Trump's trip to Scotland as his new golf course opens blurs politics and the family's business
'At some point, maybe in my very old age, I'll go there and do the most beautiful thing you've ever seen,' Trump said in 2023, during his New York civil fraud trial, talking about his plans for future developments on his property in Balmedie, Aberdeenshire.
At 79 and back in the White House, Trump is making at least part of that pledge a reality, landing in Scotland on Friday as his family's business prepares for the Aug. 13 opening of a golf course bearing his name.
Trump will be in Scotland until Tuesday, and he plans to talk trade with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.
The Aberdeen area is already home to another of his courses, Trump International Scotland, and the Republican president is also visiting a Trump course near Turnberry, about 200 miles away on Scotland's southwest coast. Trump said upon arrival Friday evening that his son is 'gonna cut a ribbon' for the new course during his trip. Eric Trump also went with his father to break ground on the project back in 2023.
Using a presidential overseas trip — with its sprawling entourage of advisors, White House and support staffers, Secret Service agents and reporters — to help show off Trump-brand golf destinations demonstrates how the president has become increasingly comfortable intermingling his governing pursuits with promoting his family's business interests.
The White House has brushed off questions about potential conflicts of interest, arguing that Trump's business success before he entered politics was a key to his appeal to voters.
White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers called the Scotland swing a 'working trip.' She added that Trump 'has built the best and most beautiful world-class golf courses anywhere in the world, which is why they continue to be used for prestigious tournaments and by the most elite players in the sport.'
Trump went to Scotland to play his Turnberry course during his first term in 2018 while en route to a meeting in Finland with Russian President Vladimir Putin. But this trip comes as the new golf course is already actively selling tee times.
'We're at a point where the Trump administration is so intertwined with the Trump business that he doesn't seem to see much of a difference,' said Jordan Libowitz, vice president for the ethics watchdog organization Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, known as CREW. 'It's as if the White House were almost an arm of the Trump Organization.'
During his first term, the Trump Organization signed an ethics pact barring deals with foreign companies. An ethics framework for Trump's second term allows them.
Trump's assets are in a trust run by his children, who are handling day-to-day operations of the Trump Organization while he's in the White House. The company has inked many recent lucrative foreign agreements involving golf courses, including plans to build luxury developments in Qatar and Vietnam, even as the Trump administration negotiates tariff rates for those countries and others.
Trump's existing Aberdeenshire course has a history nearly as rocky as the area's cliffs.
It has struggled to turn a profit and was found by Scottish conservation authorities to have partially destroyed nearby sand dunes. Trump's company also was ordered to cover the Scottish government's legal costs after the course unsuccessfully sued over the construction of a nearby wind farm, arguing in part that it hurt golfers' views.
The development was part of the massive civil case, which accused Trump of inflating his wealth to secure loans and make business deals.
Trump's company's initial plans for his first Aberdeen-area course called for a luxury hotel and nearby housing. His company received permission to build 500 houses, but Trump suggested he'd be allowed to build five times as many and borrowed against their values without actually building any homes, the lawsuit alleged.
Judge Arthur Engoron found Trump liable last year and ordered his company to pay $355 million in fines — a judgment that has grown with interest to more than $510 million as Trump appeals.
Weissert writes for the Associated Press. AP writer Chris Megerian in Washington contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
23 minutes ago
- CNBC
Luxury carmakers flag combined costs of $889 million as U.S. tariffs bite
Luxury automakers Porsche , Mercedes-Benz Group and Aston Martin on Wednesday each laid out the painful impact of U.S. President Donald Trump 's trade war — to the tune of a combined $889 million blow. German sportscar manufacturer Porsche said U.S. import tariffs resulted in a 400-million-euro ($462 million) hit in the first six months of the year, while domestic peer Mercedes-Benz Group warned of a tariff effect of roughly 370 million euros in the second quarter. British luxury carmaker Aston Martin also issued a profit warning, citing the impact of U.S. tariffs and weak Chinese demand. The London-listed company, famed for both featuring in the iconic James Bond movies and for its history of financial ups and downs, said the "evolving and disruptive U.S. tariff situation was unhelpful to our operations" through the June quarter. Collectively, the luxury carmakers warned of combined costs exceeding 770 million euros, or $889 million, from U.S. tariffs. The flurry of corporate earnings has been reaffirming the impact of the Trump administration's trade measures on Europe's auto giants. The White House in April raised tariffs to 27.5% on European Union auto imports, seeking to protect and strengthen the U.S. automotive sector. Several carmakers have since sounded the alarm , particularly given the high globalization of supply chains and the heavy reliance on manufacturing operations across North America. European auto industry groups welcomed news of a U.S.-EU framework trade agreement earlier in the week, while simultaneously expressing deep concern about the costs linked to the new tariff reality. 'Not a storm that will pass' The agreement brokered on Sunday means the Trump administration will impose a blanket tariff of 15% on most EU goods. It represents a significant reduction from Trump's threat to levy charges of 30% from Aug. 1 and almost halves the existing tariff rate on Europe's auto sector. "We continue to face significant challenges around the world. And this is not a storm that will pass," Oliver Blume, chairman of the executive board of Porsche, said in a statement out Wednesday. "The world is changing dramatically – and, above all, differently to what was expected just a few years ago. Some of the strategic decisions made back then appear in a different light today." Shares of Porsche rose 2.4% on Wednesday morning, while Mercedes-Benz Group dipped 1.5% and Aston Martin fell more than 2%.
Newsweek
23 minutes ago
- Newsweek
GOP Senator: Congress Must Hold NATO to Its 5 Percent Defense Spending Commitment
The main benefit of alliances, such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), is deterrence. Our enemies are less likely to harm one of us if they know they'll have to face all of us. At the end of the day, though, an alliance is just a promise—built on mutual trust—stating that we won't leave each other to fight threats alone. An alliance will only deter threats if our adversaries sincerely believe that we will all stick together no matter what. If an alliance has loopholes, it's not really an alliance at all. That's why some of the fine print in NATO's latest defense spending commitment is so concerning. On the surface, it appeared as though every member of NATO agreed to increase its defense spending to 5 percent of its GDP by 2035—and I'm confident that many of our allies intend to do just that. A NATO flag is pictured. A NATO flag is pictured. MATEUSZ SLODKOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images But some of our friends in NATO have already begun to weasel their way out of this commitment. Spain, for example, has flat-out refused to spend 5 percent on defense. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez told NATO officials that Spain would only spend 2.1 percent on defense, adding, "It is the legitimate right of every government to decide whether or not they are willing to make those sacrifices." To clarify: Sánchez expects the American people to make sacrifices to contribute to our shared defense, but he doesn't want anyone in Spain to miss a single siesta for the cause. Does that sound like someone who would ride with you into battle? Still, NATO exempted Spain and made the 5 percent defense spending requirement optional for each country, turning its commitment into a wish list. The Spanish carveout isn't the only crack in NATO's commitment. Under the new agreement, only 3.5 percent of each country's spending needs to contribute to core defense needs, such as military, ammunition, and other standard warfighting needs. The remaining 1.5 percent of spending can be applied to almost anything the country can claim is beneficial to its defense. Italy, for example, is already planning to include a €13.5 billion bridge to Sicily as part of its 1.5 percent defense spending. The Italian government has long viewed the bridge, which would be the world's largest suspension bridge, as a possible economic driver. Under NATO's flimsy language, though, the bridge may count as defense infrastructure. This wouldn't be the first time our NATO friends skirted their defense responsibilities. In 2006, NATO agreed to have each member spend 2 percent of its GDP on defense. Only three members of the alliance had hit the spending goal by 2014, the same year that Russian President Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula. Putin's aggression prompted NATO to reaffirm its 2 percent defense spending goal in 2014. By 2022, only seven members of NATO had reached 2 percent, and, once again, Putin invaded Ukraine in a war that continues today. That should have been the final wake-up call our NATO friends needed to meet their 2 percent spending pledge. Still, NATO's latest numbers show that eight members, including Canada, Italy, and Spain, have not met the 2 percent spending goal. Yet we are supposed to believe they'll hit 5 percent defense spending by 2035. Friends tell friends the truth. When they don't, friendships fall apart—and our adversaries take note. Today, I am introducing a resolution to commend our NATO allies who agreed to increase their defense spending to 5 percent and to strongly urge every member of NATO to follow through with this commitment sincerely. If we want to deter our adversaries, we need real investments in our defense, not bridges that have little, if anything, to do with national security. NATO is one of the greatest defensive alliances in all of human history, but these loopholes make us weaker. The world needs to know we have each other's backs, and that starts by putting your money where your mouth is. Senator John Kennedy is a Republican senator from Louisiana. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Newsweek
23 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Map, List of Cities Hosting 'Rage Against the Regime' Protests on August 2
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. "Rage Against the Regime" demonstrations against President Donald Trump and his administration's policies are scheduled to take place across the U.S. on August 2. Newsweek has contacted the 50501 Movement, who is behind the protests, for comment via email. Why It Matters There have been several nationwide days of protests against the Trump administration since he returned to office in January, many of them organized by the 50501 Movement (50 protests, 50 states, one movement). Last month, millions took to the streets for "No Kings" protests on June 14, targeting a military parade in Washington marking the Army's 250th anniversary that coincided with Trump's 79th birthday. Protests in honor of the late civil rights icon and congressman John Lewis also took place on July 17, while "Free America" events were held across the country over the Fourth of July weekend. 'Rage Against the Regime' Protest Locations on August 2 "Rage Against the Regime" is the latest nationwide day of action organized by the 50501 Movement. In a press release, organizers called for "a mass mobilization to channel our collective rage against the Trump administration for its weaponization of ICE against our communities, construction of concentration camps, covering up the Epstein files, attacks on transgender rights, and its dismantling of Medicaid, SNAP, USAID, the Department of Education, NOAA, and the National Weather Service into collective action." More than 300 demonstrations are set to take place on August 2, according to the Rage Against the Regime website. A map shows where "Rage Against the Regime" protests are planned to take place on August 2. A map shows where "Rage Against the Regime" protests are planned to take place on August 2. Rage Against the Regime website Here's a look at one event happening in every state where protests have been planned. To see all the events taking place, you can visit the website. What People Are Saying Hunter Dunn, 50501 National press coordinator, said in a statement: "The Trump administration's heralding of American neo-fascism has given us plenty to rage about. When our so-called representative government builds concentration camps and funds genocide, it becomes clear that, as Tom Morello said: 'Some of those that work forces are the same that burn crosses.'" What's Next The protests will take place in states across the U.S. on August 2. According to a messaging guide for organizers, it is a day to "come together to transform anger into action, harnessing the energy of collective resistance."
