came from Judge Richard Clifton, who warned that Bates was seeking to foster 'only on her terms,' and that the state had a legitimate interest in protecting children from potential rejection or harm. 'Parents would not be expected to entrust their children to caregivers who volunteer that they will not respect the child's self-determined gender identity,' Clifton wrote. The case has drawn national attention and praise from conservative groups, including the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which represented Bates. 'Because caregivers like Jessica cannot promote Oregon's dangerous gender ideology to young kids and take them to events like pride parades, the state considers them to be unfit parents,' said ADF senior counsel Jonathan Scruggs. 'That is false and incredibly dangerous, needlessly depriving kids of opportunities to find a loving home. The 9th Circuit was right to remind Oregon that the foster and adoption system is supposed to serve the best interests of children, not the state's ideological crusade.' In an interview with KGW8, Bates reiterated her commitment to loving all children in her care, but said she would not affirm an LGBTQ+ identity or allow permanent medical interventions like hormone therapy. 'I'm still gonna love them deeply,' she said. 'But just like my biologicals, I probably will not allow them to do any, like, permanent... hormone injections, anything that's going to rob them of their God-given body.' Bates said she would not use a child's chosen name or pronouns and would instead steer the conversation toward her Christian faith. 'God makes our identity,' she said. 'It might not feel like a gift right now... but that's something actually really special, and you are beautiful and perfect, just how you are right now.' Asked whether she would reject an LGBTQ+ child, Bates said she would never kick a child out - except in cases of 'sexually aberrant' behavior. 'The Christian sex ethic is very narrow and simple... any of the sexual activity that's outside of God's defined institution of marriage is something I would not be OK with in my house,' she added. The court's decision now sends the case back to a lower court in Oregon, where Bates' constitutional claims will be reconsidered under strict scrutiny - the most rigorous standard in constitutional law. Historically, policies that fail this test are rarely upheld. ODHS has not yet said whether it plans to appeal the decision, but a spokesperson for the Oregon Department of Justice acknowledged the setback. 'We are disappointed in the ruling but are reviewing to determine next steps,' said Jenny Hansson. Meanwhile, Bates says she intends to continue the foster care certification process - and insists that her position is about faith, not hatred. 'I would hope that we would have open communication,' she said. 'But I would probably, you know, remind them of Christ, my Christian faith that... God makes our identity, and that's something sacred and holy.' The ruling is expected to have wide ramifications for how states balance nondiscrimination policies with religious freedom in the child welfare system and is already being hailed by Christian conservatives as a landmark win in the culture wars.

First Minister disappointed to not attend Belfast Pride this year
First Minister disappointed to not attend Belfast Pride this year

South Wales Guardian

timea day ago

  • South Wales Guardian

First Minister disappointed to not attend Belfast Pride this year

It comes after the Belfast Pride organisers asked political parties to not attend the parade this year in an official capacity, after Stormont backed a ban on puberty blockers. The parade started in 1991 and over the last 30 years has grown to be the largest single parade in Northern Ireland. The theme for this year's event is No Going Back, as organisers said there must be 'no turning back from the advances made in visibility, legal protections and societal recognition'. Alliance MLA and Stormont Agriculture and Environment Minister Andrew Muir, who is gay, has said he will be attending the Pride parade in a personal capacity, describing it as an important event. First Minister Michelle O'Neill said she will mark Pride in her own way, and hopes to be able to return to Belfast Pride next year. 'For me, Pride has always been about love and friendship, about celebrating people's identity and promoting inclusivity, and I have always been an advocate for equality and human rights, so it does make me sad that they have taken the decision that they have taken,' she told the BBC. 'However, I will continue to work with the organisers, I'll continue to work with all the organisations out there that represent the whole LGBTQIA+ community, and I would say to them all that whilst they celebrate Pride on Saturday, I hope that next year I also will be celebrating Pride with them. 'I will do so this Saturday in my own way, and I'll send them all, all the members of the LGBTQIA+ community that I, as your First Minister, am your ally, I will continue to be your ally and Sinn Fein as my party will also continue to be an ally.' Meanwhile, earlier this week it was reported that the head of the Northern Ireland Civil Service, Jayne Brady, was told they would be 'open to the charge of acting politically' by taking part in Belfast Pride. Ms O'Neill said she felt that as a major employer in Northern Ireland, the civil service should be represented, however TUV MLA Timothy Gaston said there was 'deep unease' among Christian civil servants. The First Minister said: 'We are an inclusive employer and I think it is absolutely appropriate that the head of that service should be there and walk in the celebration that is Pride on Saturday. 'We can't promote inclusivity and employ that many people, and not actually turn up on the day of celebration, so I commend that as the right approach to take. 'The civil service is an employer, and they're an employer of over 24,000 staff, many of those staff will be members of the LGBTQIA+ community so therefore, I think it is appropriate that the head of the civil service will be there and actually celebrate on Pride with many of the staff.' Mr Muir said: 'I came out just under 30 years ago and, at that time as a young gay man struggling with my sexuality, I was looking to my employer, and my employer was saying, 'we're going to take part in Pride, we're going to show our support for our fellow LGBTQIA+ employees'. 'I'd be thinking, 'that's somewhere I want to work, that's somewhere I want to feel included', and I think that is really, really good, and I want to commend the leadership of the Northern Ireland Civil Service. Mr Gaston said he has written to Ms Brady to voice his concern after being contacted by Christian civil servants. 'Their concerns are not rooted in prejudice but in a principled belief that the Civil Service, as a publicly funded and supposedly apolitical body, should not be endorsing what is an overtly political and highly divisive campaign,' he said. 'Belfast Pride is not a neutral celebration. It is a platform for contentious political demands, including positions on gender ideology, family, education, and religious freedom, that are strongly contested. 'When the Civil Service appears to publicly align itself with such a movement, it sends a clear and troubling message: that one worldview is officially sanctioned, and others are to be marginalised or silenced. 'The Civil Service must be impartial, not just in its public actions but in the culture it cultivates within.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store