logo
Who will be the next Dalai Lama? Key questions answered as leader turns 90

Who will be the next Dalai Lama? Key questions answered as leader turns 90

Independent19 hours ago

As the Dalai Lama approaches his 90th birthday this Sunday, the question of his succession looms large.
The issue is captivating not only his millions of followers but also drawing significant strategic interest from global powers including China, India, and the United States.
The Nobel Peace Laureate is widely regarded as one of the world's most influential figures, with his spiritual and moral authority extending far beyond the confines of Buddhism.
Central to Tibetan Buddhist tradition is the belief that the soul of a senior monk is reincarnated after death.
This ancient practice was pivotal in identifying the 14th Dalai Lama, born Lhamo Dhondup on July 6, 1935, to a farming family in what is now Qinghai province. He was recognised as the reincarnation of his predecessor at just two years old.
According to his official website, a search party dispatched by the Tibetan government made the determination based on several auspicious signs, including a vision revealed to a senior monk. Their conviction was solidified when the young toddler reportedly identified belongings of the 13th Dalai Lama, exclaiming, "It's mine, it's mine."
In the winter of 1940, Lhamo Thondup was taken to the Potala Palace in Lhasa, the capital of today's Tibet Autonomous Region, and officially installed as the spiritual leader of Tibetans.
How will his successor be chosen?
In his book Voice for the Voiceless, released in March 2025, the Dalai Lama said his successor would be born outside China.
The Dalai Lama has lived in exile in northern India since 1959, after fleeing a failed uprising against the rule of Mao Zedong's Communists.
He wrote that he would release details about his succession around the time of his 90th birthday. On Monday, addressing a gathering in Dharamshala, he said: "There will be some kind of a framework within which we can talk about the continuation of the institution of the Dalai Lamas". He did not elaborate.
The Tibetan parliament-in-exile, based in the Himalayan town of Dharamshala, like the Dalai Lama, says a system has been established for the exiled government to continue its work while officers of the Gaden Phodrang Foundation will be charged with finding and recognising his successor.
The current Dalai Lama set up the foundation in 2015 to "maintain and support the tradition and institution of the Dalai Lama" with regard to his religious and spiritual duties, it says on its website. Its senior officers include several of his aides.
What does China say?
China says its leaders have the right to approve the Dalai Lama's successor, as a legacy from imperial times. A selection ritual, in which the names of possible reincarnations are drawn from a golden urn, dates to 1793, during the Qing dynasty.
Chinese officials have repeatedly said the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama should be decided by following national laws that decree use of the golden urn and the birth of reincarnations within China's borders.
But many Tibetans suspect any Chinese role in the selection as being a ploy to exert influence on the community.
It is inappropriate for Chinese Communists, who reject religion, "to meddle in the system of reincarnation of lamas, let alone that of the Dalai Lama," the Buddhist leader has said.
In his book, he asked Tibetans not to accept "a candidate chosen for political ends by anyone, including those in the People's Republic of China," referring to the country by its official name.
Beijing brands the Dalai Lama, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1989 for keeping alive the Tibetan cause, as a "separatist" and prohibits displays of his picture or any public show of devotion towards him.
In March 2025, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson said the Dalai Lama was a political exile with "no right to represent the Tibetan people at all".
China denies suppressing the rights of the Tibetan people, and says its rule ended serfdom in, and brought prosperity to, a backward region.
What role could India and the US play?
Apart from the Dalai Lama, India is estimated to be home to more than 100,000 Tibetan Buddhists who are free to study and work there.
Many Indians revere him, and international relations experts say his presence in India gives New Delhi some kind of leverage with rival China.
The United States, which faces rising competition from China for global dominance, has repeatedly said it is committed to advancing the human rights of Tibetans.
U.S. lawmakers have previously said they would not allow China to influence the choice of the Dalai Lama's successor.
In 2024, then U.S. President Joe Biden signed a law that presses Beijing to resolve a dispute over Tibet's demands for greater autonomy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Five years on, Hong Kong's national security law extinguishes another pro-democracy party
Five years on, Hong Kong's national security law extinguishes another pro-democracy party

The Guardian

time38 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Five years on, Hong Kong's national security law extinguishes another pro-democracy party

In a cramped, dark office, in front of a wall adorned by some misshapen shelves, faded photographs, and a single fan battling against the summer heat, the last of Hong Kong's active opposition groups admitted defeat. Behind them, a sticky-taped banner declared: 'We'd rather be ashes than dust.' Dozens of reporters had crammed inside this room on Sunday to hear the announcement that many knew was coming. The League of Social Democrats (LSD), an almost 20-year-old opposition party, was officially disbanding. The disbandment of the LSD on Sunday marks a success for Hong Kong authorities. Five years ago on Tuesday, authorities in Beijing and Hong Kong imposed a sweeping national security law (NSL) that critics immediately said would be used as a weapon to demolish institutional opposition in the city. The LSD held out longer than most, but the shuttering of the party has shown just how comprehensively the law worked. They had no choice 'in the face of immense political pressure', the party's chair, Chan Po-ying, said in a statement. 'We have endured hardships of internal disputes and the near-total imprisonment of our leadership while witnessing the erosion of civil society, the fading of grassroots voices, the omnipresence of red lines and the draconian suppression of dissent.' She added: 'We leave with heavy hearts, and with an ache in our conscience, knowing we will not be the last to fall. The terrain ahead is even more treacherous.' The LSD was founded in 2006 as a more radical arm of the pro-democracy camp, pushing the leftwing issues beyond their more moderate stable mates the Civic party (which disbanded in 2023), and the Democratic party (which began dissolution processes in February). It advocated not just for the city's political freedom and autonomy but also the rights of worker and other grassroots causes. 'Guided by the principle of 'standing unflinchingly with the vulnerable', we amplified silenced voices and exposed unjust policies and wasteful white elephant projects,' the LSD said in its farewell social media post. By mid 2020, there was a tense calm in Hong Kong. The mass street protests that swamped the city in 2019 had mostly stopped, with everyone ordered inside by the Covid-19 pandemic. More than 9,000 people involved in the pro-democracy protests had been arrested, and police were using new pandemic laws to break up fresh efforts at activism. But walking around the quiet streets in those months, there were still signs of resistance – graffitied stairs under a bridge, Lennon Walls of sticky notes plastered across university campuses. People still spoke in anger with relative freedom. An election on the horizon promised hope. Then came a new tool. Beijing sidelined Hong Kong authorities and announced in May 2020 that it would impose its own law on the city. Within a year, Guardian analysis found at least 128 people – including minors, politicians and journalists – had been arrested by the police's national security department, some of them multiple times, for acts including possession of a protest flag. A new report by Amnesty International, published this week, found that between 30 June 2020 and 17 June 2025, 332 people were arrested for 'cases involving suspected acts or activities that 'endanger national security' under 'all relevant laws', which included the NSL and a follow-up domestic law that echoed and bolstered the NSL. It said 189 had been charged, including 91 under the NSL, of which 76 were convicted. It said 85% of concluded cases involved 'only legitimate expression that should not have been criminalised', that courts denied bail in 89% of national security cases; and that pre-trial detention stretched to an average of 11 months. This showed that the law breached international human rights law and standards, the report said. Perhaps the most high-profile trial was that of media mogul Jimmy Lai. Lai, 78, was arrested and charged alongside executives at the media company he founded, accused of using the Apple Daily newspaper to publish seditious articles, and conspiring to commit foreign collusion by asking other countries to impose sanctions. Having already spent more than four years in solitary confinement, Lai is facing life in prison if found guilty. 'Hong Kong is now a place where some of its bravest and brightest citizens are sitting in jail,' Lai's son Sebastien said. 'This has nothing to do with national security and everything to do with criminalising the desire for freedom.' The impact of the law isn't just on those who have been arrested. The vagueness of its terms has cast a well-documented chill on almost every sector of the city. It has smothered everyday discussion of politics, society, school curriculums, and the contents of books and mobile games, with the threat that to do so could break the law. It has underwritten an era of broader political repression. Electoral reforms have ensured that only pro-Beijing 'patriots' can run in that promised election. Foreign judges are leaving Hong Kong's benches, with several citing the new environment. Media outlets have closed, moved overseas or faced frequent 'random' tax audits and investigations. Artists have fled after appearing on blacklists. Meanwhile, security officials have now turned their sights on 'soft resistance'. Maya Wang, associate China director at Human Rights Watch, said: 'In just five years, the Chinese government has extinguished Hong Kong's political and civil vibrancy and replaced it with the uniformity of enforced patriotism.' The Hong Kong government rejects all criticism. It praises the law and those who wield it for bringing order back to a city that was in chaos. It has accused Amnesty of 'gross distortion of the reality' with its report, and of showing 'complete disregard of the indisputable positive effects brought about' by the new laws in the past five years. Emily Lau is one of a few public political figures still speaking out. Lau served as a legislator for a quarter of a century until 2016, and is a former chair of the Democratic party. 'People will say that civil society is collapsing,' she tells the Guardian. She cites a well-known law professor who said people can complain about a law but not break it. 'But some people say now you don't know when you are stepping on the red line.' Asked if she has hope that it might come back, Lau says: 'I will never say never. Maybe it wont happen in my lifetime, but i'm not going to thrown my hands up in despair and say that's it.'

Albo, tell Donald Trump to 'bugger off': Brutal advice for PM as he drops clue about when he will meet US President
Albo, tell Donald Trump to 'bugger off': Brutal advice for PM as he drops clue about when he will meet US President

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Albo, tell Donald Trump to 'bugger off': Brutal advice for PM as he drops clue about when he will meet US President

Karl Stefanovic has told Anthony Albanese he should tell Donald Trump to 'bugger off' as he faces mounting pressure to lock in a meeting with the US President. The Prime Minister is the only leader from the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue - made up of Australia, the US, India and Japan - who is yet to meet Trump in person since his re-election. Albanese appeared on various breakfast television programs on Tuesday morning to endorse a string of changes that came into force on July 1, but was instead grilled on when a meeting with Trump would be set up. 'Look, every Quad leader has met him. It's all got a little bit embarrassing hasn't it? Pretty simple question. When are you going to meet the Donald?' Stefanovic said. The PM said they would meet in the 'coming months' but refused to lock in a date. 'I can't comprehend how the President, given how close allies we have been with the US for so long, couldn't give a rat's about meeting with you,' Stefanovic continued. 'I think it's so disrespectful. And why don't you just tell him to bugger off?' Mr Albanese said he was having audio issues and missed the question which was repeated by co-host Sarah Abo. 'He (Trump) seems to be snubbing you,' she said. The PM rejected the assumption and said he and Trump had had 'really constructive discussions'. It comes amid speculation Albanese will finally meet Trump at a Quad meeting in India later this year. 'I'd be prepared, of course, to meet with President Trump when a suitable time can be organised,' the PM told the ABC on Monday. 'We also have the Quad meeting coming up that we are finalising as well. 'So these things are being organised, and I look forward to having a meeting and continuing the constructive dialogue that I've had with President Trump up to now.' The September meeting now offers the best chance for their long overdue meeting. That month, Albanese will also travel to New York for the UN leader's week, and may also be able to meet Trump there, or make a trip to Washington. Sticking points in the US-Australia relationship which are crying out to be addressed include the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal, which is currently under review by the Trump administration, and punishing tariffs imposed by the US on Aussie imports, including a 50 per cent levy on steel and aluminium. The prime minister has been accused of dragging his feet in meeting with the leader of Australia's most important security ally. Since Trump was inaugurated in January, the pair have spoken on the phone three times. He missed an opportunity to meet the US president at the G7 Summit in Canada earlier this month when Trump left the Summit early to deal with the Israel-Iran conflict. He also did not attend last week's NATO Summit, where political observers had hoped he would have a second chance to meet with Trump. Even US lawmakers are now urging Albanese to come to the White House and develop a personal rapport with Trump in order to save the wavering AUKUS pact. The meeting, when it does happen, will not necessarily be an amicable one. Trump is expected to leverage tariffs and his commitment to AUKUS in order to pressure Albanese to increase defence spending, which at 2.2 per cent of GDP is well short of the 3 per cent that the US has previously demanded of Australia. There is added pressure on Australia to boost defence, now that NATO members have agreed to lift their defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP over 10 years - with the White House later indicating it expects its allies in the Asia-Pacific to follow suit. Trump also reportedly does not like Australia's ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, and may view Rudd's ongoing tenure as a barrier to improved relations. Rudd enjoys cross-party support in Australia, but his position has been under threat since past comments he made about Trump came to light. In November, shortly after Trump's election win, Daily Mail Australia revealed how Rudd never envisioned his comeback, calling his first term a period of 'episodic craziness'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store