Opening the door to buying a split-level home
This Wayland split-level is 3,046 square feet.
Jon Chase/The Boston Globe
Once commonly shunned by buyers, split-levels are no longer being written off.
The architectural style sprang up across the United States during the baby boom following World War II. From the 1950s to roughly the early 1980s, it was a popular choice for builders, as they could maximize square footage on relatively small lots. Because of this, split-levels are practically ubiquitous in many suburbs, including those in Greater Boston.
Yet they get a bad rap. Plenty of homebuyers associate split-levels with being unfashionably outdated — perhaps because in 1975, split-levels accounted for 12 percent of all new homes on the market, according to the National Association of Home Builders. 'In New England, they're tolerated but not beloved, in my experience,' said Kate Ziegler with
Advertisement
But that doesn't mean their minds can't be changed. Those clients Sullivan had been working with a few years ago? 'Sure enough, they bought a split-level,' said Sullivan, who works for
Advertisement
Similarly, Rahel Choi, a broker associate with
In today's high-priced market, some shoppers are increasingly seeing split-levels as suitable, budget-friendly homes with the potential for customization. Plus, when inventory is light, buyers become less picky, Sullivan added.
'Most buyers aren't actively seeking out split-level homes as their first choice, but with affordability top of mind, especially for those priced out of other property types, they're starting to consider a wider range of options,' Choi said. 'Split-levels often offer more square footage at a better price point, and savvy buyers are realizing that with the right updates, the layout and finishes can really be tailored to fit their style.'
Choi said that split-level homes that lean into their retro, mid-century pedigrees tend to drum up more interest, pointing to two split-levels that recently hit the market in the same week.
'The one with clear mid-century appeal received multiple offers and sold for about 14 percent over asking,' she said. 'The more traditional split-level? It only got one offer. Price definitely played a role, but the design and aesthetic clearly made a difference.'
One of the biggest selling points for split-levels is their adaptability for multigenerational living. Brian Harvey, owner of
Advertisement
'Split-level houses are abundant where we live. And they're great because it's essentially two houses: two ranch homes stacked on top of each other,' Harvey told the
Even when the downstairs living area isn't slated to become an in-law apartment with a full bathroom and kitchenette, Sullivan said having the extra living space can be attractive to both remote workers and families with young kids.
'I definitely see people using lower-level rooms in the splits as offices or at-home gyms,' she said. 'And I also always encourage people who have kids to go for them, because those bonus rooms downstairs are great for playrooms. You can hide all the toys downstairs, whereas the open dining room and kitchen flow upstairs can be your more classy, elegant entertaining area.'
Buyers may not be as quick to reject split-levels these days, but they still come with some legitimate drawbacks. The entryway, for one, is tight; it's often just a tiny landing that separates the two stairways.
'And when you walk in, there's no immediate coat closet. There's just limited space to put your belongings,' Sullivan said.
Plus, having multiple sets of stairs can be tough for those who'd like to
Even with their shortcomings, split-levels seem poised to shed their ugly-duckling reputation. What then will become the house style buyers shy away from most often? Victorians, Ziegler said.
Advertisement
'They need too much upkeep, if not actual renovation,' she said. 'First-time buyers right now are very wary of
Compared with homes built in the late 1800s and early 1900s, split-levels are quite contemporary. 'Exactly once I have had a client specify that they were interested in a split-level over other housing styles,' Ziegler said. 'But that preference had more to do with the age of the genre: 'newer' by our standards.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Synopsys Wins Global Tech Award for AI-Driven Chip Design Innovation
Synopsys Inc. (NASDAQ:SNPS) is one of the best software infrastructure stocks to invest in. On June 26, Frost & Sullivan announced that Synopsys had been honored with the 2025 Global Technology Innovation Leadership Award in the analog in-memory computing/AIMC segment. The recognition highlights Synopsys' AI-driven EDA suite and cloud-enabled design environment for accelerating AIMC development for next-gen, energy-efficient AI computing systems. Synopsys was specifically lauded for providing engineers with tools that simplify analog complexity, which reduces design time and boosts productivity for AIMC-based system-on-chip (SoC) architectures. Key recognized solutions include Synopsys PrimeSim, which is an NVIDIA GPU-accelerated SPICE simulator achieving up to 15x speed-up (projected to 30x with NVIDIA Grace Blackwell), and Synopsys Custom Compiler paired with PrimeWave Design Environment for robust analog and mixed-signal design. A close-up of a tech engineer soldering a modern system-on-chip circuit board in a laboratory setting. Additionally, Synopsys Cloud offers instant and browser-based access to the full EDA suite, which increases customer time to results by 40% on average. Other advanced capabilities mentioned are Synopsys for AI-driven layout-aware optimization and a mixed-signal flow providing 5x to 10x faster verification. Synopsys Inc. (NASDAQ:SNPS) provides electronic design automation software products used to design and test integrated circuits. Frost & Sullivan helps investors, corporate leaders, and governments navigate economic changes and identify disruptive technologies, megatrends, and companies to action for a continuous flow of growth opportunities. While we acknowledge the potential of SNPS as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Business Insider
13 hours ago
- Business Insider
Here are the 4 home trends that are hot in 2025
The NAHB asked 3,000 recent and prospective buyers what they want most in newly built homes. Newly built homes may be shrinking, but buyers aren't sacrificing comfort and quality. Buyers said that a great outdoor living space and smart technology are must-haves. Americans buying newly built homes are working with a lot less space, but that doesn't mean their expectations are any lower. In fact, it means they're looking to maximize every square foot. At the 2025 National Association of Real Estate Editors conference held earlier this month in New Orleans, Rose Quint, assistant vice president for survey research at the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), shared during a panel discussion what today's homebuyers value most. Drawing from NAHB's 2024 What Home Buyers Really Want report, a national survey of more than 3,000 recent and prospective homebuyers, Quint revealed that buyers are prioritizing spacious kitchens, ample outdoor space, and smart technology. "High home prices and elevated mortgage rates have made homebuyers keenly aware of what features add the most value to their daily lives," Quint said. "Buyers have determined that investing in the kitchen, in a patio, and home security features enhances the livability of a home." According to NAHB's survey, here are four trends shaping homebuying — from a bigger kitchen that focuses on efficiency to smart thermostats that allow homeowners to control their home's temperature remotely. 1. Buyers want a bigger kitchen. The American home may be shrinking, but one space buyers aren't willing to give up is the kitchen. "For those buying a smaller house, if that's what it takes to make the math work, we ask: What part of the home will you shrink? And they say, take the square footage from the home office, the dining room, even the living room, but for God's sake, stay away from the kitchen," Quint said. Homebuyers don't just want a large kitchen; they're looking for efficiency and a space that brings the family together. This means they're asking for bigger island spaces, walk-in pantries to store food and appliances, and even special-use storage for wine and spices. NAHB data shows that a central kitchen island is a top desired feature among buyers. In some luxury homes, Quint said buyers are even requesting two islands to accommodate cooking, dining, and entertaining needs. 2. Porches and patios are making a comeback. Outdoor living areas have become more important than ever, especially as homes get smaller and offer fewer gathering spaces. Survey data from the NAHB shows that 86% of respondents said they want a patio, and 81% said they'd like a back porch — a sign that porches are making a comeback. The numbers tell the story. In 2008, just 47% of newly built single-family homes had patios; by 2023, that figure had climbed to 64%. Likewise, the share of homes with porches rose from 60% to 68% over the same period. "Buyers want a patio. They want a front porch," Quint added. "They want exterior lighting to enhance the outdoor appeal of their home, landscaping, and a deck. If the home's shrinking, at least that space allows them to have more living space." 3. The modern McMansion can't beat a classic home. For a while, it felt like you couldn't drive through a neighborhood without seeing rows of boxy, modern homes. You know the look — white or gray stone exteriors, oversized rectangular windows, and often a flat roof. They may be trendy, but those minimalist builds may not be dominating the market after all. Today's buyers are leaning more toward traditionally designed homes inspired by classic styles like the kind of house you'd see on "Full House." While there's no clear majority when it comes to architectural preference, NAHB's survey found that 34% of respondents prefer traditional homes. Meanwhile, 26% favor contemporary designs, 17% lean toward bold modern styles, and just 12% prefer transitional homes, which blend modern aesthetics with traditional elements. 4. Homebuyers are tech-obsessed. From smartphones to smart cars, Americans crave cutting-edge tech, so of course, we want it in our homes, too. The NAHB found that the tech features homebuyers want most in their homes include wireless security systems, security cameras, video doorbells, smart thermostats that let them automate their home's temperature, and multi-zone HVAC systems so they can control the temperature in each room separately. "The reason these five features top the list is because homeowners are relying on technology to do two things: increase the safety of their home and improve temperature control," Quint said. "They want technology that works for them."
The Hill
21 hours ago
- The Hill
Senate Republicans' new SNAP proposal prompts GOP concern
A GOP-backed proposal that would shift some of the cost of food assistance to states for the first time is drawing renewed concern in the party, as critics argue the effort could lead to states cutting benefits on their own. Republicans are pushing to pass the proposal — which could see states with higher payment error rates covering a greater share of benefit costs — as a part of the broader spending cuts and tax package in the coming days. But that doesn't mean some Republicans aren't concerned about the measure. 'Our big thing is the data to be used, the data to be used on the error rate,' Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska.) told The Hill on Friday. 'So, that's important to make sure that the data is as accurate and reflective of the year you're judging as possible.' Numbers from the U.S. Department of Agriculture showed Alaska's payment error rate — which factors in overpayment and underpayment error rates — hit above 60 percent in fiscal year 2023. The national average hit at 11.68 percent. Sullivan noted the state has seen much lower payment error rates prior to the pandemic and is on a path to improving those figures, noting new numbers are expected soon. But he added, 'It's still higher than our traditional error rate, and as you know, the cost share is based in part on that.' According to the Alaska Beacon, the state's error rate hiked after state officials said they violated federal rules in order to continue feeding people amid a significant backlog in applications. Under the initial plan crafted by the Senate Agriculture Committee, Republicans sought to require states to cover some of the cost of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits if they have a payment error rate above 6 percent beginning in fiscal 2028. The proposal in the megabill would also allow states with rates below that level to continue paying zero percent. It also proposes states with higher payment error rates cover a greater share of benefit costs. If the error rate is 6 percent or higher, states would be subject to a sliding scale that could see their share of allotments rise to a range of between 5 percent and 15 percent. However, Senate Republicans tweaked the plan after facing a setback when their 'state cost-share' proposal was rejected by the chamber's rules referee as part of a megabill the party hopes to pass in the coming days. A release from the agriculture committee said the updated plan would allow states to choose the payment error either fiscal year 2025 or 2026 to 'calculate their state match requirement that begins in Fiscal Year 2028.' For the following fiscal year, the 'state match will be calculated using the payment error rate from three fiscal years prior,' the committee said, adding a 'state must contribute a set percentage of the cost of its SNAP benefits if its payment error rate exceeds six percent.' Asked about further potential changes to the plan, Agriculture chairman Sen. John Boozman (R-Ark.) said Friday that negotiators 'worked really hard to try and get a situation that worked for as many people as we could, and I think we've achieved that.' 'Alaska is a unique state, unique situation, so I know that everybody's trying to work hard to accommodate situations that don't fit,' Boozman said Friday afternoon. 'So, I haven't heard of any changes, and I'm sure that, you know, [Senate Majority Leader John] Thune [(R-S.D.)] will grab me if that comes about.' Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Ala.) also expressed concerns about the proposal, telling reporters earlier on Friday that she's raised them with others in the party, according to Politico. Asked briefly about the party's SNAP proposal later, Murkowski told The Hill, 'We're still in trouble on SNAP.' 'The implementation is still next to impossible for us,' she said. Republicans say the states' cost-share proposal would incentivize states to improve their error rates. But Sullivan and Murkowski aren't the only Republicans who have voiced concerns about the effort in recent weeks. Originally, the House plan called for all states to cover 5 percent of the cost of allotments in its initial version of Trump's megabill, with states that had higher payment error rates having to pay anywhere between 15 percent and 25 percent. However, the proposal was dialed back after concerns from other Republicans, including Sens. Tommy Tuberville (Ala.) and Jim Justice (W. Va.) over the measure. Asked if he's meeting with Boozman or Thune on the matter, Sullivan also told The Hill on Friday evening that he's 'meeting with everybody.' 'For me, it's just important to get the data as close to the date that you're judging,' Sullivan said, adding that he expects Alaska to see a notable drop in its error rate in a coming report.
