Government urged to create action plan one year after housing emergency declared
MSPs voted to declare a housing emergency one year ago, following on from a similar move by local councils as homelessness reached record levels.
An inquiry by the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee found the housing emergency was 'years, even decades in the making and was therefore both predictable and preventable', according to convener Ariane Burgess.
As of September 30 last year, 16,634 households were living in temporary accommodation, including 10,360 children, with both figures the highest on record.
Figures for 2024 also show that the number of homes built dropped by 7%, while new homes started by construction firms fell by 9%.
The committee's report urges ministers to create a plan and work across all Government departments to tackle the issue.
'The committee recommends that the Scottish Government develop a national overarching housing emergency action plan by the end of this session of Parliament in collaboration with the wider housing sector,' the report said.
'This should include clear milestones and outcomes to enable progress to be measured.
'A whole-systems approach is required that is led by the Scottish Government and its partners in order to stabilise housing in Scotland and help prevent future emergencies.
'The committee therefore recommends that the Scottish Government sets out how it will better coalesce its own departments around tackling housing need and ensure that wider policies across different portfolios can have a positive impact.'
Ahead of the anniversary of the declaration, Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville touted the Government's action in the past year and its plans for the future, including spending £768 million on affordable housing, funding local councils, and investing £2 million in the Scottish Empty Homes Partnership to free up unused housing stock.
The committee also urged the Government to confirm how the increase in housing spending this year, around £200m from last year, will impact its target of building 110,000 affordable homes by 2032.
Ms Somerville said: 'Providing everyone in Scotland the right to a warm, safe and affordable home is essential to our key priority of eradicating child poverty.
'The measures we have taken have meant increased investment in the affordable housing sector and fewer families living in temporary accommodation.
'As a result of our actions, an estimated more than 2,600 households with children have been helped into affordable housing in the year up to December 2024.
'We have delivered 136,000 affordable homes, with 97,000 of those for social rent, between 2007 and the end of December 2024.
'We are also working to identify and turn around empty private and social homes and encouraging more funding streams into the sector through our housing investment taskforce.
'It is encouraging that we are seeing a reduction in families in temporary accommodation in some local authority areas.
'However, we know there is more to do, which is why we have increased the affordable housing budget for this financial year by £200m to £768m. In the longer term, we will also introduce homelessness prevention measures and a system of long-term rent controls in our Housing (Scotland) Bill.
'We are determined to tackle the housing emergency and ensure that everyone in Scotland can have somewhere to call home.'
Scottish Labour housing spokesman Mark Griffin described the Government as 'arrogant and out of touch', adding: 'Since the SNP was forced to declare a housing emergency a year ago, housebuilding has plummeted, the number of children in temporary accommodation has risen to a record high, and rent and house prices have continued to climb.
'The SNP's Programme for Government has been described as a 'programme for homelessness' and its incompetent housing minister is still in a job.
'The SNP's desperate spin won't wash with the people who are living through the dire consequences of this housing emergency.'
Scottish Conservative housing spokeswoman Meghan Gallacher said: 'This stark report makes it clear the SNP have been missing in action since finally agreeing a housing emergency was occurring on their watch.
'They have continued to recklessly support rent controls, which do not work, and have continued to ask cash-strapped councils to do more with less as they try to meet local demand for housing.
'With a record number of children in temporary accommodation and housebuilding collapsing across Scotland, the SNP Government needs to wake up.
'They should mark this anniversary by accepting that current housing policies are failing, ditch plans for permanent rent controls, and instead encourage much-needed investment into our flagging housing sector.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
28 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Alex Salmond cleared of historic sexual assault allegation
Police Scotland has said it will take 'no further action' into the complaint. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The late Alex Salmond has been cleared of a historic sexual assault allegation. Police Scotland has confirmed it has ended its investigation and will take 'no further action' into a complaint reported shortly after his death in October. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Salmond, who was first minister between 2007 and 2014, died of a heart attack in North Macedonia nine months ago. Weeks later, it was reported a woman had made a claim of a non-recent sexual assault against him. Former first minister Alex Salmond | Getty Images In November, Police Scotland said: 'We can confirm that we have received a report of a non-recent sexual assault. The information is being assessed.' However the Daily Record now reports the force has said: 'Following a report of a non-recent sexual assault, enquiries were carried out and no further action will be taken.' Ash Regan, Alba's sole MSP in the Scottish Parliament, said: 'Alex Salmond died with his reputation intact as a titan of Scottish politics. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Alex can no longer defend himself, yet some remain determined to smear his name. 'It is time to let him rest, grant his wife Moira and his family the closure they deserve and draw a line so his legacy can be remembered with dignity.' She added: 'The exhaustive investigations, played out under the public spotlight, ended with his full vindication in Scotland's highest courts, civilly and criminally.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Salmond, who was twice leader of the SNP and latterly set up his own rival pro-independence Alba Party, was cleared of sexually assaulting nine women while he was first minister at the Edinburgh High Court in 2020. A jury found him not guilty on 12 charges, and delivered a not proven verdict on one further charge.
Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain's pension crisis is about to get even worse
The Government's review of pensions is asking some of the right questions. Top of the list is the age at which they should start to be paid. It is not a given that the state should fund the last third of someone's life, regardless of need. That is a choice, and a recent one. When the Old Age Pension began in 1909, it was paid from 70 and you had to have lived in the UK for 20 years and to be of 'good character'. It was means-tested, too – you needed to earn less than £21 a year to qualify. So, Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Secretary, is right to look first at the state pension age. And right to commission a report on the proportion of adult life spent in retirement. When the modern state pension was introduced in 1948, a 65-year-old could expect to receive it for just 13 years, about a sixth of their life expectancy. She is right, too, to investigate ways to boost pension savings – 8pc of earnings is not enough – and to broaden the number of people putting money aside for their retirement. Only half of working-age people are doing that, a fifth of the self-employed and fewer still of some ethnic minorities. That's not good. As ever, when it comes to pensions policy, there is also a have-cake-and-eat-it problem. The Government spends about 5pc of GDP on pensions – more than £120bn last year – but it persists with the fantasy that the amount paid to pensioners can rise into the future by the highest of earnings, inflation or 2.5pc. The triple lock is unaffordable. The unavoidable truth about pensions is that small changes in a range of unpredictable variables make a big difference when they are compounded over the decades that we now expect to live after we have stopped working. This is true for the good changes that government policy and personal choice can deliver. And for the bad ones that we can't do much about. That's why the Government is asking only some of the right questions. There are others it needs to address, all of which are difficult. The biggest pensions challenge may well be one that no one is talking about. This all became abundantly clear to me recently when I helped a colleague out with a deceptively simple question. He wanted to know what rate of investment return he needed to aim for in order to achieve the comfortable retirement he was hoping to enjoy. To answer that, I employed my pathetically rudimentary Excel skills to build a spreadsheet with a few variables that we could play with until we arrived at a plausible plan. I plugged in how much he had saved; how much he intended to put aside in future, and for how long; when he planned to wind down into semi-retirement and when he would stop completely; when he would take the state pension; and the return he would aim to achieve on his investments both before and after he stopped working. I ran the numbers from his current age of 52 until, with luck, he turns 90. Crucially, I had to make some quite big assumptions, the most important of which were that the triple lock would continue throughout his life and that the Bank of England would succeed in hitting its 2pc inflation target. By tweaking all these variables and assumptions, we were able to monitor their impact on the cumulative size of his pension pot. As you might expect, saving more for longer in an only moderately inflationary environment ended well. Working for a bit longer made a big difference. Accepting a lower income in retirement helped. None of this is rocket science, and probably doesn't require a Pensions Commission to confirm. That said, I was surprised by some of the things we discovered. One was the remarkable power of starting early. The principal reason that my colleague was pleasantly surprised by his required rate of investment return was that he had spent the previous 30 years studiously paying into his company pension, supported by a generous employer. The first additional question the Government needs to find an answer to is how to get young people engaged with their pensions. It may be boring, but it is not as boring as being old and poor. The second thing the spreadsheet taught us was the power of delay. Working just a few more years, even in a part-time capacity, can transform the arithmetic of our pension savings. Paying in for longer and taking out for less time, together with a few extra years of compound investment growth, is a magical combination. Find what you enjoy and keep doing it. But the biggest eye-opener for me was the devastating impact of even a modest uptick in inflation. A quick and easy way to make your money run out is to stop work and then try to maintain your standard of living by increasing the amount you draw down from your pension in line with rising prices. For my colleague, nudging up the assumed inflation rate from 2pc to 3pc was the difference between a £700,000 pension pot at the age of 90 and running out of cash completely a couple of years earlier. The pensions crisis that no one is talking about, therefore, is on the face of it nothing to do with pensions at all. Yes, more people need to save more, to start earlier and to carry on for longer. The Government has a role to play in encouraging all of those. But it, and the Bank of England, has an even bigger task. To keep inflation at a level where it doesn't blow our plans out of the water.
Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour urged to make it harder to sack sick staff
Labour has been urged to make it harder to sack sick workers in a bid to stop disabled staff from leaving the workforce. The Resolution Foundation - which was until last year headed by pensions minister Torsten Bell - has called on the Government to implement a raft of new rules including a 'right to reintegration' for staff on sick leave. Louise Murphy, economist at the think tank, said extra rights for disabled workers similar to those given to new mothers could transform employment prospects. 'The Government should do more to incentivise firms to employ disabled people, especially those who have been out of work for long periods. But employers need to do more in return,' she said. 'A new right to reintegration could help disabled workers back into work in the same way that maternity rights transformed women's employment prospects a generation ago.' The report said that rising levels of poor health means the Government has little chance of boosting employment to its 80pc target unless it takes steps to boost hiring of disabled workers.
