Can India create an effective framework to bridge the skill gap in its workforce?
Skill gap, where individuals, even if formally qualified, lack actual competencies needed to perform effectively on the job.
The study also broadens the definition of 'skills' to include not only technical and vocational proficiency, but also cognitive and socio-emotional capabilities - all of which are critical for productivity and long-term employability.
To test and validate the proposed framework, the study took a stepwise approach.
Live Events
Selected 7 high-growth sectors based on such indicators as their contribution to GVA, employment share, growth trajectory and strategic relevance. Additional parameters such as input-output multipliers and sunrise potential were used to identify sectors most likely to drive employment in the short-to-medium term.
Roles, as defined by Sector Skill Councils (SSCs), were aligned with National Classification of Occupations (NCO) 2015 to ensure consistency across data and analytical frameworks. This harmonisation enables more accurate forecasting and helps align skill development efforts with actual labour market needs.
Macro-level workforce analysis included examining the profile of workers - educational qualifications (general, technical and vocational), gender and occupation types - using available national datasets like PLFS and Annual Survey of Industries. Simultaneously, the study identified geographical clusters across states and districts to understand where economic and employment activity is concentrated.
Input-output modelling techniques used to forecast shifts in job demand over a 3-year horizon. Drawing on data from NAS, PLFS and international growth forecasts, these simulations offered insights into the scale and nature of workforce requirements likely to emerge across sectors.
Identification of top occupations or potentially facing skill shortages and/or gaps, stakeholders across the value chain were systematically mapped and interviewed.
India needs a dynamic framework to track skill demand and supply. While national and state-level studies have been conducted since 2011, lack of a common methodology has made it difficult to reconcile a national picture.In 2024-25, skill development and entrepreneurship ministry and NCAER launched a study to build a unified, scalable framework for skill gap assessment . This aimed to create a regularly updated system for tracking skill needs across states and sectors. It proposes a dynamic framework that enables continuous monitoring and periodic forecasting.Globally, countries with mature skill ecosystems rely on a combination of quantitative and qualitative tools to assess skill needs. India, too, has seen fragmented efforts by multiple institutions, each applying its own lens.MSDE-NCEAR framework creates a baseline from which governments, training providers and employers can work together to better target resources, update training curricula, revise qualification packs, and identify underserved regions or occupations requiring focused intervention.But it requires additional steps needed to make the system fully operational and responsive to real-time changes:A more robust and granular survey instrument can capture data on employment levels, wage structures, qualifications and skill requirements across non-agricultural enterprises, with district-level representation to ensure that local workforce trends are adequately reflected in national planning.Persistent vacancies could serve as a practical proxy for identifying hard-to-fill roles. A common national definition of such vacancies would allow for consistent tracking across regions and sectors.Real-time labour market insights drawn from enterprise records, online job portals and digital employment platforms could help identify emerging occupations, spatial mismatches and shifting industry needs. This would allow for quicker course corrections and timely updates to training curricula and qualification packs.The task ahead is to institutionalise the MSDE-NCAER framework and align it with evolving labour market trends through regular data flows and support state-level adoption. For this to happen, skill-gap studies must become central to how we plan, fund and implement investments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Delhi govt schools lead in Class III; private schools excel in higher grades: NCERT survey on competency development
Government-run schools in Delhi have outperformed government-aided, central government and privately run schools in the Capital at the foundational stage (Class 3). This is as per the Parakh Rashtriya Sarvekshan 2024, a survey conducted by the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT). This is the first time since 2017, when the NCERT started the nationwide survey to assess competency development at different levels — Foundational (Class 3), Preparatory (Class 6), and Middle (Class 9) stages — that government schools performed better than other schools in the city. However, private schools took the lead in the Preparatory and Middle stages, the report released on Monday shows. During the survey, students and teachers from 1,263 schools were surveyed and assessed. In 2017 and 2021, when the survey was conducted, under the title 'National Achievement Survey' (NAS), the performance of students in Delhi government schools was below the national average at the Foundational Level for Language, Maths, and Environmental Science. Foundational Level In the latest survey, at 71%, Class 3 students performed the best in identifying shapes, patterns in their surroundings, and numbers. At 43%, the poorest performance was recorded in doing simple transactions such as using money up to Rs 100. At 64%, the students also scored 3% above the national average in the Language category. In Maths too, the score was 1% above the national average recorded at 61%. In line with the national trend, the national average performance of private schools in the city remained behind that of government schools for the Language and Maths categories. Preparatory Level In this stage, a different trend has been witnessed. Delhi government schools take a backseat in all parameters in comparison to all other schools. Barring Language, the performance of Delhi government schools was below the national average in the other two categories — Maths, and The World Around Us. Private schools took the lead in the Capital at 67%, above the national average of 60% in Language; 55% in Maths, against the national average of 49%; and 59% for The World Around Us, which is 7% higher than the national average. Middle level Assessment in this stage reveals that while Delhi government school students performed better than the national average by 7%, private schools in the city outperformed in the assessed subjects: Maths, Language, Social Science, and Science. These schools performed above the national average in all the subjects, topping in the Language category at 76%. Among other key insights are that the central government schools in all categories in the Capital performed below the national average. In competency assessment for Class 6, children fared worst in representing commonly used fractions in daily life as parts of unit wholes and in number lines, with only 26% of students answering correctly. Meanwhile, Class 9 students found it the most difficult to apply percentages in real life, with only 28% giving the right answers. Their performance was the best, on the contrary, in Language competence. Recommendations 'Auditory, visual, and kinesthetic activities' such as 'interactive story-telling, picture-word association, and tactile learning materials' as part of building a 'multi-sensory learning approach' have been recommended to improve the abilities of students in Class 3. Schools do not provide special accommodations for students with special needs, according to 51% of respondents. To this, the NCERT has suggested 'to cultivate an inclusive culture that values diversity and supports all students'. Three key areas were identified for Class 6 and 'innovative teaching strategies', improving parent and community participation, and 'continuous professional development' have been recommended. Meanwhile, for Class 9 students in Delhi, skill education for 'diverse career paths' is a key suggestion.
Mint
19 hours ago
- Mint
Watch electricity usage to track industrial activity in real time
As India has embarked on a quest to become a global manufacturing powerhouse, with ambitious targets such as raising the share of manufacturing in gross domestic product (GDP) from about 17% currently to 25% by 2030 and creating 100 million jobs, tracking progress both accurately and in real-time is critical. Yet, policymakers and analysts typically rely on lagging indicators. The Index of Industrial Production (IIP) has a lag of 42 days, which is being lowered to 28 days; quarterly GDP is reported with a two-month delay; and the Annual Survey of Industries (ASI) is released about two years after the relevant financial year. The real-time pulse of our industrial economy, however, lies not in delayed data and indices, but in the silent electric current flowing through our wires, which is updated every second, everywhere. Also Read: Rahul Jacob: Manufacturing is crying out for a reality check Electricity consumption is one of the most immediate, granular and underused indicators of industrial output. It powers not just lighting and ventilation, but also looms, furnaces, extruders, assembly lines and cold storage facilities. Where there is manufacturing activity, there is electricity demand, and changes in it offer powerful insights into the industrial sector's health. We conducted an analysis using the ASI of 2022-23 to assess the strength of the relationship between electricity consumption and manufacturing output. Across a sample of nearly 48,000 factories, the correlation between the logarithm of electricity purchased and consumed and the logarithm of manufacturing output was a striking 0.80 (1 being perfect correlation). A 'local polynomial smoothed curve' (or a fitted line) plotted over the data showed a tight upward-sloping trend across the output spectrum, suggesting that electricity usage tracks production volumes with high precision. The data strongly suggests that electricity usage can reliably serve as a proxy for factory output across plant sizes and industries. Also Read: Think ahead: India's electronics manufacturing must go up the value curve What stands out is the strong correlation between electricity consumption and manufacturing output across states. Those like Meghalaya, Jharkhand, Punjab and Odisha top the list with coefficients above 0.84, while even large and industrially diverse states like Tamil Nadu (0.80), Maharashtra (0.79) and Gujarat (0.76) show robust associations. The pattern holds in less industrialized regions too; Assam shows a correlation of 0.81, and so does Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh. Only a few states like Nagaland (0.62) and Tripura (0.69) fall significantly below. In all, the broad reliability of this relationship across geographies is clear. Also, electricity-output correlations remain strong across industries. Energy-intensive sectors like rubber and plastics (0.86), paper and printing (0.85), pharmaceuticals (0.85) and metal and fabricated products (0.84) top the list. Even moderately intensive sectors such as textiles (0.79), electronics (0.77) and food and beverages (0.76) show consistent and robust associations. Also Read: Going nuclear will be the only way to keep the lights on as AI guzzles ever more electricity Just because electricity use and manufacturing output move together doesn't necessarily mean that one causes the other. So, we conducted a more rigorous analysis using an instrumental variable (IV) approach. Again, the findings were striking: a 1% increase in electricity consumption leads to a highly statistically significant 0.26% increase in the value of manufacturing output, even after accounting for other relevant inputs. Hence the relationship isn't just a statistical coincidence, it's economically meaningful and causally robust. Unlike most macroeconomic indicators, electricity data is available in real time, is objective and less prone to misreporting. And because it can be disaggregated by geographic region or industrial consumer category, it provides granular insights that are ideal for identifying which districts or sectors are struggling and which are progressing. For example, imagine being able to detect a production dip in the textile hub of Tirupur or a slowdown in auto-parts manufacturing in Pune not a month later through the IIP, but within days based on electricity consumption patterns. This kind of responsiveness could fundamentally change how we support and promote manufacturing activity, including managing supply chains and preparing for shocks. The IIP, being a national indicator, fails to capture industry-specific trends at the state, district and more granular levels. Also Read: Manufacturing versus services: Why privilege one over the other? India already has the infrastructure to make this transition. What we need now is to properly classify electricity consumption data by type of industry and institution and integrate it with decision-making at the most granular level. The Central Electricity Authority (CEA) already lays down guidelines for information reporting for distribution companies in each state. It should also collect information on the institutional status of each industrial consumer. We could use such identifiers as the Company Identification Number (CIN) issued under the Companies Act, Factory Serial Number obtained from the chief inspector of factories, Shops and Commercial registration number for partnerships and proprietary entities registered with the state government, and even the GST number, along with the entity's nature of activity as categorized under the National Industrial Classification system of 2008. A dashboard showing daily-updated electricity data that integrates IIP as well as GST metrics and also uses the Geographic Information System (including satellite feeds) could revolutionize how we track and support industrial growth in India. The authors are, respectively, former director general, ministry of statistics and distinguished fellow, Pahle India Foundation; and associate fellow, Pahle India Foundation.
Hans India
a day ago
- Hans India
Promises of millions of jobs bound to fall flat in India
Tall claims are usually made by political parties that they would create millions of jobs, if they are voted to power. Alternatively, in the same vein they also promise unemployment insurance in case of any delay from their side as regards honouring the promise. Data about job creation in India expose the tall claims as there is no scope for generating employment in such a large proportion, implying that promises on this count are unfounded and far away from implementation. In order to facilitate a meeting between job seekers and job providers, the Union Government launched the 'National Career Service' portal on July 20, 2015. As per the portal' s dashboard, as of May 26 this year, around 47.51 lakh active employers are registered on the portal, though vacancies are only estimated at 9.59 lakh. As per the 2024-25 annual report of the Union Ministry of Labour and Employment, there are approximately 441.5 lakh job seekers. These statistics reveal the yawning gap between the number of jobs available and the number of job seekers. The figures are reinforced by the data made available by the Director General of Employment (DGE). It considers persons in the age-group of 15-29 years as youth, whose figure stood at 372.1 million in 2021. This many experts opine is a very low estimate. According to them, there are about 610 million are in the working age. Of this, about 330 million are engaged in the non-farm sector and the livelihood of about 280 million are from agriculture and allied activities. The DGE data will further substantiate the statistics. The agency conducts the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) from time to time. As per its latest survey, the Worker Population Ratio (WPR) has gone up from 46.8 per cent in 2017-18 to 56 per cent, in addition to a significant rise in the Labour Force Participation Rate (LFPR) from 49.8 per cent to 57.9 per cent during the same period. Hence, if we consider job creation only for youth, we would be erring in recognising the basic issue of joblessness. We need to pragmatically consider that about 56 per cent of the population is available and willing to work. In the light of the improvements in life expectancy, re-employment after retirement also needs to be taken into consideration while computing job creation figures. It is also claimed by many governments that as a major job creator, the IT sector is a panacea for unemployment. The fact of the matter is that these projections are totally different when it comes to ground realities. As per a NASSCOM report, the Indian IT sector, which was worth $ 254 billion in 2021-22 will rise to $ 350 billion by this year. By the end of Financial Year 2021-22, the IT industry employed about 5.1 million; and is able to add about 60,000 jobs annually. It is projected that this sector would be able to add about 1.25 lakh a year by the FY 2025-26. Most of the skill development training sessions organized for the youth are aimed at this sector alone. With facts remaining so, where is the question of creating employment by the millions? In the context of regular and permanent jobs turning scarce, the gig economy is emerging as an alternative employment source for many job seekers. The gig workforce in the country is estimated at around 10 million now and is expected to grow by about 30 per cent every year. Not surprising that companies like Swiggy, Zomato and Rapido have become household names. To what extent these activities would secure the future of the youth needs to be pondered. The Karnataka government recently stopped the operations of Rapido, which it contended was 'illegal' under the Motor Vehicles Act. Other States could follow suit as it involves legal validity. The Central and various State Governments often proclaim that they are releasing 'job calendars', charting out timelines for creating jobs. The NDA government at the Centre as assured to create two crore jobs every year. The State governments will not be found wanting on this front. As indicated earlier, the number of job seekers as per NCS portal is 4.42 crore. Had the promise of two crore jobs a year been fulfilled, by now the scourge of unemployment should have been wiped out by now; unemployment is a stark reality in the country. The first ever monthly job data published by the Ministry of Statistics and Project Implementation recorded an Unemployment Rate (UR) of 5.1 per cent in April. The Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE), has put the UR at an average of 8.17 per cent for the period 2018 to 2025 (February). If we compute the number of unemployed persons from the existing data, the figure would be a staggering 4.13 crore as per DGE and 6.6 crore as per CMIE. These calculations are done based on the persons in the age group of 15-29 years only. If we consider the population in the age group of 15-59 years, which is considered realistic in the present context, the number of persons seeking employment would be significantly higher. Shying away these facts, the parties in power claim that the UR has come down drastically and the numbers have turned negligible. Ipso facto, joblessness is a reality and the claims of the political parties are a fallacy. (The writer is a former Vice-Chancellor of Acharya Nagarjuna University)
