
Trump's previous tariffs terrified the world economy. He's betting this time is different
Only three months later, he's betting this time is different.
In his new round of tariffs being announced this week, Trump is essentially tethering the entire world economy to his instinctual belief that import taxes will deliver factory jobs and stronger growth in the U.S., rather than the inflation and slowdown predicted by many economists.
On Tuesday, he told his Cabinet that past presidents who hadn't aggressively deployed tariffs were 'stupid.' Ever the salesman, Trump added that it was 'too time-consuming' to try to negotiate trade deals with the rest of the world, so it was just easier to send them letters, as he's doing this week, that list the tariff rates on their goods.
The letters marked a change from his self-proclaimed April 2 'Liberation Day' event at the White House, where he had posterboards with the rates displayed, a choice that led to a brief market meltdown and the 90-day negotiating period with baseline 10% tariffs that will end Wednesday. Trump, instead, chose to send form letters with random capitalizations and punctuation and other formatting issues.
'It's a better way,' Trump said of his letters. 'It's a more powerful way. And we send them a letter. You read the letter. I think it was well crafted. And, mostly it's just a little number in there: You'll pay 25%, 35%. We have some of at 60, 70.'
When Trump said those words, he had yet to issue a letter with a tariff rate higher than 40%, which he levied Monday on Laos and Myanmar. He plans to put 25% tariffs on Japan and South Korea, two major trading partners and allies deemed crucial for curbing China's economic influence. Leaders of the 14 countries tariffed so far hope to negotiate over the next three weeks before the higher rates are charged on imports.
'I would say that every case I'm treating them better than they treated us over the years,' Trump said.
Three possible outcomes
His approach is at odds with how major trade agreements have been produced over the last half-century, detailed sessions that could sometimes take years to solve complex differences between nations.
There are three possible outcomes to this political and economic wager, each of which could drastically reshape international affairs and Trump's legacy.
Trump could prove most economic experts wrong and the tariffs could deliver growth as promised. Or he could retreat again on tariffs before their Aug. 1 start in a repeat of the 'Trump Always Chickens Out' phenomenon, also known as TACO. Or he could damage the economy in ways that could boomerang against the communities that helped return him to the White House last year, as well as hurt countries that are put at a financial disadvantage by the tariffs.
Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said Trump's letters had 'extended his tariff purgatory for another month,' essentially freezing in place the U.S. economy as CEOs, foreign leaders and consumers are unclear of Trump's actual strategy on foreign trade.
'The TACO negotiating tactic pioneered by Trump is making his threats less and less credible and reducing our trading partners' willingness to even meet us halfway,' Wyden said. 'There's no sign that he's any closer to striking durable trade deals that would actually help American workers and businesses.'
So far, the stock and bond markets are relatively calm, with the S&P 500 stock index essentially flat Tuesday after a Monday decline. Trump is coming off a legislative win with his multitrillion-dollar income tax cuts. And he's confidently levying tariffs at levels that previously rocked global markets, buoyed by the fact that inflation has eased so far instead of accelerating as many economists and Democratic rivals had warned.
'By floating tariffs as high as 40% to even 100%, the administration has 'normalized' the 25% tariff hikes — yet this is still one of the most aggressive and disruptive tariff moves in modern history," said Wendong Zhang, an economist at Cornell University. 'This gradual unveiling, paradoxically, risks normalizing what would otherwise be considered exceptionally large tariff hikes.'
Questions about how much money tariffs will generate
With Trump's 90-day tariff negotiation period ending, he has so far sent letters to 14 countries that place taxes on imported goods ranging from 25% to 40%. He said he would sign an order Tuesday to place 50% tariffs on copper and said at the Cabinet meeting that at some point pharmaceutical drugs could face tariffs of as much as 200%. All of that is on top of his existing 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum, 25% tariffs on autos and his separate import taxes on Canada, Mexico and China.
'The obvious inference is that markets for now are somewhat skeptical that Trump will go through with it, or alternatively they think compromises will be reached,' said Ben May, a director of global economic research at the consultancy Oxford Economics. 'That's probably the key element.'
May said the tariffs are likely to reduce the growth in U.S. household incomes, but not cause those incomes to shrink outright.
Trump has said his tariffs would close U.S. trade imbalances, though it's unclear why he would target nations such as Tunisia that do relatively little trade with America. Administration officials say trillions of dollars in tariff revenues over the next decade would help offset the revenue losses from the continuation and expansion of his 2017 tax cuts that were signed into law Friday.
The federal government has collected US$98.2 billion in tariff revenues so far this year, more than double what it collected last year, according to the Bipartisan Policy Center.
At Tuesday's Cabinet meeting, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the tariff revenues could be 'well over $300 billion by the end of the year.' Bessent added that 'we don't agree' with the Congressional Budget Office estimate that tariffs would bring in $2.8 trillion over 10 years, 'which we think is probably low.'
The governments of Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia and South Africa have each said they hope for further negotiations on tariffs with Trump, though it's unclear how that's possible as Trump has said it would be too 'complicated' to hold all those meetings.
Instead on Tuesday, Trump posted on social media that the tariffs would be charged as scheduled starting Aug. 1.
'There has been no change to this date, and there will be no change,' Trump said on Truth Social. 'No extensions will be granted. Thank you for your attention to this matter!'
Josh Boak, The Associated Press
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Globe and Mail
13 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Prologis vs. Union Pacific: Which Supply Chain Giant Has More Room to Run?
Key Points Prologis and Union Pacific have had recent price setbacks, creating buy opportunities for long-term investors. Both companies benefit from a growing commerce industry, but the growth isn't symmetrical. Prologis offers immense growth via new warehouse builds, giving it an edge over Union Pacific's legacy rails. 10 stocks we like better than Union Pacific › Prologis and Union Pacific power the arteries of commerce. Prologis (NYSE: PLD) owns and leases the warehouses and distribution centers that keep e-commerce humming, while Union Pacific (NYSE: UNP) operates the rails that haul those goods across the U.S. heartland. Both benefit from long-term shifts like e-commerce growth, manufacturing revival, and infrastructure reinvestment. But for investors looking for a blend of income and long-term tailwinds, Prologis may offer the stronger case. Here's why. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Prologis: real estate on a roll Prologis is a behemoth of a real estate investment trust (REIT). To give you an idea of its scale: The $2.7 trillion in goods that flow through its properties each year would make Prologis the eighth-largest economy in the world, and its warehouse footprint (1.3 billion square feet ) is enough to cover the equivalent of two Manhattans. By contrast, STAG Industrial – a notable peer – owns just 117.6 million square feet. Many of Prologis' warehouses sit in the right places: near major metro areas, close to highways, ports, dense population centers. These locations are ideal for same- and next-day delivery, which is why many blue-chip giants -- like Amazon, Home Depot, and FedEx -- have lease agreements with it. A look at Prologis' most recent earnings underscores the powerful moat the company is digging. In Q1 2025, it signed 58 million square feet of new leases (up from 48 million in Q1 2024) and broke ground on $650 million in new developments (up from $273 million last year). About 78% of these were build-to-suits, meaning the leases were pre-signed before construction even began. That's well above the industry's 25% build-to-suit average, according to JLL . This sharply lowers the risk of vacancy, which matters when a single large 500,000-square-foot warehouse can cost about $40 million to build. New lease expansion is matched by growth in the actual cash generated from its core operations as measured through funds from operations (FFO), which rose 10.9% in Q1 . That bump came from strong tenant retention and rising rents. Those same dynamics pushed net operating income up 6.2 %, which shows that Prologis is extracting more value from every square foot it owns. These are strong results for any REIT -- and even more impressive at this scale. As the chart below shows, Prologis' operating revenue is several times higher than even its closest peers. To underscore the opportunity, just follow the numbers. E-commerce currently makes up about 24% of U.S. retail sales (excluding autos and gas) and is set to climb past 30% by 2030 . Each percentage point increase will demand roughly 60 to 70 million square feet of new warehouse space -- more than 18% of Prologis' existing U.S. footprint. That's a lot of new space, but here's where it gets interesting: Prologis already owns enough undeveloped land to underwrite $41.2 billion of future warehouse builds. When demand justifies new ground-up constructions, then, management can tap into this immense war chest. With that, Prologis has everything in place -- the land, the leases, the balance sheet -- to be the infrastructure backbone of online retail. Union Pacific: the steady iron horse Like Prologis, Union Pacific is a logistics giant. Instead of warehouses, however, its real estate is 32,693 miles of track, and instead of rent checks, it makes money hauling freight, like coal, grain, and cars. Both companies would profit from an e-commerce boom, yet when it comes to growth, Union Pacific doesn't have nearly as much upside. Part of the reason is the inherent constraints of Union Pacific's railroad business. Unlike Prologis, which can buy land in untapped markets, Union Pacific spends most of its capital keeping existing tracks in shape instead of the costly slog of laying new rails. Rather than expanding its footprint, Union Pacific must drive growth through efficiency, like sharper pricing power and squeezing additional volume from its existing network. Which, to be sure, is what Union Pacific is doing. Under CEO Jim Vena, who took the reins in August 2023, Union Pacific has tightened operations, broadened margins, and delivered goods with precision. In its latest quarter, a rebound in intermodal and bulk cargo -- paired with solid pricing discipline and tight cost controls -- helped Union Pacific keep its efficiency steady, boost carload revenue by 7%, and crank out $2.2 billion in cash. Unlike Prologis, however, Union Pacific's growth is tied to broad freight cycles and a network nearing capacity. This leaves it with fewer levers for major long-term upside despite operational excellence. That said, Union Pacific does have an attractive price right now. Tariff news has mostly spooked investors, even as the company's fundamentals remains solid. Granted, tariffs could dent Union Pacific's revenue, yet the company's no spring chicken. In its 163-year history, it has weathered two World Wars, a Great Depression, and every market storm in between. For value seekers, then, this sell-off could present a rare chance to grab a proven workhorse at a discount before the market realizes the engine is still humming strong. So, which is the better buy? Both companies sit at the heart of American's logistics grid, yet Prologis holds the edge. Not only is it adding warehouse space today, but it owns the land to fuel e-commerce's next big boom. It also throws off an attractive 3.8% dividend – eclipsing Union Pacific's 2.4% -- so you're getting yield and upside in one package. For investors hunting both dividend and growth, then, Prologis fits the bill. Should you invest $1,000 in Union Pacific right now? Before you buy stock in Union Pacific, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Union Pacific wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $695,481!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $969,935!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is1,053% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to179%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025 Steven Porrello has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, FedEx, Home Depot, Prologis, and Union Pacific. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $90 calls on Prologis. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Globe and Mail
18 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
3 Stocks Seeing Big Investor Interest: NVDA, PLTR, AMZN
Several stocks – NVIDIA NVDA, Palantir PLTR, and Amazon AMZN – continue to garner significant attention among investors, with all three ranking among the top ten most-visited stocks on Their popularity is easy to understand given their big gains that have been fueled by impressive stories over recent years. Given their popularity, let's take a closer look to see what's happening with each. NVIDIA Impresses Again We've all become highly familiar with NVIDIA's red-hot multi-year-long story, with its historical growth fueled by unrelenting demand for its Data Center products amid the AI frenzy. The tech titan continued to fire on all cylinders throughout its latest release concerning its Data Center, with sales of $39.1 billion up 73% from the $22.5 billion print in the same period last year. Below is a chart illustrating NVIDIA's Data Center sales on a quarterly basis. The stock is still one of the strongest AI plays out there, with shares also not that expensive on a historical basis. Shares currently trade at a 32.8X forward 12-month earnings multiple, a fraction of the 106.3X five-year high and well beneath the 48.4X five-year median. The current PEG ratio works out to a fair 1.1X, again well beneath five-year highs and the five-year median. Palantir Keeps Growing Palantir's latest set of quarterly results continued to impress, with sales climbing 40% year-over-year alongside an upgrade to its current-year sales outlook. Massive growth has been driven by red-hot demand that's seemingly only continuing to grow. As shown below, the company's sales growth has been outstanding over recent periods, a reflection of the red-hot demand PLTR has been enjoying. Importantly, customer count grew nearly 40% year-over-year and 8% sequentially. Palantir also booked a record U.S. commercial total contract value throughout the period ($810 million), which grew a staggering 180% year-over-year. AMZN Sees AWS Momentum Amazon's latest set of results showed solid momentum within AWS, with sales of $29.3 billion in the segment up 17% year-over-year. The growth rates here have been a major focus, which have commonly dictated post-earnings price action. AMZN signed several new AWS deals with companies throughout the period, a list that includes Adobe, Uber, Nasdaq, Ericsson, Cisco, and more. Many businesses have clamored for AWS, and market participants should expect Amazon to ink many more deals in the coming months/years. Below is a chart illustrating AMZN's sales on a quarterly basis. Analysts have taken a bullish stance on AMZN's current fiscal year, with the current $6.22 Zacks Consensus EPS estimate up roughly 7% over the past year. The value reflects 12.5% growth YoY, continuing the titan's growth trajectory nicely. Bottom Line The AI frenzy has kept stocks like NVIDIA NVDA and Palantir PLTR at the top of everybody's watch list, with Amazon AMZN also regularly seeing notable attention thanks to its sheer size and performance over the past decade. All three companies continue to operate in a favorable environment, with PLTR and NVDA regularly seeing strong demand thanks to the AI frenzy. Amazon AMZN is also a part of the story thanks to AWS, which has also regularly seen consistently strong demand over recent years. Zacks' Research Chief Picks Stock Most Likely to "At Least Double" Our experts have revealed their Top 5 recommendations with money-doubling potential – and Director of Research Sheraz Mian believes one is superior to the others. Of course, all our picks aren't winners but this one could far surpass earlier recommendations like Hims & Hers Health, which shot up +209%. See Our Top Stock to Double (Plus 4 Runners Up) >> Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Inc. (AMZN): Free Stock Analysis Report NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA): Free Stock Analysis Report Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR): Free Stock Analysis Report


Globe and Mail
18 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Could Apple Soon Lose Its Top Position in Warren Buffett's Portfolio?
Key Points Apple has been one of Warren Buffett's largest holdings for years, but the distance between second spot has been shrinking. Buffett has been unloading Apple stock and it has also been falling in value. 10 stocks we like better than Apple › Warren Buffett has famously referred to iPhone maker Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) as "probably the best business I know in the world." It's long been one of Buffett's favorite stocks, and it has been a staple in the Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A)(NYSE: BRK.B) portfolio for years. But while it still remains the top holding in the portfolio, it may not stay in that position for much longer. Here's why that could happen and what it might mean for investors. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Apple is no longer far and away the biggest Buffett holding It wasn't all that long ago when Apple was easily the largest holding in Berkshire's portfolio, and it wasn't even close. As of the end of 2023, Apple accounted for half of the entire portfolio and was worth more than $174 billion. The next-largest holding was Bank of America, which accounted for just 10% of the portfolio and was worth a little less than $35 billion at the time. The idea of Apple falling in the second spot just didn't look like a conceivable scenario. However, with Buffett selling Apple stock since then and shares of the tech giant also falling, that has resulted in a much different makeup of Berkshire's portfolio today. Berkshire's position in Apple has been trimmed by two-thirds and was worth nearly $67 billion as of the end of March. While that was still good enough for the top spot and represented 26% of all holdings, the second spot, which belonged to American Express, accounted for 16% of the portfolio and was worth nearly $41 billion. Today, the gap is even thinner, with Apple's share of the Berkshire portfolio coming in at just under 22% versus nearly 17% for American Express. Could Apple fall out of Berkshire's portfolio entirely? Apple has been a beloved Buffett stock for years, but amid fears of a rising capital gains tax rate, the billionaire investor has been drastically reducing his company's position in the tech giant. Even if Buffett doesn't sell any more Apple shares, the stock's falling valuation could lead to it falling to the second-largest holding in the fund in the near future. Shares of Apple are down 6% over the past 12 months, while American Express has risen by more than 37% over that stretch (returns as of July 7). Investors have been bearish on Apple over the slow rollout of artificial intelligence (AI) features for its latest iPhone. Without a drastic change and a way to convince investors that it's still a good growth stock and the business isn't falling behind its rivals, this downward trend may continue. In the longer term, I could see Apple even leaving the Berkshire portfolio permanently. Buffett is stepping down as CEO this year, at which point Greg Abel will take over. Under new leadership, there could be greater changes ahead, including potentially exiting the company's position in Apple and opting for stocks that may be better positioned for growth in AI. While that's not a guarantee, it may be a plausible scenario, especially if Apple struggles to show that it can keep up with its key competitors. Is Apple still worth investing in? Whether Apple is or isn't in Berkshire's portfolio shouldn't dictate whether you buy the stock or not. It may impact the stock in the short term as Buffett fans may follow suit and sell shares of Apple as well. Ultimately, however, whether you buy the stock or not should depend on your long-term investing strategy. If you're willing to be patient and invest in a blue chip stock that has phenomenal financials, including annual free cash flow of around $100 billion, then this can be a good investment to put into your portfolio today. While it may be a volatile road ahead for Apple, with a strong ecosystem of products and ample resources at its disposal, I'm confident the company can be a big player in AI and turn things around -- it's just a matter of how long it may take for that to happen. Should you invest $1,000 in Apple right now? Before you buy stock in Apple, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Apple wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $695,481!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $969,935!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is1,053% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to179%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025 Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. American Express is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Bank of America, and Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.