logo
Teens sound off on proposed law to prohibit cellphones in classrooms

Teens sound off on proposed law to prohibit cellphones in classrooms

Yahoo07-02-2025
It's lunchtime — and waves of hungry Lone Peak High School students are escaping campus long enough Thursday to snag something at the nearby McDonald's or maybe Taco Bell.
Several of the teens seek their midday sustenance in small social packs — chatting and laughing while traversing the school crosswalk. But many others, no surprise, focus on texting or talking on their cellphones.
And almost all the kids have devices in their hands.
So who better to deliver 'on-the-ground' opinions on proposed legislation creating a 'default' law forbidding Utah students from using their cellphone during class time? After all, it's 2025. Most Utah high school and junior high students have likely owned some sort of cellphone for almost all of their K-12 years.
So one could perhaps assume all would be strongly and uniformly opposed to any form of classroom phone prohibition. But the responses from the Lone Peak High lunch crowd were mixed, thoughtful and nuanced.
Grayson Mcevoy, a 17-year-old Lone Peak junior, would rather not have the state (or his school district) ban cellphones in class — 'but I can also see the benefits in some ways.'
If ratified, SB178 would make Utah's primary and secondary classrooms cellphone 'free zones' — unless local schools or districts opt for a different policy.
The bill essentially calls for a 'default' reset of the state's current policy, which allows cellphone use whenever or wherever students want unless local districts or school articulate a prohibitive policy.
Lone Peak High School, according to the students who spoke to the Deseret News, manages cellphone policies on a class-by-class basis. Some teachers reportedly restrict phone-use entirely in their classrooms. Others are more flexible.
Senior Dalton Riley, 18, said one of his teachers provides designated slots for students' phones during class time.
'And I'm cool with that,' said Riley. 'Personally, I don't mind. There's really no point for me to be using my phone during class.'
Taylor Hurley, 17, has learned to be flexible with his classroom cellphone use.
'It's different for each teacher,' he said. 'Each teacher has a different cellphone policy. Some are super-relaxed with phones — and others don't like us using them.'
Still, the Lone Peak senior would not be a fan of a broad prohibition. 'Phones are helpful and they help people everyday.'
Cellphones are a boon during art and painting classes for sophomore Zoe Roos. She utilizes her phone's search capabilities 'to find inspiration' for her art assignments. But she's quick to add she doesn't otherwise use her phone much in class outside of maybe sending an occasional text.
'For a lot of kids, the most distracting part of cellphones is when they are scrolling through their social media or stuff like that,' said Roos. 'It's not the communication parts (phone calls or texting) that are most distracting to kids.'
Senior Natalie Khankan, 17, is a foreign exchange student, so she possesses a broad perspective on cellphones in class rooms. 'In Italy, we're not allowed to use our phones,' she said. 'So when I came here, I found a lot of the teachers didn't really care if we use our phones. So a lot of people go on TikTok or Instagram.
'It can be really distracting — but, yes, sometimes our cellphones can be helpful.'
Khankan recognizes both sides of the cellphone/classroom debate — but said she supports SB178.
The proposed law allows for cellphone use in classrooms during an emergency. Still, senior Sophia Molina is hesitant about any policy that might prevent her from accessing her phone in a crisis.
'But I do feel there should be some kind of regulation because I sometimes see kids using their phones during the entire class period instead of engaging with others,' she said.
Regardless of class-to-class phone policies, Molina said she typically gives little thought to her cellphone during school.
'I usually just put it in my backpack and forget about it,' she said. 'It's good to not have it in my vision.'
Any policy prohibiting cellphones in class 'is a bad idea,' insisted Anke Larsen, 16. 'At a certain age, kids should be able to have their phones.'
Alyssa Lindsay, a sophomore, said she appreciates teachers who establish clear boundaries on cellphone use in their classrooms — and then trust their students to conduct themselves accordingly.
Maxwell Redding, meanwhile, worries a broad cellphone prohibition in classrooms would exact more harm than good.
'I think it's a bad idea,' he said. 'I'd be nervous if I couldn't check my notifications.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship order
Judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship order

The Hill

time10-07-2025

  • The Hill

Judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship order

It's Thursday. Those storms in the DMV were *wild* last night. 📹 This clip does it justice. 📹 And this one. 📹 Annd this one. But hey, look at 📸 the incredible sunset over the U.S. Capitol afterward! In today's issue: Judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship order First challenge to Trump's order Texas floods expose weaknesses in alert systems Noem policy may have slowed FEMA response Plus, McDonald's Snack Wrap is baaaaack 🥳 Next round of the birthright citizenship fight, ding ding: A federal judge in New Hampshire just said he would block the Trump administration from enforcing President Trump 's executive order limiting birthright citizenship. This is the first challenge since the Supreme Court scaled back judges' ability to issue nationwide injunctions. Explainer: The Supreme Court's ruling left a path open for challengers to file class action lawsuits. Today, the judge allowed the case to proceed as a class action, which has the same practical effect as a nationwide injunction. ^ Keep in mind: This move is the next natural step for challenges to Trump's order. 'After a recent Supreme Court decision limiting nationwide injunctions, lawsuits structured as class actions are effectively the only ones that can halt the president's policies across broad sections of the country.' (NYT) Back story: The Trump administration is fighting to end automatic birthright citizenship for the children of undocumented immigrants. ⛑️️ TEXAS FLOODING How do we prevent this from happening again?: President Trump is planning to visit Texas on Friday to survey the damage of the fatal Fourth of July flash flooding that has killed at least 120 people. At least 173 people are still missing, and rescue efforts have become recovery efforts. This comes as early assessments raise questions about the alert systems — as well as the disaster response. The two big questions: 1) Were people along the Guadalupe River alerted as the waters rose more than 26 feet in an hour during the night? The catastrophic flooding has exposed weaknesses in the emergency alert system. There was no siren or alarm to warn locals of the danger. CBS News's Jason Allen reports that Kerr County does have a web-based emergency alert system called CodeRED, but it was delayed while waiting for supervisor authorization. John David Trolinger, a former Kerr County official who helped install the system but has since retired, told CBS: 'I thought, 'Man, someone could die because I'm there arguing with a dispatcher that doesn't know who I am or remember my name,'' he said. 'And there was no way I was going to interrupt their process because it's, you know, it's five o'clock, someone's got to be in dispatch besides just the night, the overnight people.' Why didn't Kerr County have a siren?: Many Texas counties have a siren system to warn of flash floods, but Kerr County rejected the proposal due to the cost. The Texas Tribune's Emily Foxhall reports that officials had a 3-hour and 21-minute heads-up. 'Local officials haven't shed light on when they saw the warnings or whether they saw them in time to take action.' 2) How has the disaster response been? CNN's Gabe Cohen and Michael Williams report that the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) response was slowed by bureaucratic hurdles put in place by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. As a cost-cutting measure, Noem required her personal sign-off on any funds over $100,000 before they are released. That means FEMA wasn't able to pre-position Urban Search and Rescue crews in anticipation of the event. Keep in mind that officials warned last month that Noem's policy could delay distribution of aid during natural disasters. Noem has defended her response. 'What President Trump has empowered us to do is to let these states and local emergency management officials run and make decisions that best respond to their communities, and we be a support that comes in and comes alongside them when they need us,' she said. ➤ SIGHTS AND SOUNDS: At least three people, including two children, are dead after a flash flood hit a mountain town in New Mexico. How do sanctions sound?: Congressional leaders are considering punishing Russia with additional sanctions. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) have indicated their chambers will take up a bill to sanction Russia soon. Thune says he 'hopes' to have it passed by August recess. Timing: Russia launched a major missile and drone strike on Kyiv, Ukraine, overnight. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the U.S. and Russia are looking at a 'new and different approach' to peace negotiations, per AP. Who is keeping Republicans up at night: Elon Musk. The Hill's Alexander Bolton reports that 'Senate Republicans fear Elon Musk 's beef with President Trump could become a wild-card factor that could cost them seats in 2026 if Musk follows through on his threat to create a new political party to compete with the GOP.' Specifically: They're concerned that Musk's party could peel off more Republicans than Democrats in key races. Musk has said his platform would likely be reducing the federal debt. ➤ TIDBIT: Musk released a new version of the chatbot Grok on Wednesday. Keep in mind that its last update gave some several antisemitic responses. ➤ INTERESTING READ — WHAT WAS QUIETLY PASSED IN TRUMP'S BILL: 'Republicans quietly passed a first-of-its-kind national school choice program in President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' but celebration among advocates was tempered after the Senate added a provision giving blue states a way out,' reports The Hill's Lexi Lonas Cochran. Trump is picking a fight with Brazil: 'Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva warned on Wednesday that his government is prepared to retaliate after President Trump announced plans to impose 50 percent tariffs on goods imported from his country.' The Brazilian leader posted scathing criticism on X: 'Brazil is a sovereign nation with independent institutions and will not accept any form of tutelage,' the statement reads. ➤ TIDBIT — GOING VIRAL: During a meeting with leaders of several African nations Wednesday, Trump praised Liberian President Joseph Boakai for speaking English, which is the primary language of Liberia. 'Such good English, such beautiful,' Trump said. 'Where did you learn to speak so beautifully?' 📹 Watch The federal layoffs got the green light: The Supreme Court greenlighted President Trump 's mass layoff effort, allowing the administration to follow through with laying off thousands of federal workers. For context: 'The apparent 8-1 emergency decision lifts the widest block on Trump's plans for massive reductions in force (RIFs). But a patchwork of injunctions that have yet to reach the justices remain in place, creating a jumbled situation that keeps reductions at specific agencies on ice.' COMING UP The House is out. The Senate is in. President Trump is in Washington. (All times EST) 2 p.m.: State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce briefs reporters. 💻 Livestream Friday: Trump plans to visit Texas after the fatal flash flooding. 🐝 INTERNET BUZZ 🍍🥥 Celebrate: Today is National Piña Colada Day. 🍟 Big day for McDonald's superfans: The Snack Wrap is finally back on McDonald's menus starting today (!) It was discontinued in 2016, but thousands of fans demanded it be brought back. Nine years later, it has finally returned! 'u did it. happy snack wrap day,' McDonald's posted on X. ⚠ ️ Throw away your Ritz cracker sandwiches if you have a peanut allergy: The manufacturer of Ritz cracker sandwiches issued an urgent recall due to a potentially 'life-threatening' labeling error. Some may say they have a cheese filling, when they actually are filled with peanut butter. 💤 Wake up, Hugh!: Actor Hugh Grant fell asleep behind Queen Camilla during Wimbledon. 👋 AND FINALLY…

My Mom Chose to Leave the U.S. Before She Could Be Taken
My Mom Chose to Leave the U.S. Before She Could Be Taken

Cosmopolitan

time10-07-2025

  • Cosmopolitan

My Mom Chose to Leave the U.S. Before She Could Be Taken

Leading up to the election, my mom thought about going back to Mexico before she could potentially be deported. It wasn't until February that she gathered me and my two siblings for a family meeting to break the news. She knew we would be fine because we're no longer living with her at 32, 29, and 23 years old. But I know she was thinking about her grandkids and the milestones she might miss. We're planning a quinceañera for my daughter in two years. Will she be there for that? Or my niece and nephew's baptisms? All those questions rushed through my head, but mostly, I worried for her safety. She didn't want to risk staying in the U.S. because her biggest fear is getting detained. My mom is strong, but she has been working all her life and has accumulated injuries, including a bad back and a bad hip. She's also a little bougie, and if she were detained, she'd pretty much be in jail. I didn't believe it when she told us. She's so Americanized—I couldn't see her going back, but I knew if my mom was going to feel safer and more comfortable in Mexico, then I had to make peace with it. My mom had humble beginnings in Mexico, but she built a new life with hope for better opportunities in the U.S. when she moved here in 1989. She started as a garment worker because that's what she knew. She would leave for work first thing in the morning, way before we ate breakfast. Because she wasn't able to drop us off at school, we were left with my aunt, who also lived with us because they immigrated here together. It was a full house of around 12 people because we shared the space with my 4 cousins and my aunt, who watched us and cooked for everybody while my mom worked 12-hour days. She was a seamstress, but her job had sweatshop vibes. The workers would get paid pennies per piece as they went through stacks of fabric and hemmed them together into wearable clothes. My mom wanted to be a teacher growing up, but she gave up on that dream for the reality of raising our family. She was exhausted once she got home from long days at work, but my siblings and I always made time to crawl into bed with her and watch telenovelas like La Fea Mas Bella, Teresa, and Destilando Amor. We loved spending time with her, no matter what we did. On the weekends, she would tell us to be ready so we could go out to eat. It wasn't anything fancy—we'd go to McDonald's and local Mexican restaurants. When garment work died down, she picked up different side hustles. She would make and sell food and desserts and sell perfume and even started delivering on DoorDash and Uber Eats to help us get by. My mom is undocumented, but she was granted a work permit. At one point, it expired, and she once had to renew it and go through the whole process of proving her eligibility and immigration status. We weren't in a financially good place. The filing fees range from $260 to $520, and at the time, it would have taken months to process her application. She didn't end up renewing it because of this delay, so in the early 2000s, my siblings and I looked into my mom applying for American citizenship. That's when she became paranoid about being deported. We would hear stories of people being forced to go to Mexico for up to 10 years as a penalty for seeking citizenship with an expired work permit. She was scared of everything, but life took over. She was used to living this way—to surviving. I first learned about ICE in middle school, when I did my first protest. It was 2006, and people were walking out of schools to protest the Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act, which would have made it a felony to be in the U.S. without legal status. It didn't feel as bad as it does now, but it still left a mark on me and my family. I knew that my parents were undocumented, and I knew if we—the ones who were born here—didn't say anything about it, ICE could just come and take my mom and my stepdad, who are both Mexican immigrants. For all of it to come back around 20 years later has me at a loss for words. When I saw Trump had won the presidency, I went completely numb. I didn't even want to know how bad it was going to get, and it's at its worst with his latest legislation. As the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' passes and ICE potentially becomes the most heavily funded law enforcement agency in the government, I can't help but feel disgusted. I couldn't rightfully celebrate Independence Day when everybody's losing their independence. It just seems so off. It reminds me of the Nazi era and tragic genocide that followed it. When we were sending my mom off in Tijuana, I told my family that I was going to record everything as a memory for us. Then I thought, Wait, this would be a good post for me to share on Instagram and TikTok. Like, 'Come with me to self-deport my mom.' It was such a crazy way to start a video, but I hoped that it would help people. My daughter was like, 'What are you doing? Why are you sharing this? This is why people hate influencers. Why are you recording?' My mom even told me not to post anything until she made it safely to Guerrero, where she is now. It's hard to come by a viral video that doesn't have hateful comments. The fact that my post reached people and had so many positive comments made me feel like I wasn't alone. I knew I was doing something right when I got DMs from people who voted for Trump, saying, 'This is not what I voted for.' The fact that I'm getting empathy from the other side threw me off and was the last thing I expected. It was important to me that putting this out there wasn't an advertisement to self-deport. A Spanish television network, Univision, and other networks were running ads from the Department of Homeland Security that warned illegal immigrants to leave the U.S., and it received a lot of backlash. I was upset by it, and I wanted to make sure that wasn't what I portrayed in my videos. But I also didn't want to tell people that they have to stay here, take the abuse, and get arrested. Even though this is still happening and people will be affected by this, knowing that my mom's safe with my grandma—whom she hadn't seen in 22 years—keeps me strong in this fight. She feels at peace since she's not paying rent out there so she doesn't have to look for work right away. At the same time, I see that she's struggling to readjust. She reassures me that she's fine, but then I'll see it in her eyes. The one thing my mom made me and my siblings promise is that we would be close. We agreed to see each other once a week, just like we did when she was here. Going on family outings without her doesn't feel right because her presence was very loud. I forget that she's so far away because we talk so much in our family group chat, but not being able to depend on her has been a crazy adjustment. I've been supporting local Mexican restaurants to fill the void of her home-cooked meals and to help the vendors, who are also struggling under the Trump administration. Latinos are more than just work or what we can provide to the economy—we're human beings, we're parents, we're children. With everything that's been happening under this administration, we're being treated like trash or some kind of pests. I want to move away from that narrative and remind people of our humanity.

AI bots fuel boycotts against Amazon, McDonald's over DEI reversal: analysis
AI bots fuel boycotts against Amazon, McDonald's over DEI reversal: analysis

New York Post

time09-07-2025

  • New York Post

AI bots fuel boycotts against Amazon, McDonald's over DEI reversal: analysis

Nearly a third of the posts on social media to boycott Amazon and McDonald's for rolling back their controversial DEI initiatives were generated by AI bots, a shocking analysis from a cybersecurity firm found. The coordinated campaign was behind 30% of the fake users making negative posts across X, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok, according to Cyabra, an Israeli disinformation security firm that analyzes public data using AI. 3 An AI bot linked to an article about a nationwide McDonald's boycott over its reversal of DEI policies. The organized digital attack included creating faux news sites — with names like Newsaz and The Worlds Best News — on Facebook last month that reported on the alleged McDonald's boycott, Cyabra found. McDonald's and Amazon each slashed their diversity programs in January, just before President Trump took office. Cyabra said it was not able to definitively identify who is behind the coordinated campaign, though it noted that The People's Union USA led a similar boycott against Target, which also consisted of AI bot attacks. The coordination between the social media boycotts against Target, McDonald's and Amazon is clear, said Jill Burkes, head of PR and communications at Cyabra. Posts slamming Target, McDonald's and Amazon all use the same slogans, visuals and hashtags, and the accounts tag one another and make posts in sync, she added. 3 Amazon slashed its diversity programs in January, just before President Trump took office. Sundry Photography – The firm analyzed more than 5,000 profiles posting about McDonald's across social media platforms from June 19 to June 26 and discovered 32% of them were fake. Many of these accounts focused on the fast-food giant's DEI reversal, using hashtags like #DEIrollback, #CorporateAccountability and #EconomicJustice. A whopping 35% of 3,000 accounts posting about Amazon from the start of this year through June 20 were fake, as well, according to Cyabra. A focused analysis of posts on X from June 1 to June 24 found that 55% of accounts involved in conversations targeting Amazon were fake These bots also used similar or identical hashtags, including #PrimeDayStrike, #AmazonStrike and #AmazonFail. The Post reached out out to Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, TikTok and X for comment. The campaign does not seem to align with a particular political agenda. Rather, it's focused on amplifying tensions between both sides, Burkes said. 'Some fake accounts post as progressive voices calling out DEI rollbacks. Others pose as conservative users, mocking the brands for going 'woke' in the first place. In some cases, bots even argue with each other,' Burkes told The Post. 3 Several posts from AI bots called for a boycott against McDonald's. Christopher Sadowski 'The goal isn't to pick a side, it's to manufacture polarization and draw real users into a louder, more emotional debate.' Fake profiles typically account for just 7% to 10% of activity across social media, according to Cyabra. But that percentage spikes during conversations around sensitive or polarizing topics, like politics, elections and war zones, the firm has found. Bots attempt to mimic grassroots activism and sometimes take a broader stance. Some posts related to the McDonald's boycott, for example, included hashtags like #WorkingClassPower and #EconomicBlackout. The Post reached out to McDonald's and Amazon for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store