Hillary Clinton lambasts 'dumb' Trump administration over Signal chat leak in NY Times essay
The former Democratic presidential candidate and secretary of state assailed President Donald Trump and his team as careless and stupid over its short tenure in office so far.
"It's not the hypocrisy that bothers me; it's the stupidity. We're all shocked — shocked! — that President Trump and his team don't actually care about protecting classified information or federal record retention laws," Clinton wrote. "But we knew that already. What's much worse is that top Trump administration officials put our troops in jeopardy by sharing military plans on a commercial messaging app and unwittingly invited a journalist into the chat. That's dangerous. And it's just dumb."
Clinton posted on X earlier this week, "You have got to be kidding me," in response to the news from The Atlantic that editor Jeffrey Goldberg had been accidentally included on a group Trump administration chat about attacking Yemen. Clinton's use of a private email server at the State Department and accusations she mishandled classified information dogged her unsuccessful 2016 presidential camapign.
Clinton boasted in the Times essay that she employed "smart" power as the first secretary of state under President Barack Obama.
"The Trump approach is dumb power. Instead of a strong America using all our strengths to lead the world and confront our adversaries, Mr. Trump's America will be increasingly blind and blundering, feeble and friendless," Clinton wrote.
Among Clinton's complaints were the Trump administration's gutting of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), closing embassies and consulates, and layoffs within the government hitting intelligence agencies.
Clinton hammered away at the theme that Trump's team was unintelligent, calling various Trump administration moves "not smart," "dumb power," "dumb," and "dumb and dangerous."
She also contrasted the Trump administration's government trimming initiative, DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) with her husband's work in the 1990s.
"During the Clinton administration, my husband's Reinventing Government initiative, led by Vice President Al Gore, worked with Congress to thoughtfully streamline bureaucracy, modernize the work force and save billions of dollars. In many ways it was the opposite of the Trump administration's slash-and-burn approach. Today they are not reinventing government; they're wrecking it," she wrote.
Clinton's attacks on Trump come at the end of a week dominated by the Signal chat leak news.
The Atlantic has posted the private messages which it says show a severe national security breach, while Trump Cabinet members have maintained no classified material was discussed in the forum.
Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former Gov. Andrew Cuomo is running for NYC mayor as an independent
NEW YORK CITY (PIX11) — Former Gov. Andrew Cuomo has officially launched his independent bid for New York City mayor after losing the Democratic primary. In a video post to X, Cuomo said he's 'in it to win it' and ready to face off against state Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani, who won the Democratic bid, come November. He recently created an independent party called the 'Fight and Deliver' party. More News: Politics 'The fight to save our city isn't over,' Cuomo said. 'You deserve a mayor with the experience and ideas to make it happen again.' Mamdani beat Cuomo in the primary with 56% of the vote, according to Board of Elections data. Cuomo accused Mamdani of offering only 'slick slogans' but no real solutions. 'Unless you've been living under a rock, you probably know that the Democratic primary did not go the way I had hoped,' he said. The two will also face Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa and independents Mayor Eric Adams and Jim Walden in November. Adams said Cuomo asked him to drop out of the race after the primary. Emily Rahhal is a digital reporter who has covered New York City since 2023 after reporting in Los Angeles for years. She joined PIX11 in 2024. See more of her work here and follow her on Twitter here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Copper Tariffs: A Risky Gamble for U.S. Industry
The mainstream news media has already figured out that the Trump administration's proposed tariffs on imported copper of 50 percent would dramatically hike copper prices for American industry and raise the price of products containing copper for consumers, which is just about everything electrical. The reason is simple; The United States is a net importer of 45 percent of its copper needs according the U.S. Geological Survey. All right, you may say, so there will be some short-term pain until the United States develops enough new copper mining and refining capacity to be self-sufficient. First, it's not easy to build such capacity. New mines can take years to build, assuming you already know where the copper is. As for copper refining, few people want such facilities near them so half the challenge is quelling the opposition to any new refining operations. They also take years to build. Now nobody is going to spend money building new copper mines and refining facilities unless there is a guarantee that the price of copper will stay sufficiently elevated to justify such investments. Even if the proposed tariffs on imported copper were to go into effect, there can be no guarantee that they would be maintained for the couple of decades that investors need for such long-term investments to pay off. I suppose it's possible that all these new investments would be profitable even if the tariffs are later rescinded. But if the mines and refineries are built on the premise of long-term tariffs, high prices for copper will be part of the profitability analysis. It's certainly possible to construe the proposed copper tariffs as a bargaining position, that the Trump administration will never actually impose them or that they will be much, much lower. But one thing the administration has proven to be regarding tariffs is dramatic. While the general sentiment has been crystallized into the acronym TACO, meaning "Trump always chickens out," he may not this time. In any case, even if the United States wants to become more self-sufficient in the production key minerals, as I've explained previously, this would be very difficult, either because the country lacks the in-ground resources or because what resources it does have would be too expensive to develop. Attempting to do so would likely require either 1) substantial long-term tariffs that might break the back of the domestic industries that use these minerals for their products or 2) huge government subsidies that might prove unpopular with the public. PS. Let the subsidies begin! As I was finishing this piece, the U.S. Department of Defense agreed to become a 15 percent shareholder of MP Materials, a U.S.-based rare earth element miner and processor. The DOD guaranteed that for 10 years it would purchase all the high-strength magnets and all the neodymium-praseodymium oxide minerals produced by new facilities financed by the investment at prices that insure profitable operation. This demonstrates how critical the DOD believes these products are for defense purposes. Of course, the arrangement doesn't do anything for American industries that are also in need of domestic sources of these magnets and minerals because the Chinese government—which controls most of the rare earth market—has severely restricted exports of these minerals and related products such as high-strength magnets. By Kurt Cobb via Resource Insights More Top Reads From this article on Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
New York Post
19 minutes ago
- New York Post
Colo. DA 'will be recalled' in case of trans sex offender accused of trying to kidnap boy
A Democratic prosecutor in Colorado 'will be recalled'' for moving to dismiss charges against a transgender sex offender accused of trying to kidnap a boy from a schoolyard, a local pol told The Post on Monday. The district attorney's office in Colorado's 18th Judicial District told Fox31 that it is planning to drop the raps against Solomon Galligan, 33, after he allegedly attempted to snatch the 11-year-old during recess at Black Forest Hills Elementary School in Aurora in April 2024. 3 Suspected wannabe child-snatcher Solomon Galligan looks eerie in his mugshot. Aurora police department Advertisement Galligan underwent a competency evaluation after his arrest and was found 'mentally incompetent,' the DA's office said. 3 Arapahoe County District Attorney Amy Padden is moving to dismiss charges against the alleged kidnapper. Office of the District Attorney for the 18th Judicial District Prosecutors said they're now 'planning to drop charges against the defendant, which is required by law when they are found mentally incompetent to stand trial.' Advertisement But Aurora City Councilwoman Danielle Jurinsky disputed that stance and told The Post an 'effort' to 'recall' Democratic DA Amy Padden 'is well under way and will begin this week' — and ensured that it will be successful. 'The conduct of the 18th DA over the past six months is beyond deplorable. This is simply the icing on the cake,' said Jurinsky, a Republican. 'The progressive attitude will not be tolerated,' she said. 'While certain state laws highlight deeper issues in the state of Colorado, Amy Padden will be recalled for her part in not upholding the laws and punishing criminals.' 3 Security footage of the kidnapping attempt outside an elementary school shows children running from the criminal. KDVR Advertisement The suspected sex fiend's older sister, Sarah Galligan, even told 9News in April 2024 that her brother has been in and out of jail for 12 years and that it's not safe for community or himself to be out on the streets. She said her sibling, who was diagnosed with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder when he was 16, was deemed unfit to stand trial in previous instances and wasn't institutionalized because of a shortage of beds in mental-health centers. 'It just really sucks he had to do something so eye-catching for everybody to see he's not well, and he's not OK to be out and be on his own,' she said at the time. Amanda Morris, Solomon's niece, added, 'This has been like the fourth time that we're sitting here thinking, 'How the hell did he get released? Who's letting him out?' ' Advertisement Solomon Galligan shared the news of his gender transition in a 2011 Facebook post and later identified as a woman. That same year he was placed on the sex-offender registry after he was convicted of non-consent sexual contact. 'So im starting my hormone shots and i relly cant wait im on my hormone pills ive been on them for almost 4 months i wake up all depressed and crying but in the end its gonna be totally worth it you know what io mean im really excited my measurements are already changing and im super thrilled,' he wrote at the time. During his latest alleged crime, Galligan was captured on surveillance video approaching students playing in a field just moments before they scattered and screamed, 'Stranger danger!' Galligan allegedly grabbed one of the youngsters but lost his grip when he tripped on a white blanket he was carrying, according to a police report. The young child later told cops that Galligan had white powder smeared on his face and reeked of alcohol. Galligan fled the scene but was located by cops at a nearby Walgreens. The DA's office told The Post in a statement, 'We have not yet filed the formal motion to Dismiss. Advertisement 'We have until the end of the month to do so. The defendant is being civilly committed into mental health treatment. However, we are legally prohibited from discussing the details surrounding his competency beyond saying that he's been found mentally incompetent to proceed. 'When a defendant is found incompetent to proceed, we are legally obligated to dismiss charges. Our hands are tied based on the findings of competency. However, they are not being released to the public.'
