logo
Two million immigrants can be deported in just three days, claims Telegraph writer

Two million immigrants can be deported in just three days, claims Telegraph writer

New European19-03-2025
'We can't carry on like this,' runs a headline across an online comment piece on the Daily Telegraph today. 'It's time for mass deportations.'
So begins an inflammatory piece as part of the site's week-long 'series of essays on immigration, one of the great issues of our times', this one by someone called Guy Dampier, billed as a 'senior researcher on nationhood at the Prosperity Institute'. If that body sounds unfamiliar, it's because it's the new name for the Legatum Institute, the right wing think-tank whose Brexit greatest hits included advocating for airships to patrol the Irish border.
Conceding that 'the concept of mass deportations still seems controversial' – which it is, to the point that even Reform leader Nigel Farage is queasy about the idea – Dampier advocates the UK should follow Donald Trump's lead in the US 'by leaving any international law agreements and repealing any laws which prevent the speedy deportation of those with no right to be here'.
The writer then goes on to claim that two million people could be forcibly removed in just three days – a timescale he has calculated by using the incredibly complex and detailed formula of…er, looking at the runway capacity of the UK's busiest airport.
'Heathrow has 1,400 flights every day, so in principle, two million illegals could be deported in just three days,' says Dampier.
In terms of heavy lifting, it is fair to say that the words 'in principle' are doing work here which would put the late, great Geoff Capes to shame. In order to perform the operation Dampier is advocating, not only would there need to be enough secure accommodation capacity within a relatively short distance of Heathrow for two million people over the space of several days at the very least – which there isn't – as well as the capacity for transport and the likely closure, for safety reasons, of major Greater London arterial roads for a number of days prior to and during this masterplan, there are one or two other things Dampier may not have considered.
These include the likely legal ramifications of a government commandeering an entire airport's operations for several days as well as taking control of every flight coming in and out – and, as only around 230 of those 1,400 flights every day are British, that would involve successfully negotiating with several dozen nations to use their flagcarriers to carry out what would be an internationally highly controversial operation. Oh, and then there's the economic impact of in effect cutting much of the world off from London for the best part of a week at least.
And even all that – most of which would be subject to legal appeals which would take years, if not potentially much, much longer – would be contingent on any government successfully locating, rounding-up and incarcerating two million so-called 'illegals', something which may just be hampered by the UK prison population currently standing at 87,556, just exceeding the operational capacity of 88,818.
And finally, while there is no evidence whatsoever that there are two million immigrants living illegally in the UK – and the Telegraph recently had to correct a nonsensical headline that 'up to one in 13 Londoners could be illegal migrants' – the source of Dampier's parting shot that 'when polled, 84 per cent of the British public supported so-called mass deportations' is just as bad.
The source was a GB News story citing a poll by little-known pollsters Find Out Now 'commissioned by Adam Wren, a young campaigner with a large following on X' – and even then, the 84% supported only 'the deportation of migrants who commit violent crimes', not 'mass deportations' more widely, as Dampier claims.
In other news, the Daily Telegraph still hasn't found a new buyer.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Government bracing for 'profound uncertainty' amid recession fears
Government bracing for 'profound uncertainty' amid recession fears

BreakingNews.ie

time25 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Government bracing for 'profound uncertainty' amid recession fears

It is shaping up to be a major week for the Government as it faces rising economic uncertainty. With fears of a recession and US tariffs looming, a new business support fund and major spending plans are on the table. Advertisement Newstalk's Daniel Pitcher said the Government is bracing for what it calls 'profound uncertainty' as fears grow over US tariffs and their impact on Irish exports. This Tuesday, the Government will publish the Summer Economic Statement, outlining €30 billion in extra capital spending to boost infrastructure, housing, and energy - bringing the total National Development Plan to nearly €100 billion. At the same time, Enterprise Minister Peter Burke is expected to announce a new contingency fund to help firms most exposed to US trade penalties. Up to 950 companies could benefit, with support to cover wages and daily costs. Ministers say it's part of a wider push to avoid recession and safeguard jobs.

NIGEL FARAGE: If you're a criminal, I'm putting you on notice. Follow the law or face serious justice
NIGEL FARAGE: If you're a criminal, I'm putting you on notice. Follow the law or face serious justice

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

NIGEL FARAGE: If you're a criminal, I'm putting you on notice. Follow the law or face serious justice

Britain is lawless. Over the past 20 years, crime has become commonplace across Britain – something Labour and the Tories have accepted rather than challenged. Labour's relentless focus on restricting free speech, raising taxes, and releasing hardened criminals early has come at the direct expense of policing and public safety. We must hold the Conservatives equally accountable, they've been in power throughout this crisis. They introduced the disastrous £200 shoplifting charter, effectively incentivising theft under that threshold and allowing criminals to face no real consequences. They eroded public trust and safety. There's no question: Britain is lawless and it needs Reform. That is why today I am laying out my party's plans for how we take back control of our streets from the criminals who currently plague them. Over the last 20 years, witnessing and experiencing crime has become normalised, with Britons feeling helpless and an overworked police force struggling to keep up. Government funding seems to be going to everything except keeping the people of this country safe on the streets and secure in their homes. Moreover, the Government seems to be doing everything it can to increase the likelihood of crime by importing droves of unvetted men into our towns and cities. Total crime is now 50 per cent higher than it was in the 1990s, and twice as high as in the 1980s. The current figures today are four times greater than they were in the 1970s. Something is fundamentally wrong with both our justice system and the approach towards criminal prosecutions. Our prison system is broken and, in most cases, at full capacity. Violent repeat offenders are being released early and in many cases people do not feel confident that reporting crimes to the police will lead to justice. A recent study has revealed that 44 per cent of violent crimes go unreported and over 64 per cent of robberies and thefts. One of the greatest measures of how a country is faring is the level of trust the public holds with government officials and their ability to keep us safe. From successive Labour and Conservative governments, that trust has been completely lost. By deporting 10,400 foreign prisoners, Reform will end the crisis of prison overcrowding. There's no justification for taxpayers funding the lives of criminals who shouldn't be here in the first place. Many break the law just by entering the UK, then commit further crimes once here – disrespecting our laws, culture, and civility. The only acceptable response is deportation. Reform will commit to the building of five new 'Nightingale' style prisons across the UK. Similar to what Denmark has done, we will negotiate a deal with countries such as Kosovo to ensure prison overcrowding is not a problem that occurs in Britain. For too long, Labour and the Tories have sent the message that crime in Britain carries little to no consequence. Reform will change that. We will ensure that the punishment actually fits the crime – not our current system where people are jailed for tweets while violent criminals walk free after serving a two-year sentence. Reform will build a justice system that properly investigates and prosecutes all crimes. Britain will no longer send the message that robbery, theft, and antisocial behaviour are acceptable. I will ensure any crime, big or small, will be investigated and perpetrators will face justice. Under a Reform government, we will have full-tariff sentences. Life will mean life if I am your prime minister. There will be no early release and no suspended sentences for serious violent offenders, sexual offenders and knife possession. We will end the £200 shoplifters' charter – all shoplifters will face arrest. We will also introduce mandatory life imprisonment for drug trafficking. Reform UK will be the toughest party on law and order this country has ever seen. We will cut crime in half. We will take back control of our streets, we will take back control of our courts and prisons. If you're a criminal, I am putting you on notice. In 2029 you have a choice to make: be a law-abiding citizen or face serious justice.

Should the voting age be lowered or raised and what about a top limit?
Should the voting age be lowered or raised and what about a top limit?

Metro

time3 hours ago

  • Metro

Should the voting age be lowered or raised and what about a top limit?

Do you agree with our readers? Have your say on these MetroTalk topics and more in the comments. Regarding Labour's announcement that the voting age will be lowered from 18 to 16 for the next general election (Metro, Fri). The young are more invested in the future of this country than voters in their 70s or 80s because they are the ones who will have to live with the consequences of political decisions made in the here and now. A great many of them are far more attuned to the challenges facing our nation and our planet. Age doesn't necessarily bring wisdom. Those who were stirred up by rabble-rousers on social media and went on to riot in the streets last year – burning libraries and looting shops – were by and large in their 20s, 30s and 40s. More pertinent, surely, would be to consider placing an upper age limit on voting, given that many in their twilight years will no longer have full command of their mental faculties and may tend to vote for more selfish reasons. It is said that voters tend to become more right-wing as they grow older and, as was amply illustrated by Brexit, this is often because they haven't thought through the implications of any political changes, since they are unlikely to have to contend with them. Encouraging people to participate in politics from an earlier age can only be a good thing. A great many of those who complain about politicians today don't even bother to vote, feeling they can't make a difference or that the outcome will have little effect upon them. Apathy is the enemy of social cohesion – an engaged population is good for the health of the nation. Julian Self, Wolverton I was absolutely sickened when I heard Sir Keir Starmer is allowing 16 and 17-year-olds to vote! Before last year's general election, he promised that if Labour won, he would grant the vote to EU nationals with settled status, who – unlike youth – contribute (or have contributed) to the economy of this country through their skills and taxes. I have lived in this country for more than 40 years and have a sound knowledge of the political, economic, security and defence issues it is facing. Is that the case with 16-year-olds? Thanks, Starmer, for breaking your promise and continuing to treat more than three million people as second-class citizens. This is a very strange and unfair concept of democracy! Marie-Claire Orton, Newcastle Upon Tyne, A Frustrated EU National Lowering the voting age to 16 is just another clutching-at-straws idea by a poor government that knows it will be voted out. The age should be raised to 21. There are so many things you are not allowed to do until you are even 18, such as leave education, so at least have a few years in the adult world before being allowed to make a decision about who runs the country – because at 16 your choices will be misguided. RCG, Bishop's Stortford Regarding the pair jailed for felling the Sycamore Gap tree (MetroTalk, Thu), they should be released as soon as it grows back to its former size. Our new neighbour has bulldozed all their plants and trees to make way for concrete extensions, outbuildings and a patio – all legal. No one speaks up for these well-established plants and trees. Mity, London I'd like to join Terry McCranor (MetroTalk, Fri) in raising a glass in toasting Rob Buckhaven's column on 'Why it's cool to chill red wine'. The British hospitality trade needs all the help it can get and this article should be flagged up on your website for months. That would allow diners and pub-goers to point to it when commenting or challenging restaurateurs and landlords about the temperature of red wine. More Trending Most staff have no idea about wine, or the best serving temperature, and pour red wine from bottles on shelves behind the bar. Perhaps a future column might include four cut-out business card-size summaries of it, so readers can pass them on to the food and drink emporiums they visit. Supermarkets and leading wine merchants must help, too, by insisting winemakers include relevant advice about red wine temperature on the back label. Warm red wine is horrible and unlikely to result in a repeat order from discerning customers. Lester May, Camden Town MORE: Don't expect water bills to stop rising after we overhaul sector, minister warns MORE: Who's next for Oleksandr Usyk? Joseph Parker could get his shot but a third fight with Tyson Fury cannot be ruled out MORE: Charli XCX and new husband George Daniel celebrate wedding with wild afterparty

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store