
Videos in hockey players' trial highlight misconceptions about consent: Law experts
Article content
Two cellphone videos in which the woman says she's 'OK with this' and that 'it was all consensual' were presented as evidence during the trial of Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dube, and Callan Foote.
Article content
Article content
All five men have pleaded not guilty to sexual assault after an encounter in a London, Ont., hotel room in the early morning hours of June 19, 2018. McLeod has also pleaded not guilty to an additional charge of being a party to the offence of sexual assault.
Article content
Ontario Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia is expected to deliver her ruling on Thursday in the case that saw consent emerge as a central issue.
Article content
Prosecutors have argued the complainant did not voluntarily agree to the sexual acts that took place, nor did the players take reasonable steps to confirm her consent. The Crown has dismissed the videos taken of the woman that night as 'token lip service box checking,' arguing she felt she had no choice but to go along when a group of men she didn't know started asking her to do things inside the hotel room.
Article content
Defence lawyers, meanwhile, repeatedly challenged the complainant's credibility and reliability as a witness, arguing she was an active participant in the sexual activity and made up the allegations because she didn't want to take responsibility for her choices that night.
Article content
Video statements such as the short clips shown in this trial aren't necessarily evidence of consent, said University of Ottawa law professor Daphne Gilbert.
Article content
Article content
'Legally speaking, they have very little relevance because consent has to be ongoing and contemporaneous with the sexual activity and you have to be consenting to every single thing that is happening to you,' said Gilbert, who researches sexual violence and abuse in Canadian sports.
Article content
'There's no such thing as advance consent. And there's no thing as after-the-fact consent, either. So just because you say, 'Yeah, it was all consensual' doesn't mean that makes it so.'
Article content
Lisa Dufraimont, a law professor at York University, said such videos could also be seen as hearsay because they don't contain statements made under oath in court.
Article content
'If the complainant got on the stand at the trial and testified that they consented at the time, that would be evidence that they consented at the time,' said Dufraimont, whose research focuses on evidence issues in sexual assault cases.
Article content
But she said the videos could be used for other legal arguments, including those that may rely on a description of how a defendant or complainant was acting at the time.
Article content
'It may be that if the video is taken close in time to the alleged sexual assault, that the video shows something about the person's level of intoxication or their emotional state, which may or may not be consistent with what they later reported their emotional state was at the time,' said Dufraimont.
Article content
During the trial, the Crown argued that the videos shown in court weren't proof that the complainant voluntarily agreed to what had taken place.
Article content
'The recording of that video is not getting her consent to anything. Everything's already happened,' prosecutor Meaghan Cunningham said about the video in which the woman said it was 'all consensual,' adding that consent must be communicated for each specific act at the time it takes place.
Article content
Only one of the accused, Hart, took the stand in his own defence, and court heard or watched interviews three of the others _ McLeod, Formenton and Dube — gave police in 2018. People accused of crimes are not required to testify, nor is the defence required to call any evidence, as it is up to the Crown to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Article content
In McLeod's 2018 interview with police, he told a detective that he recorded one of the videos because he was 'just kind of worried something like this might happen.'
Article content
On the stand, Hart testified that consent videos aren't unusual for professional athletes.
Article content
Gilbert, the University of Ottawa law professor, said Canada in general still has work to do in educating young people about consent, especially in sports. She's involved in efforts to teach youth about consent through school programming, but said professional hockey in particular is behind on enacting policies to address the issue.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
17 minutes ago
- CTV News
Missing Alberta mom spotted on Vancouver Island, police say
Ashley Bartley, 30, and her four-year-old daughter Marlie Myers have been missing since July 12, police say. (Cochrane RCMP) Police in Cochrane, Alta., say a mother and daughter missing from their jurisdiction may be on Vancouver Island. Ashley Bartley and her four-year-old daughter Marlie Myers were last seen in Cochrane on July 12, and police said in a news release earlier this week that the pair may be in the Vancouver area. In an update Wednesday, Cochrane RCMP said their investigation had revealed that Bartley was seen in Courtenay, B.C., on July 18. The 30-year-old mother was seen at an ATM in the Vancouver Island city, police said, adding that she is believed to be travelling with a man in a dark grey 2017 Chevrolet Silverado with Alberta licence plate CTK 2944. The truck is pulling a white 2006 Arctic Fox trailer with B.C. plate WPW65H, police said. Mounties have previously said 'there is concern' for the well-being of Bartley and Myers. They described the mother as 5′4″ tall and 130 pounds. She has long, brown hair and brown eyes and was last seen wearing a white T-shirt, shorts and black flip flops, according to police. The daughter is three feet tall and weighs 40 to 45 pounds. She has curly, dirty-blond hair and brown eyes, and was last seen wearing pink pants, a shirt and crocs. Anyone with information on their whereabouts is asked to call Cochrane RCMP at 403-851-8000 or their local police. Tips can also be provided anonymously via Crime Stoppers.


CTV News
17 minutes ago
- CTV News
Toronto Blue Jays apologize to fan who had ‘Yankees Suck' flag confiscated
Alex Di Domizio with the flag he had specially made to read 'Yankees Suck' with a Jays logo in the centre. (X/@AlexDidomizio08) A Toronto Blue Jays fan was left quite confused when a flag he had brought to Monday night's home game against the New York Yankees at Rogers Centre was confiscated, despite not breaking the ballpark's rules. Alex Di Domizio, a Blue Jays fan who 'absolutely hates the Yankees,' decided to bring a flag he had specially made to Monday's home game against New York. It read 'Yankees Suck' with a Jays logo in the centre. 'The usher in our 200s section didn't seem to mind, but another usher came over and almost yelled at our usher for allowing me to hold a flag,' Di Domizio told CP24. 'I was holding the flag for about 10 minutes and they took it just before the game started.' Di Domizio said the second usher's main issue was that his flag said 'Yankees Suck,' and he was worried he might get kicked out after a security guard went to him and asked to 'talk outside.' 'Turns out he wanted me to bring the flag to fan services,' Di Domizio explained. 'He said I could get it back after the game.' Di Domizio said he brought the flag that night because he didn't think it would be an issue. 'I didn't swear on the flag or anything like that.' Rogers Centre's policy states that fans are welcome to bring banners and signs provided they do not 'interfere with the game itself or any game-related events, or with the ability of other fans to enjoy of the game or any such events, or contain messages, graphics or other content that may be considered distracting, commercial, religious, political, or intended to draw attention to international, political or other similar events, causes or conflicts.' 'Banners and signs must be family-friendly, and may not be obstructive, offensive, disparaging, unlawful or otherwise objectionable or inappropriate,' the policy continues. In a statement to CP24, the Blue Jays clarified that Di Domizio's flag was indeed allowed in the ballpark. 'We made a mistake and have addressed the issue to ensure it does not happen again. We have spoken with the fan to apologize and invited him back to a future game, which he is looking forward to attending.' Di Domizio said he's glad the organization made things right and it was never a question that he would remain a fan. 'It feels good to know that the (organization) apologized and recognized that there was nothing really wrong with my flag. At the end of the day, I'm a huge Jays fan who absolutely hates the Yankees. Getting something confiscated sucks, but it doesn't stop me from coming to future games.' Earlier this year, Dan Begley was escorted out of Rogers Centre during the Jays home opener for wearing a red ballcap with the slogan, 'Canada is not for sale.' The Blue Jays also apologized to Begley and said their staff made a mistake and the issue was addressed to ensure it never happens again.


CTV News
17 minutes ago
- CTV News
Orillia outsiders slapped with surcharge for using rec facilities
Big changes could be coming to the cost of fun in Orillia... especially if you don't live in the city. Those living in neighbouring communities to Orillia will be hit with a 50 per cent surcharge when using the city's recreational facilities next year. This increase will apply to various programs like swimming, summer camps, and memberships but not to user groups like minor hockey and figure skating. The city says more than half of its recreation users are non-residents and city councillors see this measure as a way to recoup some costs in next year's budget while maintaining service levels. Mayor Don McIsaac saying, 'Residents have given feedback, and they say, 'Look, it's not appropriate that we subsidize people from out of town. I mean, Orillia provides services, we have beautiful parks, we keep those up, people from out of town, we encourage our users of the park so people come and use the park, we're fine with that, but the rec center and the library, those drive our costs, and we just want to make sure we recover appropriately and don't unduly burden the taxpayers of Orillia.' The city says communities like Oro-Medonte, Severn, and Ramara can pay a lump sum to avoid the surcharge for its residents. They have time to negotiate that sum, with this measure to go into effect next May.