Russian strikes kill 16 people, including two children, in Kyiv, over 100 injured
President Volodymyr Zelensky, speaking earlier in his nightly video address, put the death toll at 14 and said rescue operations were continuing into the evening. The Interior Ministry said more than 1,200 police and rescuers were tackling the aftermath.
Ukraine's national rescue service said the toll rose to 16 after another body had been retrieved from underneath rubble. Zelensky said dozens remained in hospital.
The rescue service said 16 of the injured were children, the largest number of children hurt in a single attack on the city since Russia started its full-scale invasion almost 3-1/2 years ago.
In an earlier post on Telegram, the president said Russia had launched more than 300 drones and eight missiles. "Today the world has once again seen Russia's response to our desire for peace ... Therefore, peace without strength is impossible."
City authorities announced a day of mourning to be held on Friday.
Russia's Defence Ministry said it targeted and hit Ukrainian military airfields and ammunition depots as well as businesses linked to what it called Kyiv's military-industrial complex.
Explosions rocked Kyiv from about midnight onward and blazes lit up the night sky. Yurii Kravchuk, 62, stood wrapped in a blanket next to a damaged building with a bandage around his head. He had heard the missile alert but did not get to a shelter in time, he told Reuters.
"I started waking up my wife and then there was an explosion. My daughter ended up in the hospital," he said.
Russia, which denies targeting civilians, has stepped up air strikes in recent months on Ukrainian towns and cities far from the front lines of the war. Thousands of civilians, the vast majority of them Ukrainian, have been killed since Moscow invaded in 2022.
Kyiv and Moscow have held three rounds of talks in Istanbul this year that yielded exchanges of prisoners and bodies, but no breakthrough to defuse the conflict.
Burning Ruins
At one location in Kyiv, rescuers spent more than three hours reaching a man trapped in rubble by cutting through the wall of a neighbouring apartment, the Interior Ministry said.
The man talked to the emergency services during the operation and was pulled out alive, it added.
A five-month-old baby was among the wounded, with five children hospitalized, the head of Kyiv's military administration, Tymur Tkachenko, said on national television.
Schools and hospitals were among the buildings damaged across 27 locations in the capital, officials said.
"The attack was extremely insidious and deliberately calculated to overload the air defence system," Zelensky wrote on X.
He posted a video of burning ruins, saying people were still trapped under the rubble of one partially-ruined residential building as of the morning.
U.S. President Donald Trump, speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, sharply criticized Russia's "disgusting" behavior against Ukraine and said he planned to impose sanctions on Moscow if no agreement could be reached.
Trump said he was not sure whether sanctions would deter Russia. He has given Russian President Vladimir Putin until August 8 to make a deal or else he will respond with economic pressure.
Trump said U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff would travel to Russia after his current trip to Israel. A senior U.S. diplomat, John Kelly, told the United Nations Security Council that Trump had made clear that he wants a deal to end the war by August 8.
On Tuesday, Trump said Washington will start imposing tariffs and other measures on Russia if Moscow shows no progress toward ending the conflict.
"This is Putin's response to Trump's deadlines," Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko said. "The world must respond with a tribunal and maximum pressure."
The air force reported five direct missile hits and 21 drone hits in 12 locations. Ukrainian air defence units downed 288 drones and three cruise missiles, the air force added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
25 minutes ago
- Mint
US appeals court keeps bar on Los Angeles federal immigration arrests
Aug 2 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court late on Friday affirmed a lower court's decision temporarily barring U.S. government agents from making immigration-related arrests in Los Angeles without probable cause. Rejecting the Trump administration's request to pause the lower court's order, the three-judge appeals panel ruled that the plaintiffs would likely be able to prove that federal agents had carried out arrests based on peoples' appearance, language and where they lived or worked. President Donald Trump called National Guard troops and U.S. Marines into Los Angeles in June in response to protests against the immigration raids, marking an extraordinary use of military force to support civilian police operations within the United States. The city of Los Angeles and other Southern California municipalities joined a lawsuit filed in June by the American Civil Liberties Union accusing federal agents of using unlawful police tactics such as racial profiling to meet immigration arrest quotas set by the administration. A California judge last month blocked the Trump administration from racially profiling immigrants as it seeks deportation targets and from denying immigrants' right to access to lawyers during their detention. In Friday's unsigned decision, the judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit largely rejected the administration's appeal of the temporary restraining order. The judges agreed with the lower court in blocking federal officials from detaining people based solely on "apparent race or ethnicity," speaking Spanish or accented English, or being at locations such as a "bus stop, car wash, tow yard, day laborer pick up site, agricultural site, etc." The Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside business hours. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the order a victory for the city. "The Temporary Restraining Order that has been protecting our communities from immigration agents using racial profiling and other illegal tactics when conducting their cruel and aggressive enforcement raids and sweeps will remain in place for now," she said in a statement. Mohammad Tajsar, senior staff attorney at the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, welcomed the ruling in statement: "This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region." (Reporting by Chandni Shah in Bengaluru; Editing by William Mallard)
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Has India really stopped buying oil from Russia as Trump claims?
US President Donald Trump says India 'is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia', calling it a 'good step' if true. But Indian officials deny knowledge of any halt, while reports suggest some state refiners briefly paused purchases read more Employees manually fill containers with diesel during a power cut at a fuel station in New Delhi, July 31, 2012. Representational Image/Reuters Speaking to reporters in Washington on Saturday, United States President Donald Trump said: 'I understand that India is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard, I don't know if that's right or not. That is a good step. We will see what happens.' The comment is Trump's latest in a slew of remarks against India's purchasing of Russian crude oil. Trump has launched a campaign of economic pressure against countries continuing to engage with Russia, threatening tariffs and penalties as leverage to force a resolution to the war in Ukraine. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Days earlier, his administration announced a sweeping set of trade measures that would affect around 70 nations, including India. As part of this, a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods entering the United States took effect, alongside a separate penalty related to purchases of Russian oil and military hardware. Trump also warned that countries buying Russian oil could face tariffs as high as 100 per cent if Moscow does not agree to a peace deal by mid-August. His stance has raised concerns about the potential impact on global markets, given India's role as the largest importer of Russian seaborne crude since 2022. In a strongly worded post on Truth Social, Trump lashed out at India's trade practices and its reliance on Russian defence and energy sectors. 'Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of energy, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to stop the killing in Ukraine — All things not good!' In another comment, he took an even sharper tone: 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. We have done very little business with India, their Tariffs are too high, among the highest in the World. Likewise, Russia and the USA do almost no business together. Let's keep it that way…' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The question: Has India really stopped buying Russian oil? In response to speculation, Indian officials and sources have sought to clarify the country's position. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has not confirmed any change in policy and has made it clear that energy sourcing decisions remain based on price and national interest. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, when asked about reports suggesting Indian oil firms had stopped taking Russian crude, said during his weekly briefing, 'We take decisions based on the price at which oil is available in the international market and depending on the global situation at that time. As for the specifics of your particular question, I am not aware of it. I don't have details of these specifics.' Privately, an MEA source echoed this line, telling ANI that energy decisions are grounded in economic realities: 'India's energy purchases are driven by national interests and market forces. We do not have any reports of Indian oil firms halting Russian imports.' Reports of a temporary pause by state refiners While there has been no formal announcement from New Delhi, multiple reports suggest some state-owned refiners may have temporarily paused buying Russian oil in the past week. According to Reuters, India's key state refiners — including Indian Oil Corporation, Bharat Petroleum Corporation, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation, and Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemical Ltd — did not seek Russian crude cargoes recently. This development comes amid narrowing discounts on Russian oil and increased warnings from Washington about the risks of continuing purchases. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A man stands at an Indian Oil fuel station in Sonipat, March 5, 2025. Representational Image/Reuters These refiners, which control over 60 per cent of India's combined refining capacity of 5.2 million barrels per day, frequently purchase Russian oil on a 'delivered' basis, meaning suppliers handle shipping and insurance. When they did not place orders, they turned instead to the spot market, buying mostly West Asian and West African crude grades such as Abu Dhabi's Murban. Notably, the country's private refiners — Reliance Industries and Nayara Energy — are the largest individual buyers of Russian crude in India, but the state-owned companies dominate the overall refining landscape. Whether these pauses represent a longer-term shift or merely a short-term adjustment remains unclear. India's reliance on Russian crude since 2022 India became the world's biggest importer of Russian seaborne oil after Europe stopped most purchases in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. This marked a significant pivot in global energy flows: before 2022, Europe had been Russia's largest oil buyer. India now sources nearly 2 million barrels per day from Russia — roughly 35 per cent of its total oil imports — amounting to over $50 billion worth of purchases in the 2024-25 fiscal year, according to official data. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The range of Russian crude reaching Indian shores is wide. Imports include Urals from Russia's western ports, ESPO and Sokol from the Pacific, and some grades from the Arctic. Urals, the largest Russian export grade, is particularly reliant on India; up to 70 per cent of its exports are absorbed by Indian refiners. Russia's state oil giant Rosneft has also become deeply intertwined with India's refining sector, holding a significant stake in one of the country's largest refineries, which further cements the commercial relationship. Why purchasing Russian oil is not illegal Officials and industry sources defending India's Russian oil imports underline that the purchases are not only lawful but beneficial for global energy stability. Sources speaking to ANI stressed that Russian oil has never been sanctioned outright by the US or the European Union. Instead, a price-cap mechanism was introduced by the G7 and EU to restrict Moscow's revenues while ensuring crude continued to flow into world markets. India has adhered to this framework, ensuring all purchases stayed below the cap — currently $60 per barrel — while securing affordable energy supplies. The same sources argued that India's strategy helped prevent a worse crisis: 'Had India not absorbed discounted Russian crude combined with OPEC+ production cuts of 5.86 mb/d, global oil prices could have surged well beyond the March 2022 peak of US $137/bbl, intensifying inflationary pressures worldwide.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This perspective paints India not as an outlier, but as a stabilising force in global oil markets, especially at a time when other buyers, including the EU, continue to import Russian-origin energy in other forms. For instance, during this period, the EU remained the largest buyer of Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG), accounting for 51 per cent of exports, with China and Japan following. How Moscow could retaliate Analysts warn that any sharp reduction in Indian demand for Russian oil could provoke a major response from Moscow. Russia's exports to India are so vital that they now make up a substantial share of the Kremlin's revenues. Experts at JP Morgan have cautioned that if India's imports were disrupted, Moscow could retaliate by closing the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) pipeline from Kazakhstan. This pipeline is critical for US energy majors like Chevron and Exxon, who have significant investments in Kazakh production. Any closure of CPC would create another severe supply shock, reverberating across the global oil market. How India would manage without Russian oil If India were to scale back or halt Russian purchases, the adjustment would be complicated and costly. Refiners would have to increase imports of US and West Asian crude or reduce refining activity. Either path could send ripples through the global economy. A cut in refining runs would immediately tighten diesel supply. India is a significant exporter of refined fuels, especially diesel, to Europe. Reduced output in India would likely push European diesel prices higher. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Switching suppliers on a large scale would also require logistical and contractual adjustments. India's refiners have integrated Russian crude into their operations over the past two years; unwinding that flow would not happen overnight. Meanwhile, private refiners — which account for a large chunk of Russian crude purchases — have not publicly signalled any change. Donald Trump's claim that India has stopped buying Russian oil remains unverified. With inputs from agencies
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Indian refiners still buying oil from Russia, report claims amid Trump's 'halt' remark
Indian refiners reportedly keep buying Russian crude oil for economic reasons, despite US President Trump's claim that India stopped. Earlier, the ministry of external affairs had defended India's longstanding partnership with Russia read more Advertisement Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Russian President Vladimir Putin. File image/ Reuters Indian refiners have not stopped buying crude oil from Russia, news agency ANI has reported, citing sources in the government. 'Their supply decisions are guided by price, grade of crude, inventories, logistics and other economic factors,' the agency quoted the source as saying. The sources also highlighted Russia's crucial place in the global oil market, being the world's second-largest exporter of crude. Fears of Russian oil being pushed out of the market and the consequent dislocation of traditional trade flows drove dated Brent crude prices to soar to US$137 per barrel in March 2022. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'In this challenging environment, India, as the world's third-largest energy consumer with 85 per cent crude oil import dependence, strategically adapted its sourcing to secure affordable energy while fully adhering to international norms,' said the sources. Earlier, US President Donald Trump on Friday (August 1) said he heard that India is no longer purchasing oil from Russia. While speaking to the reporters, Trump went on to describe the alleged halting of oil purchases as a 'good step'. 'I understand India no longer is going to be buying oil from Russia,' Trump told reporters as he departed the White House for his weekend trip to his Bedminster Golf Club in New Jersey. 'That's what I heard. I don't know if that's right or not, but that's a good step. We'll see what happens,' he said. Trump's statement came after news agency Reuters reported, citing sources, that Indian state-owned refineries suspended Russian oil purchases last week amid threats of tariffs from US and narrowing price discounts. Meanwhile, the Ministry of External Affairs Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal on Friday responded to the criticisms hurled by the Trump administration and defended India's longstanding partnership with Russia. 'India and Russia share a steady and time-tested partnership,' he said. Jaiswal also reaffirmed the strength of the India-US relationship, noting it is based on 'shared interests, democratic values, and robust people-to-people ties,' and expressed confidence that bilateral relations would continue to move forward despite current tensions.
