
News Analysis: The healthcare cuts approved by Trump, Republicans go well beyond Medicaid
Covered California, the state's Affordable Care Act health insurance marketplace, estimates that as many as 660,000 of the roughly 2 million people in the program will either be stripped of coverage or drop out due to increased cost and the onerous new mandates to stay enrolled. Those who do stay could be hit with an average monthly premium increase of up to 66%.
This is Phil Willon, the L.A. Times California politics editor, filling in for columnist George Skelton this week.
To find out more about how the millions of Californians who rely on Covered California for health insurance will be affected by Trump's megabill, I spoke with Jessica Altman, the organization's executive director.
We spoke on Thursday, while the Republican-led U.S. House of Representatives was voting to approve the reconciliation legislation. According to estimates by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the package will lead to 11.8 million more people going without health insurance nationwide over the next decade.
Covered California serves as a marketplace exchange for state residents seeking healthcare insurance under the federal Affordable Care Act, widely known as Obamacare, allowing them to select from name-brand insurance providers and choose from a variety of coverage plans.
'A quarter of the people we cover are sole proprietors. That's everything from mom-and-pop Etsy shops to a consultant, a highly educated tech worker in San Francisco doing contract work. We really have that full spectrum,' Altman said.
Covered California also serves as a health insurance sanctuary for residents whose income rises enough for them to lose eligiblity for Medi-Cal, as Medicaid is known in California, or those who work for companies that don't provide benefits.
The current cost for basic coverage ranges from $0 a month for individuals earning around $21,000 — just above the income eligibility for Medi-Cal — to 8.5% of the income of people making $75,000 or more, Altman said.
The vast majority of Californians receive federal subsidies to lower their premiums, including many middle-income families who had become eligible when Congress expanded the financial assistance in 2021.
Those subsidies were not renewed in the Trump megabill. In theory, the Republican-led Congress could remedy that before the end of the year but, given that Trump spent most of his first term in office trying to repeal the Affordable Care Act, the odds of that appear slim.
'We have many, many people paying less than $10 a month for their health insurance. We're going to lose that price for sure,' Altman said. 'We also have people, that person making $75,000 a year … they're going to lose all of their tax credits and potentially pay hundreds more a month.'
And that price increase will start to hit home in four months, when Covered California's open enrollment signup period begins for 2026.
Thousands of Californians will drop their coverage because they can no longer afford the expense, Altman predicts.
'This is a moment where Americans and Californians are so financially strained: Their rent, their food, their gas, their child care, all of their transportation, all of these things,' Altman said. 'They are not in a position today where they feel like any of those costs can rise by 66%.'
Altman said the governor and California Legislature budgeted an additional $190 million for Covered California, which hopefully will help reduce the number of residents who will lose their healthcare coverage. But, she said, it's nowhere near enough to make up for the federal cuts.
Approximately 112,000 lawful immigrants in California also will be stripped of premium tax credits and cost-sharing support, essentially pushing health coverage out of financial reach, she said. That includes immigrant groups that have been eligible for assistance for years, including those with work and student visas, refugees, asylees and victims of human trafficking.
'They are limiting it so only green card holders and a couple of very nuanced categories of certain Cuban immigrants and certain immigrants from Pacific Island nations can get financial assistance,' Altman said.
Immigrants who grew up in the United States after being brought here illegally as children, a group known as 'Dreamers,' will be stripped of their eligibility, Altman said.
Thousands more Californians likely will drop coverage because of new burdensome verification requirements, including increased tax filings, and bureaucratic hurdles that must be overcome to maintain eligibility.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom already has warned that the cuts to Medicaid in what Trump calls the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' a cornerstone of his second-term agenda, will lead to hospital and clinic closures, especially in the state's underserved rural areas.
Altman said that impact will be exacerbated by the tens of thousands of Californians expected to lose their medical insurance they secured through Covered California. Medical facilities received higher compensation to care for patients who secured health insurance through Covered California than they do for patients on Medi-Cal. And hospitals and clinics will now take an even greater financial hit for caring for Californians with no health insurance, raising healthcare costs for everyone else.
'We know people will get less healthcare. They will not get their preventive care, they will not get their primary care at the rates that they do when they're covered,' Altman said. 'But when they really need care, they're going to go get it. They're going to get it at the emergency room, and our system is going to pay for it anyway.'
The must-read: Valadao votes for a Trump megabill expected to disrupt healthcare for many in the Central Valley The TK: Gov. Newsom will visit South Carolina, a pivotal presidential primary state The L.A. Times Special: Kidnappers or ICE agents? LAPD grapples with surge in calls from concerned citizens
—Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here to get it in your inbox.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
33 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Admin Sues California Over Soaring Egg Prices
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Trump administration has sued California over its animal cruelty laws, saying the state's regulation of chicken farms has led to high egg prices across the country. Lowering the cost of eggs, which spiked in recent years as an avian flu outbreak ravaged American flocks, was one of President Donald Trump's key campaign promises in the lead-up to the 2024 election. But almost six months into his second mandate, his administration has struggled to keep the cost of the staple down. The administration now says California's regulations create "unnecessary red tape" in the production of eggs and are responsible for stubbornly high prices. The lawsuit is the latest flash point in the ongoing battle between the U.S. president and the Democratic-led state, which has clashed with the Trump administration over its aggressive immigration policies and transgender rights. "Trump's back to his favorite hobby: blaming California for literally everything," the office of California Governor Gavin Newsom wrote on X, formerly Twitter, about the lawsuit. "Next up: @CAGovernor Gavin Newsom caused the fall of Rome and sent the asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs!" What Is the Lawsuit About? The lawsuit, which the Trump administration filed in Los Angeles federal court, blamed the Golden State's animal cruelty laws—widely regarded as among the strictest and most progressive in the nation—for creating the conditions that led to the current spike in egg prices across the country. The laws, the Trump administration argued, have prevented "farmers across the country from using a number of agricultural production methods which were in widespread use—and which helped keep eggs affordable." Under Proposition 2, an initiative approved by California voters in 2008 and implemented in 2015, the state forbids farmers from packing chickens together so close that a hen cannot "lie down, stand up, fully extend its limbs, and turn around freely." Essentially, the state bans the use of chicken battery farms, a method of intensive egg production where hens are stacked in rows and rows of tiny cages, which restrict their natural movements and can cause the animals high levels of stress and frustration. A composite image of a supermarket shopper walking past an egg display in Monterey Park, California, on February 10 and an inset of President Donald Trump in the State Dining Room of the White House... A composite image of a supermarket shopper walking past an egg display in Monterey Park, California, on February 10 and an inset of President Donald Trump in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 9. More FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images;Proposition 12, an initiative backed by California voters in 2018 and implemented in January 2022, outlawed the use of cages for egg-laying hens, sows and calves raised for veal, giving specific requirements of how much space farmers must give to their animals. Crucially, it also banned the in-state sale of products from caged animals raised out of state. The Trump administration's lawsuit argued that the federal Egg Products Inspection Act of 1970 should preempt any California state laws related to eggs. This law, the lawsuit says, gives the Departments of Agriculture and Health and Human Services the authority to regulate eggs to protect consumers' health and welfare, and it requires "national uniformity" in egg safety standards. "It is the prerogative of the federal government alone to regulate the quality, inspection, and packaging of eggs," the Justice Department wrote in its civil complaint. "Americans across the country have suffered the consequences of liberal policies causing massive inflation for everyday items like eggs," Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement. "Under President Trump's leadership, we will use the full extent of federal law to ensure that American families are free from oppressive regulatory burdens and restore American prosperity." It is not the first time that California's animal cruelty laws have been challenged in court. In 2014, six states—Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Alabama, Kentucky and Iowa—sued California over its egg regulations. The states lost both in a federal district court and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Other states—including Colorado, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, Oregon and Washington—have laws requiring eggs sold in the state to be from cage-free hens. In February, Nevada temporarily relaxed its cage-free requirements because of the shortages, but the rules were restored in June. How High Are Egg Prices? According to the latest consumer price index, egg prices nationwide averaged $4.55 per dozen in May—up from $2.69 a year earlier, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The main reason behind higher egg prices is that supply has shrunk as a direct consequence of the avian flu that broke out in the country in February 2022 and has since wreaked havoc among American flocks. Under federal policy, to prevent the spread of the virus, entire flocks must be culled if even a single infected bird is found on a farm. Cage-free hens proved to be particularly vulnerable to the virus. In 2024, according to NerdWallet, cage-free hens represented almost 60 percent of all bird flu cases for the year, even as they accounted for about a third of egg-laying hens in the U.S. In January, the White House blamed the Biden administration for killing more than 100 million birds, most of which were egg-laying hens. The Trump administration's lawsuit against California does not mention the avian flu that has laid waste across the U.S. egg industry and led to the culling of millions of birds across the country over the past few years.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House advisor sends hard-nosed message to Apple
White House advisor sends hard-nosed message to Apple originally appeared on TheStreet. President Trump began a wild tariff ride when he started his second term. On April 2, Trump announced "reciprocal tariffs" on all countries not subject to other sanctions, and additional tariffs for 57 major trading partners were planned for April 9, but were later paused. Trump also imposed 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico, but later exempted products that were compliant with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. 💵💰 Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter💰💵 The United States and China reached an agreement in Geneva in May to temporarily slash tariffs in an effort to de-escalate the trade conflict between the two countries. The joint statement revealed the US will temporarily decrease its average tariffs on Chinese products from 145% to 20% and China will reduce its duties on American products from 125% to 10%. The pause on additional "reciprocal tariffs" was supposed to expire on July 9. However, on July 7, Trump extended the pause to August 1 while at the same time sending "tariff letters" to some countries, warning they would be subject to a new tariff rate if they didn't reach an agreement with the US by the new deadline. It appears that the on-again, off-again tariff situation has been best described by an asset management firm, Franklin Templeton: "Continued uncertainty appears to be the only certainty." Technology is one of the industries heavily impacted by trade wars. Among the many tech giants, one is gaining special attention tariff-wise: Apple. In February, the tech giant announced it plans to invest $500 billion in the United States, which was praised by Trump. In April, the government announced that certain electronics like smartphones and laptops would, at least temporarily, be excluded from the tariffs placed on China. However, officials have indicated that additional, sector-specific tariffs on electronics are to tariffs, Apple () made a major move: It shifted more of its iPhone production to India, reducing its reliance on China. In March, it shipped nearly $2 billion worth of iPhones to the US, a record amount for its two India-based suppliers. Shifting production to India provoked Trump, who wanted new tariffs to boost US production instead of moving production from China to other countries. "I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else," Trump wrote on Truth Social in May. "If that is not the case, a Tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple to the U.S." Later that same day, Trump explained that tariffs would not only impact Apple but also other tech companies such as Korea's Samsung. More Tech Stocks:More recently, White House trade advisor Peter Navarro commented on Apple's overseas production. During an interview on CNBC's "Squawk on the Street," Navarro went straight after Apple's CEO, saying: "Going back to the first Trump term, Tim Cook has continually asked for more time in order to move his factories out of China. I mean it's the longest-running soap opera in Silicon Valley." According to Navaro, Cook isn't moving manufacturing out of China quickly enough, writes CNBC."With all these new advanced manufacturing techniques and the way things are moving with AI and things like that, it's inconceivable to me that Tim Cook could not produce his iPhones elsewhere around the world and in this country," Navarro said. How complicated would it be to move iPhone production to the US, and what would be the consequences? Wedbush Securities Senior Analyst Dan Ives previously warned that moving Apple's manufacturing to the US could make an iPhone priced at around $3,500, probably making many people reluctant to even consider buying. The time it would take to relocate production is estimated to be five to 10 years. "We believe the concept of Apple producing iPhones in the U.S. is a fairy tale that is not feasible," Ives said, according to Barron' House advisor sends hard-nosed message to Apple first appeared on TheStreet on Jul 9, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jul 9, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

USA Today
35 minutes ago
- USA Today
US stock futures lower as investors mull more Trump tariffs
U.S. stock futures are lower as investors mull more tariffs from President Donald Trump. Trump slapped a 50% tariff on Brazil, and Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said his country would respond. The levy on Brazil comes after Trump sent letters with new U.S. rates on the imports of at least seven additional countries. Earlier this week, he sent letters to 14 other countries, such as Japan and South Korea. These tariffs would go into effect Aug. 1 if the countries do not agree to a trade deal. The European Union expects to reach an outline trade agreement with the U.S. this week. At 6:15 a.m. ET, futures linked to the blue-chip Dow fell -0.18%; while broad S&P 500 futures slipped -0.12% and tech-heavy Nasdaq futures dropped -0.09%. Stocks closed higher, with the Nasdaq closing at a record high as Nvidia briefly reached a $4 trillion valuation, and Federal Reserve's meeting minutes fueled hopes that inflation pressures from tariffs would not derail interest rate cuts this year. The minutes showed most Fed members expected price increases from tariffs to be "temporary or modest." Jobless claims data for the week ending July 5 is due before the bell. Economists polled by Dow Jones are expecting an increase of 2,000 to 235,000 from the previous week. Corporate news Cryptocurrency Donald Trump Jr. purchased 350,000 shares in social media company Thumzup Media Corp for more than $4 million. Thumzp Media recently adopted a bitcoin treasury strategy and now holds more than $2 million worth of bitcoin. Separately, Apple has approved the first iOS game allowing players can spend small amounts of bitcoin for in-game extras. Payments go through ZBD's technology, which handles fast, low-cost payments without leaving the app. Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at mjlee@ and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday.