
‘The UN Is Here To Do The Right Things': Envoy Colin Stewart Bids Farewell But Keeps The Faith
' I started feeling very idealistic about the UN, and I've never lost that feeling,' Mr. Stewart told UN News in an exclusive interview.
In early August, he steps down as the Special Representative of the Secretary-General and head of the UN Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus (UNFICYP).
His departure comes at a moment of cautious optimism on the island. Just last week, the Secretary-General reported that talks between the Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot leaders were 'constructive', with 'common understanding' on new initiatives.
Mr. Stewart called the talks 'an important step' in maintaining momentum.
'We are at a bit of a challenging moment for Cyprus because of upcoming elections in the north and other dynamics,' he explained. 'The intent was to keep the ball rolling and keep the momentum going, and I think that succeeded.'
Peace by preventing sparks
Looking back at his tenure in Cyprus, Mr. Stewart likened UNFICYP's daily work to stamping out sparks before they ignite.
'There are all sorts of activities happening in the buffer zone every day, each with the potential to escalate,' he said. ' Our job is to prevent those sparks from bursting into flames. When I report to the Security Council that things are calm, it means we have been successful. '
Our job is to prevent sparks from bursting into flames. When I report to the Security Council that things are calm, it means we have been successful.
The numbers bear out his point: in more than half a century of UN peacekeeping on the island, not a single shot has been fired between the two militaries.
' Some people ask why the peacekeeping mission is still needed, given that it's been peaceful for 50 years…the answer is simple – it's peaceful because the mission has been doing its job. Without it, the deep mistrust between the sides could easily spiral into confrontation.'
Lessons on trust and empathy
Mr. Stewart also served as the Special Adviser on Cyprus, leading the Secretary-General's good offices to support a comprehensive settlement. The greatest obstacle, he said, lies not in public sentiment but in political will.
' The people get along fine,' he noted. ' Millions cross from one side to the other every year without incident. But among political leaders, distrust runs so deep that even the idea of compromise is viewed negatively. '
This distrust, he said, is rooted in decades of hardline narratives that portray the other side as an enemy rather than a partner. Breaking those narratives is essential.
'Peacebuilding requires not just negotiation but a willingness to dismantle these rigid narratives and build empathy,' he said. 'And we do this all the time at an individual level. Bring two people who have each lost something in front of each other, and they can quite readily sympathise with each other and share a common grief.'
This belief in the power of empathy, he added, resonates far beyond Cyprus: in many conflicts, peace emerges when people begin to recognise the humanity – and suffering – on the other side.
Peacekeeping not one-size-fits-all
Mr. Stewart's career has given him a panoramic view of peacekeeping's evolution.
In Timor-Leste, he saw how UN support can help a fledgling state build resilience. In Addis Ababa, as part of the UN Office to the African Union, he witnessed the power of partnerships. And in Western Sahara, he experienced the limits of peacekeeping when a ceasefire failed to hold.
He highlighted that peacekeeping is not a one-size-fits-all mode – it is modular – 'a bit of this and a bit that', tailored to the circumstances and working with a wide range of partners.
' I guess I have lived through the evolution of peacekeeping and seen many different aspects of it, [but] I am ever more convinced that peacekeeping is an absolutely essential tool for the international community. '
A quiet exit
Now preparing for life after the UN, Mr. Stewart is clear: he has no plans to return in any advisory or consulting role.
'For me, retirement means retirement,' he said with a smile.
'I want to do all the things I've been postponing for my whole career – live in a house I own, spend time with my teenage son who is going to high school…that is the life that I have in mind.'
Idealism remains intact
Concluding the interview, I asked if he had any final words. As he looked around for ideas, I suggested, 'maybe your first day on the job.'
He recalled his beginning in the United Nations, a journey that started with the referendum for self-determination in Timor-Leste in the 1990s, against the backdrop of intimidation, violence and a fragile security environment.
I started off feeling very idealistic about the UN, and I've never lost that feeling...the UN is here to do good things – the right things
'It was our watch, our responsibility to put on a free and fair vote,' he said, 'and that was going to be impossible under these circumstances.' Yet, despite the odds, the Timorese vote went ahead, and the result was clear — a success against all expectations.
' That was a very heady, exciting experience to start in the UN…it started me off feeling very idealistic about the UN, and I've never lost that feeling that, you know, the UN is here to do good things, to do the right things. '
As he steps away from the UN, Mr. Stewart says that idealism remains intact.
' It might take time, but we will succeed…even though people get discouraged because it's very, very hard for all kinds of reasons that are out of our control, it's a wonderful principle to be serving. So, I leave wishing only the best for my colleagues who will continue the fight. '

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Spinoff
a day ago
- The Spinoff
Calls grow for NZ to take a stand on Palestinian statehood
Canada, the UK and France are on the brink of recognising Palestine – so why is New Zealand still holding back, asks Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. Pressure mounts as allies take a stand New Zealand is coming under increasing pressure to recognise Palestine as a state, as key allies signal they're preparing to do just that. On Wednesday, foreign minister Winston Peters joined 14 other counterparts in signing a statement declaring their 'willingness or positive consideration' of Palestinian recognition. But Peters, backed by prime minister Christopher Luxon, made clear that formal recognition won't happen any time soon, reports RNZ's Craig McCulloch. In parliament this week, Peters argued that 'if we are to recognise the state of Palestine, New Zealand wants to know that what we are recognising is a legitimate, representative, viable political entity'. His caution hasn't stemmed the growing chorus of criticism. Former prime minister Helen Clark said that on the statehood issue, New Zealand has been hamstrung by its desire not to upset the US. 'That is no longer tenable,' she told Morning Report. Greens co-leader Marama Davidson was more blunt: 'History will judge Aotearoa if we fail to do what is right at this pivotal moment. It's time for the government to make a clear stand for human rights and for justice, and recognise Palestine as a state.' A shifting international tide New Zealand's hesitation comes as other liberal democracies move towards recognition. Canada on Thursday became the third country in a week to announce it will recognise Palestine, following similar pledges from France and the UK. Britain's promise is conditional on Israel allowing more aid into Gaza, ending its annexation plans and committing to a two-state peace process. As the UK foreign secretary David Lammy pointed out in a speech to the UN this week, Britain carries a particular responsibility to Palestine due to its colonial-era role in shaping the modern Middle East, beginning with the 1917 Balfour Declaration. Support for a two-state solution, he said, should be viewed as part of that legacy. Currently, 147 of the UN's 193 member states recognise Palestine; that number is poised to grow in the coming months. In Australia, prime minister Anthony Albanese is 'preparing the ground' for recognition, reported the ABC, but has indicated he wants to choose a moment that will have the most impact on peace prospects. The case for economic pressure In a powerful article for The Spinoff this week, New Zealand journalist Cole Martin – currently based in a refugee camp in the occupied West Bank – accused the government of offering only 'empty rhetoric' in the face of Israel's ongoing assault on Gaza. While New Zealand has signed joint statements and imposed targeted travel bans on a handful of Israeli officials, Martin says it has taken no significant action in 21 months to deter what he describes as 'genocidal' violence and apartheid policies. Martin argues that 'meaningful disruption is essential', and that economic pressure – including divestment, sanctions and boycotts – is among the most effective non-violent tools available. 'Global economic sanctions played a pivotal role in ending apartheid in South Africa,' he wrote. 'The same tools must now be applied to Israel.' What else can New Zealand do? While sanctions and trade restrictions are the most obvious tools available, they're not the only ones. Auckland University law professor Treasa Dunworth, writing for The Conversation, outlines several other ways New Zealand could demonstrate its opposition to Israel's conduct and support for Palestinian rights. These include creating a special visa pathway for Palestinians seeking family reunification, launching an inquiry into New Zealand's intelligence-sharing with Israel via the Five Eyes network, and withdrawing from Operation Prosperity Guardian, the US-led naval coalition in the Red Sea. Dunworth also points out that New Zealand could act unilaterally to refer Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the International Criminal Court for the use of starvation as a weapon of war. Each of these steps, she argues, is legally and diplomatically feasible – but all require political will. The question now, as more peer nations act, is whether New Zealand's government is willing to move beyond words.


Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
With Gaza Smouldering, Ministers Renew Push For Two-State Solution At UN
30 July 2025 The High-level International Conference for the Peaceful Settlement of the Question of Palestine and the Implementation of the Two-State Solution took place in New York from 28 to 30 July. The United States and Israel did not participate. France and Saudi Arabia, co-chairs of the Conference, called on all UN Member States to support a declaration urging collective action to end the war in Gaza and to achieve a just, peaceful and lasting settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The New York Declaration on the Peaceful Settlement of the Question of Palestine and the Implementation of the Two-State Solution outlines political, humanitarian, and security steps to be taken on a timebound and irreversible basis. The co-chairs urged countries to endorse the declaration by the end of the 79th session of the General Assembly, in early September, should they so wish. Act before it is too late In his stark opening remarks on Monday, Secretary-General Guterres stressed that the two-State solution is the only viable path to ending the longstanding conflict and achieving lasting peace in the region, warning that there is no alternative. 'A one-State reality where Palestinians are denied equal rights and forced to live under perpetual occupation and inequality? A one-State reality where Palestinians are expelled from their land? That is not peace. That is not justice. And that is not acceptable,' he said. He condemned both Hamas' 7 October 2023 attacks and the scale of Israel's military response, reiterating his call for an immediate and permanent ceasefire, the unconditional release of hostages, and unfettered humanitarian access. 'This conflict cannot be managed. It must be resolved,' Mr. Guterres concluded. 'We must act before it is too late.' Calls for peace Over the three days, more than 125 speakers took the floor during the general debate, including high-level representatives from across the globe and major regional and international organizations such as the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). Delegates underscored the urgency of concrete steps to realise a two-State solution, highlighting the need to empower and reform the Palestinian Authority, reconstruct Gaza and ensure accountability for violations of international law. France, which co-chaired the Conference, recalled its support for Israel as it joined the community of nations and affirmed that Palestinians deserve the same right to a homeland. 'At a time where the two-State solution is more threatened than ever, France is ready to fully recognise the State of Palestine,' said Jean-Noël Barrot, Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs. That recognition, he added, would come in September when leaders reconvene for the General Assembly's 80th session. Co-chair Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister, Faisal bin Farhan al Saud, emphasised the suffering of thousands of civilians in Gaza under bombardment, while Israeli settlements expand in Jerusalem and the West Bank to alter the region's demographic nature. 'Peace and security do not take place through deprivation of rights or force,' he said, underscoring the need for a genuine and irreversible peace process. The United Kingdom's Foreign Secretary, David Lammy, outlined recent UK actions – including the suspension of arms exports and sanctions on extremist settlers, and restoring of funding to the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees. 'It is with the hand of history on our shoulders that His Majesty's Government therefore intends to recognise the State of Palestine when the UN General Assembly gathers in September here in New York,' he declared. 'We will do this unless the Israeli Government acts to end the appalling situation in Gaza, ends its military campaign and commits to a long-term sustainable peace based on a two-State solution.'


Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Canada announces plans to recognise Palestinian state
Canada intends to recognise a Palestinian state at a meeting of the United Nations in September, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced on Wednesday (local time), adding more pressure on the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as the humanitarian crisis in Gaza deepens. The announcement came after France said last week it would recognise a Palestinian state, and a day after Britain said it would recognise the state at the UN if the fighting in Gaza, part of the Palestinian territories occupied by Israel, had not stopped by then. "We are working ourselves with others, to preserve the possibility of a two-state solution, to not allow the facts on the ground, deaths on the ground, the settlements on the ground, the expropriations on the ground, to get to such an extent that this is not possible," Carney said. He told reporters the planned move was predicated on the Palestinian Authority's commitment to reforms, including commitments to reform its governance and to hold general elections in 2026 in which Hamas "can play no part." The announcements by some of Israel's closest allies reflect the growing international outrage over the dire humanitarian crisis in Gaza. A global hunger monitor has warned that a worst-case scenario of famine is unfolding in the enclave. The Gaza health ministry reported seven more hunger-related deaths on Wednesday, including a two-year-old girl with an existing health condition. The Hamas-run government media office in Gaza said the Israeli military killed at least 50 people within three hours on Wednesday as they tried to get food from UN aid trucks coming into the northern Gaza Strip. "Israel rejects the statement by the Prime Minister of Canada," said Israel's foreign ministry in a statement. "The change in the position of the Canadian government at this time is a reward for Hamas and harms the efforts to achieve a ceasefire in Gaza and a framework for the release of the hostages." A White House official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said 'As the president stated, he would be rewarding Hamas if he recognizes a Palestinian state, and he doesn't think they should be rewarded. So he is not going to do that. President Trump's focus is on getting people fed (in Gaza).' The official did not respond to a question on whether the US was given advance notice of Carney's announcement. US special envoy Steve Witkoff will travel to Israel on Thursday to discuss the next steps to address the situation in Gaza, a US official said. US President Donald Trump said earlier this week he expects centres to be set up in order to feed more people in the enclave. POSSIBLE ULTIMATUM TO HAMAS Earlier on Wednesday, the Israeli security cabinet member Zeev Elkin said Israel could threaten to annex parts of Gaza to increase pressure on Hamas, an idea that would deal a blow to Palestinian hopes of statehood on land Israel now occupies. Accusing Hamas of trying to drag out ceasefire talks to gain Israeli concessions, Elkin told public broadcaster Kan that Israel may give the group an ultimatum to reach a deal before further expanding its military actions. "The most painful thing for our enemy is losing lands," he said. "A clarification to Hamas that the moment they play games with us they will lose land that they will never get back would be a significant pressure tool." Mediation efforts aimed at reaching a deal that would secure a 60-day ceasefire and the release of remaining hostages held by Hamas ground to a halt last week, with the sides trading blame for the impasse. Though recognition of a Palestinian state is largely seen as a symbolic move, Gazan man Saed al-Akhras said he hoped it marked a "real shift in how Western countries view the Palestinian cause." "Enough! Palestinians have lived for more than 70 years under killing, destruction, and occupation, while the world watches in silence," he said. Families of Israeli hostages still held in Gaza appealed for no recognition of a Palestinian state to come before their loved ones were returned. "Such recognition is not a step toward peace, but rather a clear violation of international law and a dangerous moral and political failure that legitimises horrific war crimes," the Hostages Family Forum said. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday said Britain's decision "rewards Hamas' monstrous terrorism." Israel made similar comments last week after France's announcement. Two Hamas officials did not respond to requests for comment on the demand for the group to hand its weapons to the PA, which now has limited control of parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank. Hamas has previously rejected calls to disarm, while Israel has ruled out letting the PA run Gaza. Netanyahu said this month he wanted peace with Palestinians but described any future independent state as a potential platform to destroy Israel, so control of security must remain with Israel. His cabinet includes far-right figures who openly demand the annexation of all Palestinian land. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said on Tuesday that reestablishing Jewish settlements in Gaza was "closer than ever," calling Gaza "an inseparable part of the Land of Israel." AID GOING IN, BUT NOT ENOUGH A 2-year-old girl being treated for a build-up of brain fluid died overnight of hunger, her father told Reuters on Wednesday. "Mekkah, my little daughter, died of malnutrition and the lack of medication," Salah al-Gharably said by phone from Deir Al-Balah. "Doctors said the baby has to be fed a certain type of milk... but there is no milk," he said. "She starved. We stood helpless." The deaths from starvation and malnutrition overnight raised the toll from such causes to 154, including at least 89 children, since the war's start, most in recent weeks. Israel said on Sunday it would halt military operations for 10 hours a day in parts of Gaza and designate secure routes for convoys delivering food and medicine. The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said the United Nations and its partners had been able to bring more food into Gaza in the first two days of pauses, but the volume was "still far from enough." The war began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked communities in southern Israel, killing some 1200 people and taking another 251 hostage, according to Israeli tallies. Since then, Israel's offensive in the Gaza Strip has killed more than 60,000 people and laid waste to much of the territory, the Gaza health ministry says.