$1,000 in plants stolen from Gastonia shop; plants recovered, suspect arrested
Lauren Dawsey-Smith, owner of Wild & Whimsy Living, said that on June 24, a man entered her shop at 231 E. Main Ave. around lunchtime and selected several plants as if he intended to buy them.
When employees weren't nearby, the man went into a back room and grabbed an exotic cactus and other mother plants that were given to Dawsey-Smith by her grandmother, Gladis Morris.
He then loaded about $1,000 in plants into a vehicle and left. The stolen plants included a Thai Consolation plant, a monstera ablo plant, two variegated burle mark plants and others.
After Dawsey-Smith shared security stills online, social media users identified the alleged culprit.
Jackson Cartner, 26, is charged with felony larceny in the Wild & Whimsy theft, according to Gastonia police. Court records show he also has theft charges pending in Alamance County.
Dawsey-Smith said she went with police to the home Cartner shared with his mother.
"When we were on the property and we saw the plants, police arrested him for another theft in another county," Dawsey-Smith said.
As for the plants, Dawsey-Smith said she returned to the property days later and was able to retrieve them from the property.
"This definitely won't change anything. If anything, we might be a little more alert that maybe, not everyone has the most pure intentions just because we do," she said. "The community coming together has reignited a passion in me. We really do have a lot of good, wonderful people who wanted to help... If anything, I just feel like it has created ties to the community even stronger."
This article originally appeared on The Gaston Gazette: Gastonia shop owner recovers stolen heirloom plants
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
31 minutes ago
- CBS News
LA City Council unanimously approves crackdown on "disaster tours" of Pacific Palisades
Los Angeles City Council members on Tuesday unanimously authorized a crackdown on bus tours in the Palisades Fire zone. The so-called "disaster tours," which started after the Pacific Palisades reopened to the public in mid-June, were reported to city leaders by residents in the area, according to Councilwoman Traci Park, whose district represents the area. She introduced the motion last week, receiving full support from other members of the council. Tuesday's vote now calls on the Department of Transportation to restrict bus tours in the neighborhoods impacted by January's devastating fire, which killed 12 people and destroyed more than 6,000 of homes. "It's disgusting and despicable that there would be businesses out there trying to exploit and make money off of the tragedy and misery that people experienced in these fires," said Pete Brown, a spokesperson for Park's office. He says that they've received multiple reports of tour buses driving through the remnants of neighborhoods, stopping so passengers could take photos of what used to be homes. "These are people's lives who have been upended and we lost 12 human beings in this fire and thousands and thousands of structures — homes," Brown said. "Anyone trying to take advantage of that and profit from it, it's an absolutely disgusting decision and act to engage in." With debris removal operations still underway, and some residents trying to rebuild where their homes once stood, the tours also present added danger to the area, Park said during Tuesday's council meeting. A revised ordinance will prohibit further tours and increase penalties for any companies that operate in fire zones, according to Park's office. "In not just the Palisades, but in any area that's been impacted by a wildfire or a natural disaster," Brown said. He noted that the new ordinance will be enforceable by both Los Angeles police and parking enforcement, and will be put together following a council recess.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
After Dodgers Incident With Federal Agents, Stephen Miller Co-Founded Legal Group Files Employment Complaint Over Team's DEI Efforts
A legal group co-founded by top White House aide Stephen Miller has filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, seeking an investigation of the Los Angeles Dodgers' diversity, equity and inclusion policies. The America First Legal complaint, filed on Monday, claims that the Dodgers' DEI policies 'appear to discriminate against employees, or prospective employees, solely because of their skin color or sex.' They cite a reference on the team's DEI page that outlines recruitment efforts, including 'sponsoring programs geared toward women and people of color.' More from Deadline Dodgers Donate $1 Million To L.A. Immigrant Families Impacted By ICE Raids Reparations Bill Proposed For Families Displaced By Dodger Stadium CNN Says There's "Nothing Illegal" About Reporting On ICE Sighting App As Trump Administration Threatens Network With DOJ Investigation They also take issue with business resource groups, such as those aimed at Asian professionals and the Black Action Network. Although the complaint acknowledges that the groups 'appear to be open for all employees to join,' some of them 'appear to provide material employment benefits to employees based on their race, color, sex or national origin.' As an example of the benefits, America First Legal pointed to language describing the Dodgers' Women's Opportunity Network, described as offering 'a safe and equitable space for women to thrive' and a place to 'demonstrate that women add tangible value to the organization's success.' The complaint follows an incident on June 19 in which masked agents appeared near one of the Dodgers's gates to its parking lot. Protesters gathered in the area, and the Los Angeles Police Department arrived at the scene, and the agents left. The Dodgers posted that that morning, 'ICE agents came to Dodger Stadium and requested permission to access the parking lots. They were denied entry to the grounds by the organization.' Immigration and Customs Enforcement denied that its personnel were present, but Department of Homeland Security said that Customs and Border Patrol vehicles were 'in the stadium parking lot very briefly, unrelated to any operation or enforcement.' America First Legal cited the incident in a press release announcing the EEOC complaint. It also pointed to a $1 million contribution the Dodgers made to provide financial assistance to immigrant families of those impacted by the ICE raids. The Dodgers' employment page states that it will consider 'all applicants without regard to national origin, race, color, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, disability, military status, citizenship status, pregnancy or related medical conditions, marital status, ancestry-ethnicity or any other characteristic protected by applicable state or federal civil rights law.' But the America First Legal complaint argues that the statement is 'contradictory' and that it should 'not shield the organization from scrutiny or protect it from liability for discriminating in furtherance of DEI goals.' The Dodgers have not yet commented on the complaint. Also named is Guggenheim Partners LLC, whose CEO Mark Walter is chairman and controlling owner of the Dodgers. Also last month, the 8x World Series champs — who have a very significant Latino fan base and a stadium built on land appropriated from mostly Mexican families in 1958 — announced a $1 million donation in partnership with the City of Los Angeles, as well as several local organizations, to provide financial assistance for families of immigrants impacted by the raids. 'What's happening in Los Angeles has reverberated among thousands upon thousands of people, and we have heard the calls for us to take a leading role on behalf of those affected,' said Dodgers president and CEO Stan Kasten. 'We believe that by committing resources and taking action, we will continue to support and uplift the communities of Greater Los Angeles.' The Trump administration has targeted DEI programs across the federal government, at universities and even at private corporations. The president's appointee to lead the FCC, Brendan Carr, has launched investigations of DEI practices at media and communications companies including Comcast and Disney. Best of Deadline Who Is [SPOILER]? The Latest Big Marvel Reveal Explained 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 'Poker Face' Season 2 Guest Stars: From Katie Holmes To Simon Hellberg
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
What we know about Bryan Kohberger's plea deal and whether a judge will approve it
Steve Goncalves was stunned over the weekend when he heard that prosecutors in Moscow, Idaho, had reached a plea deal with Bryan Kohberger, the man charged in the 2022 stabbing deaths of his daughter, Kaylee, and three other University of Idaho students. Just days earlier, Goncalves said he and a few of the victims' loved ones told prosecutors they did not support a plea deal. Instead, they urged prosecutors to continue pursuing the death penalty in Kohberger's upcoming quadruple murder trial, which Goncalves hoped would bring much-needed closure to their families. 'We don't want to deal. We're not interested in that. We didn't wait two and a half years for this,' the father said he told prosecutors on a Friday afternoon call. Goncalves said he walked away from the conversation with the impression that a plea deal was not a serious option in the case, leaving him blindsided when he received an email just two days later notifying him a deal had been reached. Ultimately, it was Kohberger's attorneys who broached the possibility of a plea deal as they endured a series of legal blows to their defense strategy, Goncalves told CNN's Jim Sciutto, citing conversations with prosecutors last week. The agreement would avoid a trial by allowing Kohberger to plead guilty to all four counts of murder in exchange for the government dropping the death penalty in the killings of Kaylee Goncalves, Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle and Madison Mogen, a person familiar with the matter told CNN. Goncalves and his family have slammed the deal as 'hurried' and 'secretive,' saying prosecutors should have sought input from victims' loved ones on the conditions of the deal. Jeff Kernodle, Xana's father, also expressed disappointment in the prosecutor's decision. Kernodle mourned the deal as a 'missed opportunity to set a stronger precedent in how accountability should be handled in cases like this,' he said in a statement Tuesday. 'It could have sent a message to others that these kinds of horrific crimes carry real consequences. Instead, four beautiful lives were taken, and the person responsible won't be used as an example to help prevent something like this from happening again,' Kernodle added. In contrast, families of the other two victims say they support the plea deal. Ben Mogen, father of Madison, told the Idaho Statesman he was choosing acceptance, adding the plea agreement would let his family avoid a trial and allow its wounds to keep healing. Ethan's mother, Stacy Chapin, told CNN affiliate KHQ her family would be in court Wednesday 'in support of the plea bargain.' But the deal is not set in stone, and the judge could require Kohberger to confess to details of the crime, a legal expert said. State District Judge Steven Hippler must approve the deal and will oversee a hearing in the case at 11 a.m. Wednesday, during which the plea agreement will be addressed, a letter from the prosecutor to a victim's family says, according to an Idaho Statesman report. Plea deal negotiations are often protected by a halo of privacy, so details of the closed-door conversations between prosecutors and Kohberger's attorneys are unlikely to come out unless one side steps forward, according to University of Idaho associate law professor Samuel Newton. Commonly discussed in the legal process, plea deals involve prosecutors offering a defendant incentives, such as a less severe sentence, if they accept a guilty plea, Newton said. The costs and time commitment of a death penalty case may have also played a role in both sides wanting to reach an early conclusion, Newton said. Death penalty convictions often lead to decades of painstaking appeal efforts, which he said some victims' families describe as 'torture.' 'The family is looking at … decades of legal proceedings in a death penalty case, versus if he takes life without parole, it's done and the family gets that degree of closure,' Newton said. Kohberger's legal defense team has also suffered a series of losses in recent weeks which have narrowed their strategy options, including rulings barring the defense from submitting an official alibi – as no one could confirm Kohberger's whereabouts at the time of the killings – and rejecting their attempt to present an 'alternate perpetrator' theory. During Wednesday's hearing, the judge is likely to question Kohberger thoroughly to make sure he understands that he would be forfeiting his right to a trial and sentencing appeals if he accepts the deal, Newton said. Both Goncalves and Kernodle have criticized prosecutors for not including provisions in the plea deal that would require Kohberger to confess to specific details of the crime. Those details could have been revealed at trial, which is still leaves questions over motive and how the stabbings were carried out. Goncalves hopes Judge Hippler will require Kohberger to make statements in court that would shed light on the remaining mysteries of the case. He also believes such statements would provide the suspect's supporters – many of whom maintain his innocence – less ground to stand on. 'We're all going to live with the repercussion for the rest of our lives … unless Hippler steps in and says, 'You're not going to just say you're guilty. You're going to communicate some of the details so these families can actually move on and not have to be dragged through this true crime nightmare over and over and over again.' Kernodle agreed, saying in his statement, 'It's incredibly hard to accept that a trial won't be happening. I had hoped the agreement would include conditions that required the defendant to explain his actions and provide answers to the many questions that still remain, especially where evidence is missing or unclear.' Goncalves also believes the plea deal should have barred Kohberger from reaping financial gain from selling the details of his story in the future. There is a slim chance Kohberger could maintain his innocence while accepting the plea deal by entering an Alford plea, an option that stems from a 1970 Supreme Court case. 'The benefit of the Alford plea is for a defendant who feels that they're innocent but wants to take the deal,' Newton said, noting there are no substantial differences between a regular guilty plea and an Alford plea. 'It has the same result as a guilty plea. It's just the defendant themselves is not going to say that they did it.' If the defense went this route, the state may present a factual basis for Kohberger's guilty plea, including details of how the crime was carried out, and would require him to say 'guilty' after the facts were read, Newton said. Like a regular guilty plea, Kohberger would likely be waiving his right to appeal as well, he added. Newton said it seems unlikely prosecutors would have agreed to a plea deal if they didn't have assurances Kohberger would take responsibility for the killings, making the chances of an Alford plea questionable. CNN's Norma Galeana and Betul Tuncer contributed to this report.
