Europe's best family firms have a secret weapon money can't buy
Yet the company has not allowed its reverence for tradition to divert it from innovation. Berry Bros led the charge into Asia (particularly China) in the 1980s. It now has outlets in Hong Kong, Tokyo and Singapore and stocks Chinese wine on its shelves. Everything from the company's wine cellars (including a huge one in Basingstoke) to its computer systems are state of the art.
It is fashionable in global business circles to pass over Europe with a sigh. US companies dominate the world's technological frontier (with Chinese competitors snapping at their heels). Asian companies have mastered the art of mass-producing middle-class prosperity. What are European companies good for? Part of the answer lies in longevity: The best European family companies have survived everything that history can throw at them – plagues, famines, world wars, recessions, revolutions – and continue to thrive. The Henokiens Association, an international club of 57 family businesses that have survived for at least 200 years, includes only 10 non-European members, all Japanese. The British have created their own club, the Tercentenarian Club, of companies that are more than 300 years old.
A familiar English proverb suggests that family companies seldom survive more than three generations ('from clogs to clogs in three generations'). A glance at corporate actuarial tables suggests that the three-generation rule is generous. The typical life expectancy of any company, family or non-family, is only a couple of decades, and is falling. What explains the longevity of the best European family businesses?
European business schools have done some excellent work answering this question. The IMD Business School in Switzerland has identified '25 principles necessary for long-term success' and has even come up with a model, the Family Business Secrets of Success Model. Bocconi University in Italy teamed up with the search firm Russell Reynolds Associates to identify 10 principles. For the sake of simplicity, I will focus on five culled from reading this research and my own cogitations.
Put the family business first. This may mean sidelining individual family members for the sake of the business. Long-lived family businesses are skilful at 'pruning the family tree' (encouraging less committed or talented family members to choose private life). Paradoxically, it may also mean exiting the founder's business for something more profitable. The Italian Falck family exited the steel industry, hitherto their core business, for renewables in the 1990s.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Celebrate tradition. Tradition is a unique resource which newer firms cannot match regardless of how much money they have. Thousands of companies produce wine, for example, but only the Frescobaldis in Tuscany can boast that their ancestor, Dino, rescued the first seven cantos of Dante's Divine Comedy from destruction. Tradition provides impossible-to-quantify corporate benefits: pride in collective achievements; the self-confidence to make difficult decisions (including the self-confidence to exit the family's ancestral business); and, perhaps most important of all, a sense of perspective (family companies are much better than public companies at resisting the pressure of quarterly results for long-term results).
One of the biggest problems with families is that they multiply over the generations. Successful family businesses counter that by making a conscious effort to keep tradition alive. Some live close to each other (though fans of Dallas or Dynasty will recognise that this is not always a formula for harmony). Most use less-drastic methods: holding regular family meetings, informal as much as formal, going on holiday together, telling stories of family achievements, visiting family archives, founding corporate museums.
Secure a pipeline of talent. The greatest curse of the family business is the incompetent son and heir. Successful family businesses secure a reliable supply of family members by encouraging lots of members of the family to go into the business and then subjecting them to a succession of tests. Exor chief executive John Elkann, the chosen heir of his maternal grandfather Gianni Agnelli, had to prove himself by working incognito in several different family-related businesses.
Focus on justice. The other great curse of family businesses is hurt feelings – and there is no greater source of hurt feelings in a family (particularly when money is involved) than a sense of injustice. All 10 of the long-lived family companies in the Bocconi study have developed scrupulously fair internal markets for shares which allow family members who want to exit from the company to sell their shares at a fair price and allow those who want to increase their involvement to buy them.
Provide safety valves. The ideal complement to a sense of justice is a system of safety valves. The best way to cope with family members who will not make it to the top is to provide them with alternative employment in family foundations. The best way to cope with impatient high-flyers is to give them opportunities to create subsidiaries or set up their own companies. Younger members of the Mulliez family have used family money to found new companies such as Decathlon (sports), Pizza Pai and Flunch (catering), Leroy Merlin (do-it-yourself) and Boulanger (electrical appliances). Most successful families have a behind-the-scenes 'leadership orchestrator', or godfather, who plays the role of preventing quarrels, suggesting opportunities and guiding future leaders.
The world has much to learn from Europe's long-lasting companies. Entrepreneurs who prospered during the glory years of globalisation are beginning to hand over their businesses to their children, a tricky process at any time, but particularly difficult in countries such as China that have suffered under communism; or Saudi Arabia, that has modernised only recently. They could do no better than to consult Europe's godfathers.
For their part, big public companies often suffer from a 'crisis of banality': in a world that is hungry for meaning, all too many of them adopt identical virtue-signalling language or forgettable names or logos. They should study the art of storytelling practised by the likes of Berry Bros & Rudd. Even as some American tourists like to lament Europe's supposed decline into a collection of monuments without any economic prospects, some of those monuments contain clever and innovative companies that will continue to thrive even after the giants of Silicon Valley have gone the way of Shelley's Ozymandias. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
US aims to ban Chinese technology in undersea telecommunications cables
FILE PHOTO: U.S. and Chinese flags are seen in this illustration created on March 20, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo WASHINGTON - The Federal Communications Commission said on Wednesday it plans to adopt rules to bar companies from connecting undersea submarine communication cables to the United States that include Chinese technology or equipment. "We have seen submarine cable infrastructure threatened in recent years by foreign adversaries, like China," FCC Chair Brendan Carr said in a statement. "We are therefore taking action here to guard our submarine cables against foreign adversary ownership, and access as well as cyber and physical threats." The United States has for years expressed concerns about China's role in handling network traffic and the potential for espionage. The U.S. has broad data security concerns about the network of more than 400 subsea cables that handle 99% of international internet traffic. Since 2020, U.S. regulators have been instrumental in the cancellation of four cables whose backers had wanted to link the United States with Hong Kong. The FCC last year said it was considering new rules governing undersea internet cables in the face of growing security concerns, as part of a review of regulations on the links that handle nearly all the world's online traffic. The FCC said it was considering barring the use of equipment or services in those undersea cable facilities from companies on an FCC list of companies deemed to pose threats to U.S, national security, including Huawei, ZTE China Telecom and China Mobile. Carr said the FCC is taking action to "guard our submarine cables against foreign adversary ownership, and access as well as cyber and physical threats." The FCC will also seek comment on additional measures to protect submarine cable security against foreign adversary equipment. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Over 600 Telegram groups in Singapore selling, advertising vapes removed by HSA Singapore 2 weeks' jail for man caught smuggling over 1,800 vapes and pods into Singapore Singapore Jail for man who fatally hit his daughter, 2, while driving van without licence Sport 'Like being in a washing machine with 40 deg C water': Open water swimmers brave challenging conditions Singapore Primary 1 registration: 38 primary schools to conduct ballot in Phase 2A Singapore ComfortDelGro to introduce new taxi cancellation, waiting fee policy Business Cathay Cineplexes gets fresh demands to pay up $3.3m debt for Century Square, Causeway Point outlets Singapore Countering misinformation requires both laws and access to trusted news sources: Josephine Teo The cutting of two fiber-optic undersea telecommunication cables in the Baltic Sea prompted investigations of possible sabotage. In 2023 Taiwan accused two Chinese vessels of cutting the only two cables that support internet access on the Matsu Islands and Houthi attacks in the Red Sea may have been responsible for the cutting of three cables providing internet service to Europe and Asia. REUTERS

Straits Times
6 hours ago
- Straits Times
Nvidia's Jensen Huang turns on the charm in Beijing amid US-China tech rivalry
Nvidia co-founder Jensen Huang ditched his iconic black leather jacket for a traditional Tang suit at a trade exhibition in Beijing on July 16. - On a high-profile trip to China, with billions in potential sales to the lucrative Chinese semiconductor market at stake, Nvidia co-founder Jensen Huang ditched his iconic black leather jacket for a traditional Tang suit. At the opening of a trade exhibition in Beijing on July 16, the Taiwan-born American spoke a few sentences of halting Mandarin, before adding to laughter: 'I'm going to do the rest of my speech in English now. So I don't torture you for the rest of the day.' Describing AI (artificial intelligence) models from Chinese tech players like DeepSeek, Alibaba and Baidu as 'world-class', he said: 'The heroes of China's super fast innovation are your researchers, developers and entrepreneurs. More than 1.5 million developers in China build on Nvidia today to bring their innovations to life.' Nvidia is at the heart of a global AI boom and last week became the first public company to hit US$4 trillion in stock market value . Mr Huang, who is among the American tech executives who are trying to court Chinese customers while not falling afoul of Washington's national security concerns, has come prepared on his third China visit of the year. On July 15, Nvidia announced that sales of its H20 chip to China would resume , with Washington's nod. The AI chip, a less powerful version of the firm's flagship H100, had been banned in April when Washington tightened export controls to China. But analysts said the move to approve the China-specific chip is merely a reprieve which may not last, with technology at the heart of US-China competition and both countries still in the middle of a 90-day trade truce since May 12. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Over 600 Telegram groups in Singapore selling, advertising vapes removed by HSA Singapore 2 weeks' jail for man caught smuggling over 1,800 vapes and pods into Singapore Singapore Jail for man who fatally hit his daughter, 2, while driving van without licence Singapore Primary 1 registration: 38 primary schools to conduct ballot in Phase 2A Singapore ComfortDelGro to introduce new taxi cancellation, waiting fee policy Singapore Here comes the sun: Less rain, more warm days in second half of July Singapore Instead of overcomplicating COE system, Govt has ensured affordable transport for all: SM Lee to Jamus Lim Singapore Baby died after mum took abortion pills and gave birth in toilet; coroner records an open verdict The H20's ban was estimated to have cost Nvidia US$10.5 billion across its April and July quarters. The policy reversal came after Mr Huang lobbied US President Donald Trump at the White House last week. On his visit, Mr Huang also unveiled a new graphics processing unit for the China market called the RTX Pro, which he said is 'fully compliant' with US export restrictions and would be designed for smart factories and robot training purposes. 'It takes 200 different technology companies to build one of our AI computers… it is not possible without a sophisticated supply chain,' he told President Ren Hongbin of the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade. 'That's why I'm here - to celebrate the miracle of the (Chinese) supply chain.' The Council, a government-affiliated trade body, is the organiser of the 3rd International Supply Chain Expo held in Beijing from July 16 to 20, which Nvidia took part in for the first time. Mr Huang was among the speakers at the opening ceremony. Even as he received the VIP treatment in China, Nvidia has remained caught in the crosshairs of Washington and Beijing. Mr Huang has argued that continuing to sell to China means that the US is not ceding the Chinese market to domestic players such as Huawei. He has also said that US tech export controls to China have failed, and have only pushed Chinese firms to innovate more quickly. But some, including US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, have said that Nvidia and other companies should stop helping China use 'our tools to compete with us'. Associate Professor Marina Zhang of the University of Technology Sydney saw Mr Huang's recent remarks as an effort to position himself - and Nvidia - as both compliant with US policy and indispensable to China's AI eco-system. Prof Zhang, who researches on China and technology issues, did not see the approval of the H20 as a reversal in policy, but more of a calibration. 'It reflects a 'precision sanctions' approach: allowing US firms to serve China's mid-tier AI market - keeping American players commercially viable - while still blocking access to cutting-edge compute essential for training frontier models. 'Washington is walking a tightrope: trying to avoid a full market exit for firms like Nvidia while continuing to constrain China's long-term AI capabilities,' she said, adding that this policy adjustment will not reverse China's determination to develop indigenous technologies, particularly in semiconductors. Dr Sun Chenghao, who researches US foreign policy and US-China relations at Tsinghua University, said the US decision to resume H20 chip sales to China did not represent a fundamental reversal of export controls. Rather, it is a temporary concession driven by commercial pressure and geopolitical calculations. Nvidia suffered significant losses under April's export ban, prompting Mr Huang to lobby intensely for policy adjustments, he said. 'While Washington greenlit the sales, it strictly capped the H20's performance (merely 15 to 30 per cent of the H100's capabilities) to prevent its use in cutting-edge AI training—revealing its unchanged core aim: delaying China's technological advancement.' Dr Sun said Washington could reimpose stricter controls if China's domestic chip substitutes progress faster than expected, or if US political pressures intensify. 'Notably, America has explicitly tied tech export policies to broader trade negotiations, meaning export restrictions will remain a bargaining chip to pressure China if talks stall,' he added. Mr Huang himself saw such geopolitical issues as beyond his control. When asked about the impact of US tariffs in a press conference on July 16, he said Nvidia would simply have to adapt. 'There were trade, taxes and tariffs before I came into Nvidia. There will be trade, tariffs and taxes after I leave Nvidia.'
Business Times
8 hours ago
- Business Times
China vows to regulate ‘irrational' competition in EV industry
[BEIJING] China's Cabinet on Wednesday (Jul 16) pledged to regulate what it called 'irrational' competition in the country's electric vehicle industry, vowing to strengthen cost investigation and price monitoring, according to state broadcaster CCTV. The Cabinet meeting, presided by Chinese Premier Li Qiang, was held as a two-year price war in the world's largest auto market only intensifies. China will focus on promoting the high-quality development of the electric vehicle industry and implement comprehensive measures in both the short- and long-term to address the 'phenomenon of irrational competition' in the sector, CCTV quoted the Cabinet as saying, without giving further details. The Cabinet will also urge the main automakers to fulfil commitments on supplier payment terms and promised to help them boost competitiveness through technological innovation and quality improvement. Industry regulators and executives have previously warned of excessive competition and called on automakers to halt the bruising price war which they say threatens the sector's health and sustainable development. Concerns about oversupply persist, with new vehicles being shipped overseas as 'used' since 2019, according to a Reuters report in late June. Separately, the Cabinet meeting discussed boosting domestic consumption, with policymakers vowing to systematically remove unreasonable restrictions that hinder household spending and optimise policies for a consumer goods trade-in program. REUTERS