DOMINIC LAWSON: What a farce! Labour is happy to import oil from Norway's side of the North Sea - while banning drilling on ours
Last Thursday he posted: 'Our negotiated deal with the UK is working out well. I strongly recommend to them, however, that in order to get their Energy Costs down, they stop with the costly and unsightly windmills, and incentivise modernized drilling in the North Sea, where large amounts of oil lay waiting to be taken.'
At first glance this is mystifying. Donald Trump is President of the United States. And the effect of Ed Miliband's preposterous policy of banning all new exploration drilling in the North Sea will be to make this country much more reliant in future on gas expensively liquefied and shipped across the Atlantic from US producers. Why would an American President mind that?
But a further line in Trump's post gave the reason for the President's urging of the British Government to boost our North Sea oil and gas business: 'A century of drilling left, with Aberdeen as the hub.'
You see, Trump's family business has a 1,400-acre plot just north of Aberdeen, which is being turned into highly remunerative golf courses. The first one was inaugurated in 2012, and this summer a second will open, on the shores of the North Sea, named the MacLeod Course in honour of Trump's late Scottish mother, Mary Anne MacLeod.
A booming North Sea oil and gas industry means a booming Aberdeen, the best possible news for membership numbers at Trump's Aberdeenshire golf courses. As always with Trump, his family's personal welfare is the highest consideration, even ahead of the interests of the US.
But, in this case, what is in Trump's interests is also in the interests of the UK as a whole – not just of Aberdeenshire. For the British Government's persecution of the North Sea oil and gas business is a scandalous betrayal of what had been the most productive of all our industries, a mounting risk to our own energy security, and of no benefit whatsoever in its claimed purpose – to 'fight climate change'.
On the other side of the North Sea median line, Norway is ramping up business: according to the Norwegian Shelf Directorate, it plans to boost its North Sea exploration and production 'to the highest level since 2010'.
Here's the bizarre thing: in the eyes of the British Government, and the all-powerful Climate Change Committee, if we use oil or gas from the Norwegian side of the North Sea's Continental Shelf, it does not count against our 'carbon budget'.
It is the same nonsense that says the emissions of wood burned at the Drax power station don't count as 'ours' because the forests from which they have been extracted are on the other side of the Atlantic.
Only one other government took the same perverse line with its oil and gas resources as Labour in this country. That was New Zealand, which under Jacinda Ardern in 2018 instituted a ban on drilling in the country's subsea reservoirs of gas, on the grounds that 'the world has moved on from fossil fuels'.
Er, no, it hasn't – and won't. Currently, 75 per cent of global energy demand is met by oil and gas – and here in the UK 80 per cent of our homes are heated by gas.
While Labour is planning 'a tripling of wind power capacity', that is not the same as output, because of the intermittent nature of that energy source. We will still require gas in volume to keep the lights on and industry ticking over when the wind isn't blowing and – in respect of Miliband's rush to turn agricultural land into solar farms – when the sun isn't shining.
Anyway, last week the National Party government in New Zealand scrapped the oil and gas exploration moratorium imposed by the previous PM. The new government's resources minister, Shane Jones, said Ms Ardern's policy had been disastrous, with the New Zealand national grid warning that the country was at risk of blackouts because renewables had not been generating sufficient power during cold snaps.
A Briton, Sean Rush, who runs an energy consultancy in New Zealand, told the Daily Telegraph: 'The UK Government should take notice of what happens when exploration is stifled.
'Investment flees, gas-dependent businesses close and electricity prices soar. It is an economy-killing climate policy.'
The British Government's line is that our own punitively high industrial energy prices – four times those in the US – are entirely down to the rising cost of gas, exacerbated by the war in Ukraine.
Last week this self-serving explanation was taken apart in a report – The True Affordability of Net Zero – by the founder of the energy consultancy Watt-Logic, the brilliant Kathryn Porter.
Her analysis is that while the spike in gas prices in 2022 (which has now abated) cost UK consumers around £75billion, had this country continued with gas-fired power stations rather than replace any of that with renewables, since 2006, British consumers would have been approximately £220billion better off.
Also last week I was invited to attend an unusual meeting, a sort of call to action, organised by Brindex – the association of British Independent Oil Exploration companies. It was unusual in being also attended by representatives of the GMB Union, which acts for thousands of workers in the North Sea oil and gas industry.
The general secretary of the GMB, Gary Smith, made matters clear from his side: 'In a moment when the North Sea transition is being measured in redundancies, the Government must draw breath. Tens of thousands of jobs directly supported by North Sea oil and gas hinge on these decisions.'
Yet, because of the Government's determination to persist with the Energy Profits Levy, a supposed windfall tax that still operates two years after the Ukraine war gas spike abated, a number of the British-owned North Sea oil companies face an effective tax rate of above 100 per cent.
Nicholas Pogson, of Nobel Upstream, told the meeting that he had written to Ed Miliband about this and had received no response at all, not even from an official. Nobel has now launched a judicial review of the North Sea Transition Authority (sole shareholder, E. Miliband), over its failure to apply the longstanding legal duty to maximise economic recovery of oil and gas in the UK.
Another head of a UK North Sea oil company, Francesco Mazzagatti of Viaro Energy, told me after the meeting: 'This isn't just about economics – it's about energy security and national sovereignty. By gradually undermining its own gas production, the UK is forced to rely on imports from Qatar or the US. This is not a policy, it's a gamble.'
In this context, Ed Miliband is like one of those punters in Donald Trump's former casino operations, putting all his money on red at the roulette table. Only it's our money, not his.
And 'Red Ed' is not just strangling our entrepreneurial oil and gas companies; he's also replacing skilled labour in the North Sea with Chinese-made solar panels.
And all to make our energy less secure. What a farce.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
27 minutes ago
- BBC News
Selling former Hambleton District Council offices is a 'win'
The sale of former council offices to a care home operator is a "win, win, win" situation, a senior councillor has Yorkshire Council's executive committee has agreed to dispose of the civic centre at Stone Cross in Northallerton, the former headquarters of Hambleton District building would be sold for an undisclosed fee which was described as "significant" by council authority decided the offices were not needed following the abolition of Hambleton District Council and the launch of the unitary North Yorkshire Council in 2023. Customer service facilities have also been transferred from the building to the Treadmills site in the town voted unanimously to progress the sale of the building to an unnamed care home operator at a meeting on Tuesday, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS).The authority's deputy leader Gareth Dadd said the sale was the "first major capital" disposal by the unitary authority."It is providing not just a strong capital receipt but, once we take into account the new costs from the new location of the customer service centre, we're looking at net £150,000 to £200,000 I would suggest, in revenue savings through us moving out of that particular building," he said."It's also provided a better customer service experience, as well as underpinning the new Treadmills site with increased footfall."Dadd said all-in-all it was a "win, win, win" and said the council "should not be hesitant in approving the disposal of that particular asset". Mark Crane, executive member for open to business, also spoke in favour of the sale."As a unitary authority, it's clearly wrong that we've got two large offices in the same town," he said."This is a good news story whichever way you look at it."The back-office services which previously operated from Stone Cross have been mainly relocated to County Hall in Northallerton, officials building was put up for sale earlier this year with the negotiations led by the council's property consultancy, Align Property sale will not affect the adjacent leisure centre or the former caretaker's property which are located next to the disused building. Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Windrush commissioner pledges to fight for justice for marginalised groups
The newly appointed Windrush commissioner has promised to expand his remit, to fight for justice for a wider spectrum of marginalised communities who have experienced discrimination in housing, education, employment and policing. At a launch event on Wednesday, Clive Foster will tell the immigration minister, Seema Malhotra, that he does not intend to perform a public relations role for the government. 'Many people were broken by the betrayal, hurt and displacement caused by a scandal that has left a stain on the social conscience of the nation,' he will say, adding that he will challenge officials until they complete 'unfinished work' and fulfil their commitments to those affected. Some commentators have cast Foster's new role as a 'Dettol commissioner', responsible for cleaning up the government's mess. Responding to this scepticism, Foster will tell an audience of members of the Windrush generation at Hackney town hall that his job will be 'to confront uncomfortable realities, not conceal them'. 'If I am to be seen as a Dettol commissioner, as some have called me, let it be in the spirit of healing and protection, not sanitising the truth,' he will say. 'Moral outrage still burns within me for people who had the legal and moral right to be here but were denied that.' Foster, a pastor from Nottingham, was named by the Home Office as Windrush commissioner in June and starts work this week. His appointment fulfils a promise made by the former home secretary Priti Patel to implement a series of recommendations designed to introduce comprehensive reform of the Home Office in the wake of the Windrush scandal, in which thousands of people, many of them from the Caribbean, were wrongly classified as immigration offenders despite having spent most of their lives in the UK. Foster plans to widen his role to address wider injustices, in addition to his core responsibility as 'a champion of the Windrush generation's legacy, ensuring this generation is remembered for their contribution – not just for a scandal'. He will say: 'What began as a fight for justice for the Windrush generation has become a mirror reflecting the broader struggles faced by Black Britons and other marginalised communities. People have come forward not only with experiences of immigration injustice but with experiences of discrimination in housing, education, employment and policing. I want to ensure these voices are heard in the places where change happens.' A number of applicants to the Windrush compensation scheme have seen their applications rejected because they had applied under the misapprehension that the scheme would offer compensation not just to people wrongly labelled as immigration offenders but also to those who had experienced racist treatment in the course of their working lives or during their education in the UK. Applicants often viewed the compensation scheme as an 'opening to express the longstanding hurt and pain they feel about discrimination', Foster told the Guardian. 'They want to express how discrimination and structural racism has affected them over the years. We need to create a space for those voices to be heard and ensure that the right action is taken.' Foster noted that there remained 'suspicion and apprehension' towards the Home Office among the Windrush generation and their descendants, and said some people were still wary about coming forward to apply for citizenship documentation. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion More than 8,000 people have received documentation from the Home Office confirming that they are living in the country legally. About £112m has been paid out across 3,334 compensation claims, in recognition of the extent to which people's lives were upturned by the Home Office's decision to categorise those affected as illegal immigrants. Some of those affected by the Home Office's mistakes were wrongly deported, others were detained, lost their jobs and homes or were denied access to pensions and free NHS treatment. The compensation scheme has been repeatedly criticised for being slow to resolve claims, and at least 64 people have died after submitting claims for compensation. Foster's parents moved from Jamaica to the UK in 1959. His mother worked as a nurse for the NHS and his father worked in factories and mines. 'This is personal for me,' he will say.
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘It's a concentration camp': Everything we know about Trump's new ‘Alligator Alcatraz' in the Florida Everglades
The name given by Donald Trump and his allies to Florida 's new barebones immigrant detention camp is ghoulish enough: 'Alligator Alcatraz'. Critics, however, argue that it is nothing less than a concentration camp on American soil, designed to round up disfavored minorities even if they have committed no crimes. Rapidly built and opened in the space of just two weeks on a remote and rarely used airstrip in Florida's reptile-rich Everglades, the camp is intended to hold up to 5,000 people arrested by U.S. immigration authorities while they await deportation. Numerous detainees, their families, and their lawyers have already alleged inhumane and unsafe conditions, including maggoty food and overflowing toilets. Polling suggests that almost half of all Americans disapprove of the facility, with only 26 per cent of independent voters being in favor. So what exactly is Alligator Alcatraz, and what will happen to the so far 700-odd people detained there? Surrounded by alligators and pythons Long before his 2024 election victory, Donald Trump and his team were drawing up plans to deport millions of people every year — and hold them in vast new detention camps while their cases were processed. Alligator Alcatraz is a preview of that potential future. Rather than being the federal government, it's actually a project of Florida's Republican governor — and former Trump election rival — Ron DeSantis, who invoked emergency powers to seize the land last month. Who funded this remains unclear. DeSantis has said he will be reimbursed by the federal government, and Trump's homeland security secretary, Kristi Noem, has said it will be "largely funded" by FEMA. Yet in court filings, the U.S. Justice Department has claimed that "not implemented, authorized, directed, or funded Florida's temporary detention center" — despite the fact that immigration enforcement is handled by the federal government. Regardless, Republicans have made no secret of their rationale. "You don't need to invest that much in the perimeter," claimed Florida's attorney general James Uthmeier. "If people get out, there's not much waiting for them other than alligators and pythons." And yes, 'Alligator Alcatraz' is now its official name. It's even emblazoned on road signs that lead to the facility. 'Packed into cages' The facility's construction is extremely basic — and its conditions are allegedly brutal. Detainees are kept in metal cages, with dozens of people packed into each one, housed inside gigantic heavy-duty tents in the sweltering heat. Even the staff appear to be based in temporary prefab huts and mobile trailers parked nearby. Detainees and their families have reported worm-infested food, routine medical neglect, unreliable air conditioning, and inadequate toilets that overflow and cover the floor with feces. Government officials have adamantly disputed these accusations, but have provided few details and have denied access to the media. In total, there are currently around 3,000 beds. 'They have no way to bathe, no way to wash their mouths, the toilet overflows and the floor is flooded with pee and poop,' said the wife of one 35-year-old Cuban detainee. "They eat once a day and have two minutes to eat. The meals have worms." At one point, detainees "all went on a hunger strike" in protest against the conditions, she said, adding that her calls with him were interrupted every three minutes by an automated voice saying the conversation was recorded. Lawyers have also reported being refused access and prevented from speaking to their clients. Leamsy 'La Figura' Izquierdo, a Cuban reggaeton artist arrested last week in Miami-Dade County for assault with a deadly weapon and transferred to Alligator Alcatraz, likewise told CBS News: 'There's no water to take a bath, it's been four days since I've taken a bath. "They only brought a meal once a day and it has maggots. They never take off the lights for 24 hours. The mosquitoes are as big as elephants." Another detainee said guards had taken away his Bible and told him that "here there is no right to religion". Democratic legislators who visited the camp say they're deeply concerned. While a bipartisan group was allowed to visit on July 12 — as required by state law — they were given a "sanitized" tour of still-empty areas with no detainees. Even then, their review was harsh. 'They are essentially packed into cages, wall-to-wall humans," said Florida congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz. 'This place needs to be shut the hell down. They're abusing human beings." A spokesperson for the Florida state government said, "The reporting on the conditions in the facility is completely false. The facility meets all required standards and is in good working order." Who is detained there? In early July, Donald Trump claimed that the Florida facility would "handle the most menacing migrants, some of the most vicious people on the planet" — and said he wants to see similar facilities built in "many states". But what we know of Alligator Alcatraz's inmates conflicts with his description. According to The Miami Herald and Tampa Bay Times, only one-third of the 700 people currently being held there have any criminal conviction whatsoever. 250 detainees have been judged to have broken immigration law, which is a civil offence and not a criminal one. One detainee, who described the conditions as potentially "a form of torture", told CBS: "A lot of us have our residency documents and we don't understand why we're here." That fits the general pattern of Trump's detentions so far. Despite promising to prioritize "the worst of the worst", data suggests that only 8 percent of the estimated 185,000 people detained by ICE between October 1, 2024 and May 31, 2025 had been convicted of a serious crime. One-third of detainees had some kind of criminal conviction, but among that group, 75 percent had only committed low-level crimes such as traffic offenses. How long detainees will stay at Alligator Alcatraz is unclear, but immigration court proceedings can take months or years, and the Trump administration has said it will deny bail en masse. Hence, it could be a long time for some. Is it a concentration camp? Some critics believe so. Among them is the journalist Andrea Pitzer, author of One Long Night: A Global History of Concentration Camps, who made her case in a recent op-ed for MSNBC. "This facility's purpose fits the classic model: mass civilian detention without real trials targeting vulnerable groups for political gain based on ethnicity, race, religion or political affiliation rather than for crimes committed," Pitzer wrote. "We're still in the early stages of this arc, but... the history of this kind of detention underlines that it would be a mistake to think the current cruelties are the endpoint. America is likely just getting started." While the term 'concentration camp' is most associated with the Nazis, such camps have been widely used by numerous nations, including the U.K., the U.S., Spain, and the Soviet Union. Immigration lawyer Raul A. Reyes likewise argued in The Los Angeles Times that Alligator Alcatraz is a "national disgrace" that "will place detainees in life-threatening conditions". He further claimed the facility "appears intentionally designed to inflict suffering on detainees", citing supporters' "gleeful" attitude to the idea of federal detainees being eaten by alligators. The Florida Republican Party, and Uthmeier himself, are even selling Alligator Alcatraz merchandise, including baseball caps, water bottles, and beer koozies.
