Chicago waiving city vehicle sticker penalties for all drivers in April
The office of the Chicago City Clerk is calling next month
Amnesty April
. It means they're waiving city sticker penalties to make it easier for drivers to get a vehicle sticker if they don't have one already. That means no late fees, penalties, or back charges if you buy a vehicle sticker at a City Clerk or Chicago Department of Finance office.
The cost of the sticker ranges from $53 dollars for motorcycles up to $530 for trucks.
Drivers can go to any of the three Office of the City Clerk locations to get a vehicle sticker without paying any penalties:
Amnesty April also is available at any of four Chicago Department of Finance locations:
Drivers can't take advantage of the amnesty program at Currency Exchange locations.
If you can't afford to pay for a full-year vehicle sticker, the city sells reduced-term city stickers that are valid for four months.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18-07-2025
- Yahoo
Vero Beach Mobile Home park owner owes $250,000 in fines to city, but won't pay or comply
This story was updated to add new information. VERO BEACH — Surrounded by auto repair shops and used car dealers, Vero Beach Mobile Home Park is a tight collection of nearly 50 trailers for low-income housing. Three dirt paths traverse the park, and cats are almost as plentiful as residents. Many of the residents are on disability or Social Security. Owner James Schlitt has a problem, though. He owes the city $263,750 — fines of $50 per day from Jan. 1, 2011, to June 10, according to City Clerk Sherri Philo. But, Schlitt says it's in his best interest to let the fines pile up. "It's a numbers game at this point," explained Schlitt. "It's costing me less money to let the fines pile up than it would to fix the problems." The violations levied against Schlitt require him to remove 17 homes from the property, move existing trailers 20 feet apart and clear the right-of-way from obstructions. Schlitt estimates removing one trailer costs $15,000 — or $255,000 for 17. "That's 17 homes that won't be available to people that need them," he said. "The city does not have a lot of cheap housing available already. We can't reduce it." The trailers rent for an average of $450 per month, and since 2011, removing 17 of them would have cost Schlitt nearly $1.3 million in rent over the 14 years the fines have piled up. The city has taken steps to foreclose on the property, officials said. Rock and a hard place The trailer park was established in 1951, and has looked virtually the same since. Schlitt bought the property in 2001. The code enforcement violations stemmed from a former secretary of Schlitt's, who, he said, stole more than $60,000 and disappeared. He says she filed the complaints, and vacated her trailer on the property the next day. Schlitt declined to identify the former secretary. "If she had not done that, we might not be in this situation," Schlitt said. "But, what's done is done." Turner inherited the case when he took his position with the city in 2019. "This case predates my time here," Turner said. "But there is a lot to consider, especially the lives of the people who reside at the park." Turner says the most common way for property owners to resolve large liens is to sell the property and use the proceeds to pay the fines. Schlitt says he's not selling. The value of the park is $479,818, according to the county Property Appraiser's Office. "We don't want to be in this situation either," said City Attorney John Turner. "But everyone is held to the same standard." Schlitt's wife sends weekly emails to the code-enforcement office, asking for help and how to resolve the situation. Until one is found, Schlitt repairs what he can. He doesn't foresee a resolution in the near future. "I walk the park and do my best to keep it nice," says Schlitt. "But, I am one person, and the nature of low-income housing is it tends to have some shortfalls." Local news: The Source buys site of Vero Beach Ranch for Boys Long time coming: Three neglected roads in Gifford to be paved, made safer, after 20 years He also does not want to put his tenants out on the street. "If I sell, who is going to look out for my residents," Schlitt asked. "Many of them have nowhere else to go." For now, his plan is to keep the park open and roofs over the heads of his residents. "I am just going to keep on operating it as I have been," Schlitt says. "And will continue to do so until I can't anymore." Nick Slater is TCPalm's Indian River County Watchdog reporter. You can reach him at and 224-830-2875. This article originally appeared on Treasure Coast Newspapers: Local trailer park owner owes city $250,000, but isn't planning to pay Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
26-06-2025
- Yahoo
Future of downtown development to be debated over 2 days at Edmonton public hearing
Dozens of Edmontonians will be sharing their opinions on the future of downtown development as a two-day public hearing kicks off Thursday morning at city hall. According to the Office of the City Clerk, as of 4 p.m. Wednesday, 72 people had registered to speak at the special public hearing on whether city council should extend the downtown Community Revitalization Levy (CRL) by 10 years. CRLs, which allow cities to borrow money against future property tax revenues, are a way to finance development in places where revitalization might not otherwise happen. When property values within a CRL area increase, a municipality can use the additional taxes to pay down the cost of borrowing for special projects there. Edmonton has three CRLs, and the downtown one — established in 2015 — is set to expire in 2034. City officials say extending it by a decade would allow the city to fund more projects and implement a downtown action plan. The terms of the extension, and who stands to benefit from public and private investments in the core, have become contentious — and there are millions of dollars at stake. The extension's supporters are calling it a "generational opportunity" to improve the city without raising taxes while critics are questioning why a privately-run event park should be included in the deal. What's new in the plan? The extension would add some new projects to a list that includes already completed ones like the downtown arena, community rink and Alex Decoteau Park. Infrastructure for new housing in Ice District, expanding the Winspear Centre, improving LRT entrances, brownfield remediation and the event park are among the additions. The province, the City of Edmonton and OEG Sports and Entertainment announced earlier this year that they were closing in on a deal that included a new all-season event park. The province would pay $97 million and OEG would pay $84 million with the remainder — $69 million — coming from the City of Edmonton through the CRL extension. The current CRL also has a number of projects that are in progress, like Warehouse Park, north of Jasper Avenue, between 106 and 108 Streets, and a pedway on 103A Avenue. Has the CRL worked? A recent city report says the CRL has attracted new investment and spurred development downtown to the tune of $4.7 billion. "I think that the CRL makes sense to a lot of proponents because it's worked with the arena project before, and so it's seen as a continuation of that," said Dan Mason, a sport management professor at the University of Alberta who consulted on the arena deal but has no involvement in the extension. The city report said the CRL brought three new office towers and thousands of new residential units downtown. Edmonton Mayor Amarjeet Sohi said he's keeping his mind open but the CRL has helped transform downtown — and there is still more work to do. "We may not be where other downtowns are in North America, but we are on the path to do so and things are getting better and we just cannot lose momentum," he said at a news conference Tuesday. Though downtown generates less property tax revenue than it used to for the city, Sohi said reversing that trend would benefit all Edmontonians. Sohi also said investors consider the state of a city's downtown as a factor when deciding where to bring their business. Who benefits? Some downtown business groups and organizations — like the Edmonton Chamber of Commerce, the Edmonton Downtown Business Association and the Downtown Revitalization Coalition — are urging city councillors to support the extension. They say the CRL isn't just about improving downtown but strengthening the entire city's economy and infrastructure. "From housing to transit to public safety, the CRL enables a more livable and investable city without raising taxes," the groups said in a June 20 news release. Some of the CRL extension's critics are zeroing in on the event park as a reason not to support it. The event park would be a city-owned facility east of Rogers Place, with space for more than 6,000 people outside and more than 2,500 inside. While the city would own the facility, it would be privately run, with one-third of booking time or space available for community groups and non-profits at below-market rates. A report submitted to the city from OEG said the new venue would help fill a gap in the market and bring customers to downtown businesses. Councillors asked administration to have the company's economic benefit estimates independently assessed. The city's analysis concluded the company's assumptions around economic impact were fair and reasonable. Mason, the U of A professor, said it all boils down to whether investing in the event park and the other proposed developments is the best way to achieve downtown revitalization. "The argument is over whether or not this type of development and these types of subsidies warrant that kind of investment or whether that money could be spent on something else that could also lead to this kind of conclusion," he said. Chelsea Tessier, co-owner and head brewer at Polyrhythm Brewing, north of downtown, said she likes the CRL as a model but she and her partner don't support the structure of the proposed extension. "We'd like to see more diversity and these funds being spread out around downtown," she said. She said other small business owners feel the same and would like to see other parts of the city revitalized. Other business owners and organizations have shared arguments for and against the extension with CBC News this week. Sylvester Borowka, who owns the restaurant Continental Treat, said he supports it because it could lead to increased foot traffic downtown and strengthen community. Several city councillors have criticized parts of the deal. Ward Nakota Isga Coun. and mayoral candidate Andrew Knack says he wants to remove "financially irresponsible aspects" from the extension. He'll be sharing his plan to do that at news conference before the hearing on Thursday morning.
Chicago Tribune
08-06-2025
- Chicago Tribune
Condo Adviser: Statutes differ based on the form of community association
Q. I live in a townhouse association and read your Condo Adviser column regularly. I wonder why you are called the Condo Adviser versus a Townhouse Adviser. Are applicable statutes different for condominiums versus townhouses? A. There are definitely different applicable statutes, depending on the form of community association. The Condominium Act applies only to real estate submitted to the Condominium Act. The most common type of condominium building structure is a multiunit residential building, but a townhouse community or even a single-family home community could be submitted to the provisions of the Condominium Act, which would then make that association a condominium association. The most common other statute for community associations is the Common Interest Community Association Act. The statute applies to common interest community associations other than condominium or residential cooperatives that have more than 10 units or an annual budget more than $100,000. This statute applies to most townhouse associations, except those that are deemed a townhome condominium association. Lastly, master associations are governed by section 18.5 of the Condominium Act, even though the remainder of the Condominium Act does not apply to master associations. Q. I am a unit owner in a mid-rise condominium building. Our board does conduct regular open board meetings, which is appreciated. However, no minutes are kept of the board meetings and thus, copies of board meeting minutes are not available to unit owners. Is this legal? A. Under Illinois law, condominium boards are required to keep minutes of board meetings and unit owner meetings. In fact, section 19(a)(4) of the Condominium Act requires the board of directors to make available minutes for unit owner meetings and board meetings for the previous seven years. The board should be reminded of its legal requirement to keep board meeting minutes and do so prospectively. Q. I am a unit owner in a condominium association. Recently, the unit owners were notified that the association has not paid its water bill for months and has a significant outstanding balance plus a significant amount of interest/penalties. The condominium board has not been forthcoming about this. How can we determine if the water bill has been paid? A. Unit owners have a few avenues to obtain information about the payment of association common expenses, specifically the water bill. Per Section 19(a)(9) of the Condominium Act, unit owners are entitled to inspect the books and records of the association for the current and previous 10 fiscal years. A unit owner should request the inspection in writing and may search for water bill payments, or any other payments to vendors for that matter. Alternatively, for a Chicago water bill, a unit owner may obtain a copy of the city of Chicago water bill and full payment certificate from the Chicago Department of Finance, which can be obtained online.
