Speed limit to be increased at Ilkley fatal crash site
The speed limit on a stretch of rural road is set to be increased, despite it having previously being lowered due to a fatal crash in the area.Bradford Council has proposed changing the limit on Moor Road in Ilkley to 40mph (64 km/h), between Hangingstone Road and Burley Woodhead.A number of changes had previously been made to the section of the road in 2023, such as reducing the speed limit from 50mph (80 km/h) to 30mph (48 km/h), following the death of a 25-year-old driver there, a council spokesperson said.The decision to increase the speed limit had "not been taken lightly", but the stretch of road had been deemed "unsuitable" for such a low limit, they added.
According to the authority, Moor Road had undergone several changes following a spate of incidents, and those changes were then subject to a period of monitoring. In conjunction with West Yorkshire Police, the council's road safety team had subsequenlty found the 30mph speed limit had led to some drivers making "unsafe overtaking manoeuvres" in the area.As a result, it had been decided to increase the limit to 40mph, but warning signs, lining and hazard marker posts would all remain in place.
'Balanced approach'
A Bradford Council spokesperson said: "We know this may seem like an unusual step to take, but can assure everyone it is being done with advice from the police and experienced highways engineers. "We remain committed to ensuring speed limits are safe, consistent, and appropriate for all road users."The new 40mph will still be 10mph lower than it was originally. "While this change will result in varying speed limits along the route, it reflects a balanced approach based on evidence, national policy, and professional judgement."
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
There's just one group of British people who are told to take responsibility
I recently had to complete a 'Safe and Considerate Driving Course', which took a day. The first half was held in a sort of classroom where our small group watched videos and were instructed in various dos and don'ts. The second half was 'on-road' with a helpful supervisor. The importance of confidentiality was heavily emphasised, so I shall not reveal any identifiable details, but what interested me greatly was the philosophy which lay behind the course. It was that each driver must take complete responsibility for his or her actions. All drivers – certainly all drivers made to go on such courses – tend to blame others for anything bad that happens. A crash is the fault of another driver, we say, or potholes or confusing road signs or traffic jams, or – a real favourite – of cyclists. We also like accusing the family member in our passenger seat of causing irritation or distraction. Our course teachers did not say such considerations are non-existent. How could they? The human race is full of imperfections, especially noticeable when on the move. But they stuck to the central issue: the only power that drivers have to improve their situations is to improve themselves. For example, we can, if we try, build in enough journey time to avoid getting flustered and stressed; we will help a traffic blockage flow quicker if we give way to someone than if we push in front, and so on. If we are to be better drivers, we must study, admit and correct our faults. This attitude reminded me of Step 4 of the 12 Steps of Alcoholics Anonymous – the need to 'make a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves'. Our teachers were polite and quite humorous, but on this key point, they were stern and unbending. As I drove (oh so carefully) away, it struck me how very different this theory of conduct was from most of what we nowadays get taught in other forums. For instance, our obsession with being discriminated against on grounds of race, sex, sexuality, age, religion etc, and of being able to sue for redress, is entirely based on the idea that we are the victims of others and nothing is our fault. Indeed, the famous Macpherson definition of a racist incident ('A racist incident is an incident which the victim or anyone else considers racist') makes every complainant a victim without any need for proof. It leaves no room at all for the idea that the 'victims' may be in error, let alone offensive themselves. Similarly, all plans for prison reform are based on the idea that prisoners are splendid people who just need lots of help getting jobs. It never seems to be part of their sentence that they should learn to examine their own behaviour, repent and do better. The Safe and Considerate Driving Course is partly precise guidance (eg 'Only a fool breaks the two-second rule'). Chiefly, though, it is an applied model of how to maintain a good society. It should be applied more widely. A serious man? As Sir Keir Starmer marks his first anniversary in office, I do feel a bit sorry for him. He won an astounding victory last year and has not yet proved himself evil, extreme, corrupt or stupid, yet everyone says he is useless. It is wrong – even mildly unconstitutional – to write him off after only a year. Nevertheless, I do think he has some explaining to do, and explaining seems to be an activity that he does not enjoy. The word he most likes to use is 'serious'. He is serious and so are the various summits he attends, he says; people like Kemi Badenoch who say he should not globetrot but should face the House of Commons, are not serious, he adds. I do hope he is serious: these are serious times. Sir Keir certainly has a serious demeanour. He has had serious words to say about government borrowing, welfare waste, immigration, rearmament, Ukraine, Israel/Palestine and much more. More often than not, however, he has started off on one track and then either reversed direction or not followed through. It is, as yet, too early to say for certain, but Sir Keir has not yet proved that he deserves to be taken seriously. Rural buses For most of my nearly 70 years, I have lived in a rural area. For all that time, people have complained about inadequate and declining rural bus services. For all that time, however, I have observed that rural buses are never full, except some in the school-run. Most are about four-fifths empty; it is not uncommon to see a rural bus with no passengers at all. How to account for this mismatch between alleged need and actual use? A partial explanation is that if the bus service schedule thins out, people feel it is unreliable and therefore switch to other means of transport. But another factor is a failure to adapt the transport itself to falling demand. Why are most rural buses still extremely large, and therefore very expensive in capital costs and on petrol? Their unnecessary size also makes them slower than they need be, blocking country lanes. They are the elephant in the road. I believe their normal maximum passenger capacity is 57 although, for most journeys, 15 or so would do the trick. It would be an act of true social entrepreneurism to design a new, compact rural bus, cheaper to run and cosier, by a country mile, to travel in.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Sixty firefighters tackle major Birmingham blaze
About 60 firefighters are tackling a large fire in Birmingham which is close to the Midlands Fire and Rescue Service said people living on and near Tyburn Road, Erdington, should keep their doors and windows closed after they were called at about 16:55 fire was in a building belonging to an office furniture company and was close to junction six of the M6, Spaghetti Junction, the brigade Midlands Police said it was helping the fire service and several roads in the area were closed. Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Nissan to axe hundreds of UK jobs
Nissan plans to cut hundreds of jobs at its Sunderland factory as the carmaker scrambles to boost profits amid slow demand for electric vehicles (EV). On Monday, the Japanese manufacturer announced plans to cut around 250 jobs – roughly 4pc of its 6,000-strong workforce at the plant in the North of England – through a voluntary redundancy scheme. Office staff and shop floor supervisors at the Sunderland facility will be affected by the cull, while manufacturing workers will be unaffected, the group said. Nissan's Sunderland facility was first opened in 1986 to supply cars including the iconic Nissan Bluebird to markets in the UK and Europe. The factory is currently the largest car factory in Britain and Nissan's only factory in Europe. The car factory in Sunderland is also the city's largest employer. The cuts come as Nissan seeks to cut ¥400bn (£2bn) of costs after its profits slumped amid slower-than-expected uptake of EVs in Europe. Nissan has invested heavily in its push to become a leading manufacturer of EVs in a bid to ditch petrol and diesel car production by 2030. The plans saw it commit £2bn worth of investments for upgrades to its Sunderland facility in 2023 to prepare for the switch to EVs. 25-year low The lay-offs come as slow uptake of EVs hits Nissan's profitability. Slumping sales in China and pricing pressures in the US have also hurt Nissan's income, while soaring energy prices and labour costs have further eroded profits. The slowdown saw Nissan report an 88pc drop in its profits for the full year 2025, in what marked its worst set of financial results in 25 years. In response, the company outlined a far-reaching turnaround plan that is expected to see it lay off 20,000 of its 133,500 global employees. A Nissan spokesman said: 'This week we are beginning discussions with some of our team in Sunderland about the opportunity to voluntarily leave Nissan, with support from the company.' 'This will support the plant's efficiency as we aim to become a leaner, more resilient business,' the spokesman said. Nissan is now expected to start producing its fully electric Leaf model out of its Sunderland facility this year, with a view to launching an electric version of its Juke car in 2026. The spokesman said: 'Our Sunderland plant remains at the forefront of our electrification strategy.'
