No deal yet on Wyoming property tax cut bill
The deal on the table was to amend Senate File 69, 'Homeowner property tax exemption,' to include a 25% property tax cut for residential structures up to $1 million in value with no backfill from state savings. The proposal also included no sunset date, although the cuts may have to be repealed, depending on the outcome of a 2026 ballot initiative to cut 50% of homeowners' property taxes.
The Senate position on the bill had been a 50% tax cut without backfill, to sunset in two years. The House had inserted over $200 million from state savings to make up for lost revenue to cities, towns and counties that depend on property tax revenue for local services, and included a 25% cut in perpetuity without a sunset date.
Sens. Troy McKeown, R-Gillette; Tim Salazar, R-Riverton; and Mike Gierau, D-Jackson, all voted for a 25% cut as proposed by the joint conference committee Tuesday morning. All three lawmakers from the House, including Rep. Scott Heiner, R-Green River; Rep. Tony Locke, R-Casper; and Rep. Christopher Knapp, R-Gillette, voted against the proposal.
Senate leaders left the meeting frustrated.
Wyoming Legislature's 2025 Session
Sen. Tim Salazar, R-Riverton, listens during the a committee meeting on Jan. 16. Salazar was one of three members of a joint conference committee that failed to reach a compromise on a property tax cut bill Tuesday morning.
'As of yesterday, we both had decided to have a 7 a.m. JCC meeting, and we came to agree (on) the understanding we had (made) yesterday,' Salazar told reporters after the meeting. 'It was a surprise to me that this occurred.'
Salazar said that while the Senate would prefer a 50% cut, 25% would offer a measure of property tax relief as requested by 'the people back home," while not being a deep enough cut to require backfill, in his opinion.
'I've always said that perfection is the enemy of the good. This was a good deal. We supported it. We came here at 7 a.m. to sign our names, and it didn't occur,' Salazar said.
Senate President Bo Biteman, R-Ranchester, told reporters that the House and Senate had made a deal Monday night prior to calling the joint conference committee.
Sen. Bo Biteman, R-Ranchester (2025)
Sen. Bo Biteman, R-Ranchester
'We shook hands. We had a deal,' Biteman said.
When asked if the three representatives on the committee may have needed time to take the proposal back to that body, Biteman added that the representatives 'wouldn't have made a deal (Monday) if they didn't have the votes."
Gierau also said that it seemed the two chambers had reached an agreement on Monday, but 'then our friends on the other side, for some reason between yesterday and today, decided – they said they wanted to go confer.'
Sen. Mike Gierau, D-Jackson (2025)
Sen. Mike Gierau, D-Jackson
The proposal Tuesday was not a surprise to the House, Gierau said.
'When they have agreed and shook on a deal, I find it interesting that they have to talk to their body,' Gierau said. '(Senate) leadership has been forthright and open. It is not everything I wanted, but it has been totally transparent on our side.'
Heiner told the Wyoming Tribune Eagle that SF 69 is an 'important piece of legislation that has wide implications for the citizens of Wyoming." He said he did not feel the House leadership had rejected the proposal by voting against it.
Rep. Scott Heiner, R-Green River (2025)
Rep. Scott Heiner, R-Green River
'After getting the Senate's proposed amendment this morning, we wanted to go back to our chamber and discuss it with our members and to run the numbers,' Heiner said. 'We asked for a couple days and (will) reconvene for further discussion.'
Locke also told the WTE that the intention was not to 'burn anything down,' but to give the House time to deliberate.
'I'm very in favor of property tax relief. It was not an intention to burn anything down. It was just more of a ... we need a little time to discuss exactly the direction we want to take this,' Locke said.
When asked if the House knew what deal would be on the table Tuesday morning, Locke said that 'a lot of ideas had been thrown around, and we wanted to make sure we knew the nuance of what was being proposed.'
McKeown said that as it stands, any large-scale property tax relief is in representatives' hands. Sticking points in the negotiations leading up to the joint conference committee included the percentage of the cut and backfill.
'I am not going to mince words. This wasn't just our offer. This was what they wanted. It is what they agreed to, until this morning. It is very, very disappointing,' McKeown said. 'I have been pushing this bill for three years, and I thought we were there. This morning was hugely disappointing, and it will be what they want to do with it. We can't make them vote yes.'
Salazar said that he was concerned the bill might not meet legislative deadlines at this rate. Gierau said he had hoped the joint conference committee could get back together Tuesday to agree on a deal, but Heiner said negotiations may take another day or two.
Friday is the last day to send bills to Gov. Mark Gordon's office in order to allow enough time for a veto override by lawmakers before they adjourn March 6.
Locke said to expect ongoing negotiations over the next day or two.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
14 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bove vote dogged by new whistleblower complaints
Senate Democrats are seeking clarification about whether there is an ongoing investigation into Justice Department official Emil Bove after three different whistleblowers came forward with information ahead of his confirmation vote for a lifetime appointment to the bench. The request from Sens. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) comes as a third whistleblower filed a complaint against Bove, alleging the nominee misled the Senate Judiciary Committee. Bove, previously one of Trump's personal defense lawyers, serves in the No. 3 role at the Justice Department and has been nominated to sit on the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. After clearing an initial procedural hurdle, a vote on his nomination could come as soon as Tuesday night. Schiff and Booker ask the Justice Department's Office of Inspector General to confirm for lawmakers whether they have ignited an investigation into Bove. 'As the Senate approaches a final vote this week on Mr. Bove's nomination to serve as United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, it is imperative that Senators exercise their constitutional duty of advice and consent with full knowledge of Mr. Bove's actions,' they wrote. 'We therefore request that you clarify for Senators whether your office is undertaking any investigations of or related to Mr. Bove. In the event these whistleblower complaints and other reports have not already prompted investigations by your office, we urge you to undertake a thorough review of these disclosures and allegations.' They argue the three different whistleblower complaints 'paint a picture that Mr. Bove likely violated laws and Department regulations, and abused his authority while acting as one of the Department's most senior officials.' According to The Washington Post, a third whistleblower has forwarded new allegations about Bove's role in ending the prosecution of New York Mayor Eric Adams (D) on bribery charges. Prosecutors who worked the case refused to drop the charges and sign onto the dismissal notice, prompting a wave of resignations. Bove said during his confirmation hearing that the Trump administration needed Adams's cooperation on immigration matters, prompting cries from Democrats that the move was a clear quid pro quo. 'Policy reasons made it appropriate to drop the charges,' Bove said at the time. He has already been accused by whistleblower Erez Reuveni of suggesting the Justice Department defy any court orders blocking the Trump administration from deporting migrants to a foreign prison under the Alien Enemies Act, saying DOJ might have to tell the courts 'f–k you.' A second whistleblower has stepped forward with information they say corroborates Reuveni's allegations. A judge has since begun a probe into whether the Justice Department defied his order to halt or turn around flights carrying Venezuelan men deported under the Alien Enemies Act, finding probable cause to hold the Trump administration in criminal contempt for willfully disobeying his order to immediately halt deportations. Bove has said he could not recall whether he used the expletive but said during his confirmation hearing that he 'certainly conveyed the importance of the upcoming operation.' Details are scarce on the third whistleblower complaint. 'A new whistleblower, whose disclosures have not been publicized, has strong evidence that Emil Bove was not truthful to the Senate Judiciary Committee during his confirmation hearing for his nomination to serve on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals,' Peter Carr, a spokesman for Justice Connection said in a statement. The group, a DOJ alumni group that assists whistleblowers, was asked to release a statement on the whistleblower's behalf. 'The whistleblower has tried to share this information with Republican senators for weeks and they have not provided any response. We urge the senators to hear from this whistleblower before the final vote on his nomination.' The Justice Department did not respond to a request for comment. GOP members have not stopped by Booker's office to review the documents provided by the latest whistleblower, the Post reported. Committee members asked Bove questions on a number of topics. Beyond whether he encouraged defiance of court orders, he was also asked about leading the effort to fire prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases and collecting a list of FBI agents who worked on investigations into rioters. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) backed Bove out of the committee, saying that while he will not confirm those who condoned Jan. 6, he did not feel the nominee had condoned the riots. Bove advanced after an initial round of voting where Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) were the only GOP members to vote against him. Democrats previously demanded a hearing with Reuveni, but the panel's Republicans blocked it. 'Another whistleblower has come forward with evidence that raises serious concerns with Emil Bove's misconduct,' Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee said. 'This is another damning indictment of a man who should never be a federal judge—and Senate Republicans will bear full responsibility for the consequences if they rubber stamp Mr. Bove's nomination.'
The Hill
14 minutes ago
- The Hill
Greene calls Gaza humanitarian crisis a ‘genocide'
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) called the humanitarian crisis in Gaza a 'genocide' in a social media, appearing to be the first Republican in Congress to use the term to describe the situation. 'It's the most truthful and easiest thing to say that Oct 7th in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned, but so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza,' Greene said in a post on X on Monday night. Her comment came as part of a larger response criticizing fellow Republican Rep. Randy Fine (R-Fla.), one of three Jewish Republicans in the House who joined the chamber after a special election earlier this year. Greene dug into Fine over his recent social media posts about the conflict, including denying that there is starvation in Gaza. 'There is no starvation. Everything about the 'Palestinian' cause is a lie,' Fine said in a post on Sunday. Last week, Fine posted: 'Release the hostages. Until then, starve away.' Trump on Monday said there was 'real starvation' happening in Gaza and that the U.S. would do more to address it. 'I can only imagine how Florida's 6th district feels now that their Representative, that they were told to vote for, openly calls for starving innocent people and children,' Greene said, before going on to make her comment about the genocide. 'But a Jewish U.S. Representative calling for the continued starvation of innocent people and children is disgraceful. His awful statement will actually cause more antisemitism,' Greene said. Fine's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment, and he has not yet responded on social media. Greene's stance marks a major break with her party, and an escalation of her criticism of Israel — and U.S. financial support for Israel — as the war in Gaza drags on. Over the weekend she posted that 'what has been happening to innocent people and children in Gaza is horrific.' Earlier this month, Greene introduced an amendment to cut funding to Israel's missile defense, which failed in a 6-422 vote. Greene has previously been accused of antisemitism, most famously over a 2018 Facebook post that has come to be known as the 'Jewish space laser' post — though Greene never used that phrase. In the post, Greene in which she floated that a 'laser beam or light beam' from 'space solar generators' could be to blame for wildfires in California, also mentioning the 'Rothschild Inc.' Greene later said she did not know the Rothschilds have long been at the center of antisemitic conspiracy theories. Greene also voted against an antisemitism awareness bill last year, saying it would define antisemitic behavior to include remarks about Jews killing Jesus, which she said went against the Bible.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What the GOP's megabill promotional plan doesn't mention
National Republicans want their House conference to sell President Donald Trump's megabill during Congress' August recess, rather than duck and let Democrats push a narrative that the bill is a tax cut for the rich. That advice is memorialized in a five-page memo from the National Republican Congressional Committee, which was obtained by POLITICO. "The best defense is a good offense," the NRCC memo read. It urged lawmakers to beware of "trackers" who catch members off message, distribute talking points through interviews with local media and not let Democratic activity "distract you from driving your message." The memo reveals how the party hopes to communicate a potential vulnerability ahead of next year's midterms. In particular, the NRCC wants members to cast the bill's Medicaid cuts — already a top target of Democrats — as an overhaul that will strengthen the program. The organization also highlights polls showing voters support work requirements and removing ineligible recipients from coverage. 'With the One Big Beautiful Bill signed into law by President Trump just a few weeks ago, this is a critical opportunity to continue to define how this legislation will help every voter and push back on Democrat fearmongering,' the NRCC wrote in the memo. The comprehensive memo from Republicans' campaign arm shows just how crucial the messaging battle will be ahead of 2026, as both parties expect the megabill, recently signed into law, to become one of the top issues of the cycle. Republicans want to avoid letting Democrats control the message around the bill, especially given that midterms historically favor the party that is out of power — and rule of the House could be decided by just a few seats. By equipping the conference with ample talking points, the NRCC is hoping members can stave off the onslaught of attacks from Democrats. The memo relays a few areas the NRCC wants members to focus on, including getting ahead of the attacks that Democrats have already started waging about the bill. 'We can't let them control the narrative,' the NRCC said of Democrats. In warning GOP members not to fall for Democratic 'trackers,' or political operatives who will try to get them to say damaging info, while they are back home, the NRCC advised, 'They are not reporters or constituents; you do not owe them a response.' In addition to Medicaid, the NRCC urged its members to highlight tax relief, immigration, business reforms and 'holding elites accountable.' On Monday, Vice President JD Vance offered an example for Republican legislators, calling out Ohio Democratic lawmakers by name during a rally in the state. 'You know why she's not here today?' Vance said of Rep. Emilia Sykes. 'Because she's not celebrating no taxes on tips, she's not celebrating no taxes overtime, she's not celebrating the highest rising take home pay in 60 years, because she fought us every step of the way on the big beautiful bill.' And the NRCC suggested its members hold roundtables and visit hospitals, restaurants and small businesses to highlight specific provisions of the bill. It advises holding in-person interviews with local media outlets. The memo, however, did not address whether to hold town halls, something that became a hot-button issue the last time lawmakers went home for an extended period. Democrats — armed with their own talking points — are already planning rallies in red districts across the country as they begin to realize their own messaging plans. They hope to paint the bill as a tax cut for the wealthy at the expense of Americans who use programs like Medicaid and SNAP. 'The Big, Ugly Law is a political disaster,' Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesperson Viet Shelton said in a statement. 'The American people know it's a giveaway to billionaires that's paid for by ripping away health care from millions and jacking up folks' energy costs. Everyone hates it and vulnerable House Republicans know it, which is why they're scared to face their constituents in person during the August recess.' Last week, NRCC chair Rep. Richard Hudson (R-N.C.) told reporters he would 'love for [Democrats] to come to my district,' but cautioned members of Democrats infiltrating in-person town halls. 'Democrats are still pretty determined to hijack our town halls and try to prevent us from having this conversation with our constituents, so I would encourage them to use other means,' Hudson said last week. Still, there is a note of caution to members not to let the opposing party set the agenda. 'Seek to drown out Democrats' efforts to knock you off message with a disciplined and compelling communications effort of your own,' the memo advised.
