Santana 'Flying Under Radar' To Avoid Scrutiny Of Controversial Open-Pit Mine
Sustainable Tarras, a group representing the small rural community adjacent to the proposed mine, says that it has uncovered multiple instances of 'very worrying information' which has further heightened their concerns about the experience and approach Santana is taking to this huge project. The company has never built or operated a mine before.
Resource consent application without public notification intended to bypass locals [1]
In recent days, the group obtained a resource consent lodged by Santana to Central Otago District Council, covering a workers camp and various mine buildings. 'We are concerned about many aspects of this application, but even more so about the way it has been lodged,' said Suze Keith, Chair of Sustainable Tarras. 'For starters, the application appears to be missing critical detail and would therefore be likely to be ruled incomplete by the council.' This comes afte r an earlier resource consent application was also ruled incomplete by CODC.[2]
'On top of this current application seeming incomplete, they've asked CODC for a 'Non Publicly Notified' consent. Given the huge impact on adjacent landowners and residents, that is outrageous. The least they could do is to share and discuss these plans publicly well beforehand and ask for a publicly notified consent path. All this from a company which says they have good standing in the community, and claim to have been engaging well.
Operating in breach of District Plan
Ms Keith says that the group has also discovered that Santana has likely been operating outside of District Plan Rules for years.
"The company has operated an industrial factory in Bendigo that we believe to be in clear breach of the district plan for several years. This plant is used to process their drill samples and coordinate drilling crews that work on the proposed mine site nearby. It is outrageous that this overseas company has such disregard for our local regulations, and we are awaiting a council ruling on this. This kind of behaviour is of huge concern if they are to actually be granted consent for the mine in the future.'
Mine related works announced at very short notice to commence tomorrow [3]
'And it gets worse,' she said. "We learned that Santana on Thursday communicated to the local community that they will commence significant works in the area, affecting landowners with road closures and explosive blasting activities, with some of these activities starting as early as Monday. Yes, tomorrow.'
'To add insult to injury, Santana does not even have council approval for the majority of these works,' She said. 'It's beyond arrogant - in fact it's a callous disregard for the locally affected residents and indeed our local district council.
Cavalier approach
Ms Keith cited these findings as examples of 'the cavalier approach that this tiny Australian mining company takes towards a huge environmentally impacting project in our Outstanding Natural Landscape in Central Otago.' She said that these are not isolated examples.
The company continues to ignore Sustainable Tarras' reasonable questions [4] and claims local community drop in sessions without sharing important details on the project's impacts. 'Collectively these incidents speak volumes about how this company chooses to operate in our district and what we can expect going forward.'
Broken promises to the community
Ms Keith cited a pattern of promises broken to the community, which are emerging with increasing regularity and increasing impact.
'Santana has broken its promise to make expert reports available as soon as these were completed', she said. 'They have announced to the stock exchange that certain reports are completed, and have made comments about how comprehensive they are, but despite our requests will not share them with us. Why would they not make this information public? What have they found out that they don't want to share?
'An earlier plan to provide proper accommodation for its temporary workforce has been walked back - now proposed to be a large multi year workers campground, with temporary shelters and camp conditions. A far cry from quality accommodation.'
Ms Keith also pointed to a promise to locals to seal the Thomson Gorge Road, which 'now appears off the table as well'.
Local community locked out, disillusioned and seeking answers
Ms Keith said that the most recent findings this week have brought the group's concerns to a head. 'Yet again we see worrying decision-making from Santana that only increases disappointment and distress: the company keeps us locals in the dark, they grossly understate the effects on the local community in their applications and they want to rely on flying under the radar to speed things along without scrutiny.'
"In the absence of Santana providing clarity and detail about the impacts of their plans to the local community, we ask that our district and regional councils keep us fully informed as soon as they receive any information or consider making any project decisions", she said. 'It appears to be the only way we may get to fully understand and have some influence over what will otherwise be a massive shock with likely huge and lasting impacts and community outrage in the wider district.'
References 1-4 above available on the Sustainable Tarras website - at the following links
Resource consent application without public notification intended to bypass locals - link: https://sustainabletarras.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/250126-application.pdf
Earlier resource consent application ruled incomplete by CODC - link: https://sustainabletarras.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/210308v3-returned-incomplete-s88.pdf
Mine related works announced at very short notice - link: https://sustainabletarras.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/upcoming-early-works-for-the-bendigo-ophir-gold-project.pdf
The company continues to ignore Sustainable Tarras' reasonable questions - link: https://sustainabletarras.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/santana-mining-permit-application-feb-2025-sustainable-tarras-questions.pdf
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
39 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Tourism Holdings picks up speed as NZX trades flat on low volumes
The NZX Briscoe Group compounded Monday's gains, lifting 3.1% to 5.99. Robertshawe said the stock is continuing to benefit from joining the share market's main index in June. 'It shouldn't happen this way, but it does, just because it's in the 50, more people are looking at it, and so you'll get more people researching it.' NZ's largest electricity lines company, Vector, rose 2.26% to $4.53. According to Robertshawe, a couple of analysts from broking houses ('I think Forsyth Barr and Jarden') have upped their longer-term forecast and valuations for the stock recently. Tourism Holdings (THL) gained 9.09% to $2.16 on volumes worth just over $63,000. The campervan company informed the market in June that it had received a buyout offer. The $2.30 per share offer price represented a 57.5% premium over the at-the-time trading price of $1.46. 'It got under $2 when there's a bid at $2.30, potentially just around the corner. That seems a bit wrong. So that's not a surprising move,' Robertshawe said. Another company that is potentially being taken over, Vital, was up 1.16% to 43.5 cents. In June, Tait Communications, a Christchurch-based critical communications systems provider, made a formal offer to purchase the company for 45c per share and 13c per employee option. A significant product holder (SPH) notice released to the NZX by Vital on Tuesday showed Tait had upped its stake to 30.4%. The US Unlike the United States' S&P 500 and the Australian bluechip ASX 200, which are trading at all-time highs, the NZX 50 is still down nearly 3% for the year to date. Overnight, President Donald Trump threatened Russia with 'severe' tariffs and other financial penalties if the war in Ukraine does not end soon, in a meeting with Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte. That came after Trump said he would impose a 30% rate for Mexico and the European Union, which would kick in on August 1 if they did not accept better terms in the ongoing trade discussions with the two trading partners. Robertshawe said a state of inertia had set in and that markets appear to be ignoring news that would, in normal circumstances, move global stocks. 'Risks are clearly higher than February. Even if a tariff is stuck at 10%, it's still higher than they were before then. Earnings have been downgraded to 3% to 4% globally, and markets are at new highs. 'The market's saying, 'Despite it being riskier than it was, I'm happy to pay more for stocks'. And I think that is hard to understand from a fundamentals perspective.'
Newsroom
42 minutes ago
- Newsroom
Supermarkets impervious to bad headlines and court fines
Opinion: If you have the impression the big supermarket chains have been facing a lot of court cases over allegations of abusing competition, heavying suppliers or exploiting customers, then you're not wrong. The Commerce Commission reveals it will be filing civil proceedings against Foodstuffs North Island and its wholesale arm, Gilmours, for alleged cartel conduct. Essentially, it alleges they pressured a big food producer to cancel a deal to supply direct to a hospitality customer, and instead transact via the Foodstuffs firms. We've been hearing these sorts of allegations for more than 10 years now. In 2014, Shane Jones (who was then a Labour MP) sparked an inquiry by claiming in Parliament that New Zealand suppliers were being 'blackmailed' into making payments to the Australian-owned chain Countdown, to ensure their products continued to be stocked. He called it a 'shakedown' and an example of the ruthless 'dingo culture' of Australian corporations. Back then, I remember talking to big Kiwi food suppliers. Really big companies. Companies whose brands are household names. One senior manager at a food multinational told me the supermarket brought in top Australian managers to its south Auckland HQ, to review suppliers' terms. 'Suddenly you get invited into a windowless room at Favona Rd and you get ambushed.' But they were too scared to speak out publicly – 'people are nervous about getting that phone call inviting them to that windowless room' – and that's only slowly starting to change. Today, the focus is on both Woolworths (as Countdown is now branded) and perhaps more so, the New Zealand cooperatives that make up Foodstuffs. It started with the Commerce Commission market study of grocery competition. And from July 2021, one after another, Kiwi suppliers mustered the courage to speak publicly to Newsroom. First Sarah Hedger, the founder of a the small Yum Granola breakfast cereal maker in Nelson. Then Orchard Gold, Bloomsberry Chocolate and even the big fishing company Sealord. Yet just last week, the commission issued a warning to Foodstuffs North Island for its treatment of another supplier, arbitrarily obstructing and delaying the business from raising its wholesale prices. The commission is already prosecuting Woolworths for allegedly misleading consumers about the price they'd pay for groceries, and fake 'specials'. The owners of Foodstuff's Pak'nSave supermarkets in Mill St and Silverdale have pleaded guilty to similar charges. Earlier, Pak'nSave Mangere was fined $78,000 for promotional price discrepancies. The commission has taken action against both supermarket chains over restrictive land covenants. Last year, the High Court penalised Foodstuffs $3.25m for lodging anti-competitive land covenants with the purpose of blocking competitors. There are more ongoing Commerce Commission investigations, that may yet result in criminal charges or civil proceedings. And it's not just the commission that has unscrupulous supermarket behaviour in its crosshairs. Newsroom revealed in 2023 that police had won a judicial order forcing grocery giants Foodstuffs and Woolworths to change the way they do business. It was the result of a test case against Silverstream New World for illegal discounting of alcohol. That was followed last year by the Alcohol Regulation and Licensing Authority ordering more than 30 New World supermarkets' off-licences to be suspended, after a wider police case of illegal discounting. The question has to be, are these bad corporate citizens? Certainly, senior politicians in both National and Labour seem to have drawn that conclusion. Finance Minister Nicola Willis, like her Labour predecessors, has spoken loudly and firmly about her determination to crack down on supermarkets in order to rein in rising food prices. Foodstuffs managing director Chris Quin says his cooperatives are very focused on managing down prices. He claims a basket of food from Pak'nSave compares favourably in price with a basket from Aldi in Australia. He claims Foodstuffs has surveyed New Zealanders and most of them understand that rising prices are driving the continuing food inflation. 'Facts do matter a little bit. I know they can appear pretty complicated, but keeping it simple like that matters,' he told broadcaster Mike Hosking a month ago. 'But none of that makes it easier in terms of households meeting budget.' In response to the latest court case, spokesperson Stefan Herrick says Foodstuffs North Island and its stores are committed to complying with all their regulatory obligations, and cooperated fully with the Commerce Commission throughout its investigation. 'We strongly deny any unlawful conduct,' he says. 'As this matter will be before the court in due course, it would not be appropriate to comment further at this time.' Jon Duffy, the Consumer NZ chief executive, welcomes the Commerce Commission cases, which he says are difficult for regulators to detect. 'Complainants reporting this type of conduct often face the risk of retribution. When you are dealing with businesses on the scale of supermarkets, targeted retribution could wipe out a supplier's business.' Consumer NZ, too, reports heading off-the-record comments for years, about how supermarkets conduct their business and treat suppliers. 'We understand there is a significant number of other active cases on the commission's books relating to a range of supermarket conduct under the Commerce Act, the Grocery Industry Competition Act and the Fair Trading Act.' Duffy believes the series of cases, with warnings and guilty pleas, could indicate a culture issue within the Foodstuffs North Island cooperative – a belief it can act without consequence. It's got to the extent that last week, Willis said she planned to meet Fonterra chief executive Miles Hurrell to discuss how to get affordable cheese, milk and butter to New Zealanders. Willis said she was interested in how much of the recent price increases were due to Fonterra's wholesale prices, and how much was about a lack of supermarket competition. It's true that last month, Stats NZ figures showed the price of milk was up 15 percent, cheese was up more than 30 percent, and a 500g block of butter had risen 51 percent – and that's not entirely down to rising global dairy prices. This is an exemplar of populist retail politics – and her own coalition partner David Seymour was quick to differentiate Act's position. At the party conference this weekend, he acknowledged concern at people 'driving across the country just to buy butter at Costco in Auckland', but warned that Willis' proposal to break up the private grocery firms would scare off international investment. Jon Duffy acknowledges the politics involved. 'Yes, politicians have got headlines calling out the behaviour of the supermarkets in respect of consumers and suppliers,' he says, 'but that doesn't mean there isn't a significant issue to be addressed'. 'There is a clear difference in robust dealings between commercial actors and what could amount to anti-competitive behaviour. What's been alleged in the proceedings announced today is reminiscent of the excesses of the robber barons of the early 20th century which led to the establishment of competition law in the first place.' What's clear is that 10 years of increasingly robust Commerce Commission action has thus far failed to solve the problem. Chair Dr John Small says the commission does not tolerate this kind of behaviour and will not hesitate to take court action, where appropriate. What's also clear, after 10 years, is the supermarkets seem able to absorb the bad publicity, convictions and fines without it seriously hurting their businesses. They seem impervious. And that goes to the heart of the problem: no matter what Kiwi suppliers and consumers may think of the supermarkets' behaviour, they have few other choices about where to buy and sell their groceries.
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
West Coast Regional Council Chair Defends Rate Rises
The West Coast Regional Council is defending its rate rises, and contesting figures put out by Taxpayers' Union showing the council topped the country for rate hikes over the past three years. Council chair Peter Haddock said the figures were flawed. The West Coast Regional Council's [WCRC] total rates increase this year was in fact 18 percent - higher than the Taxpayers Union figure of 12 percent, he said. The council itself previously reported the increase as 12 percent, but the figure did not include targeted rates and charges for Civil Defence and the new District Plan. But the total rate rise over three years was lower than the Taypayers' Union figure of 65 percent, Haddock said. "Our cumulative rate increase was more than 10 percent less than that … it was still high at 55 percent over three years but there are very good reasons why Coast rates have increased," he said. The council had previously started to fail on delivering mandatory work programmes because of cost cutting in previous years, and it was running an unbalanced budget, using mining bond deposits and prudent flood protection reserves held on behalf of ratepayers, to cover operational costs, Haddock said. "As a council, we couldn't continue this approach which amounted to kicking the can down the road," he said. "It would mean the next generation had to pay for unbalanced budgets just to make increases in WCRC rate requirements look better on paper." The cost of administering the new combined District Plan had also landed on the regional council, along with the cost of upgrading flood protection for Westport, Franz Josef and Hokitika. "I know West Coasters are doing it tough, and I know average incomes for many people are considerably less than the rest of the country. But I also know kicking the can along isn't good business practice," Haddock said. The impact of the 18 percent rate rise on individual ratepayers would vary. "Those with properties with a higher capital value will pay more rates than those with a lower capital value, that is fair." "We will not … live beyond our means. The government expects us to be financially prudent, and more importantly, so do Coasters. We've worked hard to rebuild council and ensure it is positioned to deliver for the community." The WCRC's job was to create the environment for the community and businesses to thrive, the chair said. "Our environment is dynamic … we've been investing heavily in flood protection work to ensure our communities remain safe and businesses can keep operating." Striking the right balance between development and management of effects was difficult when those effects took a long time to appear or were not fully understood, but the council had to ensure future generations did not have to pay for its mistakes, Haddock said. As the council completed the flood protection schemes, the costs passed on to the community would significantly reduce, he said.
