logo
Agencies warn Iranian hackers may still target US entities, networks

Agencies warn Iranian hackers may still target US entities, networks

The Hill2 days ago
Several U.S. agencies warned Monday that hackers affiliated with Iran may still target U.S. entities and networks despite the current ceasefire between Israel and Iran.
Defense companies tied to Israeli research and defense firms face an 'increased risk,' the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Defense Cyber Crime Center and National Security Agency noted.
'Despite a declared ceasefire and ongoing negotiations towards a permanent solution, Iranian-affiliated cyber actors and hacktivist groups may still conduct malicious cyber activity,' they wrote in a joint bulletin.
The agencies underscored that Iranian hackers often exploit 'targets of opportunity,' including the use of unpatched or outdated software and default or common passwords on devices connected to the internet.
They urged operators and owners of critical infrastructure, as well as other U.S. entities, to take steps to strengthen their cybersecurity, such as disconnecting certain systems from the public internet, updating passwords, adding multifactor authentication and applying software patches.
The Department of Homeland Security previously warned about the potential for 'low-level' cyberattacks against U.S. networks after President Trump ordered strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites earlier this month.
Iranian-aligned hackers claimed responsibility for a cyberattack on Trump's Truth Social platform, which saw a surge in reports of problems shortly after the U.S. strikes on Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Daughter of assassinated civil rights leader sees painful echoes of political violence in America
Daughter of assassinated civil rights leader sees painful echoes of political violence in America

San Francisco Chronicle​

time13 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Daughter of assassinated civil rights leader sees painful echoes of political violence in America

Jackson, Miss. (AP) — More than 60 years after a white supremacist assassinated civil rights leader Medgar Evers, his daughter still sees the same strain of political violence at work in American society. 'It's painful,' said Reena Evers-Everette. 'It's very painful.' Evers-Everette was 8 years old when her father, a field secretary for the NAACP, was shot to death in the driveway of his home in Jackson, Mississippi. A few months after Evers' killing in 1963, President John F. Kennedy was gunned down. The deaths of civil rights leaders Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, and U.S. Sen. Robert F. Kennedy followed later that decade. Now, experts say the level of political violence in America over the past few years is likely the highest it's been since the 1960s and 1970s. The past year alone has seen the assassination of a Minnesota state lawmaker and her husband, the killing of two Israeli Embassy staffers, and two assassination attempts on then-presidential candidate Donald Trump. At a four-day conference celebrating Evers' life just before what would have been his 100th birthday on July 2, his daughter was joined by the daughters of slain civil rights leaders: Kerry Kennedy, the daughter of Robert F. Kennedy, and Bettie Dahmer, the daughter of civil and voting rights activist Vernon Dahmer. The 2025 Democracy in Action Convening, 'Medgar Evers at 100: a Legacy of Justice, a Future of Change,' was held in Jackson. 'I just was feeling so much pain, and I didn't want anyone else to have to go through that,' Kennedy said, recalling that after her father died, she prayed for the man who killed him. 'I was saying, 'Please don't — please don't kill the guy that killed him.'' Two-time Georgia gubernatorial candidate and voting rights activist Stacey Abrams spoke at the event, denouncing efforts by the Trump administration to strip the names of activists from Navy vessels, including possibly Evers. 'They want to take his name off a boat because they don't want us to have a reminder of how far he sailed us forward,' Abrams told the conference crowd. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has undertaken an effort to change the names of ships and military bases that were given by President Joe Biden's Democratic administration, which often honored service members who were women, people of color, or from the LGBTQ+ community. Abrams drew parallels between acts of radical political violence and the Trump administration's use of military resources against protesters in Los Angeles who were demonstrating against immigration enforcement actions. 'Unfortunately, we cannot decry political violence and then sanction the sending of the Marines and the National Guard to stop protesters and not believe that that conflicting message doesn't communicate itself,' Abrams told The Associated Press. 'What I want us to remember is that whether it is Medgar Evers or Melissa Hortman, no one who is willing to speak for the people should have their lives cut short because of what they say.'

Iran prepared to mine Strait of Hormuz last month amid Israel tensions, say US sources: Report
Iran prepared to mine Strait of Hormuz last month amid Israel tensions, say US sources: Report

Business Upturn

time26 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

Iran prepared to mine Strait of Hormuz last month amid Israel tensions, say US sources: Report

By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on July 2, 2025, 09:35 IST Iran's military loaded naval mines onto vessels in the Persian Gulf last month, raising concerns within Washington that Tehran was preparing to blockade the Strait of Hormuz following Israeli strikes on Iranian sites, Reuters reported on Wednesday, citing two US officials familiar with the matter. The mine-loading activity, which had not been publicly disclosed earlier, took place shortly after Israel launched a missile attack on Iran on June 13. The US officials, speaking on condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the intelligence, stated that the mines have not been deployed but their movement indicates serious Iranian consideration of blocking the strategic waterway. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world's most vital shipping lanes, with nearly 20% of global oil and gas shipments passing through it. Any disruption could have sent global energy prices soaring. However, oil prices have fallen by more than 10% since US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, largely due to relief that shipping through the strait has remained unaffected. Following US airstrikes on June 22 that targeted three key Iranian nuclear sites, Iran's parliament reportedly supported a non-binding resolution to close the strait. However, the final decision rests with Iran's Supreme National Security Council, as noted by Iran's Press TV. Historically, Iran has threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz during periods of heightened geopolitical tension but has never acted on those threats. Reuters reported that it remains unclear whether the mines remain aboard the Iranian vessels or if they have since been removed. US intelligence gathering on the matter likely involved satellite imagery, human intelligence, or a combination of both, the sources added. Ahmedabad Plane Crash Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.

Trump says the GOP mega bill will eliminate taxes on Social Security. It does not.

time29 minutes ago

Trump says the GOP mega bill will eliminate taxes on Social Security. It does not.

WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump keeps saying that Republicans' mega tax and spending cut legislation will eliminate taxes on federal Social Security benefits. It does not. At best, Trump's 'no tax on Social Security' claim exaggerates the benefits to seniors if either the House or Senate-passed proposals is signed into law. Here's a look at Trump's recent statements, and what the proposals would — or would not — do. Trump repeatedly told voters during his 2024 campaign that he would eliminate taxes on Social Security. As his massive legislative package has moved through Congress, the Republican president has claimed that's what the bill would do. Trump said on a recent appearance on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures" that the bill includes 'no tax on tips, no tax on Social Security, no tax on overtime.' But instead of eliminating the tax, the Senate and House have each passed their own versions of a temporary tax deduction for seniors aged 65 and over, which applies to all income — not just Social Security. And it turns out not all Social Security beneficiaries will be able to claim the deduction. Those who won't be able to do so include the lowest-income seniors who already don't pay taxes on Social Security, those who choose to claim their benefits before they reach age 65 and those above a defined income threshold. The Senate proposal includes a temporary $6,000 deduction for seniors over the age of 65, contrasted with the House proposal, which includes a temporary deduction of $4,000. The Senate proposal approved Tuesday would eliminate Social Security tax liability for seniors with adjusted gross incomes of $75,000 or less or $150,000 if filing as a married couple. If passed into law, the tax deduction would last four years, from 2025 to 2029. The deductions phase out as income increases. Touting a new Council of Economic Advisers analysis, the White House said Tuesday that '88% of all seniors who receive Social Security — will pay NO TAX on their Social Security benefits," going on to say that the Senate proposal's $6,000 senior deduction 'is estimated to benefit 33.9 million seniors, including seniors not claiming Social Security. The deduction yields an average increase in after-tax income of $670 per senior who benefits from it.' Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the Tax Foundation think tank, said conflating the tax deduction with a claim that there will be no tax on Social Security could end up confusing and angering a lot of seniors who will expect to not pay taxes on their Social Security benefits. 'While the deduction does provide some relief for seniors, it's far from completely repealing the tax on their benefits,' Watson said. The cost of actually eliminating the tax on Social Security would have massive impacts on the economy. University of Pennsylvania's Penn Wharton Budget Model estimates that eliminating income taxes on Social Security benefits 'would reduce revenues by $1.5 trillion over 10 years and increase federal debt by 7 percent by 2054" and speed up the projected depletion date of the Social Security Trust Fund from 2034 to 2032. Discussions over taxes on Social Security are just part of the overall bill, which is estimated in its Senate version to increase federal deficits over the next 10 years by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Administration officials have said the cost of the tax bill would be offset by tariff income. Recently, the CBO separately estimated that Trump's sweeping tariff plan would cut deficits by $2.8 trillion over a 10-year period while shrinking the economy, raising the inflation rate and reducing the purchasing power of households overall.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store